Impact of a geriatric intervention based on the Comprehensive Geriatrics Assessment on avoidable admissions in older patients at risk evaluated in the Emergency Department.

OBJECTIVE: To know the impact of a geriatric intervention based on the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) on avoidable admissions in older patients at risk evaluated in the Emergency Department. METHOD: Prospective observational unicenter study. We included patients, from October 1, 2018 to January 31, 2020, over 75 years who were attended at the Emergency Department with a Triage Risk Screening Tool (TRST) score≥2. All patients were evaluated by a geriatrician through the CGA. The reasons for going to the Emergency room were collected and also the main intervention carried out by Geriatrics, whether admission or discharge was indicated and whether the admission was avoidable. We did a cost analysis calculating this by (bed/day×average stay×number of admissions avoided). RESULTS: We included 260 patients, 66% were women and the mean age was 86 years. 73.5% patients had polypharmacy, the mean Charlson index was 2.5 (5.6). 63.3% were independent for walking and 20.8% independent for basic activities of daily living. 59% had cognitive impairment. 91.5% lived at home. The most frequent reason for visiting the Emergency room was decline of general state in 22% and the most frequent intervention carried out by Geriatrics was assistance in the decision making process in 35.4% followed by referral to a preferential outpatient geriatric care circuit in 32.7%. Other interventions carried out by Geriatrics was assistance in clarifying diagnosis (4.2%), assistance in pharmacological adjustment (8.5%), referral to a standard geriatric care pathway (13.1%), telephone follow-up (4.2%) and/or coordination with Social Services for care planning (11.2%). Including all patients, 29.2% required hospital admission and 70.8% were discharged. 40% admissions were avoided, which meant more than 540 thousand euros saved. CONCLUSIONS: A standardized CGA coordinated by Geriatrics in older patients at risk of suffering adverse events in the Emergency room reduces admissions and costs, so it should therefore be established as a recommendation of good clinical practice.

Impact and characteristics of hospital-acquired influenza over 10 seasons in a third-level university hospital.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the characteristics of patients with nosocomial flu, to compare them with patients with community-acquired influenza to study possible differences and to identify possible risk factors associated with this type of flu. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Observational, cross-sectional and retrospective study of hospitalized patients with a microbiological confirmation of influenza in a third-level university hospital over 10 seasons, from 2009 to 2019. Nosocomial influenza was defined as that infection whose symptoms began 72h after hospital admission, and its incidence, characteristics and consequences were further analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1260 hospitalized patients with a microbiological diagnosis of influenza were included, which 110 (8.7%) were nosocomial. Patients with hospital-acquired influenza were younger (71.74±16.03 years, P=0.044), had a longer hospital stay (24.25±20.25 days, P<0.001), had more frequently a history of chronic pulmonary pathologies (P=0.010), immunodeficiency (P<0.001), and were associated with greater development of bacterial superinfection (P<0.001), respiratory distress (P=0.003), and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) (P<0.001). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the following characteristics were identified as independent risk factors: immunodeficiency (ORa=2.33; 95% CI: 1.47-3.60); ICU admission (ORa=4.29; 95% CI: 2.23-10.91); bacterial superinfection (ORa=1.64; 95% CI: 1.06-2.53) and respiratory distress (ORa=3.88; 95% CI: 1.23-12.23). CONCLUSIONS: Nosocomial influenza is more common in patients with a history of immunodeficiency. In addition, patients with hospital-acquired influenza had an increased risk of bacterial superinfection, admission to the ICU, and development of respiratory distress.

