Endourology Fellowship: More Than a Stone's Throw Away for Women.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize and trend female representation in the endourology fellowship match compared to the urology residency match. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Available deidentified match data from 2017 to 2022 was obtained from American Urological Association (AUA) and Endourology Society annual census data. We evaluated gender-specific participation in the urology residency and endourology fellowship match and compared differences in the trends over the last 6 years. RESULTS: Between the years 2017 to 2021 there was a total of 313 applicants for a fellowship in endourology, of those only 8.6% were women. In that same time period, a significantly larger number of women (27.1%) participated in the urology residency match (p=P<0.01). When specifically examining the endourology applicant trend, there was no significant increase in participation (R=0.7, p=0.35) between 2017 and 2021, as compared to the significant increase in total number of applicants (R=7.1, p=0.04). However, in the urology match, there has been a constant and significant increase in both female (R=13.7, p=0.03) and total applicants (R= 27, p=0.04) between 2017 and 2022. CONCLUSIONS: While there has been an overall increase in the number of applicants to urology, the number of women in endourology fellowship has not increased at a commensurate rate. In light of these findings, it is the responsibility of the endourology community to identify social and systemic barriers for women in this field and advocate for change.

How I Do It: ERAS protocol featuring erector spinae plane block for percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the gold-standard treatment for large and complex renal stones. Though associated with higher stone-free rates compared to other minimally invasive stone procedures, this comes at the expense of increased morbidity including postoperative pain and discomfort. We describe our enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for PCNL with emphasis on the use of erector spinae plane blocks to improve patient satisfaction and reduce postoperative opioid use and bother.

Prospective Randomized Trial of Antibiotic Prophylaxis Duration for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Low-Risk Patients.

Introduction and Objective: Postoperative infection and sepsis account for the most common complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), as high as 14% in low-risk patients. Although the American Urological Association (AUA) recommends perioperative antibiotics for 24 hours or less for PCNL, practice patterns vary regarding duration of antibiotic therapy. We aimed to compare the efficacy of 24-hour antibiotic coverage vs short-course protocol of antibiotic prophylaxis for PCNL. Materials and Methods: Low-risk patients with a sterile preoperative urine culture undergoing PCNL were prospectively randomized to antibiotics for up to 24 hours after procedure (24Hr) or continued until external urinary catheters were removed (CR) study groups. Patients were given a first generation cephalosporin, or ciprofloxacin in patients with penicillin allergy. Exclusion criteria included age <18 years, receiving antibiotics immediately before the procedure, history of urosepsis, presence of indwelling catheter >1 week, multistage procedure, immunosuppression, pregnancy, multiple antibiotic allergies, and patients who are breastfeeding. Results: Ninety-eight patients were randomized to either 24Hr (n = 49) or CR (n = 49). Mean duration of antibiotic administration was 20.6 and 34.0 hours in the 24Hr and CR groups (p = 0.04), respectively. Age, comorbidities, stone size, operative time, number of punctures, dilations, and proportion of "tubeless" procedures were similar between groups. There were no differences in febrile episodes, rates of systemic inflammatory response syndrome, bacteremia, or culture-proven postoperative urinary tract infection between the 24Hr and CR groups. Overall complication rates were similar between groups. In a subgroup analysis which excluded "tubeless" patients (24 and 29 patients in 24Hr and CR groups, respectively), no differences were seen in postoperative outcomes. Conclusions: In a randomized, prospective study, we found that a 24-hour protocol for antibiotic prophylaxis is not associated with increased risk of infection-related events compared to giving antibiotics until external catheters are removed in patients with low infectious risk undergoing PCNL. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02579161.

