RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Co-FriSero study describes a COVID-19 outbreak at the Friedrichroda hospital in Thuringia, Germany, with 185 beds and 404 employees, at the onset of the pandemic between March 30th, 2020, and April 13th, 2020. This study aimed to analyze potential sources of SARS-CoV-2 transmission amongst hospital employees. METHODS: After the outbreak, a comprehensive follow-up was conducted through a questionnaire and a seroprevalence study using two different immunoassays for IgG detection and a third for discordant results. RESULTS: PCR screenings confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in 25 of 229 employees, with an additional 7 detected through serology. Statistical analysis indicated that direct patient contact, exposure to high flow ventilation in non-isolated rooms, direct contact with colleagues, shared use of recreational rooms, and carpooling were associated with an increased infection risk. Conversely, contact with family and friends, public transportation, public events, and use of locker rooms were not associated with infection. Male gender showed a lower infection likelihood, independent of age and other risk factors. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the role of direct patient care and internal staff interactions in the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the hospital setting. It suggests that non-traditional transmission routes like carpooling require consideration in pandemic preparedness.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to identify the pathogen spectrum of community acquired pneumonia in people living with HIV (PLWH), and to compare it with a matched HIV negative group in order to reassess therapeutic strategies for PLWH. METHODS: Seventy-three (n = 73) PLWH (median CD4 3-6 months before CAP: 515/µl; SD 309) with community acquired pneumonia (CAP) were matched with 218 HIV-negative CAP controls in a prospective study design. Pathogen identifications used blood culture, samples from the upper and lower respiratory tract (culture and multiplex PCR) and urinary pneumococcal and legionella antigen test. RESULTS: Although the vaccination rate among PLWH with CAP was significantly higher (pneumococcal vaccination: 27.4 vs. 8.3%, p < 0.001; influenza vaccination: 34.2 vs. 17.4%, p = 0.009), pneumococci were found most frequently as pathogen among both PLWH (n = 19/21.3%) and controls (n = 34/17.2%; p = 0.410), followed by Haemophilus influenzae (PLWH, n = 12/13.5%, vs. controls, n = 25 / 12.6%; p = 0.850). Staphylococcus aureus was found equally in 20.2 and 19.2% in PLWH and controls, but infection or colonization could not be distinguished. Mortality during 6-month follow-up was significantly higher for PLWH (5/73, or 6.8%) versus controls (3/218, or 1.4%), however with lower case numbers than previously reported. Typical HIV-associated pathogens such as Pneumocystis jirovecii were found only exceptionally. CONCLUSIONS: Our study underscores the persistent clinical burden of CAP for PLWH. From pathogen perspective, empirical antibiotic treatment for CAP in PLWH on antiretroviral therapy should cover pneumococci and Haemophilus influenzae and may be adopted from valid common recommendations.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Infecciones por VIH , Infecciones por Haemophilus , Neumonía Bacteriana , Humanos , Neumonía Bacteriana/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Haemophilus/tratamiento farmacológico , Haemophilus influenzae , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the overall and procedure-specific incidence of surgical site infections (SSI) caused by Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) as well as risk factors for such across all surgical disciplines in Europe. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort of patients with surgical procedures performed at 14 European centres in 2016, with a nested case-control analysis. S. aureus SSI were identified by a semi-automated crossmatching bacteriological and electronic health record data. Within each surgical procedure, cases and controls were matched using optimal propensity score matching. RESULTS: A total of 764 of 178 902 patients had S. aureus SSI (0.4%), with 86.0% of these caused by methicillin susceptible and 14% by resistant pathogens. Mean S. aureus SSI incidence was similar for all surgical specialties, while varying by procedure. CONCLUSIONS: This large procedure-independent study of S. aureus SSI proves a low overall infection rate of 0.4% in this cohort. It provides proof of principle for a semi-automated approach to utilize big data in epidemiological studies of healthcare-associated infections. Trials registration The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov under NCT03353532 (11/2017).
