[Medication reconciliation: Interests and limits]. / Conciliation médicamenteuse : intérêts et limites.

Admission to hospital is a critical transition point for the continuity of care in medication management. Medication reconciliation can identify and resolve errors due to inaccurate medication histories. The practice of medication reconciliation is securing for the patient because of the medication errors detected with significant clinical impact. Its implementation must comply with the recommendations of the French National Authority for Health (HAS) and its deployment is now integrated into the contract for improving the quality and efficiency of care (CAQES). However, although it allows to intercept medication errors, its impact on the length of hospitalization, the rate of readmission and/or death following discharge seems limited. Given the limited human resources to carry out this time-consuming activity, patient prioritization should be considered. Studies on the fate of patients and on the medico-economic issues are also necessary in order to make this activity sustainable.

Assessing the effect of PRP addition to facial micro-lipofilling for patients suffering from Scleroderma: A prospective routine care analysis.

BACKGROUND: Combining fat graft with platelet derived products is now common practice in regenerative surgery. We proposed to assess the safety and efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) addition to a micro-lipofilling protocol for facial treatment of patients suffering from Systemic Sclerosis (SSc). OBJECTIVE: Main objective was to evaluate the improvement of the Mouth Handicap In Systemic Sclerosis (MHISS) scale score at 6 months post-therapy. METHOD: Included SSc patients had a MHISS score equal or up to 20. Surgery was performed under general anesthesia. Micro-fat and PRP (CCA-NA from DEPA Classification) were mixed in a 70/30 ratio, before injection in peri-oral sites according to a specific protocol. Efficacy criteria were recorded at baseline, 3 and 6 months. Moreover, we compared this cohort (current study) to a former (2015) non-enriched micro-lipofilling cohort in the same indication, using the same protocol. RESULTS: Thirteen women patients with mean age of 53.2 years (±14.3) have been included. At baseline, mean MHISS score was 29.5 (±8.7) and significantly decreased to 22.5 (±7.8) at 6 months (P=0.016), corresponding to a 22.0% of improvement from baseline, with a mean decrease of 6.5 points (±7.5) at 6 months. Patients received a mean volume of 30.8ml PRP-micro-fat (±8.1ml). CONCLUSION: PRP addition appeared beneficial, however, controlled studies are required to determine its superiority to facial micro-lipofilling.

Should we prevent thrombosis related to intravenous immunoglobulin infusions with systematic anticoagulant prophylaxis?

Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) are commonly used for treatment of dysimmune diseases, but they are known to promote thrombotic events. The medical records of patients who received IVIg infusions to treat neuromuscular disorders were retrospectively studied during two periods: the on-demand period (May 2013-January 2015), when patients received anticoagulant prophylaxis based on personal thrombotic risk factors, and the systematic period (May 2015-January 2017), when patients received systematic anticoagulant prophylaxis. Of the 334 total patients included, 19/153 received anticoagulant prophylaxis in the on-demand period, and 181 were treated in the systematic period. In the on-demand period, thrombosis occurred in three patients (1.96%) as one central retinal artery occlusion, one pulmonary embolism, and one brachiocephalic vein thrombosis. In the systematic period, thrombosis occurred in two patients (1.1%), both as pulmonary embolisms. There was no statistical difference in thrombosis incidence between the periods (P=0.66). The only factor associated with thrombosis was splenectomy (20% versus 0.3% in patients without thrombosis, P=0.03). There were no adverse events due to thromboprophylaxis by low-molecular-weight heparin in either period. Systematic thromboprophylaxis did not significantly reduce the incidence of thrombosis versus thromboprophylaxis based on personal thrombotic risk.

Efficacy of intravenous iron therapy in non-anaemic iron-deficient patients with fatigue.

Iron deficiency, without anaemia, is common in the general population and induces various symptoms. Its management consists of oral and intravenous supplementation for cases of inefficacy of or intolerance to oral iron. We assessed the efficacy of intravenous iron therapy in non-anaemic iron-deficient patients with fatigue. We prospectively evaluated the level of fatigue, using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), in patients suffering from iron deficiency without anaemia, treated by intravenous iron at the moment of the perfusion (W0), after 4 weeks (W4), and 12 weeks (W12). Of 25 patients, at W0, the mean FFS was 49.3+/-13.7. There was a significant improvement in FSS at W4 (44+/-15; p = 0.01) and a sustained response at W12 with an FFS of 35.8+/-17.1 (p < 0,0001). There was no correlation between FSS and serum ferritin level at W12 (p=0.54) or between serum ferritin at W12 and difference between FSS at W0 and W12 (p=0.58). There were six mild adverse events (24%): asthenia (8%), nausea (8%), headache (4%), local pain (4%); and no serious adverse events. Our results suggest the rapid efficacy of intravenous iron in improving fatigue in iron deficiency without anaemia with a good profile of tolerance.

[Amiodarone-induced optic neuropathy: A rare side effect]. / Un effet indésirable rare de l'amiodarone : la neuropathie optique.

INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis of bilateral papilledema implies emergency medical care to look for intracranial hypertension and arteritic ischemic neuropathy. However, other causes must also be mentioned, including drugs. Too often underrated because of their usual benignity, drug side ophthalmological effects can be severe and are typically bilateral. CASE REPORT: An 80-year-old woman was hospitalized for bilateral papilledema, predominantly in the left eye, with lowered visual acuity. After ruling out intracranial hypertension, arteritic ischemic optic neuropathy, non-arteritic, and inflammatory bilateral papilledema, the diagnosis was toxic optic neuropathy. CONCLUSION: Bilateral edematous optic neuropathy is a known side effect of amiodarone, uncommon but to be known because of the large number of patients benefiting from this treatment.