Effect of Remdesivir vs Standard Care on Clinical Status at 11 Days in Patients With Moderate COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Remdesivir demonstrated clinical benefit in a placebo-controlled trial in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but its effect in patients with moderate disease is unknown. Objective: To determine the efficacy of 5 or 10 days of remdesivir treatment compared with standard care on clinical status on day 11 after initiation of treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, open-label trial of hospitalized patients with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and moderate COVID-19 pneumonia (pulmonary infiltrates and room-air oxygen saturation >94%) enrolled from March 15 through April 18, 2020, at 105 hospitals in the United States, Europe, and Asia. The date of final follow-up was May 20, 2020. Interventions: Patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive a 10-day course of remdesivir (n = 197), a 5-day course of remdesivir (n = 199), or standard care (n = 200). Remdesivir was dosed intravenously at 200 mg on day 1 followed by 100 mg/d. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was clinical status on day 11 on a 7-point ordinal scale ranging from death (category 1) to discharged (category 7). Differences between remdesivir treatment groups and standard care were calculated using proportional odds models and expressed as odds ratios. An odds ratio greater than 1 indicates difference in clinical status distribution toward category 7 for the remdesivir group vs the standard care group. Results: Among 596 patients who were randomized, 584 began the study and received remdesivir or continued standard care (median age, 57 [interquartile range, 46-66] years; 227 [39%] women; 56% had cardiovascular disease, 42% hypertension, and 40% diabetes), and 533 (91%) completed the trial. Median length of treatment was 5 days for patients in the 5-day remdesivir group and 6 days for patients in the 10-day remdesivir group. On day 11, patients in the 5-day remdesivir group had statistically significantly higher odds of a better clinical status distribution than those receiving standard care (odds ratio, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.09-2.48; P = .02). The clinical status distribution on day 11 between the 10-day remdesivir and standard care groups was not significantly different (P = .18 by Wilcoxon rank sum test). By day 28, 9 patients had died: 2 (1%) in the 5-day remdesivir group, 3 (2%) in the 10-day remdesivir group, and 4 (2%) in the standard care group. Nausea (10% vs 3%), hypokalemia (6% vs 2%), and headache (5% vs 3%) were more frequent among remdesivir-treated patients compared with standard care. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with moderate COVID-19, those randomized to a 10-day course of remdesivir did not have a statistically significant difference in clinical status compared with standard care at 11 days after initiation of treatment. Patients randomized to a 5-day course of remdesivir had a statistically significant difference in clinical status compared with standard care, but the difference was of uncertain clinical importance. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04292730.

Cost/efficacy analysis of preferred Spanish AIDS study group regimens and the dual therapy with lopinavir/ritonavir plus lamivudine for initial ART in HIV infected adults.

INTRODUCTION: The National AIDS Plan and the Spanish AIDS study group (GESIDA) proposes "preferred regimens" (PR) of antiretroviral treatment (ART) as initial therapy in HIV-infected patients. In 2013, the recommended regimens were all triple therapy regimens. The Gardel Study assessed the efficacy of a dual therapy (DT) combination of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) plus lamivudine (3TC). Our objective is to evaluate the GESIDA PR and the DT regimen LPV/r+3TC cost/efficacy ratios. METHODS: Decision tree models were built. EFFICACY: probability of having viral load <50 copies/mL at week 48. ART regime cost: costs of ART, adverse effects, and drug resistance tests during the first 48 weeks. RESULTS: Cost/efficacy ratios varied between 5,817 and 13,930 euros per responder at 48 weeks, for the DT of LPV/r+3TC and tenofovir DF/emtricitabine+raltegravir, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Taking into account the official Spanish prices of ART, the most efficient regimen was DT of LPV/r+3TC, followed by the triple therapy with non-nucleoside containing regimens.

[Consensus statement on the clinical management of human immunodeficiency virus-associated neurocognitive disorders]. / Documento de consenso sobre el manejo clínico de los trastornos neurocognitivos asociados a la infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (enero 2013).

OBJECTIVE: To develop a consensus document containing clinical recommendations for the management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND). METHODS: We assembled a panel of experts appointed by GeSIDA and the Secretariat of the National AIDS Plan (PNS), including internal medicine physicians with expertise in the field of HIV, neuropsychologists, neurologists and neuroradiologists. Scientific information was reviewed to October 2012 in publications and conference papers. In support of the recommendations using two levels of evidence: the strength of the recommendation in the opinion of the experts (A, B, C) and the level of empirical evidence (I, II, III), two levels based on the criteria of the Infectious Disease Society of America, already used in previous documents GeSIDA/SPNS. RESULTS: Multiple recommendations for the clinical management of these disorders are provided, including two graphics algorithms, considering both the diagnostic and possible therapeutic strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Neurocognitive disorders associated with HIV infection is currently highly prevalent, are associated with a decreased quality of life and daily activities, and given the possibility of occurrence of an increase in the coming years, there is a need to adequately manage these disorders, from a diagnostic as well as therapeutic point of view, and always from a multidisciplinary perspective.

[Controversies and future of the approach to cardiovascular disease in HIV patients]. / Controversias y futuro del abordaje de la enfermedad cardiovascular en pacientes con VIH.

Cardiovascular diseases are an increasing problem in patients with HIV infection. The causes of the increased cardiovascular risk in HIV-infected patients are multifactorial. Currently, the question of which factor has the most weight in this equation - whether traditional risk factors, the virus per se or antiretroviral therapy - remains to be determined. The absolute risk of cardiovascular disease in a particular patient depends on the composite risk profile. At present, there are no data to support a distinct approach to cardiovascular risk evaluation in HIV-infected patients. Cardiovascular risk equations should be incorporated into routine daily clinical assessment in order to identify patients in need of specific interventions.

