Predictors of extended length of stay following outpatient reduction mammaplasty.

PURPOSE: Reduction mammaplasty has transitioned into a largely outpatient procedure in the United States. Following planned outpatient procedures, patients may still be admitted for additional inpatient care, incurring clinical and economic burden. Prior literature has not explored the preoperative and perioperative determinants of extended lengths of stay (LOS) after breast reduction surgery. METHODS: Patients who underwent scheduled outpatient reduction mammaplasty were identified via current procedural terminology code from the 2013 to 2021 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program databases. The primary outcome was extended LOS, defined as an LOS greater than 1 day. The most significant predictor variables were identified through bivariate association, and a binary logistic regression model was used to characterize predictive associations (p < 0.05). RESULTS: In this study, 33,924 patients were included in the final cohort of planned outpatient reduction mammaplasty cases. Among them 325 (1.0%) patients had extended LOS. Concurrent liposuction, body contouring, and increased operative time were the most significant predictors of extended LOS (p < 0.001), followed by older age, higher body mass index, bleeding disorder, history of diabetes, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and White race (p < 0.05). When adjusted for other confounding variables, extended LOS was also a significant predictor of increased risk of postoperative complications after discharge (OR: 1.85, 95% confidence intervals: 1.27-2.69, p = 0.0012). CONCLUSION: Extended LOS after planned outpatient reduction mammaplasty is associated with specific comorbidities, and is a significant predictor of postoperative complications following hospital discharge. DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT: The data that support the findings of this study are publicly available.

Use of Absorbable Dermal Staples in Bilateral Breast Reduction Surgery: Effects on Operative Times, Surgical Outcomes, and Procedure Charges.

BACKGROUND: Use of the absorbable deep dermal stapler in wound closure has become more common in plastic surgery because of its possible reduction in operative times and subsequent decrease in operative room costs. In this study, we examine the effects of this stapler on operative times and postoperative complications in bilateral reduction mammaplasties. METHODS: A retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted via electronic chart review on patients who underwent bilateral reduction mammaplasties. Patients were stratified by wound closure method. One group was closed with sutures only, and in the other group, deep dermal staples were used during closure of the inframammary fold incision. Incidences of patient comorbidities and postoperative complications were compared. In addition, a financial cost analysis was performed. RESULTS: The final patient cohort included 62 patients. Operative time was reduced by an average of 21.8 minutes when using deep dermal staples during closure, compared with when closing solely with sutures (P = 0.032). When controlling for mass of breast tissue removed and type of pedicle, deep dermal staple closure still predicted a reduction of 26.5 (SE, 9.9) minutes in operative time (P = 0.010). Postoperative complications were not affected by wound closure method (odds ratio, 4.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-31.7, P = 0.087). Though not statistically significant, financial charge was decreased with usage of deep dermal staples (P = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: Use of absorbable deep dermal staples produces a significant decrease in operative time for reduction mammaplasties with no increase in postoperative complication rates.

Impact of Sociodemographic and Hospital Factors on Inpatient Bilateral Reduction Mammaplasty: A National Inpatient Sample Analysis.

Background: Although reduction mammaplasty remains a common procedure in plastic surgery, its interaction with sociodemographic and economic disparities has remained relatively uncharacterized on a nationwide scale. Methods: Patients who underwent reduction mammaplasty were identified within the 2016-2018 National Inpatient Sample databases. In addition to clinical comorbidities, sociodemographic characteristics, hospital-level variables, and postoperative outcomes of each patient were collected for analysis. Statistical analyses, including univariate comparison and multivariate logistic regression, were applied to the cohort to determine significant predictors of adverse outcomes, described as extended length of stay, higher financial cost, and postoperative complications. Results: The final patient cohort included 414 patients who underwent inpatient reduction mammaplasty. The average age was 45.2 ±â€…14.5 years. The average length of stay was 1.6 ±â€…1.5 days, and the average hospital charge was $53,873.81 ± $36,014.50. Sixty (14.5%) patients experienced at least one postoperative complication. Black race and treatment within a nonmetropolitan or rural county predicted postoperative complications (P < 0.01). Black race, lower relative income, and concurrent abdominal contouring procedures also predicted occurrence of extended length of stay (P < 0.01). Hospital factors, including larger bed capacity and for-profit ownership, predicted high hospital charges (P < 0.05). Severity of comorbidities, measured by a clinical index, also predicted all three outcomes (P < 0.001). Conclusion: In addition to well-described clinical variables, multiple sociodemographic and economic disparities affect outcomes in inpatient reduction mammaplasty.

