Immunotherapy utilization in stage IIIA melanoma: less may be more.

Background: Immunotherapy agents are approved for adjuvant treatment of stage III melanoma; however, evidence for survival benefit in early stage III disease is lacking. Current guidelines for adjuvant immunotherapy utilization in stage IIIA rely on clinician judgment, creating an opportunity for significant variation in prescribing patterns. This study aimed to characterize current immunotherapy practice variations and to compare patient outcomes for different prescribing practices in stage IIIA melanoma. Study design: Patients with melanoma diagnosed from 2015-2019 that met American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition criteria for stage IIIA and underwent resection were identified in the National Cancer Database. Multiple imputation by chained equations replaced missing values. Factors associated with receipt of adjuvant immunotherapy were identified. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression compared overall survival across groups. Results: Of 4,432 patients included in the study, 34% received adjuvant immunotherapy. Patients had lower risk-adjusted odds of receiving immunotherapy if they were treated at an academic center (OR=0.48, 95%CI=0.33-0.72, p<0.001 vs. community facility) or at a high-volume center (OR=0.69, 0.56-0.84, p<0.001 vs. low-volume). Immunotherapy receipt was not associated with risk-adjusted survival (p=0.095). Moreover, patients treated at high-volume centers experienced longer overall risk-adjusted survival than those treated at low-volume centers (HR=0.52, 0.29-0.93, p=0.030). Risk-adjusted survival trended toward being longer at academic centers than at community centers, but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Academic and high-volume centers utilize significantly less adjuvant immunotherapy in stage IIIA melanoma than community and low-volume centers without compromise in overall survival. These findings suggest that this population may benefit from more judicious immunotherapy utilization.

Case report: Metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma presenting seven years after loco-regional disease resection of primary tumor with interval in-transit and nodal metastases.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare tumor with a high risk of recurrence after definitive therapy; however, the optimal duration of surveillance is unclear. First recurrences typically occur within 3 years. National guidelines recommend that patients undergo physical examination and imaging for surveillance during this time period. However, the duration of surveillance beyond this is not defined. Here, we describe a case of a patient developing a recurrence of MCC 7 years after the primary diagnosis with interval in-transit and regional lymph node metastases 15 months following the treatment of the primary MCC. Such late recurrences are rare, largely not reported, and the risk factors contributing to late recurrences are not well described. This case highlights the possibility of late recurrences of MCC after an initial in-transit and nodal recurrence and underscores the importance of identifying predictors of recurrence that may better guide the duration of surveillance.

The role of imaging and sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with T3b-T4b melanoma with clinically negative disease.

Background: Previous studies demonstrate minimal utility of pre-operative imaging for low-risk melanoma; however, imaging may be more critical for patients with high-risk disease. Our study evaluates the impact of peri-operative cross-sectional imaging in patients with T3b-T4b melanoma. Methods: Patients with T3b-T4b melanoma who underwent wide local excision were identified from a single institution (1/1/2005 - 12/31/2020). Cross-sectional imaging was defined as body CT, PET and/or MRI in the perioperative period, with the following findings: in-transit or nodal disease, metastatic disease, incidental cancer, or other. Propensity scores were created for the odds of undergoing pre-operative imaging. Recurrence free survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Results: A total of 209 patients were identified with a median age of 65 (IQR 54-76), of which the majority were male (65.1%), with nodular melanoma (39.7%) and T4b disease (47.9%). Overall, 55.0% underwent pre-operative imaging. There were no differences in imaging findings between the pre- and post-operative cohorts. After propensity-score matching, there was no difference in recurrence free survival. Sentinel node biopsy was performed in 77.5% patients, with 47.5% resulting in a positive result. Conclusion: Pre-operative cross-sectional imaging does not impact the management of patients with high-risk melanoma. Careful consideration of imaging use is critical in the management of these patients and highlights the importance of sentinel node biopsy for stratification and decision making.

Malignant Melanoma in Older Adults: Different Patient or Different Disease?