Authorship in Urology: A Gender Reveal.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate female author representation in urologic literature as compared to the proportion of female practicing urologists. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was designed to analyze trends in women authorship of urology publications in 2019 as compared to AUA 2019 census data. The 5 highest impact urologic journals in 2019 were identified using the publicly available SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) indices. Author genders and study categorization were independently determined by 2 authors. Chi-squared test was used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: The 5 highest impact urologic journals in 2019 as per SJR were European Urology, Journal of Urology, British Journal of Urology International, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, and Nature Reviews Urology. A total of 501 publications were included for analysis. Women comprised 22.1% of first authors and 14.6% of senior authors. The proportion of publications authored by women was significantly higher than would be expected based on population proportions from the AUA 2019 census data for women as both first (P < .0001) and senior author (P =.0005). Similarly, women authorship was significantly higher than expected for basic science (P < .0001), clinical medicine (P <.0001), economics/practice management (P =.0002), editorial (P =.0027), and review/meta-analysis (P <.0001) publications. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates that women contribute to the urologic literature significantly more than would be expected based on the proportion of practicing female urologists. However, with the persistence of gender gap in academic medicine promotions, further research into contributing factors and strategies for improvement are needed to promote greater women representation in academia.

Utility of Frailty Assessment in Urologic Stone Surgery: A Review of the Literature.

Introduction and Objective: As life expectancy continues to rise, the prevalence of frailty is also increasing. The idea of frailty and its effect on the operative patient has been previously studied, but not regularly incorporated into routine practice. We present a review on frailty metrics in the literature, validated assessment methods, and simplified screening tools to better predict and optimize patient outcomes. Methods: An online PubMed search was conducted by three authors (T.A., T.G.R.B., M.M.) for overall frailty, frailty assessment, and preoperative risk assessment. Only English publications were included in the analysis. Full-text analysis was then conducted by all three authors to validate the data. Results: An abundance of literature was found on frailty. Even though some methods are validated as extremely effective for assessing frailty, they may be time-consuming and require a specialist. Various quick screening methods are also presented, many already validated, and should be utilized by urologists more regularly. Conclusions: Multiple studies demonstrate the relationship between frailty and surgical patients' outcome. Many quick, office-based, validated tools to screen for frailty are described, and should be incorporated into our practice in appropriate patients. Future research is now focused on the concept of "prehabilitation" to improve patient frailty status in the preoperative setting, and consequently operative outcomes.

Frailty as predictor of complications in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

INTRODUCTION & OBJECTIVE: Surgical complications are difficult to predict, despite existing tools. Frailty phenotype has shown promise estimating postoperative risk among the elderly. We evaluate the use of frailty as a predictive tool on patients undergoing percutaneous renal surgery. METHODS: Frailty was prospectively analyzed using the Hopkins Frailty Index, consisting of 5 components yielding an additive score: patients categorized not frail, intermediate, or severely frail. Primary outcomes were complications during admission and 30-day complication rate. Secondary outcomes included overall hospital length of stay (LOS) and discharge location. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients recruited, of whom five excluded as they did not need the procedure. A total of 95 patients analyzed; 69, 10, and 16 patients were not frail, intermediate, and severely frail, respectively. There were no differences in blood loss, number of dilations, presence of a staghorn calculus, laterality, or location of dilation. Severely frail patients were likely to be older and have a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score and Charlson comorbidity index. Patients of intermediate or severe frailty were more likely to exhibit postoperative fevers, bacteremia, sepsis, and require ICU admissions (P < 0.05). Frail patients had a longer LOS (P < 0.001) and tended to require skilled assistance when discharge (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty assessment appears useful stratifying those at risk of extended hospitalization, septic complications, and need for assistance following percutaneous renal surgery. Risks of sepsis, bacteremia, and post-operative hemorrhage may be higher in frail individuals. Preoperative assessment of frailty phenotype may give insight into treatment decisions and represent a modifiable marker allowing future trials exploring the concept of "prehabilitation".

Novel Irrigation Protocol for Renal Pelvis Sterilization During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Pilot Study.

While percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) remains the treatment modality of choice for kidney stones larger than 2 cm, infectious complications are most common, ranging from 5% to 32%. We present here a novel technique for potentially improving collecting system sterility during PCNL and initial postoperative outcomes. Retrospective chart analysis data of our irrigation protocol were collected from our first 56 patients between February and July 2019. Traditional prone PCNL was performed in a standard manner using fluoroscopic guidance. Using a ureteral catheter that was placed cystoscopically, a renal pelvis urine culture was taken and subsequently 10 mL of betadine solution was instilled into the collecting system. Gentamicin in normal saline (80 mg/3 L) was utilized as the irrigant fluid for the first 6 L of irrigation. From this cohort, 57% patients were women and mean age was 60 ± 14 years. About 23% of patients were diabetic and 55% were hypertensive. Seventy percent of patients had stone burden >2 cm and no patients had stone burden <1 cm. Fifteen patients had positive urine cultures treated preoperatively, while four patients had contaminated cultures. All patients were treated with our antibiotic irrigation and betadine protocol regardless of preoperative cultures or antibiotics. Mean baseline creatinine level was 0.95 ± 0.41, with a mean change of 0.18 at postoperative day 1. Of the 15 (26%) of 56 patients with a systemic inflammatory response syndrome response (two of following four criteria: white blood cells <4 or >12; heart rate >90; hypothermia <96.8°F or hyperthermia >100.4°F; and respiratory rate >20), only six patients (11%) were febrile and two patients had positive blood cultures (3%). There were no adverse reactions to the betadine or antibiotic irrigation. We present here our initial experience of a new technique for renal pelvis sterilization and its safety and feasibility using intrarenal instillation of betadine and antibiotic irrigation. No Clinical Trial Registration number applicable.

Integrated Real-Time Digital Measurement During Ureteroscopic Procedures for Nephrolithiasis: A Workflow Feasibility Study.

Introduction: Accurate estimation of stone fragment size during ureteroscopic lithotripsy procedures facilitates operative efficiency and predicts the safety of fragment extraction or spontaneous passage. Using a novel stone measurement software application, this study assesses the feasibility of performing integrated real-time digital stone measurement during ureteroscopy. Methods: This workflow feasibility study was conducted in two phases. First, in the ex vivo simulation, mock stone fragments were placed in a renal collecting system training model. A basket extraction task was performed using a digital ureteroscope, with and without digital stone measurement. The time required to perform the tasks was recorded and compared. Second, in the in vivo workflow trial, adult patients undergoing ureteroscopic stone procedures were prospectively enrolled. Intraoperative measurements of stone fragments were performed to determine the time required to complete the measurements. Technical failures and perioperative complications were recorded. Results: In the ex vivo simulation, 20 mock stones mimicking varied fragmentation conditions were tested in the training model. The mean completion time of the basketing task without vs with digital stone measurement was 16.5 seconds (range 10.2-33.7) vs 38.9 seconds (range 27.2-60.0). Mean additional time required to measure stones was 22.3 seconds (range 8.4-42.7). In the in vivo workflow trial, nine patients undergoing ureteroscopy were enrolled. A median of five fragments (range 3-10) were measured in each patient. Mean completion time for each measurement was 10.1 seconds (range 8.2-12.8). Mean total time required to perform digital measurement per procedure was 50.8 seconds (range 25.9-99.0). No technical failures or clinical complications were observed. Conclusions: Integrating real-time digital stone measurement during ureteroscopy is safe and feasible. The findings support clinical trials of digital stone measurement to enhance intraoperative decision-making during ureteroscopy.

Personalized Renal Collecting System Mockup for Procedural Training Under Ultrasound Guidance.

Objective: In recent years, there has been increasing interest in the use of ultrasound guidance for endoscopic and percutaneous procedures. Kidney mockups could be used for training, however, available mockups are normally incompatible with ultrasound imaging. We developed a reproducible method to manufacture an ultrasound-compatible collecting system mockup that can be made at urology laboratories. Methods: Positive and negative molding methods were used. A three-dimensional (3D) digital model of a urinary collecting system and the overlying skin surface were segmented from computed tomography. A containment mold (negative) was made following the shape of the skin surface using 3D printing. A collecting system mold (positive) was also 3D printed, but made of a dissolvable material. The containment mold was filled with a gelatin formula with the collecting system mold submersed in situ within. After the gelatin solidified, a solution was used to dissolve the collecting system mold, but not the gelatin, leaving a cavity with the shape of the collecting system. The gelatin was extracted from the container mockup and the collecting system cavity was filled with water. The mockup was imaged with ultrasound to assess echogenicity and suitability for simulating ultrasound-guided procedures. Results: A clear shape corresponding to the collecting system was observed inside the gel structure. Structural integrity was maintained with no observable manufacturing marks or separation seams. Ultrasound images of the mockup demonstrated clear differentiation at the gelatin/water interface. A mock stone was placed in the collecting system and needle targeted to simulate percutaneous needle access. Conclusion: We developed a simple method to manufacture a personalized mockup of the renal collecting system of a patient that can be used for ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle access. Generic collecting system mockups can be used for training, and patient-specific models can be used to simulate and decide the best access path before a clinical case.

