Review of Current Concepts in Metatarsus Adductus.

Metatarsus adductus (MA), the most common congenital foot deformity, involves adduction of the forefoot at the tarsometatarsal joint, with normal hindfoot alignment. Early diagnosis is important because treatment is more successful if initiated before age 9 months. Treatment of MA depends on deformity severity, in which mild to moderate deformity can be treated conservatively. Current standard of care for severe or rigid deformity involves referral by primary care physicians to specialists for management by casting and splinting. Recently, several orthoses have demonstrated equal effectiveness to casting and may allow for primary care physicians to treat MA without the need for referral. In this review article, we provide an overview of MA and discuss diagnosis and treatment. We also discuss novel devices and suggest how they may affect the future management of severe and rigid MA. [Pediatr Ann. 2024;53(4):e152-e156.].

[METATARSUS ADDUCTUS - A COMMON DEFORMITY - WHAT TO DO AND WHEN?]

INTRODUCTION: The most common foot deformity in newborns is the forefoot adduction deformity (FAD), where the hindfoot foot is in a normal position. The diagnosis for this problem is mainly based on a physical examination. The use of imaging methods has been described, but no advantage was shown with their utilization in determining the diagnosis and guiding treatment. Several classification systems have been proposed to characterize the degree of severity. The classifications are based on the degree of deviation and the flexibility of the foot. Early diagnosis and early treatment, if necessary, are extremely important to improve the chances of treatment success. Treatment depends on the severity of the deformity. For mild deformities the treatment is conservative - follow-up or stretching of the foot. The usual treatment for severe deformities is serial casting. Several orthoses have recently been proposed to address the problem and these demonstrated similar results, higher comfort and satisfaction, lower cost and a similar side effect profile. Surgical treatments to correct the deformity are reserved for cases where conservative treatment failed and for older children. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge on the subject, describe the ways to diagnose and classify the deformity, and present the variety of ways to treat the problem including the use of innovative braces. In addition, we will offer a protocol for the treatment of the deformity that is accepted in our institution. The protocol will assist primary care physicians to both diagnose and treat appropriate deformities, and know when a specialist referral is necessary.

Should I Ask Doctor Google? Reliability of Israeli Web-based Information Regarding General Orthopedic Injuries and Symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Websites serve as a source of medical information for a large part of the public, some claim to be a substitute for a physician's consultation. Many patients meet a physician after conducting internet research. Medical staff are concerned that internet sources of information are unreliable and may lead to erroneous decisions by patients. OBJECTIVES: To examine the reliability of web-based sources of information (through the Google™ search engine) regarding five common orthopedic complaints and injuries. METHODS: We performed a search of five common orthopedic complaints and injuries using the Google search engine. The reliability of web-based information was measured by the DISCERN tool, which is a valid and verified tool for examining the reliability of medical information sources to the public. The reliability of 47 websites was examined by two orthopedic surgeons and two senior residents. RESULTS: The overall average score given to the sites was 2.8, on a scale of 1 to 5. We found that the higher the site appeared in the search results, the higher the quality of its information. Commercial sites scored higher than general internet information sources. CONCLUSIONS: The internet network is a very broad source of information. For those who lack scientific education and training it is not easy to distinguish between reliable and unreliable or biased sources. The trend of searching for medical information and self-healing is increasing. We must strengthen the network with reliable sources by creating official scientific position papers by medical teams and promoting them online.

Residents' perspective on duty hours at an Israeli tertiary hospital.

