RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Dialysis is lifesaving for acute kidney injury (AKI), but access is poor in less resourced settings. A "peritoneal dialysis (PD) first" policy for paediatric AKI is more feasible than haemodialysis in low-resource settings. METHODS: Retrospective review of modalities and outcomes of children dialysed acutely at Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital between 1998 and 2020. RESULTS: Of the 593 children with AKI who received dialysis, 463 (78.1%) received PD first. Median age was 9.0 (range 0.03-219.3; IQR 13.0-69.6) months; 57.6% were < 1 year old. Weights ranged from 0.9 to 2.0 kg (median 7.0 kg, IQR 3.0-16.0 kg); 38.6% were < 5 kg. PD was used more in younger children compared to extracorporeal dialysis (ECD), with median ages 6.4 (IQR 0.9-30.4) vs. 73.9 (IQR 17.5-113.9) months, respectively (p = 0.001). PD was performed with Seldinger soft catheters (n = 480/578, 83%), predominantly inserted by paediatricians at the bedside (n = 412/490, 84.1%). Complications occurred in 127/560 (22.7%) children receiving PD. Overall, 314/542 (57.8%) children survived. Survival was significantly lower in neonates (< 1 month old, 47.5%) and infants (1-12 months old, 49.2%) compared with older children (> 1 year old, 70.4%, p < 0.0001). Survival was superior in the ECD (75.4%) than in the PD group (55.6%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: "PD First for Paediatric AKI" is a valuable therapeutic approach for children with AKI. It is feasible in low-resourced settings where bedside PD catheter insertion can be safely taught and is an acceptable dialysis modality, especially in settings where children with AKI would otherwise not survive.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Diálisis Peritoneal , Humanos , Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Lesión Renal Aguda/mortalidad , Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Sudáfrica/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Preescolar , Masculino , Lactante , Femenino , Niño , Adolescente , Diálisis Peritoneal/efectos adversos , Diálisis Peritoneal/métodos , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Diálisis Renal/métodos , Recién Nacido , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Importance: Sepsis is a leading cause of death among children worldwide. Current pediatric-specific criteria for sepsis were published in 2005 based on expert opinion. In 2016, the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) defined sepsis as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, but it excluded children. Objective: To update and evaluate criteria for sepsis and septic shock in children. Evidence Review: The Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) convened a task force of 35 pediatric experts in critical care, emergency medicine, infectious diseases, general pediatrics, nursing, public health, and neonatology from 6 continents. Using evidence from an international survey, systematic review and meta-analysis, and a new organ dysfunction score developed based on more than 3 million electronic health record encounters from 10 sites on 4 continents, a modified Delphi consensus process was employed to develop criteria. Findings: Based on survey data, most pediatric clinicians used sepsis to refer to infection with life-threatening organ dysfunction, which differed from prior pediatric sepsis criteria that used systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria, which have poor predictive properties, and included the redundant term, severe sepsis. The SCCM task force recommends that sepsis in children be identified by a Phoenix Sepsis Score of at least 2 points in children with suspected infection, which indicates potentially life-threatening dysfunction of the respiratory, cardiovascular, coagulation, and/or neurological systems. Children with a Phoenix Sepsis Score of at least 2 points had in-hospital mortality of 7.1% in higher-resource settings and 28.5% in lower-resource settings, more than 8 times that of children with suspected infection not meeting these criteria. Mortality was higher in children who had organ dysfunction in at least 1 of 4-respiratory, cardiovascular, coagulation, and/or neurological-organ systems that was not the primary site of infection. Septic shock was defined as children with sepsis who had cardiovascular dysfunction, indicated by at least 1 cardiovascular point in the Phoenix Sepsis Score, which included severe hypotension for age, blood lactate exceeding 5 mmol/L, or need for vasoactive medication. Children with septic shock had an in-hospital mortality rate of 10.8% and 33.5% in higher- and lower-resource settings, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: The Phoenix sepsis criteria for sepsis and septic shock in children were derived and validated by the international SCCM Pediatric Sepsis Definition Task Force using a large international database and survey, systematic review and meta-analysis, and modified Delphi consensus approach. A Phoenix Sepsis Score of at least 2 identified potentially life-threatening organ dysfunction in children younger than 18 years with infection, and its use has the potential to improve clinical care, epidemiological assessment, and research in pediatric sepsis and septic shock around the world.
