Practice Patterns and Return-to-Sports Timing of National Football League Head Team Physicians for ACL Reconstruction.

Background: Previous surveys of the practice patterns for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in collegiate and professional team physicians have shown bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft being the most common graft, with variable return-to-sports timing. Purpose: To evaluate the current practice patterns and return-to-sports timing of National Football League (NFL) head team physicians for ACL reconstruction. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Method: All 32 NFL head team orthopaedic surgeons were surveyed and asked their primary ACL graft preference, revision ACL graft preference, use of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) or anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALL), use of suture brace augmentation, return-to-sport timing, and whether functional testing was utilized in determining readiness of return to play. The years of experience of the physician were also evaluated. Results: All 32 head team physicians responded, with 31 (97%) using ipsilateral BPTB autograft in the primary setting and 1 using ipsilateral quadriceps autograft. In the revision setting, 24 (75%) physicians preferred a contralateral BPTB autograft, while 5 (16%) used an ipsilateral quadriceps autograft, 1 (3%) used a contralateral quadriceps autograft, and 2 (6%) used a BPTB allograft. One respondent (3%) used suture brace augmentation "most of the time" in the primary setting and always in the revision setting. No respondents utilized an ALL or LET in the primary setting and 2 (6%) respondents always performed an LET in revisions. Five others (16%) have performed at least 1 ALL or LET in an NFL athlete. Mean return to sports was at 9 months postoperatively, with no physicians allowing players to return before 7 months. All but 1 respondent used functional testing in return-to-sports decision-making. Conclusion: All but 1 of the 32 NFL head team physicians used BPTB autograft in primary ACL reconstruction. The majority preferred contralateral BPTB autograft in revisions, with a few considering extra-articular procedures or suture bracing in addition. On average, head team physicians allowed players to return at 9 months postoperatively, with none allowing return before 7 months. Nearly all utilized functional testing to aid in return-to-play decision-making. These homogenous findings in this high-risk and public athletic cohort aid in patient education and clinical decision-making for best treatment of ACL injuries, particularly in contact athletes.

Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques and Postoperative Care Among Leaders in the Field: A Survey of the Herodicus Society.

Background: Despite a growing body of literature regarding anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), there remains a wide diversity in surgical technique and clinical practice across providers. Purpose: To (1) describe current ACLR practice preferences among members of the Herodicus society and (2) determine whether these preferences are influenced by years in practice and overall surgical volume. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A 24-question survey investigating surgeons' practices and preferred ACLR surgical techniques was sent via email to all active Herodicus Society members. Survey responses were subdivided by years of experience and overall ACLR annual case volume. Descriptive statistics were compiled and chi-square testing was utilized to determine the significance of experience and case volume on survey responses. Results: Of the 113 invited Herodicus Society members who perform ACLR, 69 (61%) completed the survey. Respondents had a mean ± SD of 30.9 ± 9.8 years of experience in clinical practice and performed a mean of 96.0 ± 50.7 primary and 21.6 ± 16.9 revision ACLR annually. Of revision cases, 72.1% were performed using a single-stage technique. Mean frequency of graft usage by surgeon was bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft (58.6%), quadriceps autograft (14.6%), hamstring tendon autograft (14.0%), and allograft (11.8%). The plurality of surgeons responded that they used anterolateral augmentation "rarely" in primary ACLR (39.1%) and "sometimes" in revision ACLR (31.9%), with the majority performing lateral extra-articular tenodesis (66.7%) rather than anterolateral ligament reconstruction (14.5%). Most surgeons would not allow a 20-year-old football player to return before 7 months after ACLR (71.0%) but highly valued return-to-sports testing to determine readiness (94.2%). Higher volume surgeons performed single-stage revision ACLR at a significantly higher rate (79.8% vs 62.9%, P = .02) and significantly differed in return-to-sports criteria, with a greater proportion relying primarily on biometric testing (P = .01). Conclusion: The survey demonstrated that, in the Herodicus Society, a wide range of preferences exist regarding ACLR surgical technique. Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft is the most frequent primary ACLR graft choice. Most participants have not embraced newer techniques such as anterolateral or suture tape augmentation. Return to sports is generally not allowed before 7 months and heavily factors-in return-to-sports testing metrics, suggesting that purely time-based criteria for return to sports is not modern practice among elite sports medicine surgeons.