Flap management following orthotopic heart transplantation: A single institution's review of 66 sternal wound complications.

BACKGROUND: Sternotomy wound complications are more frequent after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) compared to other cardiac surgeries, primarily due to additional risk factors, including immunosuppression. Flap closure often becomes necessary for definitive treatment, although there is a scarcity of data on the outcomes of sternal wound reconstruction in this specific population. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 604 sternal wound reconstructions performed by a single surgeon between 1996 and 2023. Inclusion criteria comprised patients who underwent OHT as their primary cardiac procedure. Surgical interventions involved sternal hardware removal, debridement, and muscle flap closure. RESULTS: The study included 66 patients, with culture-positive wound infection being the most common indication for reconstruction (51.5%). The median duration between transplantation and sternal wound reconstruction was 25 days. Bilateral pectoralis major myocutaneous advancement flaps (n = 63), rectus abdominis flaps (n = 2), or pectoralis major turnover flaps (n = 1) were used. Intraoperative wound cultures revealed positivity in 48 patients (72.7%), with Staphylococcus epidermidis being the most frequently cultured organism (25.0%). The overall complication rate was 31.8%, and two patient deaths were related to sternal wounds, resulting from multiorgan failure following septic shock. The majority of the patients reported excellent long-term functional and esthetic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Sternal wounds following OHT pose a significant morbidity risk. Our strategy focuses on immediate and aggressive antibiotic therapy, thorough debridement, and definitive closure with bilateral pectoralis myocutaneous advancement flaps. This approach has demonstrated complication and mortality rates comparable to the general cardiac surgery population, as well as excellent functional and esthetic results.

Are Patients with Syndromic Craniosynostosis at Greater Risk for Epilepsy than Patients with Nonsyndromic Craniosynostosis?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether patients with syndromic craniosynostosis (SCS) are at increased risk for epilepsy relative to patients with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis (NSCS). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was completed using the Kids' Inpatient Database (KID). All patients diagnosed with craniosynostosis (CS) were included. The primary predictor variable was study grouping (SCS vs. NSCS). The primary outcome variable was a diagnosis of epilepsy. Descriptive statistics, univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify independent risk factors for epilepsy. RESULTS: The final study sample included a total of 10,089 patients (mean age, 1.78 years ± 3.70; 37.7% female). 9278 patients (92.0%) had NSCS, and the remaining 811 patients (8.0%) had SCS. A total of 577 patients (5.7%) had epilepsy. Not controlling for other variables, patients with SCS were at increased risk for epilepsy relative to patients with NSCS (OR 2.1, P < 0.001). After controlling for all significant variables, patients with SCS were no longer at increased risk for epilepsy relative to patients with NSCS (OR 0.73, P = 0.063). Hydrocephalus, Chiari malformation (CM), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), atrial septal defect (ASD), gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) were all independent risk factors (P < 0.05) for epilepsy. CONCLUSIONS: Syndromic craniosynostosis (SCS) in itself is not a risk factor for epilepsy relative to NSCS. The greater prevalence of hydrocephalus, CM, OSA, ASD, and GERD, all of which were risk factors for epilepsy, in patients with SCS relative to patients with NSCS likely explains the greater prevalence of epilepsy in SCS relative to NSCS.

Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: Weighing the risks of delayed chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormonal therapy.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with unilateral breast cancer opt for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) at the time of therapeutic mastectomy (immediate CPM) or following completion of adjuvant therapy. Studies show that immediate CPM increases the risk of surgical complications related to unilateral mastectomy (UM) alone, which may lead to delays in adjuvant therapy initiation. However, it is unclear if these complications cause clinically significant delays in initiating adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or hormonal therapy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients with breast cancer who underwent immediate CPM versus UM alone at Columbia University Medical Center from January 2000 to December 2020. Patient demographic and oncologic characteristics; complications; and timing of adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and/or hormonal therapy relative to therapeutic mastectomy were collected. RESULTS: In this study, 239 UM alone patients were propensity score matched to 239 immediate CPM patients. No significant difference in complication rates was found between the index and contralateral breasts in CPM patients. A similar percentage of CPM and UM patients experienced postoperative complications (19% vs. 17%, p = 0.64). No significant difference in time to adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or hormonal therapy was found between CPM patients with complications and all CPM patients or all UM patients. CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of clear guidance for clinical decision-making regarding timing of CPM relative to adjuvant therapy. Our study suggests that immediate CPM does not significantly increase the risks of postoperative complications or complication-related delays in the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or hormonal therapy. This information may help patients and providers to plan, select, and schedule breast cancer treatment options.

The impact of a shadowing program on medical students' interest in plastic surgery.

Given the lack of formal education on plastic surgery services during the preclinical years of medical school, many medical students commonly misunderstand the breadth and depth of the field. Shadowing is highly impactful in shaping students' desire to pursue surgery, but the impact of plastic surgery shadowing remains unexplored. The study design utilized an anonymous web-based survey containing questions surrounding prior interest in surgery, race, gender, medical school progress, and clinical versus OR shadowing. All medical students who participated in an ongoing, voluntary plastic surgery shadowing program over a two-year period were invited to complete the survey. Of the 54 students who shadowed during the study period, 43 (79.6%) returned the survey. Students reported an overall greater impact of OR shadowing than clinic shadowing on their interest in plastic surgery, approaching significance (p = 0.0527). On simple and multivariate regression, the number of times a student shadowed in the OR was the only statistically significant predictor of students' interest in plastic surgery (p = 0.0003). In general, the majority of students reported that their shadowing experience "significantly increased" (24.2%) or "somewhat increased" (45.5%) their interest in pursuing a career in plastic surgery. The impact of shadowing, particularly in the operating room, on students' interest in plastic surgery demonstrates the value of structured shadowing programs. Additionally, given the particularly influential effect of shadowing in the operating room, our results indicate that efforts may benefit most from facilitating student exposure to the hands-on aspects of the field.

A Review of 559 Sternal Wound Reconstructions at a Single Institution: Indications and Outcomes for Combining an Omental Flap With Bilateral Pectoralis Major Flaps in a Subset of 17 Patients With Infections Extending Into the Deep Mediastinum.

BACKGROUND: Sternal wound infection (SWI) and dehiscence after median sternotomy for cardiac surgery remain challenging clinical problems with high morbidity. Bilateral pectoralis major myocutaneous flaps are excellent for most sternal wounds but do not reach deeper mediastinal recesses. The omental flap may be a useful adjunct for addressing these deeper mediastinal infections. METHODS: Records of 598 sternal wound reconstructions performed by a single surgeon (J.A.A.) from 1996 to 2022 were reviewed. At the time of surgery, patients underwent sternal hardware removal, debridement, and closure with bilateral pectoralis major myocutaneous flaps. Pedicled omental flaps were also mobilized when additional vascularized tissue was required within the deeper mediastinum. RESULTS: Complete data were available for 559 sternal wound reconstructions performed by the senior author during this period. Bilateral pectoralis and omental flaps were mobilized in 17 of 559 (3.04%) patients. Common indications for initial cardiac surgery included repair or replacement of diseased aortic roots (9/17; 52.94%), aortic valves (8/17; 47.06%), and mitral valves (6/17; 35.29). Mean American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 3.56. Preoperative morbidity included culture-positive wound infection (12/17; 70.59%), dehiscence (15/17; 88.24%), wound drainage (11/17; 64.71%), and inability to close the chest after the original sternotomy because of hemodynamic instability (6/17; 35.29%). Intraoperative deep mediastinal or bone cultures were positive in 8 of 17 (47.06%) patients. Postoperative complications included partial dehiscence (2/17; 11.76%), skin edge necrosis (1/17; 5.88%), seroma (1/17; 5.88%), abdominal hernia (1/17; 5.88%), and recurrent infection (2/17; 11.76%). Three patients (17.65%) died within 30 days of the reconstruction surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing combined pectoralis major and omental flap closure frequently had a history of aortic root and valve disease, and other significant preoperative morbidities. However, postoperative complication rates after combined flap closure were relatively low. Combined pectoralis major and omental flap reconstruction thus appears to be an effective intervention in patients with sternal wounds extending into the deep mediastinum.

Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventive Healing Approach for the Primary Prevention of Lymphedema: A 4-Year Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) remains the leading cause of lymphedema nationally, and there is still no cure for the disease. The lymphatic microsurgical preventive healing approach (LYMPHA) is a promising option for lymphedema prophylaxis in patients undergoing ALND, but long-term outcomes of the LYMPHA are not well established. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing ALND at their center from November of 2012 to November of 2016 and assembled two cohorts, those who received the LYMPHA and those who did not (non-LYMPHA). Patient data were collected to evaluate lymphedema risk and long-term lymphedema incidence of each group. RESULTS: Forty-five women were included in both our LYMPHA and non-LYMPHA cohorts. Mean body mass index (27.7 kg/m2 versus 29.9 kg/m2; P = 0.15) and radiation therapy rates (60.0% versus 68.9%; P = 0.51) did not differ between groups. Non-LYMPHA patients underwent complete mastectomy more frequently than LYMPHA patients (97.8% versus 77.8%; P = 0.007), but had a similar number of nodes removed during ALND (14.4 versus 15.8; P = 0.32). Median follow-up time was greater than 4 years for both LYMPHA and non-LYMPHA groups (57.0 months versus 63.0 months; P = 0.07). Overall, lymphedema incidence was 31.1% in the LYMPHA group and 33.3% in the non-LYMPHA group (P > 0.99). No significant differences in lymphedema incidences were observed between the LYMPHA and non-LYMPHA groups for patients with obesity, patients who received radiation therapy, or patients with obesity who also received radiation therapy (P > 0.05 for all subgroups). CONCLUSIONS: The LYMPHA may not prevent lymphedema long-term in patients who undergo ALND. More long-term studies are needed to determine the true potential of the procedure. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

An Analysis of 400 Sternal Wound Reconstructions at a Single Institution: Bacterial Pathogens Vary With Time.

BACKGROUND: Sternal wound (SW) infection and dehiscence after median sternotomy from cardiac surgery remain challenging complications with high morbidity. Knowledge of common pathogen types and variance with time from cardiac surgery can simplify the choice of antibiotics while awaiting definitive culture results. METHODS: Records of 505 patients undergoing SW reconstruction by the senior author from 1996 to 2018 at a high-volume cardiac surgery center were reviewed. The most common indications for reconstruction were SW infection and dehiscence. At surgery, all patients underwent removal of sternal hardware, thorough debridement, and closure with bilateral pectoralis major myocutaneous advancement flaps. Deep tissue and bone cultures were sent in nearly all cases. Patients were split into group 1 or group 2 based on timing of flap reconstruction after initial cardiac surgery: 0 to 30 days and longer than 30 days, respectively. RESULTS: Complete data were available for 400 SW procedures performed during this period. Group 1 included 203 patients, and group 2 had 197 patients, with a mean time to SW surgery of 16.3 and 138.1 days, respectively. Intraoperative cultures were positive in 147 of 203 (72.4%), and 122 of 197 (61.9%) patients, respectively. Forty-four patients grew polymicrobial cultures. There was a significant difference in culture positivity rates in the 2 groups (P = 0.0004). The most common bacteria cultured in group 1 was Staphylococcus epidermidis (54 of 203 vs 21 of 197; P < 0.0001), whereas methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus was most common in group 2 (15 of 203 vs 22 of 197; P = 0.23). Methicillin-resistant S. aureus was relatively common in both groups (17 of 203 vs 21 of 197; P = 0.50). Although not statistically significant, Pseudomonas, Klebsiella, and Candida were all found in a higher percentage of patients in group 2 (p = 0.11, 0.20, 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: Microbial species cultured in SW flap reconstruction vary over time. Staphylococcus epidermidis is the most common infectious agent in patients having reconstruction within 30 days of cardiac surgery, whereas methicillin-sensitive S. aureus is most common after 30 days. The trend toward a higher incidence of Gram-negative and fungal organisms after 30 days may indicate a need for broader initial anti-infective coverage in this patient group. Awareness of these pathogen patterns can better inform antibiotic selection while awaiting culture data.