Asunto(s)
Sepsis , Choque Séptico , Humanos , Niño , Choque Séptico/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica/etiología , Consenso , Sepsis/mortalidad , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/diagnóstico , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de ÓrganosRESUMEN
Importance: The Society of Critical Care Medicine Pediatric Sepsis Definition Task Force sought to develop and validate new clinical criteria for pediatric sepsis and septic shock using measures of organ dysfunction through a data-driven approach. Objective: To derive and validate novel criteria for pediatric sepsis and septic shock across differently resourced settings. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, international, retrospective cohort study in 10 health systems in the US, Colombia, Bangladesh, China, and Kenya, 3 of which were used as external validation sites. Data were collected from emergency and inpatient encounters for children (aged <18 years) from 2010 to 2019: 3â¯049â¯699 in the development (including derivation and internal validation) set and 581â¯317 in the external validation set. Exposure: Stacked regression models to predict mortality in children with suspected infection were derived and validated using the best-performing organ dysfunction subscores from 8 existing scores. The final model was then translated into an integer-based score used to establish binary criteria for sepsis and septic shock. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome for all analyses was in-hospital mortality. Model- and integer-based score performance measures included the area under the precision recall curve (AUPRC; primary) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC; secondary). For binary criteria, primary performance measures were positive predictive value and sensitivity. Results: Among the 172â¯984 children with suspected infection in the first 24 hours (development set; 1.2% mortality), a 4-organ-system model performed best. The integer version of that model, the Phoenix Sepsis Score, had AUPRCs of 0.23 to 0.38 (95% CI range, 0.20-0.39) and AUROCs of 0.71 to 0.92 (95% CI range, 0.70-0.92) to predict mortality in the validation sets. Using a Phoenix Sepsis Score of 2 points or higher in children with suspected infection as criteria for sepsis and sepsis plus 1 or more cardiovascular point as criteria for septic shock resulted in a higher positive predictive value and higher or similar sensitivity compared with the 2005 International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference (IPSCC) criteria across differently resourced settings. Conclusions and Relevance: The novel Phoenix sepsis criteria, which were derived and validated using data from higher- and lower-resource settings, had improved performance for the diagnosis of pediatric sepsis and septic shock compared with the existing IPSCC criteria.
Asunto(s)
Sepsis , Choque Séptico , Humanos , Niño , Choque Séptico/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Sepsis/complicaciones , Mortalidad HospitalariaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: New paediatric sepsis criteria are being developed by an international task force. However, it remains unknown what type of clinical decision support (CDS) tools will be most useful for dissemination of those criteria in resource-poor settings. We sought to design effective CDS tools by identifying the paediatric sepsis-related decisional needs of multidisciplinary clinicians and health system administrators in resource-poor settings. DESIGN: Semistructured qualitative focus groups and interviews with 35 clinicians (8 nurses, 27 physicians) and 5 administrators at health systems that regularly provide care for children with sepsis, April-May 2022. SETTING: Health systems in Africa, Asia and Latin America, where sepsis has a large impact on child health and healthcare resources may be limited. PARTICIPANTS: Participants had a mean age of 45 years, a mean of 15 years of experience, and were 45% female. RESULTS: Emergent themes were related to the decisional needs of clinicians caring for children with sepsis and to the needs of health system administrators as they make decisions about which CDS tools to implement. Themes included variation across regions and institutions in infectious aetiologies of sepsis and available clinical resources, the need for CDS tools to be flexible and customisable in order for implementation to be successful, and proposed features and format of an ideal paediatric sepsis CDS tool. CONCLUSION: Findings from this study will directly contribute to the design and implementation of CDS tools to increase the uptake and impact of the new paediatric sepsis criteria in resource-poor settings.
Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas , Médicos , Sepsis , Humanos , Niño , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Investigación Cualitativa , Grupos Focales , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Sepsis/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Reducing child mortality in low-income countries is constrained by a lack of vital statistics. In the absence of such data, verbal autopsies provide an acceptable method to determining attributable causes of death. The objective was to assess potential causes of pediatric postdischarge mortality in children younger than age 5 years (under-5) originally admitted for suspected sepsis using verbal autopsies. METHODS: Secondary analysis of verbal autopsy data from children admitted to 6 hospitals across Uganda from July 2017 to March 2020. Structured verbal autopsy interviews were conducted for all deaths within 6 months after discharge. Two physicians independently classified a primary cause of death, up to 4 alternative causes, and up to 5 contributing conditions using the Start-Up Mortality List, with discordance resolved by consensus. RESULTS: Verbal autopsies were completed for 361 (98.6%) of the 366 (5.9%) children who died among 6191 discharges (median admission age: 5.4 months [interquartile range, 1.8-16.7]; median time to mortality: 28 days [interquartile range, 9-74]). Most deaths (62.3%) occurred in the community. Leading primary causes of death, assigned in 356 (98.6%) of cases, were pneumonia (26.2%), sepsis (22.1%), malaria (8.5%), and diarrhea (7.9%). Common contributors to death were malnutrition (50.5%) and anemia (25.7%). Reviewers were less confident in their causes of death for neonates than older children (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Postdischarge mortality frequently occurred in the community in children admitted for suspected sepsis in Uganda. Analyses of the probable causes for these deaths using verbal autopsies suggest potential areas for interventions, focused on early detection of infections, as well as prevention and treatment of underlying contributors such as malnutrition and anemia.
Asunto(s)
Anemia , Desnutrición , Sepsis , Recién Nacido , Niño , Humanos , Lactante , Adolescente , Preescolar , Autopsia , Causas de Muerte , Uganda/epidemiología , Cuidados Posteriores , Alta del Paciente , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Anemia/diagnósticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To describe the prevalence of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (pARDS) and the characteristics of children with pARDS in South African PICUs. DESIGN: Observational multicenter, cross-sectional point-prevalence study. SETTING: Eight PICUs in four South African provinces. PATIENTS: All children beyond the neonatal period and under 18 years of age admitted to participating PICUs. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinical and demographic data were prospectively collected on a single day of each month, from February to July 2022, using a centralized database. Cases with or at risk of pARDS were identified using the 2015 Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference criteria. Prevalence was calculated as the number of children meeting pARDS criteria/the total number of children admitted to PICU at the same time points. Three hundred ten patients were present in the PICU on study days: 166 (53.5%) male, median (interquartile range [IQR]) age 9.8 (3.1-32.9) months, and 195 (62.9%) invasively mechanically ventilated. Seventy-one (22.9%) patients were classified as being "at risk" of pARDS and 95 patients (prevalence 30.6%; 95% CI, 24.7-37.5%) fulfilled pARDS case criteria, with severity classified as mild (58.2%), moderate (25.3%), and severe (17.6%). Median (IQR) admission Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 risk of mortality in patients with and without pARDS was 5.6 (3.4-12.1) % versus 3.9 (1.0-8.2) % ( p = 0.002). Diagnostic categories differed between pARDS and non-pARDS groups ( p = 0.002), with no difference in age, sex, or presence of comorbidities. On multivariable logistic regression, increasing admission risk of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.04; p = 0.04) and being admitted with a respiratory condition (aOR 2.64; 95% CI, 1.27-5.48; p = 0.01) were independently associated with an increased likelihood of having pARDS. CONCLUSIONS: The 30.6% prevalence of pARDS in South Africa is substantially higher than reports from other sociogeographical regions, highlighting the need for further research in this setting.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Recién Nacido , Niño , Humanos , Masculino , Lactante , Adolescente , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Sudáfrica/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo PediátricoRESUMEN
Septic shock is a leading cause of hospitalisation, morbidity, and mortality for children worldwide. In 2020, the paediatric Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) issued evidence-based recommendations for clinicians caring for children with septic shock and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction based on the evidence available at the time. There are now more trials from multiple settings, including low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), addressing optimal fluid choice and amount, selection and timing of vasoactive infusions, and optimal monitoring and therapeutic endpoints. In response to developments in adult critical care to trial personalised haemodynamic management algorithms, it is timely to critically reassess the current state of applying SSC guidelines in LMIC settings. In this Viewpoint, we briefly outline the challenges to improve sepsis care in LMICs and then discuss three key concepts that are relevant to management of children with septic shock around the world, especially in LMICs. These concepts include uncertainties surrounding the early recognition of paediatric septic shock, choices for initial haemodynamic support, and titration of ongoing resuscitation to therapeutic endpoints. Specifically, given the evolving understanding of clinical phenotypes, we focus on the controversies surrounding the concepts of early fluid resuscitation and vasoactive agent use, including insights gained from experience in LMICs and high-income countries. We outline the key components of sepsis management that are both globally relevant and translatable to low-resource settings, with a view to open the conversation to the large variety of treatment pathways, especially in LMICs. We emphasise the role of simple and easily available monitoring tools to apply the SSC guidelines and to tailor individualised support to the patient's cardiovascular physiology.
