Treatment planning comparison of high-dose-rate brachytherapy vs. robotic and conventional stereotactic body radiotherapy for ultrahypofractionated treatment of prostate cancer.

Background and purpose: Ultrahypofractionated radiation therapy is increasingly used in the treatment of prostate cancer. High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) are representative methods of ultrahypofractionation. This study was performed to compare clinically applied treatment plans for patients who had been treated using HDR-BT vs. conventional or robotic SBRT. Materials and methods: Calculated dose-volume indices between HDR-BT without a perirectal spacer (n = 20), robotic SBRT without a spacer (n = 40), and conventional (non-robotic) SBRT with a spacer (n = 40) were compared. Percentages against the prescription dose regarding the planning target volume (PTV), bladder, rectum, and urethra were statistically compared. Results: The D50% of the PTV with HDR-BT (140.5% ± 4.9%) was significantly higher than that with robotic or conventional SBRT (116.2% ± 1.6%, 101.0% ± 0.4%, p < 0.01). The D2cm3 of the bladder with HDR-BT (65.6% ± 6.4%) was significantly lower than those with SBRT (105.3% ± 2.9%, 98.0% ± 1.3%, p < 0.01). The D2cm3 of the rectum with HDR-BT (60.6% ± 6.2%) was also significantly lower than those with SBRT (85.1% ± 8.8%, 70.4% ± 9.6%, p < 0.01). By contrast, the D0.1cm3 of the urethra with HDR-BT (117.1% ± 3.6%) was significantly higher than those with SBRT (100.2% ± 0.7%, 104.5% ± 0.6%, p < 0.01). Conclusions: HDR-BT could administer a higher dose to the PTV and a lower dose to the bladder and rectum, at the cost of a slightly higher dose to the urethra compared with SBRT.

Comparison of Dose Distribution Between VMAT-SBRT and Scanning Carbon-ion Radiotherapy for Early-stage NSCLC.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The purpose of this study was to compare the dose distribution between scanning carbon-ion radiotherapy (sCIRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy with stereotactic body radiation therapy (VMAT-SBRT) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with early-stage NSCLC who underwent sCIRT at Kanagawa Cancer Center between 2018-2020 were enrolled. Dose-volume histogram parameters of the planned target volume and normal organs for sCIRT and VMAT-SBRT were evaluated. RESULTS: The homogeneity index of the target volume of sCIRT was significantly lower than that of VMAT-SBRT. The dose of sCIRT was significantly lower than that of VMAT-SBRT at low volumes in the lung, heart, spinal cord, and esophagus. CONCLUSION: The dose distribution of sCIRT for early-stage NSCLC was better than that of VMAT-SBRT.

Interfractional robustness of scanning carbon ion radiotherapy for prostate cancer: An analysis based on dose distribution from daily in-room CT images.

PURPOSE: We analyzed interfractional robustness of scanning carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for prostate cancer based on the dose distribution using daily in-room computed tomography (CT) images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 11 consecutive patients treated with scanning CIRT for localized prostate cancer in our hospital between December 2015 and January 2016. In-room CT images were taken under treatment conditions in every treatment session. The dose distribution on each in-room CT image was recalculated, while retaining the pencil beam arrangement of the initial treatment plan. Then, the dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters including the percentage of the clinical target volume (CTV) with 95% and 90% of the prescribed dose area (V95% of CTV, V90% of CTV) and V80% of rectum were calculated. The acceptance criteria for the CTV and rectum were set at V95% of CTV ≥95%, V90% of CTV ≥98%, and V80% of rectum < 10 ml. RESULTS: V95% of CTV, V90% of CTV, and V80% of rectum for the reproduced plans were 98.8 ± 3.49%, 99.5 ± 2.15%, and 4.39 ± 3.96 ml, respectively. Acceptance of V95% of CTV, V90% of CTV, and V80% of rectum was obtained in 123 (94%), 125 (95%) and 117 sessions (89%), respectively. Acceptance of the mean dose of V95% of CTV, V90% of CTV, and V80% of rectum for each patient was obtained in 10 (91%), 10 (91%), and 11 patients (100%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated acceptable interfractional robustness based on the dose distribution in scanning CIRT for prostate cancer.

