Correlation between urinary fractionated metanephrines in 24-hour and spot urine samples for evaluating the therapeutic effect of metyrosine: a subanalysis of a multicenter, open-label phase I/II study.

We recently conducted an open-label phase I/II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative and chronic treatment with metyrosine (an inhibitor of catecholamine synthesis) in pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL) in Japan. We compared creatinine-corrected metanephrine fractions in spot urine and 24-hour urine samples (the current standard for the screening and diagnosis of PPGLs) from 16 patients to assess the therapeutic effect of metyrosine. Percent changes from baseline in urinary metanephrine (uMN) or normetanephrine (uNMN) were compared between spot and 24-hour urine samples. Mean percent changes in uMN or uNMN in spot and 24-hour urine were -26.36% and -29.27%, respectively. The difference in the percent change from baseline between uMN or uNMN in spot and 24-hour urine was small (-2.90%). The correlation coefficient was 0.87 for percent changes from baseline between uMN or uNMN measured in spot and 24-hour urine. The area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve of uMN or uNMN measured in spot urine vs. 24-hour urine (reference standard) to assess the efficacy of metyrosine treatment was 0.93. Correlations and ROCs between 24-hour urinary vanillylmandelic acid, adrenaline, and noradrenaline and 24-hour uMN or uNMN were similar to those between spot uMN or uNMN and 24-hour uMN or uNMN. No large difference was observed between spot and 24-hour urine for the assessment of metyrosine treatment by quantifying uMN or uNMN in Japanese patients with PPGLs. These results suggest that spot urine samples may be useful in assessing the therapeutic effect of metyrosine.

Nivolumab alone or in combination with cisplatin plus gemcitabine in Japanese patients with unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer: a non-randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 1 study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the safety and tolerability of the immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab, as monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy, in Japanese patients with biliary tract cancer. METHODS: This multicentre, open-label, phase 1 trial was done at four cancer centres in Japan. Eligible patients were aged 20-79 years, had biliary tract adenocarcinoma (intrahepatic bile duct cancer, extrahepatic bile duct cancer, gallbladder cancer, or ampullary cancer), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1, adequate hepatic, renal, and haematological function, and tumour tissue samples for PD-L1 expression analysis. Patients with unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer that was refractory or intolerant to gemcitabine-based treatment regimens received nivolumab monotherapy (240 mg every 2 weeks [monotherapy cohort]). Chemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer received nivolumab (240 mg every 2 weeks) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2) plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) chemotherapy (combined therapy cohort). The primary objective was to assess tolerability and safety. The primary objective was assessed in the safety population of all patients who had received at least one dose of nivolumab. This study is registered with www.clinicaltrials.jp, number JapicCTI-153098, and follow-up is ongoing. FINDINGS: 30 patients were enrolled into each cohort between Jan 13, 2016, and April 19, 2017. Data cutoff was Aug 31, 2017. In the monotherapy cohort, the most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events were decreased appetite (five [17%]), malaise (four [13%]), and pruritus (four [13%]). Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported by three (10%) patients (rash, maculopapular rash, and amylase increase) and treatment-related serious adverse events were reported by one (3%) patient (pleurisy). In the combined therapy cohort, the most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events were neutrophil count decrease (any grade 25 [83%]; grade 3-4 in 23 [77%] patients) and platelet count decrease (any grade 25 [83%] of 30; grade 3-4 in 15 [50%] patients). Six (20%) patients reported 11 treatment-related serious adverse events (platelet count decrease [three patients], febrile neutropenia [two patients], neutrophil count decrease, anaemia, anaphylactic reaction, decreased appetite, pyrexia, and myocarditis [one patient each]). In the monotherapy cohort, median overall survival was 5·2 months (90% CI 4·5-8·7), median progression-free survival was 1·4 months (90% CI 1·4-1·4), and one of 30 patients had an objective response. In the combined therapy cohort, median overall survival was 15·4 months (90% CI 11·8-not estimable), median progression-free survival was 4·2 months (90% CI 2·8-5·6), and 11 of 30 patients had an objective response. INTERPRETATION: Nivolumab had a manageable safety profile and signs of clinical activity in patients with unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer. This initial assessment of nivolumab for the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer provides supportive evidence for future larger randomised studies of nivolumab in this difficult to treat cancer. FUNDING: Ono Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Bristol-Myers Squibb Inc.

Efficacy and safety of nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab in Japanese patients with advanced melanoma: An open-label, single-arm, multicentre phase II study.

AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab in treatment-naïve Japanese patients with advanced melanoma. METHODS: In this multicentre, single-arm study, treatment-naïve Japanese patients with unresectable stage III/IV or recurrent melanoma received nivolumab (1 mg/kg) plus ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by biweekly doses of nivolumab (3 mg/kg). The primary end-point was centrally assessed objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end-points included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate and safety. RESULTS: The subtypes of the thirty patients enrolled were: 12, mucosal; eight, non-acral cutaneous; seven, acral; two, uveal and one, unknown primary melanoma. The ORR was 43.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 25.5, 62.6) with central and local assessment. The centrally and locally assessed disease control rate (95% CI) were 73.3% (54.1, 87.7) and 86.7% (69.3, 96.2), respectively. At the median follow-up period of 14.1 months (range 5.2-27.7), median OS and centrally assessed PFS were not reached. OS (95% CI) at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months was 93.3% (75.9, 98.3), 83.3% (64.5, 92.7), 72.9% (50.0, 86.5) and 65.6% (40.4, 82.2), respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in all patients. Grade III-IV and serious AEs occurred, mostly during the combination phase, in 23 (76.7%) and 20 (66.7%) patients, respectively. No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in treatment-naïve Japanese patients with advanced melanoma including rare subtypes. Incidence rates for grade III-IV AEs were high but manageable with appropriate medical attention and treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: JapicCTI-152869.