Objective In this study, we aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between older and younger patients with melanoma and to evaluate for differences in tumor genetic makeup that might explain differences in clinical behavior between older and younger cohorts. Materials and methods A consecutive sample of patients diagnosed with melanoma at a single institution from 1984 to 2019 was categorized by age into younger, middle, and older cohorts. Tumor characteristics, melanoma-specific survival, and recurrence-free survival were assessed while accounting for differential follow-up and death from other causes using Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank testing. Results A total of 4378 patients were included in the study. Older patients presented with a higher incidence of T3 and T4 tumors, and a lower incidence of T1 tumors (p<0.001). The same group of patients had a lower nodal positivity at any given Breslow thickness (p<0.01). Melanoma-specific survival was lower for older patients with T2 tumors (p=0.046). There was no difference in recurrence-free survival among all age groups and tumor thicknesses (p>0.05). For patients with a given genetic profile, the melanoma-specific survival and recurrence-free survival were equivalent across ages. BRAF was the most common driver in the younger group, while NRAS and other mutations increased in prevalence as age rose. Conclusions Older adults have decreased melanoma-specific survival for T2 tumors and lower nodal positivity, suggesting a different pattern of metastatic progression. The mutational drivers of cutaneous melanoma change with age and may play a role in the different metastatic progression as well as the differential melanoma-specific survival across all age cohorts.

Integrative molecular and clinical profiling of acral melanoma links focal amplification of 22q11.21 to metastasis.

Acral melanoma, the most common melanoma subtype among non-White individuals, is associated with poor prognosis. However, its key molecular drivers remain obscure. Here, we perform integrative genomic and clinical profiling of acral melanomas from 104 patients treated in North America (n = 37) or China (n = 67). We find that recurrent, late-arising focal amplifications of cytoband 22q11.21 are a leading determinant of inferior survival, strongly associated with metastasis, and linked to downregulation of immunomodulatory genes associated with response to immune checkpoint blockade. Unexpectedly, LZTR1 - a known tumor suppressor in other cancers - is a key candidate oncogene in this cytoband. Silencing of LZTR1 in melanoma cell lines causes apoptotic cell death independent of major hotspot mutations or melanoma subtypes. Conversely, overexpression of LZTR1 in normal human melanocytes initiates processes associated with metastasis, including anchorage-independent growth, formation of spheroids, and an increase in MAPK and SRC activities. Our results provide insights into the etiology of acral melanoma and implicate LZTR1 as a key tumor promoter and therapeutic target.

Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Changing Practice Patterns and Impact on Recurrence-Free and Overall Survival at a Single Institution and Nationally.

BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin. Our report describes the evolution of management and characteristics associated with recurrence, disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) in the treatment of MCC. METHODS: A single institution retrospective review of MCC and SEER data to determine factors associated with RFS, DSS, and OS using a multivariable Cox regression on inverse-probability weighted cohorts. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-nine patients were identified with a median age of 75. Of these, 96% were Caucasian and 60% male. Fifty-eight out of 159 (36%) of all patients were deceased with 21/58 (36%) dead from MCC with a median follow-up of 3.1 years. Institutionally, trends over time demonstrated an increased use of immunotherapy with a concomitant decrease in chemotherapy and decreased use of radiotherapy alone. Institutionally and nationally, there has been increased surgical nodal staging. Institutionally, factors associated with shorter DSS included advanced age, active cigarette smoker (p = 0.002), cT2 disease (p = 0.007), and MCC with unknown primary (p < 0.001). Institutionally, factors associated with shorter OS included ages ≥ 75 years (p < 0.001), an immunocompromised state (p < 0.001), truncal primary site (p = 0.002), and cT2 disease (HR 9.59, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Changing practice patterns in MCC management have been driven by the adoption of immunotherapy. Our study highlights that competing risks of mortality in MCC patients likely prevents OS from being an accurate surrogate outcome measure to understand factors associated with DSS.

Predictive accuracy of elevated mitotic rate on lymph node positivity and recurrence in thin melanomas.

Background: Mitotic rate (MR) is considered an important prognostic factor for melanoma but is not currently used for staging because its nuanced effect is not yet well-delineated. We sought to determine if T category-specific MR is predictive of sentinel lymph node (SLN) positivity, recurrence, and melanoma-specific mortality (MSM). Methods: A retrospective review of patients with primary cutaneous melanoma from 1994 to 2020 at a single academic center was performed. Patient demographics and tumor characteristics were recorded. MR was considered elevated for each AJCC8-defined T category if it was ≥2 mitoses/mm2 for T1, ≥4 mitoses/mm2 for T2, ≥6 mitoses/mm2 for T3, or ≥7 mitoses/mm2 for T4. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the predictive accuracy of MR on selected outcomes while controlling for ulceration. Results: Data from 2,984 patients with complete records were analyzed. Along with Breslow thickness and ulceration, elevated MR was associated with higher risk of MSM (HR 1.816, P=0.0001). There was no difference among patients with ulcerated T1 or T2 tumors regardless of MR, but those with non-ulcerated T1 or T2 tumors and elevated MR were more likely to have positive SLNs (P<0.0001 and P=0.0043, respectively) and recurrence (P=0.0007 and P=0.0004, respectively) compared to counterparts with low MR. There were no notable differences for T3 or T4 tumors based on MR. Conclusions: Elevated MR is associated with SLN positivity and recurrence in thin melanomas, independent of ulceration. SLN biopsy should therefore be strongly considered for patients with non-ulcerated lesions <0.8 mm thick if the MR is ≥2 mitoses/mm2.