Dosimetric Comparison of Radiation Therapy Using Hybrid-VMAT Technique for Stage I Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study focused on the hybrid-volumetric modulated arc therapy (hVMAT) for stage I esophageal cancer and compared the effects on dose distribution induced by changes in the ratio of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) to VMAT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients who underwent 3DCRT for cT1bN0M0 esophageal cancer at Kanagawa Cancer Center from January 2014 to April 2019 were included in the study. The dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters of the target volume and normal organs were evaluated in the 3DCRT, hVMAT, and VMAT treatment plans. RESULTS: The homogeneity index of the target volume was significantly lower for hVMAT. In hVMAT, as the ratio of VMAT increased, the volume of low-dose region in the heart and lung increased, whereas the volume of the middle- to high-dose region decreased. As the ratio of VMAT increased, the mean dose in the heart decreased, whereas the mean dose in the lung increased. CONCLUSION: Favorable dose concentration was obtained for the target volume in hVMAT for stage I esophageal cancer. Altering the ratio of VMAT significantly changed the DVH parameters in normal organs.

Dosimetric Comparison Between Carbon-ion Radiotherapy and Photon Radiotherapy for Stage I Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The present study aimed to compare the radiation dose distribution of carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for stage I esophageal cancer with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with cT1bN0M0 esophageal cancer who received 3DCRT at Kanagawa Cancer Center between January 2014 and April 2019 were enrolled. The dose-volume histogram parameters of the target volume and normal organs planned with CIRT, 3DCRT, and VMAT were evaluated. RESULTS: The homogeneity index for the target volume of CIRT was significantly lower than that of 3DCRT and VMAT. In addition, the radiation dose of CIRT to the heart, lungs, spinal cord, and skin was significantly lower than that of 3DCRT and VMAT. CONCLUSION: Favorable dose distributions with CIRT were demonstrated compared with 3DCRT and VMAT for esophageal cancer.

Prostate-specific antigen dynamics after neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy and carbon ion radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explain the dynamics of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in patients with prostate cancer who were treated with carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) and neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). METHODS: Eighty-five patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer who received CIRT and neoadjuvant ADT from December 2015 to December 2017 were analyzed in the present study. The total dose of CIRT was set at 51.6 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) delivered in 12 fractions over 3 weeks. The PSA bounce was defined as a ≥0.4 ng/ml increase of PSA levels from the nadir, followed by any decrease. PSA failure was defined using the Phoenix criteria. RESULTS: The median patient age was 68 (range, 48-81) years. The median follow-up duration was 33 (range, 20-48) months. The clinical T stage was T1c, T2a, and T2b in 27, 44, and 14 patients, respectively. The Gleason score was 6 in 3 patients and 7 in 82 patients. The median pretreatment PSA level was 7.37 (range, 3.33-19.0) ng/ml. All patients received neoadjuvant ADT for a median of 6 (range, 2-117) months. PSA bounces were observed in 39 patients (45.9%), occurring a median of 12 (range, 6-30) months after CIRT. PSA failure was observed in eight patients (9.4%), occurring a median of 21 (range, 15-33) months after CIRT. The 3-year PSA failure-free survival rate was 88.5%. No clinical recurrence was observed during the follow-up period. Younger age and lower T stage were significant predictors of PSA bounce. Younger age was a significant predictor of PSA failure. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we identified the significant predictors of the occurrence of PSA bounce and failure. Further follow-up is needed to reveal the clinical significance of PSA dynamics.

Preliminary result of carbon-ion radiotherapy using the spot scanning method for prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for prostate cancer was initiated at Kanagawa Cancer Center in 2015. The present study analyzed the preliminary clinical outcomes of CIRT for prostate cancer. METHODS: The clinical outcomes of 253 patients with prostate cancer who were treated with CIRT delivered using the spot scanning method between December 2015 and December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The irradiation dose was set at 51.6 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) delivered in 12 fractions over 3 weeks. Biochemical relapse was defined using the Phoenix definition. Toxicities were assessed according to CTCAE version 4.0. RESULTS: The median patient age was 70 (47-86) years. The median follow-up duration was 35.3 (4.1-52.9) months. According to the D'Amico classification system, 8, 88, and 157 patients were classified as having low, intermediate, and high risks, respectively. Androgen deprivation therapy was administered in 244 patients. The biochemical relapse-free rate in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups at 3 years was 87.5, 88.0, and 97.5%, respectively (P = 0.036). Grade 2 acute urinary toxicity was observed in 12 (4.7%) patients. Grade 2 acute rectal toxicity was not observed. Grade 2 late urinary toxicity and grade 2 late rectal toxicity were observed in 17 (6.7%) and 3 patients (1.2%), respectively. Previous transurethral resection of the prostate was significantly associated with late grade 2 toxicity in univariate analysis. The predictive factor for late rectal toxicity was not detected. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated that CIRT using the spot scanning method for prostate cancer produces favorable outcomes.