[Prospective validation of a pharmacogenetic test: the PREDICT-1 study]. / Validación prospectiva de un test farmacogenético: estudio PREDICT-1.

The aim of the PREDICT-1 study was to determine the clinical utility of the pharmacogenetic test identifying HLA-B*5701 to reduce the incidence of hypersensitivity reaction to abacavir, diagnosed clinically and with immunological confirmation, as well as to reduce unwarranted withdrawal of this drug. In the PREDICT-1 study, 1,956 patients were randomized to be screened for HLA-B*5701 before starting abacavir treatment (excluding participants who were HLA-B*5701-positive) or to receive abacavir without knowing their HLA-B*5701 status under conventional clinical monitoring. The prevalence of HLA-B*5701-positivity was 5.7%. In the group that underwent prospective screening, no hypersensitivity tests with immunological confirmation (by positive epicutaneous patch testing) were observed compared with an incidence of 2.7% in the group undergoing standard follow-up. The sensitivity of prospective screening in predicting immunologically confirmed hypersensitivity reaction to abacavir was 100% and its negative predictive value was 100%. The number of clinically suspected hypersensitivity reactions to abacavir was also lower in the screened group (3.4% versus 7.8% in the group undergoing conventional follow-up). The sensitivity of epicutaneous patch testing for immunological confirmation was 100%.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-emtricitabine coformulation for once-daily dual NRTI backbone.

Truvada is the coformulation of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF; 300 mg) and emtricitabine (FTC; 200 mg) in a single tablet, providing the nucleotide backbone for once-daily dosing, as a component of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). TDF (the bioavailable prodrug of tenofovir) is hydrolyzed to tenofovir intracellularly and phosphorylated to the active metabolite, tenofovir diphosphate. Tenofovir is a nucleotide analog of deoxyadenosine monophosphate, with activity against HIV-1, -2 and hepatitis B virus. FTC, the fluorinated derivative of lamivudine, is an analog of deoxycitidine, active against HIV-1, -2 and hepatitis B virus. Their long half-lives in plasma and in peripheral blood mononuclear cells allow once-daily dosing. Both are eliminated renally. Resistance mutation K65R is selected for by tenofovir and confers a two- to fourfold reduced susceptibility to this drug. The incidence of K65R is low (3%) and has not been observed in clinical trials with the concomitant use of tenofovir and FTC. FTC selects for M184V mutation less frequently than lamivudine. Tenofovir drug interactions include increased exposure to didanosine and inferior immune recovery that preclude their concomitant use. Boosted protease inhibitors increase exposure to tenofovir without dose adjustment required. FTC has no significant drug interactions. They are not metabolized by cytochrome P450, which confers little potential for interactions with drugs metabolized by these enzymes. As tenofovir and FTC are renally eliminated, drugs eliminated by tubular secretion must be avoided. Both antiretrovirals, as individual agents and in coadministration have evidenced antiviral potency in clinical trials. Pivotal study 934 evidenced superior efficacy of the combination TDF/FTC/efavirenz (EFV) versus zidovudine/FTC/EFV. The toxicity profile of tenofovir and FTC has been extensively studied. Lipid profile is more favorable with tenofovir than thymidine analog. Tenofovir requires surveillance of glomerular filtration rate and dosing interval adjustment when creatinine clearance is less than 50 ml/min and avoidance less than 30 ml/min. Fat loss is less likely with tenofovir than with thymidine analog. Clinical trials have assessed the performance of the coformulation of TDF and FTC.

[Retrospective epidemiological study on the durability of the treatment of HIV infection or AIDS in Spain]. / Estudio epidemiológico retrospectivo sobre la duración del tratamiento de la infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana en España.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To know the durability of consecutive regimens of antiretroviral treatment is important to design a long-term therapy, but there is not much information about this subject. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Retrospective epidemiological study of a sample of 401 patients who began antiretroviral treatment between January 1997 and April 2000 at ten Spanish hospitals. The duration of each consecutive antiretroviral regimen was calculated and the reasons for modification and discontinuation were described. RESULTS: In the 3 years and 3 months covered by the study, 48.6% of the patients received more than one regimen of therapy. Seventy five of the initial prescribed combinations included protease inhibitors. Median duration of consecutive lines of therapy was decreasing: 560, 360, 330 and 202 days for the first, second, third and fourth regimens, respectively. The main reason to modification was intolerance or toxicity (46.2, 49.1 and 47.1% for the first, second and third modification). A fifth of changes was originated by difficulties to follow the therapy. Virological failure was the reason for modification in 21.8, 24.5 and 26.5% of first, second and third changes. CONCLUSIONS: Duration of consecutive antiretroviral regimens progressively decreases. Intolerance or drug toxicity were the main reasons conditioning the change of treatment.