Spinal Cord Drift Following Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy and Fusion for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

BACKGROUND: Cervical laminoplasty and laminectomy and fusion (LF) are posterior-based surgical techniques for the surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Interestingly, the comparative amount of spinal cord drift obtained from these procedures has not been extensively described. The purpose of this study is to compare spinal cord drift between cervical laminoplasty and LF in patients with CSM. METHODS: The laminoplasty group consisted of 22 patients, and the LF group consisted of 44 patients. Preoperative and postoperative alignment was measured using the Cobb angle (C2-C7). Spinal cord position was measured on axial T2-magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine preoperatively and postoperatively. Spinal cord drift was quantified by subtracting preoperative values from postoperative values. Functional improvement was assessed using the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score. RESULTS: Mean spinal cord drift was higher following LF compared to laminoplasty (2.70 vs 1.71 mm, P < .01). Using logistic regression analysis, there was no correlation between sagittal alignment and spinal cord drift. Both groups showed an improvement in mJOA scores postoperatively compared to their preoperative values (laminoplasty, +2.0, P = .012; LF, +2.4, P < .01). However, there was no difference in mJOA score improvement postoperatively between both groups (P = .482). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that patients who had LF for CSM achieved more spinal cord drift postoperatively compared to those who had laminoplasty. However, the increased drift did not translate into superior functional outcome as measured by the mJOA score. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Spinal cord drift following LF may differ from laminoplasty in patients undergoing surgery for CSM. This finding should be considered when assessing CSM patients for surgical intervention.

Demographic Trends in the Use of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring for Scoliosis Surgery in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative neuromonitoring (ION), such as motor-evoked potential (MEP), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP), and electromyography (EMG), is used to detect impending neurological injuries during spinal surgery. To date, little is known about the trends in the use of ION for scoliosis surgery in the United States. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed using the PearlDiver Database to identify patients that had scoliosis surgery with and without ION from years 2005 to 2011. Demographic information (such as age, gender, region within the United States) and clinical information (such as type of ION and rates of neurological injury) were assessed. RESULTS: There were 3618 patients who had scoliosis surgery during the study period. Intraoperative neuromonitoring was used in 1361 (37.6%) of these cases. The number of cases in which ION was used increased from 27% in 2005 to 46.9% in 2011 (P < .0001). Multimodal ION was used more commonly than unimodal ION (64.6% versus 35.4%). The most commonly used modality was combined SSEP and EMG, while the least used modality was MEP only. Neurological injuries occurred in 1.8 and 2.0% of patients that had surgery with and without ION, respectively (P = .561). Intraoperative neuromonitoring was used most commonly in patients <65 years of age and in the Northeastern part of the United States (age P = .006, region P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of ION for scoliosis surgery gradually increased annually from 2005 to 2011. Age and regional differences were noted with neuromonitoring being most commonly used for scoliosis surgery in nonelderly patients and in the Northeastern part of the United States. No differences were noted in the risk of neurological injury in patients that had surgery with and without ION. Although the findings from this study may seem to suggest that ION may not influence the risk of neurologic injury, this result must be interpreted with caution as inherently riskier surgeries may utilize ION more, leading to an actual reduction in injuries more dramatic than observed in this study.

Cervical Paraspinal Muscle Atrophy Rates Following Laminoplasty and Laminectomy with Fusion for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

BACKGROUND: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a disorder that can cause neurologic deterioration. Studies on paraspinal muscular atrophy (PMA) in the lumbar spine have shown that these changes are caused by several perioperative factors. It is possible that PMA in the cervical spine could behave similarly. In this retrospective study, we compared the degree of PMA after laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion (LF) using a standard posterior approach to the cervical spine. METHODS: 18 laminoplasty and 43 LF patients were included in this study. For each patient, preoperative and postoperative MRI files were obtained and transferred into OsiriX imaging software. Atrophy rate was obtained and reported as percentage change in cross-sectional area of the cervical paraspinal muscles from preoperative to postoperative imaging. RESULTS: Mean cross-sectional cervical muscle atrophy rates were 6% and 13.1% for laminoplasty and LF, respectively, representing a 2.19 times increase in the degree of atrophy (P < 0.001). Independently, LF was associated with a 5.84% increase in the rate of PMA (P = 0.03). Involvement of C3 as the cephalad surgical level was associated with a 5.78% decrease in the rate of PMA (P = 0.03). For each degree increase in postoperative Cobb angle, there was a 0.66% decrease in the rate of PMA (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: PMA should be part of the decision making process when a posterior approach is considered, inasmuch as this study demonstrates that cervical laminoplasty was associated with significantly lower rates of PMA compared with cervical laminectomy and fusion. Additionally, these results suggest that minimizing PMA may help preserve cervical lordosis.