Arthroscopic Management of Posterior Shoulder Instability.

Posterior shoulder instability is a distinct subcategory of shoulder instability with an incidence higher than previously reported. Pain is typically the primary complaint, with pathology due to repetitive microtrauma being more common that a specific traumatic event. If nonoperative treatment fails, arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral repair has been shown to result in excellent outcomes and return to sport, with American football players having the best outcomes and throwers being slightly less predictable. Risk factors for surgical failure include decreased glenoid bone width, rotator cuff injury, female gender, and the use of less than 3 anchors.

Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries in Overhead Athletes: Diagnosis, Management, and Clinical Outcomes.

Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries are a common source of pain and disability in overhead and throwing athletes. The prolonged nature of healing often results in notable time lost from competitive sports regardless of the definitive management strategy. A thorough history and physical examination are critical in the diagnosis of UCL injury and understanding patient goals and expectations. In carefully selected patients, nonsurgical management, including rest and slow progression back to activities, can result in successful return to sport. Recent literature has suggested that administration of platelet-rich plasma may be effective in aiding in the healing process, particularly in proximal and partial-thickness tears; however, additional study is warranted. UCL reconstruction has been the benchmark for tears not amendable to nonsurgical treatment, with flexor-pronator complex preservation being important. UCL repair has historically been most commonly used in partial avulsions, but indications have yet to be completely well defined. Knowledge regarding appropriate UCL treatment continues to evolve with patient-specific treatment being essential.

Location of Shoulder Glenoid Labral Tears: A Study of 1763 Consecutive Patients.

BACKGROUND: Anterior shoulder labral tearing has historically been considered the most common location of shoulder labral pathology. Recently, smaller studies have reported that posterior labral involvement may be more common than previously recognized. PURPOSE: To examine the location of surgically repaired labral tears by a single surgeon over a consecutive 23-year period. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A total of 1763 consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic or open shoulder labral repair by a single seniorsports medicine fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeon between April 2000 and April 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify patients, which included 29806, 29807, 29822, and 29823. Exclusion criteria included isolated shoulder manipulation or glenohumeral joint or labral debridement that did not include repair. Intraoperative glenoid labral tears observed were categorized into 7 broad categories: (1) anterior labral tears, (2) posterior labral tears, (3) superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) type II tears (A, B, or C), (4) SLAP type V tears, (5) SLAP type VIII tears, or (6) circumferential labral tears (combined SLAP, anterior, and posterior labral tear). Shoulders diagnosed with multiple tear patterns (ie, anterior and posterior) were also noted. RESULTS: During the 23-year period, 1763 patients underwent arthroscopic or open labral repair; they included 1295 male and 468 female patients, ranging in age from 12 to 70 years, with a mean age of 23.2 years and median age of 19 years. Overall, 28.4% of tears involved the anterior labrum, 64.9% involved the posterior labrum, and 59.6% involved the superior labrum. Regarding isolated tears, 9.3% were isolated anterior labral tears, 19.7% were isolated posterior labral tears, 11.5% involved the anterior and posterior labrum, 22.2% were isolated superior (SLAP type II-IV) tears, 3.63% were isolated SLAP type V tears, 29.8% were isolated SLAP type VIII tears, and 4.1% were circumferential tears. CONCLUSION: Posterior shoulder labral tearing was more common than anterior tearing in a large consecutive series of 1763 patients who underwent surgical repair. This highlights the importance of posterior labral pathology, which sometimes may be overlooked because of more vague complaints, with pain and loss of function being the most common.

The Psychology of ACL Injury, Treatment, and Recovery: Current Concepts and Future Directions.