What Are the Risk Factors for Epilepsy Among Patients With Craniosynostosis?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the risk factors for epilepsy among patients with craniosynostosis. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study that was completed with the Kids' Inpatient Database. All patients diagnosed with craniosynostosis between the years 2000 and 2012 were included. The primary predictor variables were obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), hydrocephalus, brain compression (BC), cerebral edema, papilledema, dolichocephaly, and plagiocephaly. The outcome variable was epilepsy. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine odds ratios (ORs) for the outcome (epilepsy). RESULTS: Our final sample had 4,709 patients with craniosynostosis, of whom 244 patients exhibited epilepsy (5.2%). The mean age of the patients was 1.43 years (range: 0-20). Relative to Asian patients, Black patients were 4 times more likely to have epilepsy (P < .05). Relative to patients in fringe counties of metro areas with a population of at least 1 million, patients in metro areas of 50,000 to 249,999 population were almost 2 times more likely to have epilepsy (P < .01). Hydrocephalus (OR, 6.6; P < .001), BC (OR, 2.4; P < .01), and OSA (OR, 3.0; P < .001) were independent risk factors for epilepsy among our sample of patients with craniosynostosis. CONCLUSIONS: Hydrocephalus, OSA, and BC increase the risk of epilepsy in patients with craniosynostosis. Black patients with craniosynostosis are also at increased risk for epilepsy. With regard to location, patients in areas with a population of 50,000 to 250,000 were at increased risk for epilepsy.

Dislodgement of tissue expander ports in a patient without trauma or MRI history.

Tissue expansion is involved in the majority of breast reconstruction procedures in the United States. We describe a case of a 56-year-old woman who was found to have bilateral dislodged magnetic ports in her breast tissue expanders at her surgery to replace the expanders with permanent implants. An awareness that this can occur would be helpful for all plastic surgeons who perform breast reconstruction.

Open Repair Versus Closed Repair: A Cost-Analysis of the Two Surgical Approaches for the Treatment of Craniosynostoses.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to quantify the hospitalization charges of the 2 general surgical approaches in the treatment of craniosynostosis and determine if there was a significant difference between the 2. Several studies compared them side-by-side according to specific variables, such as success rates, postoperative complications, blood loss, and length of stay, but were limited by small sample sizes. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study that was conducted using the Kids' Inpatient Database (KID). All patients diagnosed with craniosynostosis (Q75.0) were identified. The procedures were grouped according to the approach taken, whether it was a traditional, open approach, or a closed, minimally invasive approach. The primary predictor variable was the surgical approach (open vs closed). The outcome variables were the hospital charges (US dollars) and length of stay (days). Statistical analyses were based on the univariate and multivariate linear regression models, and P value less than .05 marked the significance level. RESULTS: Among a sample of 2,585 cases, an open approach was employed in 2,353 cases and a closed approach in 232 cases. Race, payer information, hospital region, admission status (elective vs not elective), patient location, and surgical approach (open vs closed) were all significant predictors (P < .15) of increased hospitalization charges. Relative to white patients, being in the 'other' racial class added $10,987 in hospital charges (P < .05). Relative to the Northeast, being a patient in the West added $33,459 in hospital charges (P < .01). Not being admitted electively added $72,572 (P < .01) relative to elective admissions. Finally, open repair added $59,539 (P < .01) in charges relative to closed repair. CONCLUSIONS: The traditional open approach added nearly $60,000 to the cost of the procedure when compared with the closed, endoscopic approach. The scope and invasiveness of the open approach demand greater surgical services, hospital services, supplies, and equipment, ultimately contributing to this increased cost.