Methods of Sentinel Lymph Node Identification in Auricular Melanoma.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is used to evaluate for micrometastasis in auricular melanoma. However, lymphatic drainage patterns of the ear are not well defined and predicting the location of sentinel nodes can be difficult. The goal of this study was to define the lymphatic drainage patterns of the ear and to compare multiple modalities of sentinel node identification. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database evaluated 80 patients with auricular melanoma who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy by comparing preoperative imaging with intraoperative identification of sentinel nodes. Patients were placed into two cohorts, based on the modality of preoperative imaging: (1) planar lymphoscintigraphy only (n = 63) and (2) single-photon emission computerized tomography combined with computerized tomography (SPECT-CT) only (n = 17). Sites of preoperative mapping and sites of intraoperative identification were recorded as parotid/preauricular, mastoid/postauricular, and/or cervical. RESULTS: In patients that underwent planar lymphoscintigraphy preoperatively (n = 63), significantly more sentinel nodes were identified intraoperatively than were mapped preoperatively in both the parotid/preauricular (P = 0.0017) and mastoid/postauricular (P = 0.0047) regions. Thirty-two nodes were identified intraoperatively that were not mapped preoperatively in the planar lymphoscintigraphy group (n = 63), two of which were positive for micrometastatic disease. In contrast, there were no discrepancies between preoperative mapping and intraoperative identification of sentinel nodes in the SPECT-CT group (n = 17). CONCLUSIONS: SPECT-CT is more accurate than planar lymphoscintigraphy for the preoperative identification of draining sentinel lymph nodes in auricular melanoma. If SPECT-CT is not available, planar lymphoscintigraphy can also be used safely, but careful intraoperative evaluation, even in basins not mapped by lymphoscintigraphy, must be performed to avoid missed sentinel nodes.

Acral Lentiginous Melanoma: Do Surgical Approach and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Matter?

Management of acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) remains controversial. Traditionally, ALM was managed with digit amputation (DA), resulting in significant morbidity, but recent evidence has advocated for digit sparing management. Furthermore, the significance of nodal metastasis for ALM is not well reported. The aims of this study were to determine if surgical approach for primary ALM impacts outcomes and to evaluate the predictive value of nodal status for ALM. METHODS: Patients with localized ALM diagnosed from 1982 to 2017 were retrospectively identified. Clinicopathologic characteristics were correlated with surgical approach, nodal metastasis, overall survival, and recurrence-free survival. RESULTS: There were 47 patients with ALM. Median age was 59 years, and median thickness was 3 mm. 51% of patients underwent wide local excision (WLE), 27.9% underwent DA, and 20.9% underwent partial digit amputation (PDA). ALM on the hand versus foot (OR: 12.7, 95%, confidence interval (CI), 2.0-80.1; P = 0.007) and subungual versus nonsubungual location (OR: 28.0, 95% confidence interval, 2.7-295.7; P = 0.006) were significantly associated with surgical approach (DA and PDA versus WLE). There were no significant differences in overall survival or recurrence-free survival between DA, PDA, or WLE cases (P = 0.481 and P = 0.778, respectively). There were no significant differences in overall survival or recurrence-free survival based on nodal status (P = 0.562 and P = 0.136, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in overall survival or recurrence-free survival were seen between ALM patients treated with DA, PDA, and WLE. Given these results, PDA or WLE may be options in select patients with digital ALM; however, careful consideration must be taken when deciding on the surgical approach.