CONTEXT: Interest in the relationship between psychology and the outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) continues to grow as variable rates of return to preinjury level of activity continue to be observed. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Articles were collected from peer-reviewed sources available on PubMed using a combination of search terms, including psychology, resilience, mental health, recovery, and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Further evaluation of the included bibliographies were used to expand the evidence. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. RESULTS: General mental health and wellbeing, in addition to a host of unique psychological traits (self-efficacy, resilience, psychological readiness and distress, pain catastrophizing, locus of control, and kinesiophobia) have been demonstrated convincingly to affect treatment outcomes. Moreover, compelling evidence suggests that a number of these traits may be modifiable. Although the effect of resilience on outcomes of orthopaedic surgical procedures has been studied extensively, there is very limited information linking this unique psychological trait to the outcomes of ACLR. Similarly, the available information related to other parameters, such as pain catastrophizing, is limited with respect to the existence of adequately sized cohorts capable of accommodating more rigorous and compelling analyses. A better understanding of the specific mechanisms through which psychological traits influence outcomes can inform future interventions intended to improve rates of return to preinjury level of activity after ACLR. CONCLUSION: The impact of psychology on patients' responses to ACL injury and treatment represents a promising avenue for improving low rates of return to preinjury activity levels among certain cohorts. Future research into these areas should focus on specific effects of targeted interventions on known, modifiable risk factors that commonly contribute to suboptimal clinical outcomes. STRENGTH-OF-RECOMMENDATION TAXONOMY (SORT): B.

Patient Resilience Does Not Conclusively Affect Clinical Outcomes Associated With Arthroscopic Surgery but Substantial Limitations of the Literature Exist.

Purpose: To determine whether low resilience is predictive of worse patient-reported outcomes (PROs) or diminished improvements in clinical outcomes after joint preserving and arthroscopic surgery. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Science Direct was performed on September 28, 2022, for studies investigating the relationship between resilience and PROs after arthroscopic surgery in accordance with the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Results: Nine articles (level II-IV studies) were included in the final analysis. A total of 887 patients (54% male, average age 45 years) underwent arthroscopic surgery, including general knee (n = 3 studies), ACLR-only knee (n = 1 study), rotator cuff repair (n = 4 studies), and hip (n = 1 study). The Brief Resilience Scale was the most common instrument measuring resilience in 7 of 9 studies (78%). Five of 9 studies (56%) stratified patients based on high, normal, or low resilience cohorts, and these stratification threshold values differed between studies. Only 4 of 9 studies (44%) measured PROs both before and after surgery. Three of 9 studies (33%) reported rates of return to activity, with 2 studies (22%) noting high resilience to be associated with a higher likelihood of return to sport/duty, specifically after knee arthroscopy. However, significant associations between resilience and functional outcomes were not consistently observed, nor was resilience consistently observed to be predictive of subjects' capacity to return to a preinjury level of function. Conclusions: Patient resilience is inconsistently demonstrated to affect clinical outcomes associated with joint preserving and arthroscopic surgery. However, substantial limitations in the existing literature including underpowered sample sizes, lack of standardization in stratifying patients based on pretreatment resilience, and inconsistent collection of PROs throughout the continuum of care, diminish the strength of most conclusions that have been drawn. Level of Evidence: Level IV, systematic review of level II-IV studies.

Osteochondritis Dissecans Lesions of the Knee: Evidence-Based Treatment.

Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the knee is a potentially disabling condition in adolescent and young adults, which is likely multifactorial in origin. In recent years, there have been notable improvements in identification and treatment. Clinical presentation varies based mostly on OCD lesion stability. Patients with stable lesions generally present with vague knee pain and altered gait while mechanical symptoms and effusion are more common with unstable lesions. Lesions most commonly occur on the lateral aspect of the medial femoral condyle in patients aged 10 to 20 years. Magnetic resonance imaging is vital to diagnose and predict clinical treatment, which is largely based on stability of the fragment. Conservative treatment of stable lesions in patients with open physis is recommended with protected weight-bearing and gradual progression of activities over the course of 3 to 6 months. Stable OCD lesions which failed a nonsurgical course can be treated with transarticular or retrograde drilling while unstable lesions usually require fixation, autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), osteochondral autograft transfer (OATS), or osteochondral allograft transplantation. This review highlights the most current understanding of knee OCD lesions and treatment options with the goal of optimizing outcomes in this difficult pathology.

Understanding Shoulder and Elbow Injuries in the Windmill Softball Pitcher.