An Outcomes Review of 330 Sternal Wound Reconstructions: Timing of Closure Does Make a Difference.

BACKGROUND: Sternal wound infection and dehiscence following cardiac surgery remain difficult clinical problems with high morbidity. Older classification systems regarding timing to reconstruction do not take into account recent improvements in critical care, wound vacuum-assisted closure use, or next-generation antibiotic therapies, which may prolong time to reconstruction. METHODS: Records of patients undergoing sternal wound reconstruction performed by the senior author (J.A.A.) from 1996 to 2018 at a high-volume cardiac surgery center were reviewed. Indications included sternal wound infection or dehiscence. All patients underwent single-stage removal of hardware, débridement, and flap closure. Patients were divided into two groups based on timing of wound closure after cardiac surgery: less than 30 days or greater than or equal to 30 days. RESULTS: Of the 505 patients identified during the study period, 330 had sufficient data for analysis. Mean time to sternal wound surgery was 15.7 days in the early group compared to 64.4 days (p < 0.01) beyond 30 days. Postdébridement cultures were positive in 72 percent versus 62.5 percent of patients (p = 0.11), whereas rates of postoperative infection were significantly higher in the delayed group: 1.9 percent versus 9.5 percent (p < 0.01). Partial wound dehiscence rates were also higher after 30 days (1.9 percent versus 11.3 percent; p < 0.01), whereas total length of stay was decreased. Use of wound vacuum-assisted closure was significantly associated with reconstruction beyond 30 days (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Although performing sternal wound reconstruction more than 30 days after initial cardiac surgery was associated with a shorter overall hospital length of stay and higher extubation rates in the operating room, these patients also had elevated postoperative infection and wound complication rates. The authors thus recommend not delaying definitive surgical reconstruction when possible. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Primary Cleft Rhinoplasty: Long-Term Outcomes of a Single Technique Used Over 2 Decades.

BACKGROUND: Primary cleft rhinoplasty has become widely accepted owing to evidence of improved outcomes and need for fewer revisions. Several techniques have been described, but few surgeons have reported long-term outcomes of repairs performed via a single method. The present study examines long-term outcomes of a single surgeon's experience over 22 years using the same primary cleft rhinoplasty technique. METHODS: All consecutive cases of primary cleft rhinoplasty performed by the senior author at the time of unilateral cleft lip repair from 1996 to 2018 were selected for retrospective review. Patients older than 3 years or lacking documented follow-up were excluded. The primary outcome was the need for secondary rhinoplasty at age 15 years or later. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients met inclusion criteria. Median follow-up time was 7.52 years (interquartile range, 1.38-14.82). Twelve patients required minor long-term lip revision. No school-aged patients required additional correction of the nasal deformity before beginning school. Fifteen patients had follow-up beyond 14 years of age, 5 of whom had undergone definitive rhinoplasties as adolescents (8.9% of cohort; 33.3% of patients with follow-up beyond 14 years). Of the remaining 10 patients older than 14 years at last follow-up, none were seeking additional rhinoplasty. CONCLUSIONS: This series represents one of the longest-running published experiences of primary cleft rhinoplasty. Using a technique that requires no nasal incisions, the senior author has had excellent long-term results, with no need for any elementary school age rhinoplasties and with the majority of patients with follow-up older than 14 years not requiring a rhinoplasty in adolescence.

