RESUMEN
Background: Osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal (CMC) is considered a common musculoskeletal disorder. The treatment of carpometacarpal osteoarthritis could be either by conservative or surgical methods. surgical treatment, there are various alternatives, including trapeziectomy and arthroplasty. This study aims to perform a systematic review of the literature to determine the functional outcomes associated with trapeziectomy and arthroplasty in CMC arthritis. Objectives: To determine the functional outcomes associated with trapeziectomy and arthroplasty in CMC arthritis patients. Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and performed on August 2022 by one independent reviewer (author) using PubMed database, EBSCO Host, EMBASE, and ScienceDirect. The literature search will be based on Patients, Intervention, Control, and Outcome (PICO) criteria, as mentioned in the following: Patients with any carpometacarpal arthritis; with the intervention of using carpometacarpal arthroplasty as their method of surgery; control with trapeziectomy and primary outcome of functional outcome. Clinical outcomes using patient-reported outcome measures and complications were included. The quality of the included studies was evaluated with Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tools. Quantitative analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.4. Results: Three studies met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Both treatments resulted in significant improvements in functional scores. When matching patients according to preoperative function, patients receiving arthroplasty had better postoperative function (Quick DASH: trapeziectomy = 25.1, ARPE = 16.8). Conclusion: This study showed that variable results of clinical outcomes improved after trapezeictomy and arthroplasty in patients with CMC arthritis. Evidence showed that arthroplasty allows for a better improvement in functional outcome.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Treatment of choice for posttraumatic arthritis in proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints has remained a controversial subject. There is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal approach and treatment options for PIP joint arthritis. In this study, we report our experience in management of PIP joint arthritis using soft-tissue interpositional arthroplasty. CASE PRESENTATION: A 12-year-old female, right-handed, complains of stiffness on the left ring finger. There was a flexion deformity accompanied by limitation on both active and passive flexion-extension range of motion (ROM) of the PIP joint. Soft tissue interpositional arthroplasty was then performed using middle phalanx periosteum as interpositional material. Postoperative follow-up showed improvement in both active and passive ROM of PIP joint, improvement in joint function, and a good pain relief. Overall, the patient was satisfied with the outcomes of the procedure. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Arthrodesis, implant arthroplasty, and interpositional arthroplasty are the treatments of choice for stiff fingers that are caused by bone problems. In this study, we report a case of PIP joint arthritis treated with interpositional arthroplasty. It was able to provide ROM improvement and good functional results. Periosteum is used as an interposition material because of its in-situ nature thereby reducing donor site related morbidity and postoperative complications. In addition, the use of the periosteum makes this procedure relatively inexpensive and makes it a suitable treatment of choice in limited resources areas. CONCLUSION: Soft tissue interpositional arthroplasty shows promising results as a treatment option for arthritis of PIP joint, especially in limited resource areas.
RESUMEN
Background: Distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability results from the disruption of the triangular fibrocartilaginous complex consisting of DRUJ's primary and secondary stabilizers. The gold standard of stabilization procedure remains ligament reconstruction that utilizes tendon grafts to reanimate the volar and dorsal radioulnar ligament (RUL) as the primary stabilizers of the joint. The palmaris longus (PL) tendon, the graft of choice in reconstructive surgery, is commonly used in DRUJ reconstruction. However, it can exhibit anatomic variations from agenesis to the variation in morphology, location, and attachment that is rarely encountered other than in cadaveric studies. Case Presentation: We present a case of a 14-year-old boy with ulnar-sided wrist pain and instability following an injury in a boxing match four months before admission. The clinical and radiological results suggested a DRUJ injury with extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) tendinitis. A ligament reconstruction using the PL tendon graft was planned. Intraoperatively, the PL was found anomalous with dual distal attachments and a short graft length. Results: We performed Adams ligament reconstruction technique with some modifications to the original design. To overcome the under-sized graft, instead of passing it around the ulnar neck, we added one more bone tunnel on the ulna to enhance the construct stability by a tendon to bone healing. Conclusion: In reconstructive surgeries, surgeons should consider the other sources of grafts as graft variations exist. Otherwise, as in our case, modifications to the standard technique can be made.
