Conformation coupled enzyme catalysis: single-molecule and transient kinetics investigation of dihydrofolate reductase.

Ensemble kinetics and single-molecule fluorescence microscopy were used to study conformational transitions associated with enzyme catalysis by dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR). The active site loop of DHFR was labeled with a fluorescence quencher, QSY35, at amino acid position 17, and the fluorescent probe, Alexa555, at amino acid 37, by introducing cysteines at these sites with site-specific mutagenesis. The distance between the probes was such that approximately 50% fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) occurred. The double-labeled enzyme retained essentially full catalytic activity, and stopped-flow studies of both the forward and reverse reactions revealed that the distance between probes increased prior to hydride transfer. A fluctuation in fluorescence intensity of single molecules of DHFR was observed in an equilibrium mixture of substrates but not in their absence. Ensemble rate constants were derived from the distributions of lifetimes observed and attributed to a reversible conformational change. Studies were carried out with both NADPH and NADPD as substrates, with no measurable isotope effect. Similar studies with a G121V mutant DHFR resulted in smaller rate constants. This mutant DHFR has reduced catalytic activity, so that the collective data for the conformational change suggest that the conformational change being observed is associated with catalysis and probably represents a conformational change prior to hydride transfer. If the change in fluorescence is attributed to a change in FRET, the distance change associated with the conformational change is approximately 1-2 A. These results are correlated with other measurements related to conformation coupled catalysis.

Altering protein specificity: techniques and applications.

Protein engineering constitutes a powerful tool for generating novel proteins that serve as catalysts to induce selective chemical and biological transformations that would not otherwise be possible. Protocols that are commonly employed for altering the substrate specificity and selectivity profiles by mutating known enzymes include rational and random methods as well as techniques that entail evolution, selection and screening. Proteins identified by these techniques play important roles in a variety of industrial and medicinal applications and in the study of protein structure-function relationships. Herein we present a critical overview of methods for creating new functional proteins having altered specificity profiles and some practical case studies in which these techniques have been applied to solving problems in synthetic and medicinal chemistry and to elucidating enzyme function and biological pathways.

Using X-ray crystallography of the Asp55Asn mutant of the phosphatidylcholine-preferring phospholipase C from Bacillus cereus to support the mechanistic role of Asp55 as the general base.

Because mutations of the ionizable Asp at position 55 of the phosphatidylcholine preferring phospholipase C from Bacillus cereus (PLC(Bc)) to a non-ionizable Asn generate a mutant enzyme (D55N) with 10(4)-fold lower catalytic activity than the wild-type enzyme, we tentatively identified Asp55 as the general base for the enzymatic reaction. To eliminate the alternate possibility that Asp55 is a structurally important amino acid, the X-ray structures of unbound D55N and complexes of D55N with two non-hydrolyzable substrate analogues have been solved and refined to 2.0, 2.0, and 2.3A, respectively. The structures of unbound wild-type PLC(Bc) and a wild-type PLC(Bc)-complex with a non-hydrolyzable substrate analogue do not change significantly as a result of replacing Asp55 with Asn. These observations demonstrate that Asp55 is not critical for the structural integrity of the enzyme and support the hypothesis that Asp55 is the general base in the PLC(Bc)-catalyzed hydrolysis of phospholipids.

Altering substrate specificity of phosphatidylcholine-preferring phospholipase C of Bacillus cereus by random mutagenesis of the headgroup binding site.

PLC(Bc) is a 28.5 kDa monomeric enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of the phosphodiester bond of phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, and phosphatidylserine to provide a diacylglycerol and the corresponding phosphorylated headgroup. Because single replacements of Glu4, Tyr56, and Phe66 in the headgroup binding pocket led to changes in substrate specificity [Martin et al. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 3410-3415], a combinatorial library of approximately 6000 maltose binding protein-PLC(Bc) fusion protein mutants containing random permutations of these three residues was generated to identify PLC(Bc) mutants with altered specificity profiles and high catalytic activities. Members of this library were screened for hydrolytic activity toward the water soluble substrates C6PC, C6PE, and C6PS using a novel protocol that was conducted in a 96-well format and featured the in situ cleavage of the fusion protein to release the mutant PLC(Bc)s. Ten mutant enzymes that exhibited significant preferences toward C6PE or C6PS were selected and analyzed by steady-state kinetics to determine their specificity constants, k(cat)/K(M). The C6PS selective clones E4G, E4Q/Y56T/F66Y, and E4K/Y56V exhibited higher specificity constants toward C6PS than wt, whereas Y56T, F66Y, and Y56T/F66Y were C6PE selective and had comparable or higher specificity constants than wt for C6PE. The corresponding wt residues were singly reinserted back into the E4Q/Y56T/F66Y and E4K/Y56V mutants via site-directed mutagenesis, and the E4Q/F66Y mutant thus obtained exhibited a 10-fold higher specificity constant toward C6PS than wt, a value significantly higher than other PLC(Bc) mutants. On the basis of available data, an aromatic residue at position 66 appears important for significant catalytic activity toward all three substrates, especially C6PC and C6PE. The charge of residue 4 also appears to be a determinant of enzyme specificity as a negatively charged residue at this position endows the enzyme with C6PC and C6PE preference, whereas a polar neutral or positively charged residue results in C6PS selectivity. Replacing Tyr56 with Val, Ala, Thr, or Ser greatly reduces activity toward C6PC. Thus, the substrate specificity of PLC(Bc) can be modulated by varying three of the amino acid residues that constitute the headgroup binding pocket, and it is now apparent that this enzyme is not evolutionarily optimized to hydrolyze phospholipids with ethanolamine or serine headgroups.