BACKGROUND: Specialization in medical professions is considered a challenging and intensive period due to the number and sequence of duty hours. Considering the effect of duty hours on residents, both physically and mentally, several models have been created over the years to address this complexity. The two main model schools aim to decrease the duty hour length and night shift (i.e., night float, NF) frequency. In recent years, duty hours have become a source of disagreement and frustration among the medical community, both residents and attendings. A possible change in the duty hour structure may affect residents in terms of several parameters, such as patient safety, the well-being of the physician and the degree of training of the resident. PURPOSE: (1) To investigate medical residents' perspectives on their duty hours utilizing online questionnaires on their effect on the work environment and (2) to assess residents' preferences in relation to the suggested shortened shift and NF models. METHODS: Questionnaires were emailed to all residents (main residents and fellows) at an Israeli tertiary medical center between March 2020 and April 2020. Questions were scored from 1 (disagree) to 5 (fully agree). RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty residents (227 main residents, 43 fellows) participated in the study (40% female). The score for the degree of balance between work and personal life was low (0.9±1.99). The shortened shift model was perceived by the residents as more compatible with a balanced lifestyle than the NF model (3.77 ± 1.20 and 3.14 ± 1.26, respectively, P < 0.0001). Neither model was considered to risk impairing professional training (2.33 ± 1.45 and 2.47 ± 1.25, respectively, P = 0.12). Overall, 74% of the residents were not willing to lower their income if the decision were made to change models, and 56% were not willing to increase the number of shifts. CONCLUSIONS: There is agreement among residents that shortening shift hours to 16 h would have a positive effect on the balance between personal life and work. In the eyes of residents, the change would not impair their training during residency.

[111 INDIUM LABELED LEUKOCYTE SCINTIGRAPHY IS A LOW SENSITIVITY TEST FOR DIAGNOSING PROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION IN EQUIVOCAL CASES].

INTRODUCTION: Nuclear medicine techniques are suggested to be used in equivocal cases only. Nuclear medicine procedures, specifically labeled leucocytes however, are widely used in the diagnosis of joint infection across Europe. The aim of our study was to determine if Indium 111 labeled leukocyte scintigraphy has a role in the diagnosis of infected prosthetic joints. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, the records of a total of 146 prosthetic hip or knee revision surgeries, in 116 patients, performed in our Institute between the years 2013-2016 were reviewed. A total of 34 patients with labeled leukocyte scans were analyzed. Ten patients had more than one scan (two to four times). The scintigraphy result reports were correlated with the outcome with respect to intra-/post-operative diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. RESULTS: The findings of 42 of 44 scintigraphy tests were negative. One study in a patient who had three prior negative labeled white blood cells (WBC) scintigraphies was equivocal. One study was positive, but a later test in the same patient was negative. Of these 34 patients, nine were demonstrated intra- or post operatively as positive for infected prosthetic joint, including the two positive cases above. The remaining 25 patients went through revision surgery with no evidence of infection; 30 of 38 bone scans were positive. Of these 30 patients, seven were demonstrated intra- or post-operatively as positive for infected prosthetic joint. CONCLUSIONS: In our study population indium labeled leukocyte scintigraphy was found to be a non-sensitive test for the diagnosis of a prosthetic joint infection and had a poor negative predictive value. It is expected that following the guidelines more strictly and choosing the appropriate modality for assessing prosthetic joint infection will improve the diagnostic accuracy of these techniques.

Visual estimation of pro-supination angle is superior to wrist or elbow angles.

OBJECTIVE: To examine our hypothesis that the accuracy of visual estimation, while measuring the angles of forearm, wrist and elbow, may vary between the different angles, and that this may depend on the experience of the observer. METHODS: A slide show comprising of clinical photos and radiographs of different elbow, forearm and wrist angles was presented to 164 attending orthopedic surgeons, orthopedic residents and medical students who made a visual estimation of the different joints' angles. RESULTS: Forearm pronation was found to be estimated most accurately (mean 6.1°) while radiographs of wrist flexion (mean 12°) and photos of wrist extension (mean 16°) were estimated the least accurately. Specialists estimated angles more accurately than residents and both were more accurate than students, regardless of the estimated joint. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of visual estimation of a joint's angle depends on the specific joint viewed. Experience in the practice of orthopedic surgery (and not only upper extremity surgery) will improve the accuracy of estimation in general. Regarding the elbow, forearm and wrist, the results of our study suggest that a goniometer should be used whenever an accuracy of up to 10° is important, and for measuring wrist flexion and extension.