Although pitching-related injuries in the overhead athlete have been studied extensively, injuries associated with windmill pitching are not as clearly elucidated. Windmill pitching produces high forces and torques in the upper extremity, and studies have shown it creates similar shoulder and elbow joint loads to those reported in baseball pitchers. Studies have shown that the windmill pitching motion generates high levels of biceps activation with an eccentric load, placing the biceps at increased risk for overuse injuries. Although the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine published prevention guidelines including recommendations for maximum pitch counts in softball, these recommendations have not been adopted by most United States softball governing bodies. The repetitive windmill motion in conjunction with high pitch count demands in competitive softball creates notable challenges for the sports medicine physician. As with overhead throwing athletes, identifying and preventing overuse is crucial in preventing injuries in the windmill pitcher, and prevention and rehabilitation should focus on optimizing mechanics and kinematics, core, hip, and lower body strength, and recognition of muscle fatigue. With more than two million fastpitch softball participants in the United States, it is essential to better understand the etiology, evaluation, and prevention of injuries in the windmill pitching athlete.

Management of Patellar Tendinopathy.

Patellar tendinopathy is a common pathology typically seen in athletes involved in repetitive explosive jumping and running activities. Also known as jumpers' knee, it is commonly seen in high-level basketball players. Typically, athletes continue to play with symptoms, which can be aggravated and progress to partial patellar tendon tears. When partial patellar tendon tears occur, prolonged recovery and decreased performance is commonly seen. The pathology and treatment can be frustrating for both the athlete and medical provider. Patellar tendinopathy typically does not involve inflammation but rather microinjury to the tendon fibers, which leads to mucoid degeneration, necrosis, and loss of transitional fibrocartilage. When partial tendon tears do occur, the typical location is posteromedially adjacent to the patella. Treatment involves a stepwise approach starting with nonoperative means, including activity modification, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories, and physical therapy focused on eccentrics. Extracorporeal shock wave treatments and injections with platelet-rich plasma or bone marrow aspirate concentrate should be considered, with evolving literature to support their use. Ultrasound percutaneous tendon scrapping with a needle supplemented with the aforementioned injections is an emerging treatment option that the authors have found to be helpful, although further studies are required. Surgical intervention is considered after failure of nonoperative treatments, and typically occurs in tears greater than 50% of the tendon thickness and in tendons with increased thickness (>8.8 mm). Open or arthroscopic debridement can be considered, with no studies showing superior outcomes with either technique; however, no high-quality comparison studies exist. The authors prefer an open technique where, much like a bone-patellar tendon-bone harvest, the unhealthy proximal tendon and bone are excised with then closure of the healthy tendon with absorbable sutures. Suture anchor repair may also be used when necessary. In a recent systematic review, surgical management of patellar tendinopathy has been shown to result in improved patient-reported outcomes with return to sport at high levels.1 Treatment for the difficult and sometimes frustrating pathology of patellar tendinopathy continues to evolve, with biologic and less-invasive ultrasound-based treatments showing promise, and surgical intervention providing reliable outcomes.

Adhesions in the setting of hip arthroscopy.

With the growing number of primary arthroscopies performed, patients requiring revision hip arthroscopies for various issues is high including postoperative adhesion formation, a source of pain, mechanical symptoms, range of motion limitation, stiffness, and microinstability. Adhesions are a consequence of biological pathways that have been stimulated by injury or surgical interventions leading to an increased healing response. Preventative efforts have included surgical adjuncts during/after primary hip arthroscopy, biologic augmentation, and postoperative rehabilitation. Treatment options for adhesion formation includes surgical lysis of adhesions with or without placement of biologic membranes aimed at inhibiting adhesion reformation as well as systemic medications to further reduce the risk. Postoperative rehabilitation exercises have also been demonstrated to prevent adhesions as a result of hip arthroscopy. Ongoing clinical trials are further investigating pathways and prevention of adhesion formation.

Correlation of Acromial Morphology With Risk and Direction of Shoulder Instability: An MRI Study.

