Repositioning accuracy of a novel thermoplastic mask for head and neck cancer radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the reproducibility of patient shoulder position immobilized with a novel and innovative prototype mask (E-Frame, Engineering System). METHODS: The E-frame mask fixes both shoulders and bisaxillary regions compared with that of a commercial mask (Type-S, CIVCO). Thirteen and twelve patients were immobilized with the Type-S and E-Frame mask systems, respectively. For each treatment fraction, cone-beam CT (CBCT) images of the patient were acquired and retrospectively analyzed. The CBCT images were registered to the planning CT based on the cervical spine, and then the displacements of the acromial extremity of the clavicle were measured. RESULTS: The systematic and random errors between the two mask systems were evaluated. The differences of the systematic errors between the two mask systems were not statistically significant. The mean random errors in the three directions (AP, SI and LR) were 2.7 mm, 3.1 mm and 1.5 mm, respectively for the Type-S mask, and 2.8 mm 2.5 mm and 1.4 mm, respectively for the E-Frame mask. The random error of the E-Frame masks in the SI direction was significantly smaller than that of the Type-S. The number of cases showing displacements exceeding 10 mm in the SI direction for at least one fraction was eight (61% of 13 cases) and three (25% of 12 cases) for Type-S and E-Frame masks, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The E-Frame masks reduced the random displacements of patient's shoulders in the SI direction, effectively preventing large shoulder shifts that occurred frequently with Type-S masks.

In vivo three-dimensional wrist motion analysis using magnetic resonance imaging and volume-based registration.

This study represents a new attempt to non-invasively analyze three-dimensional motions of the wrist in vivo. A volume-based registration method using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was developed to avoid radiation exposure. The primary aim was to evaluate the accuracy of volume-based registration and compare it with surface-based registration. The secondary aim was to evaluate contributions of the scaphoid and lunate to global wrist motion during flexion-extension motion (FEM), radio-ulnar deviation (RUD) and radial-extension/ulnoflexion, "dart-throwing" motion (DTM) in the right wrists of 12 healthy volunteers. Volume-based registration displayed a mean rotation error of 1.29 degrees +/-1.03 degrees and a mean translation error of 0.21+/-0.25 mm and was significantly more accurate than surface-based registration in rotation. Different patterns of contribution of the scaphoid and lunate were identified for FEM, RUD, and DTM. The scaphoid contributes predominantly in the radiocarpal joint during FEM, in the midcarpal joint during RUD and almost equally between these joints during DTM. The lunate contributes almost equally in both joints during FEM and predominantly in the midcarpal joint during RUD and DTM.

In vivo elbow biomechanical analysis during flexion: three-dimensional motion analysis using magnetic resonance imaging.

The purpose of this article is to evaluate in vivo 3-dimensional kinematics of the elbow joint during elbow flexion. We studied the ulnohumeral and radiohumeral joint noninvasively in 3 elbows in healthy volunteers using a markerless bone registration algorithm. Magnetic resonance images were acquired in 6 positions of elbow flexion. The inferred contact areas on the ulna against the trochlea tended to occur only on the medial facet of the trochlear notch in all of the elbow positions we tested. The inferred contact areas on the radial head against the capitellum occurred on the central depression of the radial head in all of the tested elbow positions except for 135 degrees flexion, where the anterior rim of the radial head articulates with the capitellum.