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Humanos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Staphylococcus aureus , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
In Germany, the proportion of community-acquired pneumonia due to Streptococcus pneumoniae rebounded to a near-pandemic level in the second half of 2021. Vaccination uptake against respiratory pathogens, including S. pneumoniae, should be strengthened. https://bit.ly/3JMlwFt.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The Co-HCW study is a prospective, longitudinal, single-center observational study that aims to assess the SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and infection status in staff members of Jena University Hospital (JUH) in Jena, Germany. METHODS: This follow-up study covers the observation period from 19th May 2020 to 22nd June 2021. At each of the three voluntary study visits, participants filled out a questionnaire regarding their SARS-CoV-2 exposure and provided serum samples to detect specific SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Participants who were tested positive for antibodies against nucleocapsid and/or spike protein without previous vaccination and/or reported a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test were regarded to have been infected with SARS-CoV-2. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was applied to identify potential risk factors for infected compared to non-infected participants. RESULTS: Out of 660 participants that were included during the first study visit, 406 participants (61.5%) were eligible for the final analysis as their COVID-19 risk area (high-risk n = 76; intermediate-risk n = 198; low-risk n = 132) did not change during the study. Forty-four participants [10.8%, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 8.0-14.3%] had evidence of a current or past SARS-CoV-2 infection detected by serology (n = 40) and/or PCR (n = 28). No association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and the COVID-19 risk group according to working place was detected. However, exposure to a SARS-CoV-2 positive household member [adjusted OR (AOR) 4.46, 95% CI 2.06-9.65] or colleague (AOR 2.30, 95%CI 1.10-4.79) was found to significantly increase the risk of a SARS-CoV-2 infection. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that non-patient-related SARS-CoV-2 exposure posed the highest infection risk for hospital staff members of JUH.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Estudios Prospectivos , Personal de Hospital , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Hospitales Universitarios , Personal de SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Information on testing units in health care is scarce, particularly the group of late-presenters among the HIV-first diagnoses is still a challenge in Germany. AIM: Analysis of the impact of testing units on and reasons for the prevalence of HIV-first diagnoses and late presentation, taking 2014 for illustrative purposes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of all individuals, treated in the Network HIV-Regional who were first diagnosed with HIV in 2014; patient characteristics, demographic and clinical data, including information on HIV testing were collected retrospectively and in a decentralised manner, pseudonymized and statistically evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 971 individuals with HIV-first diagnosis from 31 specialised care centres throughout Germany (15 hospitals, 16 private practices) represented 27.5% of all National HIV-first diagnoses -registrations from Robert Koch Institute for 2014, with similar results for CD4-cell count and HIV-transmission risk. The most common test site was a hospital (34.8%), followed by the office of a family doctor (19.6%) and medical specialist (16.1%). If the first diagnosis was established in hospital, then the patients were on average older than those tested on an ambulant care basis (42 vs. 37 years, p=0.001); moreover, the HI-viral load was higher (585 vs. 270 thousand copies/mL, p<0.001) and the CD4-cell count lower (265 vs. 414/µL, p<0.001). In 208/971 individuals with first diagnosis, at least one AIDS-defining disease was found, most frequently pneumocystis-pneumonia (43.8%), candidiasis (36.5%) and Kaposi sarcoma (10.6%). A regional comparison revealed that in eastern Germany, for first diagnosed HIV-patients were younger, had a higher HIV-RNA viral load and also more often clinical AIDS. CONCLUSION: This analysis of HIV-Regional for 2014 enables a deeper insight into HIV first diagnoses, on the eve of the introduction of important prevention tools in Germany, e. g., HIV home testing and pre-exposure prophylaxis. This cross-sectional analysis was representative for Germany and underscores the importance of specialised hospitals, in particular for eastern Germany, and furthermore the involvement of late-presenters into HIV health care.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida , Infecciones por VIH , Humanos , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Transversales , Alemania/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Infections, as well as adverse birth outcomes, may be more frequent in migrant women. Schistosomiasis, echinococcosis, and hepatitis E virus (HEV) seropositivity are associated with the adverse pregnancy outcomes of fetal growth restriction and premature delivery. METHODS: A cohort study of 82 pregnant women with a history of migration and corresponding delivery of newborns in Germany was conducted. RESULTS: Overall, 9% of sera tested positive for anti-HEV IgG. None of the patients tested positive for anti-HEV IgM, schistosomiasis, or echinococcus serology. Birth weights were below the 10th percentile for gestational age in 8.5% of the neonates. No association between HEV serology and fetal growth restriction (FGR) frequency was found. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to German baseline data, no increased risk for HEV exposure or serological signs of exposure against schistosomiasis or echinococcosis could be observed in pregnant migrants. An influence of the anti-HEV serology status on fetal growth restriction could not be found.