BACKGROUND: The influence of bony morphology on the development of posterior shoulder instability is not well known. PURPOSE: To determine if acromial morphology, as measured on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is associated with posterior or anterior shoulder instability. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: MRI measurements of posterior acromial coverage (PAC), posterior acromial height (PAH), posterior acromial tilt (PAT), and anterior acromial coverage (AAC) were completed for 3 separate matched groups who underwent surgical intervention: posterior instability, anterior instability, and a comparison group of patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery for snapping scapula. Inclusion criteria were patients with recurrent instability <40 years of age without multidirectional instability, glenoid bone loss >13.5%, or glenoid retroversion >10%. RESULTS: Overall, 37 patients were included in each group. PAC was significantly less in the posterior instability group than in the anterior instability and comparison groups (68.3° vs 88.7° vs 81.7°; P < .001). PAH was significantly greater in the posterior group than in the anterior instability group (11.0 mm vs -0.1 mm; P < .001) and comparison group (0.7 mm; P < .001). There was no difference between the posterior and anterior groups in terms of PAT or AAC (P = .45 and P = .05, respectively). PAT was significantly smaller in the posterior instability group than the comparison group (55.2° vs 62.2°; P = .026). The anterior and comparison groups were not significantly different in PAH or PAT (P = .874 and P = .067, respectively) but were significantly different in AAC (P = .026). CONCLUSION: A higher and flatter posterior acromion, as measured on preoperative MRI, appears to be associated with patients who require arthroscopic capsulolabral repair due to posterior shoulder instability. This information may help clinicians to both diagnose and predict the need for operative intervention for patients with posterior labral tears.

Outcomes After Revision Posterior Shoulder Capsulolabral Repair in Adolescent Athletes.

Background: Few studies have evaluated the outcomes of posterior arthroscopic capsulolabral repair in adolescents, especially with regard to outcomes after revision repair. Hypothesis: Adolescent athletes who undergo revision arthroscopic posterior unidirectional capsulolabral repair will have similar outcomes and return to play when compared with adolescent athletes who underwent primary arthroscopic posterior unidirectional capsulolabral repair. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Data were reviewed from patients who underwent posterior shoulder stabilization between 2000 and 2019 and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patients <11 and >19 years of age and those with multidirectional instability were excluded. Revision surgery was defined as repeat arthroscopic posterior capsular repair. The ability to return to sport (and level of sport), clinical outcomes scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] and visual analog scale for pain), and patient-reported perception of range of motion, strength, and satisfaction were recorded. Comparisons between the primary and revision cohorts were made using the chi-square or the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Included were 180 adolescent patients (182 shoulders) who underwent a primary unidirectional posterior stabilization, with an average follow-up of 6.1 years. Of these patients, 17 patients required revision surgery (9.3% revision rate). At the final follow-up, patients who underwent revision surgery returned to sport at similar rates to those who did not (70.6% vs 85.9%; P = .095) and were similarly likely to return to their presurgery level of play (41.1% vs 23.7%; P = .10). The no-revision patients had higher ASES scores (76.1 vs 87.1; P = .007) as well as less pain and improved subjective range of motion scores. However, both groups had similar subjective strength scores, and both reported that surgical repair was satisfactory (no revision, 93.2% vs revision, 88.2%; P = .45). Conclusion: Adolescent athletes had a low risk of revision surgery and frequently returned to play after arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral repair, often at a lower level of play. Those who required revision surgery had poorer outcome scores but still reported a high rate of satisfaction.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Posterior Shoulder Instability With a Clinically Relevant Posterior Glenoid Bone Loss Model.