Asunto(s)
Sepsis , Choque Séptico , Humanos , Choque Séptico/terapia , Sepsis/terapia , Cuidados Críticos , Fluidoterapia , HemodinámicaRESUMEN
The Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) Reviewer Academy seeks to train and establish a community of trusted, reliable, and skilled peer reviewers with diverse backgrounds and interests to promote high-quality reviews for each of the SCCM journals. Goals of the Academy include building accessible resources to highlight qualities of excellent manuscript reviews; educating and mentoring a diverse group of healthcare professionals; and establishing and upholding standards for insightful and informative reviews. This manuscript will map the mission of the Reviewer Academy with a succinct summary of the importance of peer review, process of reviewing a manuscript, and the expected ethical standards of reviewers. We will equip readers to target concise, thoughtful feedback as peer reviewers, advance their understanding of the editorial process and inspire readers to integrate medical journalism into diverse professional careers.
Asunto(s)
Tutoría , Revisión por Pares , Humanos , Personal de Salud , Mentores , Grupo Paritario , Revisión de la Investigación por Pares , Sociedades MédicasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Access to care for children with kidney disease is limited in less well-resourced regions of the world and paediatric nephrology (PN) workforce development with good practical skills is critical. METHODS: Retrospective review of a PN training program and trainee feedback from 1999 to 2021, based at Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital (RCWMCH), University of Cape Town. RESULTS: A regionally appropriate 1-2-year training program enrolled 38 fellows with an initial 100% return rate to their country of origin. Program funding included fellowships from the International Pediatric Nephrology Association (IPNA), International Society of Nephrology (ISN), International Society of Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD), and the African Paediatric Fellowship Program (APFP). Fellows were trained on both in- and out-patient management of infants and children with kidney disorders. "Hands-on skills" training included examination, diagnosis and management skills, practical insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheters for management of acute kidney injury and kidney biopsies. Of 16 trainees who completed > 1 year of training, 14 (88%) successfully completed subspecialty exams and 9 (56%) completed a master's degree with a research component. PN fellows reported that their training was appropriate and enabled them to make a difference in their respective communities. CONCLUSIONS: This training program has successfully equipped African physicians with the requisite knowledge and skills to provide PN services in resource-constrained areas for children with kidney disease. The provision of funding from multiple organizations committed to paediatric kidney disease has contributed to the success of the program, along with the fellows' commitment to build PN healthcare capacity in Africa. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.
Asunto(s)
Nefrología , Diálisis Peritoneal , Humanos , Niño , África , Cateterismo , BecasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and incidence of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (pARDS) among infants and children admitted to the PICU. DESIGN: A single-center descriptive point prevalence study with twice weekly data collection over a 6 months (August 2020 to February 12, 2021). SETTING: Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa. PATIENTS: All infants and children admitted to the PICU on study days were included. INTERVENTIONS: Data were captured electronically on a standardized case record form using a Research Electronic Data Capture electronic database. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference criteria were used to define pARDS cases. Prevalence was calculated as the total number of pARDS cases/1,000 PICU bed days. The study included 354 patients (median [interquartile range]) 10.1 months old (1.5-61.3 mo old), with 204 males (57.6%), who occupied 879 bed days. Of these 879 bed days, 266 (30.3%; 95% CI, 27.2-33.3%) were occupied by pARDS cases, with a calculated prevalence and incidence of 302.6 of 1,000 bed days (30.3%) and 29.7% (95% CI, 26.7-32.7%), respectively. Three cases from the cohort were defined using the oxygen saturation index calculation. In cases receiving invasive ventilation ( n = 494; 56.2%), pARDS severity was classified as mild ( n = 143; 16.3%), moderate ( n = 44; 5.0%), and severe ( n = 29, 3.3%). A further 205 beds (23.3%) were occupied by patients classified as being at risk of pARDS. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence and incidence of pARDS in a South African PICU appears substantially higher than findings described in international reports. Further investigation of risk factors and outcomes is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Lactante , Masculino , Niño , Humanos , Sudáfrica/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Incidencia , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/epidemiología , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/etiología , Respiración Artificial , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo PediátricoRESUMEN