RESUMEN
The Co-HCW study is a prospective cohort study among hospital staff, including healthcare workers (HCWs) and administration staff, at the Jena University Hospital (JUH), Germany. The objectives of this study were to assess SARS-CoV-2 IgG seroprevalence, individual exposure risk factors and compliance of HCWs to wear personal protective equipment (PPE). After the first nosocomial COVID-19 outbreak at JUH, mandatory masking was implemented on 20th March 2020. We evaluated point seroprevalence using two IgG detecting immunoassays and issued a questionnaire to assess COVID-19 exposure, clinical symptoms and compliance to wear PPE. Antibody retesting was offered to participants with a divergent result of both immunoassays 5-10 weeks after the first test. Between 19th May and 19th June 2020, we analysed 660 participants [out of 3,228; 20.4%]. Among them, 212 participants (32.1%) had received a previous COVID-19 test. Four of them (1.9%) reported a positive test result. After recruitment, 18 participants (2.7%) had SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in at least one immunoassay. Overall, 21 participants (3.2%) had any evidence of a past or current SARS-CoV-2 infection. Among them, 13 (61.9%) were not aware of direct COVID-19 exposure and 9 (42.9%) did not report any clinical symptoms. COVID-19 exposure at home (adjusted OR (aOR) with 95% CI: 47.82 (5.49, 416.62)) was associated with SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence. We observed no evidence for an association between seroprevalence and exposure at work (aOR 0.48 (0.13, 1.70)) or with COVID-19 risk area according to the working place (aOR for intermediate-risk vs. high-risk: 1.97 (0.42, 9.22), aOR for low-risk versus high-risk: 2.10 (0.40, 11.06); p = .655). Reported compliance of HCWs to wear PPE differed (p < .001) between working in high-risk (98.3%) and in intermediate-risk areas (69.8%). In conclusion, compared to administration staff, we observed no additional risk to acquire SARS-CoV-2 infections by patient care, probably due to high compliance to wear PPE.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Animales , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/veterinaria , Personal de Salud , Hospitales , Humanos , Personal de Hospital , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudios SeroepidemiológicosRESUMEN
Acute Q fever is a generally self-limiting infection caused by the intracellular gram-negative bacterium Coxiella burnetii. For yet unknown reasons, a subset of patients develops chronic infection. Furthermore, chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) as post-acute Q fever sequelae has been described. We here investigated the rates of chronic Q fever and incidences of CFS 6 years after one of the largest European Q fever outbreaks that occurred in Jena, Germany in 2005 with 331 reported cases, who lived in proximity of a grazing flock of sheep. A total of 80 patients and their 52 non-diseased household members from the former outbreak, were enrolled 6 years after the outbreak. Blood samples were collected and tested for chronic Q fever which was determined by seroprevalence using referenced immunofluorescence assays. Also, the presence of CFS was assessed using the Short Form Symptom Inventory developed by the Centers (United States) for Disease Control and Prevention (SF CDC- SI). In 80 out of 132 (60.6%) study participants, previous Q fever infection was confirmed serologically, while no previous infection was detected in the 52 household members. None of the participants fulfilled the serological criteria of chronic Q fever. The evaluation of the CDC-SI did not show any differences between the two groups. Also, there was no difference between both groups regarding fulfillment of CFS-defining criteria (n = 3 (3.8%; sero-positive) versus n = 2 (3.8%; sero-negative), p = 0.655). Our 6-year follow-up study of a large Q fever outbreak did not find evidence of chronic Q fever or post Q fever CFS. There was no asymptomatic sero-positivity in household members of Q fever patients.