BACKGROUND: Existing biomechanical studies of posterior glenoid bone loss and labral pathology are limited by their use of anterior instability models, which differ in both orientation and morphology and have been performed in only a single, neutral arm position. PURPOSE: To evaluate the biomechanical effectiveness of a posterior labral repair in the setting of a clinically relevant posterior bone loss model in various at-risk arm positions. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested in 7 consecutive states using a 6 degrees of freedom robotic arm: (1) native, (2) posterior labral tear (6-9 o'clock), (3) posterior labral repair, (4) mean posterior glenoid bone loss (7%) with labral tear, (5) mean posterior glenoid bone loss with labral repair, (6) large posterior glenoid bone loss (28%) with labral tear, and (7) large posterior glenoid bone loss with labral repair. Bone loss was created using 3-dimensional printed computed tomography model templates. Biomechanical testing consisted of 75 N of posterior-inferior force and 75 N of compression at 60° and 90° of flexion and scaption. Posterior-inferior translation, lateral translation, and peak dislocation force were measured for each condition. RESULTS: Labral repair significantly increased dislocation force independent of bone loss state between 10.1 and 14.8 N depending on arm position. Dislocation force significantly decreased between no bone loss and small bone loss (11.9-13.5 N), small bone loss and large bone loss (9.4-14.3 N), and no bone loss and large bone loss (21.2-26.5 N). Labral repair significantly decreased posterior-inferior translation compared with labral tear states by a range of 1.0 to 2.3 mm. In the native state, the shoulder was most unstable in 60° of scaption, with 29.9 ± 6.1-mm posterior-inferior translation. CONCLUSION: Posterior labral repair improved stability of the glenohumeral joint, and even in smaller to medium amounts of posterior glenoid bone loss the glenohumeral stability was maintained with labral repair in this cadaveric model. However, a labral repair with large bone loss could not improve stability to the native state. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study shows that larger amounts of posterior glenoid bone loss (>25%) may require bony augmentation for adequate stability.

Editorial Commentary: Risk Factors of Cyclops Syndrome in Quadriceps Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: More Helpful Data in Weighing Graft Choice.

Arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction can be a devastating complication with risk factors and causes not well established. Cyclops syndrome is a subtype involving localized scar anterior to the graft, which is typically treated with arthroscopic debridement. ACL quadriceps autograft is a newly popular graft option for which clinical data continue to develop. However, recent research shows possible increased risk of arthrofibrosis with quadriceps autograft. Possible causes include inability to achieve active terminal knee extension after extensor mechanism graft harvesting; patient characteristics, including female sex, and social, psychological, musculoskeletal, and hormonal differences; larger graft diameter; concomitant meniscus repair; exposed collagen fibers of the graft abrading the fat pad or tibial tunnel or intercondylar notch; smaller notch size; intra-articular cytokine; and biomechanical stiffness of the graft.

Minimum 10-Year Clinical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Capsulolabral Repair for Isolated Posterior Shoulder Instability.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic capsulolabral repair for posterior shoulder instability has been shown to improve patient-reported outcomes and return to sport at short-term and midterm follow-up, but long-term outcomes are unknown. PURPOSE: To determine the objective and subjective clinical outcomes of shoulder function after arthroscopic posterior shoulder stabilization at a minimum 10-year follow-up. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A total of 53 patients (55 shoulders) with unidirectional recurrent posterior shoulder instability who underwent arthroscopic capsulolabral repair were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 15.4 years. Outcomes such as the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score, Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic shoulder and elbow score, and subjective strength, stability, range of motion, and pain were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at a minimum 10-year follow-up. Outcomes from the same patient cohort were previously collected at 3.0-year follow-up and were evaluated for longitudinal analysis. Subgroup analyses for sport type (contact vs noncontact), position (thrower vs nonthrower), and revision versus nonrevision were performed. Risk factors for revision surgery based on magnetic resonance imaging findings, patient characteristics, and surgical findings were investigated. RESULTS: Arthroscopic capsulolabral repair for posterior shoulder instability led to a statistically significant improvement on all outcome measures, with similar values at short-term (3.0-year) and long-term (15.4-year) follow-up. Across the total population, patients with 19 of 55 shoulders (35%) returned to sport at the same preinjury level, and patients with 33 of 55 shoulders (60%) returned to sport at some level. At long-term follow-up, patients with only 22% of shoulders were involved in the primary sport in which the injury was sustained, with patients with 28% of shoulders discontinuing sporting participation because of ongoing shoulder issues. Throwers trended toward lower Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic scores than nonthrowers both preoperatively (36.5 ± 22.8 vs 48.7 ± 22.9, respectively; P = .10) and postoperatively (57.4 ± 27.0 vs 73.5 ± 26.8, respectively; P = .09) but had similar improvements. Contact and noncontact athletes had similar preoperative and postoperative values, with equal improvements after surgery. With failure defined as revision surgery, an ASES score <60, or a stability value >5, 19 of 55 shoulders (35%) met failure criteria at final follow-up. Overall, 7 of 55 shoulders (13%) underwent revision surgery. At long-term follow-up, patients who underwent revision surgery had worse outcomes than those who did not undergo revision (ASES score: 53.1 ± 25.9 vs 81.8 ± 19.4, respectively; P < .001). An acute injury in the postoperative period (P < .001) and a smaller glenoid bone width on magnetic resonance imaging (P = .02) were the only identified risk factors for revision surgery. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic capsulolabral repair for posterior shoulder instability was a durable treatment option that improved long-term shoulder pain and function and facilitated return to sport in the majority of patients at a mean follow-up of 15.4 years, although a notable proportion of patients met various criteria for failure.