Is It Worth the Risk? Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy With Immediate Bilateral Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of women are choosing to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy with immediate bilateral breast reconstruction. Operating on the contralateral noncancer side is not without its own set of risks. We sought to compare complication rates between the cancerous and contralateral prophylactic breasts. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients undergoing immediate postmastectomy bilateral breast reconstruction for unilateral breast cancer between January 2008 and January 2019 at a single institution. Data were collected on patient demographics, cancer and adjuvant/neoadjuvant treatments, tumor, reconstruction, hospital stay, and complications. Complications were compared between the cancerous and the noncancerous breasts. RESULTS: One hundred sixty patients met the inclusion criteria of this study. Of these 160 patients, 33 (20.6%) had complications (major and minor) only to the cancerous breast, 7 (4.4%) had complications only to the noncancerous breast, and 7 (4.4%) had bilateral complications. Most patients underwent tissue expander/implant reconstruction (93.8%) with the rest (6.2%) undergoing abdominally based flap or latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction. Patients with complications were more likely to have hypertension, diabetes, exposure to radiation, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Complications included wound dehiscence, hematoma, cellulitis, seroma, capsular contracture, infected implant, and skin necrosis. Overall, there were significantly more complications to the cancerous breasts than the noncancerous breasts (P < 0.001). In addition, although exposure to radiation to the affected side significantly increased the likelihood of complications to that side (P < 0.0001), patients who were not exposed to any radiation were also more likely to have complications to the cancer side than to the noncancer side (P = 0.00065). However, after controlling for the effects of radiation, there was no significant difference in complications between the cancer side and the prophylactic side when stratifying by specific complications. CONCLUSIONS: Although contralateral prophylactic mastectomy with immediate bilateral reconstruction is not without added risk when compared with a unilateral procedure, this study shows that the incidence of complications to the noncancerous breast is less than that to the cancerous breast. This information can be used to help counsel patients with unilateral breast cancer on their treatment options and associated risks.

Extraocular sebaceous carcinoma as a rapidly growing back mass: a case report.

Sebaceous carcinoma is a rare cutaneous malignancy that frequently mimics other dermatologic conditions. Extraocular subtypes are uncommon, but when present are frequently located in the head and neck region. Herein, we present a patient with a rapidly growing upper back mass eventually diagnosed as sebaceous carcinoma and managed with wide surgical excision. Currently, sparse literature exists to guide management of such patients. This case highlights not only the diagnostic challenges of sebaceous carcinoma, but also the need for further studies to investigate therapeutic interventions and long-term outcomes.

Resolution of Systemic Rheumatologic Symptoms following Breast Implant Removal.

Reports of women with breast implants who suffer a wide variety of systemic symptoms have become more and more prevalent over the past several years. This entity has become known as breast implant illness in conventional news and social media outlets but has vague and nonspecific diagnostic criteria. As a result, the phenomenon is difficult to both identify and treat. The reported patient is a 76-year-old woman who underwent breast reconstruction with a latissimus dorsi flap and textured silicone implant 20 years before the onset of symptoms, which included debilitating joint pain. She had previously maintained an active lifestyle, but symptoms progressed to a point where she was unable to perform basic tasks. A full rheumatologic and connective tissue workup was done, but other than elevated markers of inflammation, it showed no diagnosable disease entity. After a lengthy discussion with her primary care physician and plastic surgeon, she decided to undergo removal of the implant. Following explantation, her symptoms quickly improved, and within several weeks, she was able to return to her active lifestyle.

The effect of operative time on complication profile and length of hospital stay in autologous and implant-based breast reconstruction patients: An analysis of the 2007-2012 ACS-NSQIP database.

BACKGROUND: It is a generally accepted relationship that an increase in operative time results in an increase in postoperative morbidity. However, few studies have investigated the minute by minute effect of increased operation time on outcomes in reconstructive breast surgery. The authors examined the association between operation time and postoperative outcomes for autologous and implant-based breast reconstructions. METHODS: Data used in these analyses were extracted from all plastic surgery procedures identified in the 2007-2012 ACS-NSQIP datasets. Logistic regression models were used to examine associations between operation time and adverse outcomes. Generalized linear models using a Poisson distribution and a logarithmic link function were used to examine the association between the two continuous variables of operating time and the length of hospital admission. RESULTS: The results drawn from the database show a statistically significant association between operating length for autologous breast reconstructions and both surgical and medical complications. The OR of 1.0018 and 1.0015 for surgical and medical complications, respectively, reflects a minute by minute increase. For implant-based reconstructions, a similar association was seen with surgical complications with an OR of 1.004. Across both subgroups of breast reconstruction, there was a significant association between an increase in OR time and the length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: We have shown a linear relationship that conveys a minute by minute increase in the complication profile and the chance of a longer hospital stay for breast reconstruction patients with regard to operative time.