Sepsis is a leading cause of global mortality in children, yet definitions for pediatric sepsis are outdated and lack global applicability and validity. In adults, the Sepsis-3 Definition Taskforce queried databases from high-income countries to develop and validate the criteria. The merit of this definition has been widely acknowledged; however, important considerations about less-resourced and more diverse settings pose challenges to its use globally. To improve applicability and relevance globally, the Pediatric Sepsis Definition Taskforce sought to develop a conceptual framework and rationale of the critical aspects and context-specific factors that must be considered for the optimal operationalization of future pediatric sepsis definitions. It is important to address challenges in developing a set of pediatric sepsis criteria which capture manifestations of illnesses with vastly different etiologies and underlying mechanisms. Ideal criteria need to be unambiguous, and capable of adapting to the different contexts in which children with suspected infections are present around the globe. Additionally, criteria need to facilitate early recognition and timely escalation of treatment to prevent progression and limit life-threatening organ dysfunction. To address these challenges, locally adaptable solutions are required, which permit individualized care based on available resources and the pretest probability of sepsis. This should facilitate affordable diagnostics which support risk stratification and prediction of likely treatment responses, and solutions for locally relevant outcome measures. For this purpose, global collaborative databases need to be established, using minimum variable datasets from routinely collected data. In summary, a "Think globally, act locally" approach is required.
Asunto(s)
Sepsis , Niño , Humanos , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Sepsis/terapia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Bases de Datos Factuales , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de SaludRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Derangement in serum electrolytes and kidney function is often overlooked, especially in resource-constrained settings, and associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to describe the burden of derangements in serum electrolytes and kidney function in children presenting to a tertiary hospital in Nigeria. METHODS: The laboratory records of all children who had serum electrolytes urea and creatinine ordered on their first presentation to hospital between January 1 and June 30, 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Basic demographic data including admission status (inpatient or outpatient) were recordedandserum levels of sodium, potassium, chloride and bicarbonate were assessed for derangements usingnormal values from established reference ranges. Results of repeat samples were excluded. Kidney function was classified based on the serum creatinine relative to normal values for age and sex. RESULTS: During the study period, 1909 children (60.3% male); median (IQR) age 42 (11.9) months had serum chemistry and 1248 (65.4%) were admitted. Results of their first samples were analyzed. Electrolyte derangements were present in 78.6% of the samples most commonly hyponatraemia (41.1%), low bicarbonate(37.2%), hypochloraemia (33.5%) and hypokalemia(18.9%). Azotaemia was found in 20.1% of the results. Elevated serum creatinine levels were found in 399 children (24.7%), 24.1% of those being in the severe category. Children aged 5 years and younger accounted for 76.4% of those with derangement in kidney function. One hundred and eight outpatients (17.8%) had deranged kidney function. CONCLUSION: Deranged serum electrolytes and kidney function were common in this cohort.
Asunto(s)
Bicarbonatos , Electrólitos , Humanos , Masculino , Niño , Femenino , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Estudios Retrospectivos , Nigeria/epidemiología , Creatinina , RiñónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Standardized, consistent reporting of social determinants of health (SDOH) in studies on children with sepsis would allow for: 1) understanding the association of SDOH with illness severity and outcomes, 2) comparing populations and extrapolating study results, and 3) identification of potentially modifiable socioeconomic factors for policy makers. We, therefore, sought to determine how frequently data on SDOH were reported, which factors were collected and how these factors were defined in studies of sepsis in children. DATA SOURCES AND SELECTION: We reviewed 106 articles (published between 2005 and 2020) utilized in a recent systematic review on physiologic criteria for pediatric sepsis. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted by two reviewers on variables that fell within the World Health Organization's SDOH categories. DATA SYNTHESIS: SDOH were not the primary outcome in any of the included studies. Seventeen percent of articles (18/106) did not report on any SDOH, and a further 36.8% (39/106) only reported on gender/sex. Of the remaining 46.2% of articles, the most reported SDOH categories were preadmission nutritional status (35.8%, 38/106) and race/ethnicity (18.9%, 20/106). However, no two studies used the same definition of the variables reported within each of these categories. Six studies reported on socioeconomic status (3.8%, 6/106), including two from upper-middle-income and four from lower middle-income countries. Only three studies reported on parental education levels (2.8%, 3/106). No study reported on parental job security or structural conflict. CONCLUSIONS: We found overall low reporting of SDOH and marked variability in categorizations and definitions of SDOH variables. Consistent and standardized reporting of SDOH in pediatric sepsis studies is needed to understand the role these factors play in the development and severity of sepsis, to compare and extrapolate study results between settings and to implement policies aimed at improving socioeconomic conditions related to sepsis.
