A Whole-Spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Cross-Sectional Study of the Clinicoradiological Association of Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebra with Degenerative Disc Disease, End Plate Degeneration, Low Back Pain, and Facet Tropism.

OBJECTIVE: To understand lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV)-associated degenerative pathologies and their correlation to low back pain and radicular pain. METHODS: Whole-spine magnetic resonance imaging was evaluated for disc degeneration using Pfirrmann grading, end plate changes using total end plate score (TEPS), and facet tropism in patients with low back pain and radicular pain, and their association with LSTV was analyzed. RESULTS: In group 1, LSTV was seen in 15% of patients with 83% of these patients having sacralization. Disc degeneration was seen in 58%, 51%, and 63% of patients at levels C, B, and A, respectively; patients with sacralization had significant degeneration at all 3 levels. Similarly, the total end plate score and facet tropism were significantly higher in patients with sacralization. Facet tropism was observed in 31%, 40%, and 35% of patients with no -LSTV, patients with sacralization, and patients with lumbarization, respectively. In group 2, LSTV was seen in 17% of patients with sacralization accounting for 82%. Disc degeneration was seen in 44%, 36%, and 54% patients at levels C, B, and A, respectively. No significant difference was observed in the mean total end plate score between groups. Facet tropism was identified in 89% and 81% of patients with sacralization and patients with lumbarization, respectively, compared with only 19% of patients with no LSTV. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low back pain had a higher incidence of sacralization with corresponding disc degeneration, facet tropism ,and end plate changes. In patients with radicular pain, lumbarization was associated only with facet tropism. These findings may aid clinicians in prognostication and patient counseling.

Evaluation of Disc and Endplate Degeneration in AO Type A Fractures Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Disc degeneration after trauma has been the focus of several investigations, although vertebral endplate changes have received comparatively less attention. The main aim of the present study is to radiologically evaluate the prevalence of the degree of degeneration of the adjacent discs and endplates after AO type A thoracolumbar fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 25 patients with an AO type A injury (50 discs and 150 endplates). The type of disc lesion adjacent to the fractured vertebra was classified using the Pfirrmann and Oner classifications immediately after trauma and at the 1-year follow-up. The endplate defects were assessed using the endplate scoring system (total endplate score 1-6) in T1-weighted images. The kyphosis angle and vertebral body height were also measured. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 18 men (72%) and 7 women (28%), with a mean age of 38.9 ± 11.3 years. Overall, 28% of the fractures were type A1, 4% were type A2, 24% were type A3, and 44% were type A4. On statistical analysis, a significant change was found in the degree of degeneration in the cranial adjacent disc using both the Oner (P = 0.004) and Pfirrmann (P = 0.001) classifications at the end of 1 year. The morphological changes at the cranial adjacent discs at 1 year of follow-up showed a strong positive correlation with superior endplate degeneration. CONCLUSIONS: The results from the present study indicate that endplate fractures of vertebrae in patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures can cause disc degeneration, especially at the cranial endplate.

Propensity matched outcome analysis following microdiscectomy versus interlaminar endoscopic discectomy for L5-S1 disc herniation.

Purpose: The main purpose of the study is to perform a propensity-matched functional outcome analysis following microdiscectomy (MD) versus interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD) for L5-S1 disc herniation. Although many studies have compared endoscopic lumbar discectomy and microdiscectomy, few have compared the outcomes of microdiscectomy (MD) and interlaminar endoscopic discectomy (IELD) at the L5-S1 level. Methods: This is a propensity-matched analysis of 100 patients (50 MD patients, 50 IELD patients) based on baseline covariates with a minimum of one-year follow-up. Patient-reported outcome measures were obtained from EMR during follow-up visits. Back pain and sciatic pain were assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS-B and VAS-L). Functional outcome was assessed using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Score and 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) score. Data were obtained at baseline (pre-op) and at 0, 1, 3, and 12 months post-operatively. Results: Mean operative time was significantly lower (p < 0.001) in the IELD group (44 min) compared to the MD group (59 min). Mean VAS-B at the immediate and 1-month postoperative period was significantly (p < 0.001) lower in the IELD group (0.36, 0.24) when compared with the MD group (1.74, 1.16). There was no significant difference between IELD and MD groups with regard to improvement in sciatic pain (VAS-L). ODI scores at 1 month and 3 months post-operative period were significantly (p < 0.001) lower in the IELD group (30.1, 23.2) when compared with the MD group (41, 27.5). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups with regards to VAS-B, ODI, and SF-12 at 1-year follow-up. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that the IELD group achieved better immediate and early postoperative outcomes despite no significant difference at one-year follow-up.

Giant Anomalous Cervical Spinous Process Causing Dynamic Cord Compression: An Unusual Cause for Myelopathy: A Case Report.

CASE: A 47-year-old male patient presented with progressively worsening gait instability caused by a giant anomalous, free-floating C5 spinous process resulting in dynamic cord compression and myelopathy. The patient was successfully managed with a C5 laminectomy and total excision of the anomalous spinous process with a good functional outcome at the final follow-up. CONCLUSION: Anomalies of the posterior arch of the subaxial cervical spine are relatively uncommon and asymptomatic. This case is being reported for its rarity and to highlight the role of dynamic imaging in patients presenting with congenital anomalies of the cervical spine presenting with compressive myelopathy.