Outcomes of Open Versus Arthroscopic Treatment of HAGL Tears.

BACKGROUND: Lesions that involve humeral avulsions of the glenohumeral ligament (HAGLs), although less common, are primary contributors to recurrent events of dislocation and subluxation of the glenohumeral joint. PURPOSE: To describe the clinical presentation, examination, and surgical outcomes of patients presenting with HAGL lesions who underwent repair using an arthroscopic or open technique. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed of skeletally mature patients without glenohumeral arthritis who presented with HAGL lesions and subsequently underwent arthroscopic or open repair between 2005 and 2017. Independent variables included patient characteristics, clinical presentation, physical examination findings, and arthroscopic findings. Dependent variables included pre- and postoperative Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) score, and range of motion outcomes. RESULTS: Eighteen patients diagnosed with a HAGL lesion who underwent primary arthroscopic repair (n = 7) or open repair (n = 11) were included. There were 17 male patients and 1 female patient with a mean age of 24.9 years (range, 16-38 years). Mean follow-up duration was 50.9 months (range, 24-160 months). Seventeen patients (94.4%) reported pain as the most common symptom, and 7 (38.9%) reported sensation of instability. Scores significantly improved from pre- to postoperative for the arthroscopic and open groups (P < .001): SANE (mean ± SD; arthroscopic, 30.7 ± 15.7 to 92.1 ± 12.2; open, 45.5 ± 8.50 to 90.7 ± 5.24) and WOSI (arthroscopic, 51.4 ± 11.4 to 2.49 ± 3.70; open, 45.5 ± 7.37 to 11.5 ± 5.76). The magnitude of improvement in SANE scores was significantly higher for patients treated arthroscopically (Δ60.0; open, Δ46.5; P = .012). Postoperative WOSI scores were also significantly better in the arthroscopic cohort (2.49 ± 3.70; open, 11.5 ± 5.76; P = .00094). CONCLUSION: Symptomatic HAGL tears present primarily with pain as opposed to instability, necessitating a high index of suspicion for injury. The tears may be treated successfully with an arthroscopic or open technique with significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes and stability.

Surgical Management of Patellar Tendinopathy Results in Improved Outcomes and High Rates of Return to Sport: A Systematic Review.

Although the majority of patients with patellar tendinopathy (PT) can be treated nonoperatively, operative management may be indicated for recalcitrant cases. While several surgical techniques have been described, there is limited understanding of postoperative outcomes and expectations regarding return to activity and sport. The purpose of this study was to characterize the clinical outcomes associated with the surgical management of PT with an emphasis on return to sport (RTS) rates. We hypothesized that surgical management would lead to clinically important improvements in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with high rates of RTS and RTS at the same level. A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases was performed in December 2020. Level of evidence studies I through IV, investigating results of surgical management for PT (PRO, functional outcomes, pain, and/or RTS), were included. The search was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Forty clinical studies reporting on surgery for PT satisfied inclusion criteria, with 1,238 total knees undergoing surgery for PT. A comparison of pre- and postoperative Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment, patellar tendon (VISA-P) scores (mean difference: 41.89, p < 0.00001), Lysholm scores (mean difference: 41.52, p < 0.00001), and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores (mean difference: 5, p < 0.00001) demonstrated clinically and statistically significant improvements after surgery. The overall RTS rate following operative management was 89.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 86.4-92.8, I 2 = 56.5%) with 76.1% (95% CI: 69.7.5-81.9, I 2 = 76.4%) of athletes returning to the same level of activity. Surgery for PT provides meaningful improvement in patient reported outcomes and pain while allowing athletes to RTS at high rates with levels of participation similar to that of preinjury. Comparative studies of open and/or arthroscopic surgery are still limited but current evidence suggests better rates of RTS for arthroscopic surgery compared with open surgery. This is a systematic review of level-I to -IV studies.