Asunto(s)
Coxiella burnetii , Síndrome de Fatiga Crónica , Fiebre Q , Enfermedades de las Ovejas , Animales , Brotes de Enfermedades/veterinaria , Síndrome de Fatiga Crónica/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Fatiga Crónica/epidemiología , Síndrome de Fatiga Crónica/etiología , Síndrome de Fatiga Crónica/veterinaria , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Fiebre Q/complicaciones , Fiebre Q/epidemiología , Fiebre Q/veterinaria , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Ovinos , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Migrant women may have an increased risk of adverse birth outcomes. This study analyses the occurrence of low birth weight, preterm birth and intrauterine growth restriction / fetal growth restriction (IUGR/FGR) in pregnant migrants. METHOD: Cross-sectional study of 82 mother-child pairs of pregnant migrants attending medical care in Germany. RESULTS: The Median age was 27 years, 49% of patients were of oriental-asian ethnicity and median year of migration was 2015. At least one previous pregnancy was reported in 76% of patients, in 40% the delivery mode was caesarian section. Median gestational age was 39.7 weeks. Preterm birth occurred in 6.1% of pregnancies. Median gestational age for preterm birth was 32.3 weeks. Low birth weight (< 2500 g) occurred in 6.1%. Birth weights below the 10th percentile of birth weight for gestational age were observed in 8.5% of the total cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to German data no increased occurrence of low birth weight, preterm birth or IUGR/FGR was found. We note that the rate of caesarian section births was higher than in the general population for reasons yet to be identified. The authors propose stratification according to migration status for the national documentation of birth outcomes in Germany.
Asunto(s)
Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Emigrantes e Inmigrantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/epidemiología , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Pueblo Asiatico , Población Negra , Estudios Transversales , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiología , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/epidemiología , Recién Nacido de Bajo Peso , Recién Nacido , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Nigeria/etnología , Embarazo , Somalia/etnología , Siria/etnología , Población Blanca , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The aim of this retrospective cohort study at eight hospitals in Germany was to specify influenza-associated in-hospital mortality during the 2017/2018 flu season, which was the strongest in Germany in the past 30 years. A total of 1560 patients were included in the study. Overall, in-hospital mortality was 6.7% (n = 103), in patients treated in the intensive care unit (n = 161) mortality was 22.4%. The proportion of deceased patients per hospital was between 0% and 7.0%. Influenza was the immediate cause of death in 82.8% (n = 82) of the decedents.
Asunto(s)
Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Gripe Humana/mortalidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Alemania , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/terapia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Due to a substantial proportion of asymptomatic and mild courses, many severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections remain unreported. Therefore, assessment of seroprevalence may detect the real burden of disease. We aimed to determine and characterize the rate of SARS-CoV-2 infections and the resulting seroprevalence in a defined population. The primary objective of the study was to assess SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence using six different IgG-detecting immunoassays. Secondary objectives of the study were: (a) to determine potential risk factors for symptomatic versus asymptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 courses, and (b) to investigate the rate of virus RNA-persistence. METHODS: CoNAN is a population-based cohort study performed in the community Neustadt am Rennsteig, Germany, which was quarantined from 22 March to 5 April after six SARS-CoV-2 cases were detected in the village's population. The SARS-CoV-2 outbreak comprised 51 cases and 3 deaths. The CoNAN study was performed from 13 May to 22 May 2020, 6 weeks after a SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. RESULTS: We enrolled a total of 626 participants (71% of the community population) for PCR and antibody testing in the study. All actual SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests were negative. Fifty-two out of 620 (8.4%) participants had antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in at least two different assays. There were 38 participants with previously PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Of those, only 19 (50%) displayed anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. We also show that antibody-positive participants with symptoms compatible with a respiratory tract infection had significantly higher antibody levels then asymptomatic participants (EU-assay: median 2.9 versus 7.2 IgG-index, p 0.002; DS-assay: median 45.2 versus 143 AU/mL, p 0.002). Persisting viral replication was not detected. CONCLUSIONS: Our data question the relevance and reliability of IgG antibody testing to detect past SARS-CoV-2 infections 6 weeks after an outbreak. We conclude that assessing immunity for SARS-CoV-2 infection should not rely on antibody tests alone.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Prueba Serológica para COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infecciones Asintomáticas/epidemiología , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , ARN Viral/genética , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
According to the Robert Koch Institute, the estimated HIV prevalence in Germany is 86â100. On-third of the affected persons is over 50 years old. Overall, the prognosis of patients with HIV infection depends crucially on the time of diagnosis. The unfounded stigmatization of affected patients stands in the way of today's treatment options as it did 30 years ago. Every practice of primary care must also take into consideration the medical care of HIV-infected people. The purpose of this article is to make the general practitioner aware of this topic and to prepare for the necessary procedure in everyday practice in this rare but not unlikely situation.