Buyer Beware: Evidence-Based Evaluation of Dietary Supplements for Nephrolithiasis.

Introduction: Numerous dietary supplements claiming to treat or prevent kidney stones have recently been brought to the market. However, the evidence for these claims is not clear. This study assesses the scientific evidence supporting dietary supplements for the treatment and prevention of urinary stone disease. Materials and Methods: Two online marketplaces (Amazon and Google) were queried for dietary supplements available without a prescription to treat, alleviate, or prevent stone disease. Product labels were reviewed to compile stone-related claims and active ingredients. The 30-day cost of treatment and consumer star rating were assessed. MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were queried with labeled ingredients to assess the scientific evidence from published and lay sources. Results: A total of 27 dietary supplements containing 56 ingredients were analyzed. Supplements made a variety of claims, including dissolving stones (12 products, 44%), preventing stone formation (7 products, 26%), and reducing stone symptoms (6 products, 22%). Mean 30-day cost was $32 (range $4-$189). All products were rated highly by consumers (mean 4.2 of 5 stars). Of the 56 ingredients, 9 (16%) had any published studies for use in stone disease, and 5 (9%) had exclusively studies supporting their use. Eighteen scientific publications about the ingredients were identified, of which six showed mixed or no benefit in stone disease. Overall, 18 (67%) supplements contained ingredients with conflicting or absent evidence of benefit. No association was found between product cost or rating and products containing ingredients supported by human or animal studies (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Two-thirds of dietary supplements claiming to treat or prevent kidney stones contain ingredients with conflicting or no scientific evidence to support their claims. Clinicians should counsel stone formers that the effects of most supplements are unknown or unstudied in humans, and that the absence of evidence does not imply absence of potential harm.

Conservative Management of Liver Perforation During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Case Couplet Presentation.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) remains the recommended intervention for large kidney stones, major complications, although rare, are between 1% and 7%. Literature regarding liver injury during PCNL is sparse, and many incidences occur unnoticed. In general, most liver injuries can be treated conservatively when compared with other organ injury sustained during PCNL. Despite this, there is still significant potential for intraperitoneal bleeding as well as possible hemodynamic instability that may result secondary to the inadvertent access. Our team describes two cases of liver injury during PCNL with focus on presentation and injury management. Both cases were treated conservatively through close clinical monitoring and delayed removal of nephrostomy tube. Both liver injuries were diagnosed primarily through postprocedure axial CT imaging. In general, risk factors include supracostal access, particularly at or above the 11th rib, as well as hepatomegaly. Despite that liver injury is a rare complication of right-sided PCNL, outcomes can result in significant blood loss not diagnosed. We present in this study two instances of effective conservative management of liver injury after PCNL.

Management of Splenic Injury During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Report of Two Cases.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has become the standard of care for the removal of kidney stones >2 cm. Major complications, although rare, are between 1% and 7%. Splenic injury during PCNL is rare and can often be managed conservatively, but has the potential to be devastating, necessitating the importance of early diagnosis. Our team describes two cases of splenic injury during PCNL with emphasis on diagnosis and management. Although both cases were managed conservatively through close monitoring and prolonged nephrostomy tube presence, one case had a concurrent pneumothorax. Both cases were diagnosed primarily through postprocedure CT imaging. Risk factors primarily include supracostal access and splenomegaly. Splenic injury is a rare complication that can often be managed conservatively; however, prompt recognition of injury is important. We present in this study two cases of conservative splenic injury management sustained during PCNL.

