A mimicker of inflammatory breast carcinoma: Lupus mastitis and evolving imaging features.

Rare case of lupus mastitis in a 58-year-old female with discoid lupus erythematosus presented with fever, left breast swelling, and painful palpable lesion. Accurate imaging and histopathologic evaluation allowed for appropriate management and regression of breast findings with hydroxychloroquine treatment, emphasizing the need to avoid unnecessary biopsies and surgeries.

The Performance of Radiographic Criteria for Bone Malignancy When Applied to Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

BACKGROUND: The conventional radiologic features that differentiate benign from malignant bone lesions were originally described using radiography (x-ray [XR]). When evaluating sectional imaging studies such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT), one may apply these principles to identify malignant bone lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performances of these radiographic features for detecting malignity when applied to CT and MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by our institutional ethical board. Thirty-nine patients with histopathologic proof of a high-grade bone malignancy and preoperative imaging data obtained with a minimum of two different modalities were included in the study. Four radiologists reviewed the images and scored the lesions for distinctness of margins, presence and type of periosteal reaction, matrix mineralization, and presence of soft tissue mass. The average score for each modality was then tested for accuracy with regard to the histopathology. RESULTS: When lesion margins were considered, XR was the best modality to detect a high-grade malignancy. MRI, especially postcontrast T1-weighted sequence, was the least helpful in this regard. There was no significant difference between CT and XR and between CT and MRI. When the periosteal reaction was considered, XR was the best modality to detect the malignant type of periosteal reaction. In this regard, MRI and CT were misleading; either by not detecting or undergrading periosteal reaction. MRI was the best modality to detect soft tissue mass. CONCLUSION: Conventional imaging criteria for bone malignancy can be misleading when applied to MRI or CT. When cross-sectional imaging features contradict those from XR, the latter should be the guide for clinical management.

Colitis cystica profunda: MRI appearance.

Colitis cystica profunda (CCP) is an uncommon benign condition characterized by mucin-filled cysts located in the submucosa, frequently associated with the solitary ulcer and rectal prolapse syndromes. The diagnosis of this entity is important as it can mimic rectal cancer and therefore may result in unnecessary surgical resection. Endoscopic examination and barium enema findings are suggestive but not specific, neither are superficial biopsy findings. Transrectal ultrasound is helpful in the diagnosis by imaging the layers of the rectal wall. The authors report a 16-year-old male with a rectal lesion mimicking malignant mass on endoscopic examination. The lesion was defined as CCP, based on MR imaging findings which disclosed multiple noninfiltrating submucosal cysts, confirmed by histopathological examination. To our knowledge, this is the first case of CCP in the radiology literature describing MRI findings.