Survival after checkpoint inhibitors for metastatic acral, mucosal and uveal melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are thought to be effective against cutaneous melanoma in part because of the large burden of somatic mutations (neoantigens) generated from exposure to ultraviolet radiation. However, rare melanoma subtypes arising from acral skin, mucosal surfaces, and the uveal tract are largely sun-shielded. Genomic studies show these sun-shielded melanomas have a paucity of neoantigens and unique biology; they are thought to be largely resistant to immunotherapy. It has not been definitively shown that CPI improves survival in metastatic sun-shielded melanoma. METHODS: We reviewed a single institutional experience using antibodies against CTLA-4, PD-1 and/or PD-L1 to treat patients with metastatic melanoma. Primary tumor histology was categorized as cutaneous, unknown, acral, mucosal, or uveal. We studied demographic data, treatment characteristics, and overall survival (OS) after CPI. RESULTS: We treated 428 patients with metastatic melanoma from 2007 to 2019. Primary tumors were cutaneous in 283 (66%), unknown in 55 (13%), acral in 22 (5%), mucosal in 38 (9%), and uveal in 30 (7%). Patients with metastatic disease from cutaneous primary tumors had median OS after CPI of 45 months compared with 17 months for acral (p=0.047), 18 months for mucosal (p=0.003), and 12 months for uveal (p<0.001). For all patients with sun-shielded melanoma (n=90), first treatment with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 was followed by a median OS of 9 months compared with 18 months after anti-CTLA-4 (p=0.010) and 20 months after combination therapy (p=0.003). There were 21 patients who achieved actual 3-year survival; 20 received both anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1, either sequentially or in combination. Over 80% of 3-year survivors with progressive disease were treated with local therapy after CPI. CONCLUSIONS: Long survival in patients with metastatic melanoma from acral, mucosal, and uveal primary tumors was associated with receipt of both anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies. Complete responses were rare, and local therapy was frequently employed to control disease progression. While sun-shielded melanomas exhibit worse outcomes after CPI than cutaneous melanomas, with an aggressive multidisciplinary approach, 5-year survival is still possible for 25%-32% of these patients.

Patterns of failure after immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors predict durable progression-free survival after local therapy for metastatic melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) have revolutionized the treatment of metastatic melanoma, but most patients treated with CPI eventually develop progressive disease. Local therapy including surgery, ablation or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may be useful to manage limited progression, but criteria for patient selection have not been established. Previous work has suggested progression-free survival (PFS) after local therapy is associated with patterns of immunotherapy failure, but this has not been studied in patients treated with CPI. METHODS: We analyzed clinical data from patients with metastatic melanoma who were treated with antibodies against CTLA-4, PD-1 or PD-L1, either as single-agent or combination therapy, and identified those who had disease progression in 1 to 3 sites managed with local therapy. Patterns of CPI failure were designated by independent radiological review as growth of established metastases or appearance of new metastases. Local therapy for diagnosis, palliation or CNS metastases was excluded. RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-eight patients with metastatic melanoma received treatment with CPI from 2007 to 2018. Seventy-seven have ongoing complete responses while 69 died within 6 months of starting CPI; of the remaining 282 patients, 52 (18%) were treated with local therapy meeting our inclusion criteria. Local therapy to achieve no evidence of disease (NED) was associated with three-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 31% and five-year disease-specific survival (DSS) of 60%. Stratified by patterns of failure, patients with progression in established tumors had three-year PFS of 70%, while those with new metastases had three-year PFS of 6% (P = 0.001). Five-year DSS after local therapy was 93% versus 31%, respectively (P = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Local therapy for oligoprogression after CPI can result in durable PFS in selected patients. We observed that patterns of failure seen during or after CPI treatment are strongly associated with PFS after local therapy, and may represent a useful criterion for patient selection. This experience suggests there may be an increased role for local therapy in patients being treated with immunotherapy.

Nonvisualization of Sentinel Lymph Nodes by Lymphoscintigraphy in Primary Cutaneous Melanoma: Incidence, Risk Factors, and a Review of Management Options.