Dynamic Posterior Instability Test: A New Test for Posterior Glenohumeral Instability.

Background: Recurrent posterior shoulder instability has become an increasingly recognized cause of shoulder disability, especially among athletes. The presentation can be vague and therefore its clinical diagnosis is often overlooked. Few diagnostic tests exist and these tests are difficult to perform in an anxious and apprehensive patient. Many also lack high specificity and do not effectively distinguish posterior labral tears from other shoulder pathologies. As a result, the authors worked to develop a new test, the dynamic posterior instability test (DPIT). The purpose of this study was to describe the DPIT as well as a modified DPIT test and to evaluate the accuracy of these tests in detecting posterior labral pathology. It was hypothesized that the dynamic posterior instability test (DPIT) would improve accuracy in the evaluation of posterior labral tears. Methods: For a 9-month period, the DPIT and modified DPIT tests were performed on all patients evaluated for posterior instability of the shoulder. The records of all patients who had undergone a posterior labral repair (type VIII SLAP and posterior labral tears) were reviewed. The results of the DPIT and modified DPIT tests were compared to intra-operative findings. Anterior glenohumeral instability patients were also evaluated with these tests to serve as a control. Results: Fifty-one patients had a positive and 3 patients had a negative DPIT test. Of the anterior instability patients, there was 1 positive and 19 negative test results. The sensitivity of the DPIT test was 94.4%, specificity 95%, the positive predictive value 0.98, and the negative predictive value 0.86. The results of the modified DPIT were the same as the DPIT test. Conclusions: The DPIT and modified DPIT tests provide a valuable new tool when combined with history and other physical examination findings improve the accuracy of diagnosis of posterior shoulder instability.

Open Repair of Complete Proximal Hamstring Avulsions in Workers' Compensation Patients.

Background: Several studies have reported excellent results after surgical repair of proximal hamstring avulsions. However, the effect on these patients of receiving workers' compensation has not yet been explored. Hypothesis: Workers' compensation patients undergoing proximal hamstring repair of complete tears will have similar outcomes when compared with a matched control group of non-workers' compensation patients. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Workers' compensation patients who underwent complete proximal hamstring avulsion open repair between 2010 and 2019 were identified (WC group). A control group was matched by age (±3 years), sex, and body mass index (BMI; ±3). Demographics and patient-reported outcome measures were compared, including standard and custom Marx activity rating scale (MARS), standard and custom lower extremity functional scale (LEFS), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Rate and time to return to work were recorded. Results: The WC group was composed of 20 patients (8 men, 12 women) with a mean age of 52.3 years and BMI of 32.4. The 20 matched controls (8 men, 12 women) who underwent repair had a mean age of 50.6 years and a mean BMI of 31.2. There was no difference between the groups regarding age (P = .924), sex (P > .999), or BMI (P = .330). The WC group reported similar mean MARS (3.3 vs 5.4; P = .174), custom MARS (87.5 vs 97.0; P = .215), and VAS pain (3.3 vs 3.8; P = .698) scores compared with controls. However, the WC group had significantly lower standard LEFS (69.1 vs 94.1; P < .001) and custom LEFS (62.3 vs 87.9; P < .001) scores, returned to work at a lower rate (70.0% vs 94.1%; P = .039), and required more time to return to work after repair (4.3 vs 3.5 months; P = .029) compared with controls. Conclusion: Workers' compensation patients who underwent open proximal hamstring repair for complete avulsions experienced inferior patient-reported outcomes, required more time to return to work, and returned to work at a lower rate than a matched control group.