Asunto(s)
Sepsis , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Humanos , Niño , Factores Socioeconómicos , Sepsis/epidemiologíaAsunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Niño , Humanos , Nueva Zelanda , AustraliaRESUMEN
This article reviews the many factors that have to be taken into account as we consider the advancement of pediatric critical care (PCC) in multiple settings across the world. The extent of PCC and the range of patients who are cared for in this environment are considered. Along with a review of the ongoing treatment and technology advances in the PCC setting, the structures and systems required to support these services are also considered. Finally the question of how PCC can be made sustainable in a volatile world with the impacts of global crises such as climate change is addressed.
Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos , Pediatría , Niño , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Definitions for pediatric sepsis were established in 2005 without data-driven criteria. It is unknown whether the more recent adult Sepsis-3 definitions meet the needs of providers caring for children. We aimed to explore the use and applicability of criteria to diagnose sepsis and septic shock in children across the world. METHODS: This is an international electronic survey of clinicians distributed across international and national societies representing pediatric intensive care, emergency medicine, pediatrics, and pediatric infectious diseases. Respondents stated their preferences on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: There were 2835 survey responses analyzed, of which 48% originated from upper-middle income countries, followed by high income countries (38%) and low or lower-middle income countries (14%). Abnormal vital signs, laboratory evidence of inflammation, and microbiologic diagnoses were the criteria most used for the diagnosis of "sepsis." The 2005 consensus definitions were perceived to be the most useful for sepsis recognition, while Sepsis-3 definitions were stated as more useful for benchmarking, disease classification, enrollment into trials, and prognostication. The World Health Organization definitions were perceived as least useful across all domains. Seventy one percent of respondents agreed that the term sepsis should be restricted to children with infection-associated organ dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians around the world apply a myriad of signs, symptoms, laboratory studies, and treatment factors when diagnosing sepsis. The concept of sepsis as infection with associated organ dysfunction is broadly supported. Currently available sepsis definitions fall short of the perceived needs. Future diagnostic algorithms should be pragmatic and sensitive to the clinical settings.
Asunto(s)
Pediatría , Sepsis , Choque Séptico , Niño , Humanos , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Sepsis/terapia , Choque Séptico/diagnóstico , Choque Séptico/terapia , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Vancomycin is often used in the ICU for the treatment of Gram-positive bacterial infection. In critically ill children, there are pathophysiologic changes that affect the pharmacokinetics of vancomycin. A systematic review of vancomycin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in critically ill children was performed. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic studies of vancomycin in critically ill children published up to May 2021 were included in the review provided they included children aged > 1 month. Studies including neonates were excluded. A search was performed using the PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. The Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Systematic Reviews (ROBIS) was used to check for quality and reduce bias. Data on study characteristics, patient demographics, clinical parameters, pharmacokinetic parameters, outcomes, and study limitations were collected. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included in this review. A wide variety of dosing and sampling strategies were used in the studies. Methods for estimating vancomycin pharmacokinetics, especially the area under the curve over 24 h, varied. Vancomycin doses of 20-60 mg/kg were given daily. This resulted in high variability in pharmacokinetic parameters. Vancomycin trough level was less than 15 µg/mL in most of the studies. Vancomycin clearance ranged from 0.05 to 0.38 L/h/kg. Volume of distribution ranged from 0.1 to 1.16 L/kg. Half-life was between 2.4 and 23.6 h. Patients in the study receiving continuous vancomycin infusion had AUC24 < 400 µg·h/mL. CONCLUSION: There is large variability in the pharmacokinetics of vancomycin among critically ill patients. Studies to assess the factors responsible for this variability in vancomycin pharmacokinetics are needed.