BACKGROUND: Lymphoscintigraphy is often performed before sentinel lymph node biopsy, especially in areas likely to have multiple or aberrant drainage patterns. This study aims to determine the incidence and characteristics of melanoma patients with negative lymphoscintigraphic findings and to review the management options and surgical recommendations. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients with primary cutaneous melanoma who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy between 2005 and 2016. Patients with nonvisualized lymph nodes on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy were compared in a 1:4 ratio with a randomly selected unmatched cohort drawn from all melanoma patients who underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy within the period of the study. Demographic, clinical, and outcome data were compared between these groups. RESULTS: A negative lymphoscintigraphic scan was seen in 2.3 percent of all cases (25 of 1073). In both univariate and multivariate analyses, predictive patient- and tumor-specific factors for negative lymphoscintigraphy included older age and head and neck location. Patients with a nonvisualized sentinel lymph node had significantly worse overall survival compared with patients who had a visualized sentinel lymph node, but there was no difference in melanoma-specific survival. In 16 of the 25 cases (64 percent), at least one sentinel lymph node was found intraoperatively despite the negative lymphoscintigraphic findings. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients with head and neck melanomas are more likely to experience nodal nonvisualization on lymphoscintigraphy. In patients who have nodal nonvisualization, the surgeon should attempt sentinel lymph node biopsy at the time of excision of the primary lesion because a sentinel lymph node can still be found in a majority of cases, and it offers prognostic information. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.

A Thirty-Year Experience With Head and Neck Flap Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Head and neck (HN) defects after tumor extirpation can be challenging to repair. Historically, pedicled flaps were the mainstay for reconstruction, but recently, free tissue transfer has been preferred. This study compares patient characteristics and flap outcomes for HN defects over a 30-year period at the authors' institution. METHODS: Head and neck cancer patients receiving flap reconstruction from 1983 to 2013 were included. Records were reviewed for demographic and perioperative data. Flap complications were compared and statistical tests were 2-tailed with a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: Eight hundred sixty-one patients fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria. Pedicled reconstruction predominated during early time-points (96.3% pedicled), compared with later years (69.5% free-tissue). Free flaps were associated with significantly longer operative times (643.5 versus 429.7 minutes, P<0.0001) and postoperative stays (16.89 versus 14.01 nights, P = 0.0005) and had higher rates of emergent reoperation, total flap loss, hematoma, and donor site morbidity. Previous irradiation did not affect major complication rate for either flap type. CONCLUSIONS: A shift from pedicled to free flaps for HN reconstruction occurred over the last 30 years. Free flaps had a higher complication profile in this cohort, which was largely accounted for by a higher return rate to the operating room compared with pedicled flaps (17.31% versus 5.46%, P<0.0001). Additionally, this complication profile may reflect the increasingly common use of free tissue flaps for more complex reconstructions. Several of these differences in complication rates between flap types were no longer significant in the last 5 years of this study.

Interlesional diversity of T cell receptors in melanoma with immune checkpoints enriched in tissue-resident memory T cells.

Heterogeneity of tumor cells and their microenvironment can affect outcome in cancer. Blockade of immune checkpoints (ICPs) expressed only on a subset of immune cells leads to durable responses in advanced melanoma. Tissue-resident memory T (TRM) cells have recently emerged as a distinct subset of memory T cells in nonlymphoid tissues. Here, we show that functional properties and expression of ICPs within tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) differ from those of blood T cells. TILs secrete less IL-2, IFN-γ, and TNF-α compared with circulating counterparts, and expression of VEGF correlated with reduced TIL infiltration. Within tumors, ICPs are particularly enriched within T cells with phenotype and genomic features of TRM cells and the CD16+ subset of myeloid cells. Concurrent T cell receptor (TCR) and tumor exome sequencing of individual metastases in the same patient revealed that interlesional diversity of TCRs exceeded differences in mutation/neoantigen load in tumor cells. These findings suggest that the TRM subset of TILs may be the major target of ICP blockade and illustrate interlesional diversity of tissue-resident TCRs within individual metastases, which did not equilibrate between metastases and may differentially affect the outcome of immune therapy at each site.

Functional Neck Dissection: The Operative Technique Series.

A clinical case of a patient undergoing right functional neck dissection is presented. A detailed, step-by-step video description highlighting the pearls of the operation accompanies the article. This will be the first of many contributions in a Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and PRS Global Open Operative Technique Series initiative that endeavors to disseminate plastic and reconstructive knowledge worldwide.

Regression in thin melanoma is associated with nodal recurrence after a negative sentinel node biopsy.