Management of Colon Perforation During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients with Complex Anatomy: A Case Series.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), first described in 1976, is the gold standard for the management of large kidney stones, with stone-free rates as high as 95% in contemporary literature. Colonic injuries during PCNL are a rare complication with an estimated incidence of 0.3%-0.5%. However, given the high morbidity incurred and the necessity of prompt operative intervention, it is imperative that practitioners have a low suspicion threshold for such injuries, particularly in those patients with altered or complex anatomy. This case series addresses peri- and postoperative outcomes of colon perforation during PCNL in patients with complex anatomy and reviews the technical challenges of surgery with potential methods to avoid injury in the future. Herein we review three instances of colonic injuries and their subsequent management to highlight both the presentation and the optimal management of these rare occurrences.

Infrequent use of clinical trials registries in published systematic reviews in urology.

OBJECTIVE: Validity of systematic reviews may be affected by non-publication of statistically non-significant or unfavorable clinical trial results. One function of clinical trial registries is to make these non-published studies available and thereby reduce potential publication bias. We aim to assess the use of clinical trial registries in published systematic reviews in urology. METHODS: We identified all systematic reviews published in the five highest-impact general urology journals that publish original research between January 1 and December 31, 2017. Full-text analysis was performed to determine if protocols included searching clinical trial registries meeting WHO Registry Network criteria. RESULTS: Of a total of 204 search results, 92 were included in the analysis as systematic reviews. The majority searched the MEDLINE (91, 98%), EMBASE (69, 75%), and Cochrane (49, 53%) databases. Based on published methods, only 16 (17%) systematic reviews searched any clinical trial registries: 14 (15%) ClinicalTrials.gov, 6 (6%) WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and 2 (2%) ISRCTN registry. Rates of searching clinical trial registries were low regardless of the journal: 8 of 34 (24%) in European Urology; 2 of 10 (20%) in BJU International; 3 of 17 (18%) in Urology; 2 of 18 (11%) in The Journal of Urology; and 1 of 13 (8%) in World Journal of Urology. CONCLUSION: The majority of recently published systematic reviews in urology do not routinely search clinical trial registries. Inclusion of these registries can help identify unpublished trial data, which may improve the quality of systematic reviews by reducing publication bias.

Rapid, Efficient Crowdsourcing Using Social Media for the Surgical Management of Nephrolithiasis.

Introduction: The surgical management of nephrolithiasis can be challenging due to multiple appropriate and feasible approaches. One advantage of urologists' increasing social media use is the opportunity for crowdsourcing or aggregating feedback from remote participants. This study assesses the purposes and extent of online crowdsourcing by urologists for surgical stone disease. Methods: Twitter was queried with 22 stone-related keywords during a 60-day study period. All public posts were reviewed to identify crowdsourcing requests by urologists seeking clinical advice or feedback about surgical stone management. Content analysis of the crowdsourcing posts was performed by two reviewers to assess the purposes of and responses to the requests. Results: A total of 399 posts linked to 29 crowdsourcing requests were analyzed. Crowdsourcing requests were answered rapidly; the median time from initial post to final reply by participants was 2 days. In the majority of requests, the author of the initial request posted a follow-up question or clarification, underscoring a bidirectional exchange of ideas. Most crowdsourcing engaged an international audience; requests originated from 27 urologists in 12 countries, and all but one of the 29 requests (97%) received replies from users outside the origin country. Four purposes for crowdsourcing were observed: patient-specific surgical planning (206 posts, 52%); colleagues' experiences with a device or technique (86 posts, 22%); general advice about stone-related concerns (57 posts, 14%); and solutions to complications or quality improvement challenges (50 posts, 12%). Finally, protection of patient privacy appeared to be a concern; among the 17 (59%) crowdsourcing requests that were about individual patients or cases, all included patient-specific images or radiography, but none noted whether patient permission had been obtained. Conclusions: Social media crowdsourcing facilitates a range of general, patient-specific, and quality improvement challenges in surgical stone management. Participants should consider privacy concerns when publicly sharing imaging or patient data.

Expanding the Utilization of Robotic Procedures in Urologic Surgery.

Although the word "robot" was coined in 1921, only close to 70 years later were robotic devices developed to assist during surgery. Urology has always been at the forefront of endoscopic, minimally invasive, and robotic developments in medicine. Robotic prostatectomy signaled the emerging role of robotic surgery in urology, but since then it has been applied to every urologic laparoscopic procedure.