Prognostic markers for nodal metastasis in thin melanoma patients are debated. We present a single institution study looking at factors predictive of nodal disease in thin melanoma patients. Retrospective review from 1997 to 2012 identified 252 patients with thin melanoma (≤1 mm) who underwent a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Node-positive patients included positive SLNB patients and negative SLNB patients who developed a nodal recurrence (false-negative SLNB). Clinicopathologic characteristics were correlated with nodal status and outcome. Median follow-up was 45.5 months. Twelve of 252 patients (4.8%) were node-positive including six positive SLNB (2.4%) and six false-negative SLNB (2.4%) patients. No clinicopathologic factors were significantly correlated with nodal disease. For the six false-negative SLNB patients, median time to nodal recurrence was 37.5 months. Regression was seen in only 16% of cases, but the rate increased to 60% for false-negative SLNB cases. Both age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.01-1.17; P = 0.02) and regression (OR: 8.33, 95% CI: 1.34-52.63; P = 0.02) were significantly associated with nodal recurrence after a negative SLNB on univariable analysis. Nodal disease in thin melanoma patients was seen in 4.8% of cases. Although regression was not correlated with nodal metastasis, it was correlated with a false-negative SLNB. Patients with thin melanoma and regression may need more intensive surveillance after a negative SLNB. Further study is needed to determine if the same immune mechanisms that result in regression in primary tumors also lead to regression in lymph nodes, which may decrease detection of melanoma nodal metastases.

The Prognostic Significance of Sentinel Lymph Node Status for Patients with Thick Melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is recommended for patients with intermediate-thickness melanoma, but the use of SLNB for patients with thick melanoma is debated. This report presents a single-institution study investigating factors predictive of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis and outcome for thick-melanoma patients . METHODS: A retrospective review of a single-institution database from 1997 to 2012 identified 147 patients with thick primary cutaneous melanoma (≥4 mm) who had an SLNB. Clinicopathologic characteristics were correlated with nodal status and outcome. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 67 years, and 61.9 % of the patients were men. The median tumor thickness was 5.5 mm, and 54 patients (36.7 %) had a positive SLN. Multivariable analysis showed that only tumor thickness significantly predicted SLN metastasis (odds ratio 1.14; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.28; P = 0.02). The overall median follow-up period was 34.6 months. Overall survival (OS) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) were significantly worse for the positive versus negative-SLN patients. Multivariable analysis showed that age [hazard ratio (HR) 1.04; 95 % CI 1.01-1.07; P = 0.02] and SLN status (HR 2.24; 95 % CI 1.03-4.88; P = 0.04) significantly predicted OS, whereas only SLN status (HR 3.85; 95 % CI 2.13-6.97; P < 0.01) significantly predicted MSS. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor thickness predicts SLN status in thick melanomas. Furthermore, SLN status is prognostic for OS and MSS in thick-melanoma patients, with positive-SLN patients having significantly worse OS and MSS. These findings show that SLNB should be recommended for thick-melanoma patients, particularly because detection of SLN metastasis can identify patients for potential systemic therapy and treatment of nodal disease at a microscopic stage.

Malignant Melanoma: Beyond the Basics.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After reading this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Discuss the initial management of cutaneous malignant melanoma with regard to diagnostic biopsy and currently accepted resection margins. 2. Be familiar with the management options for melanoma in specific situations such as subungual melanoma, auricular melanoma, and melanoma in the pregnant patient. 3. Discuss the differentiating characteristics of desmoplastic melanoma and its treatment options. 4. List the indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy and be aware of the ongoing trials and current literature. 5. Discuss the medical therapies available to patients with metastatic melanoma. SUMMARY: Management of the melanoma patient is a complex and evolving subject. Plastic surgeons should be aware of the recent changes in the field. Excisional biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis, although there is no evidence that use of other biopsy types alters survival or recurrence. Wide local excisions should be carried out with margins as recommended by National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines according to lesion Breslow depth, with sentinel lymph node biopsy being offered to all medically suitable candidates with intermediate thickness melanomas (1.0 to 4.0 mm), and with sentinel lymph node biopsy being considered for high-risk lesions (ulceration and/or high mitotic figures) with melanomas of 0.75 to 1.0 mm. Melanomas diagnosed during pregnancy can be treated with preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and wide local excision under local anesthesia, with sentinel lymph node biopsy under general anesthesia delayed until after delivery. Management of desmoplastic melanoma is currently controversial with regard to the indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy and the efficacy of postoperative radiation therapy. Subungual and auricular melanoma have evolved from being treated by amputation of the involved appendage to less radical procedures-ear reconstruction is now attempted in the absence of gross invasion into the perichondrium, and subungual melanomas may be treated with wide local excision down to and including the periosteum, with immediate full-thickness skin grafting over bone. Although surgical treatment remains the current gold standard, recent advances in immunotherapy and targeted molecular therapy for metastatic melanoma show great promise for the development of medical therapies for melanoma.