Regression of Anterior Disk-Osteophyte Complex Following Cervical Laminectomy and Fusion for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective case-control study. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion modifies the natural course of anterior disk-osteophyte complex in patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Dorsal migration of the spinal cord is the main purported mechanism of spinal cord decompression following cervical laminectomy and fusion but other potential mechanisms have received scant attention in the literature. This study was conducted to investigate whether cervical laminectomy and fusion affects the size of anterior disk-osteophyte complex. METHODS: The medical records and radiographic imaging of 44 patients who underwent cervical laminectomy and fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy between 2006 and 2013 were analyzed. The size of the anterior disk-osteophyte complex was measured preoperatively and postoperatively on MR images taken at an interval of >3 months apart. A control group consisted of 20 nonoperatively treated advanced cervical spondylosis patients. Patients in the control met the same inclusion and exclusion criteria and also had sequential magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) taken at an interval of >3 months apart. RESULTS: The nonoperative and operative groups were statistically similar in the pertinent patient demographics and characteristics including sex, age, time to second MRI, size of anterior disk-osteophyte complex on baseline MRI, mean number of levels affected, and percentage of patients with T2 signal change. As expected the mJOA scores were significantly lower in the operative versus nonoperative cohort (13.6 vs. 16.5, P<0.01). A significant decrease in the size of anterior disk osteophyte was observed in the operative group postoperatively (P<0.01). In comparison, there was no statistically significant change in the size of the anterior disk-osteophyte complex in the control group (P>0.05). The magnitude of the change in disk size between the 2 groups was statistically significant (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that regression of anterior disk-osteophyte complex occurs following cervical laminectomy and fusion, and likely provides another mechanism of spinal cord decompression.

Demographic Trends in the Use of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring for Scoliosis Surgery in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative neuromonitoring (ION) such as motor-evoked potential (MEP), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) and electromyography (EMG) are used to detect impending neurological injuries during spinal surgery. To date, little is known on the trends in the use of ION for scoliosis surgery in the United States. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed using the PearlDiver Database to identify patients that had scoliosis surgery with and without ION from years 2005 to 2011. Demographic information (such as age, gender, region within the United States) and clinical information (such as type of ION and rates of neurological injury) were assessed. RESULTS: There were 3618 patients who had scoliosis surgery during the study period. ION was used in 1361 (37.6%) of these cases. The number of cases in which ION was used increased from 27% in 2005 to 46.9% in 2011 (p < 0.0001). Multimodal ION was used more commonly than unimodal ION (64.6% vs. 35.4%). The most commonly used modality was combined SSEP and EMG while the least used modality was MEP only. Neurological injuries occurred in 1.8% and 2.0% of patients that had surgery with and without ION, respectively (p = 0.561). ION was used most commonly in patients < 65 years of age and in the Northeastern part of the United States (age; p = 0.006, region; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of ION for scoliosis surgery gradually increased annually from 2005 to 2011. Age and regional differences were noted with neuromonitoring being most commonly used for scoliosis surgery in non-elderly patients and in the Northeastern part of the United States. No differences were noted in the risk of neurological injury in patients that had surgery with and without ION. Although the findings from this study may seem to suggest that ION may not influence the risk of neurologic injury, this result must be interpreted with caution as inherently riskier surgeries may utilize ION more, leading to an actual reduction in injuries more dramatic than observed in this study.

Routine Use of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring During ACDFs for the Treatment of Spondylotic Myelopathy and Radiculopathy Is Questionable: A Review of 15,395 Cases.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective database study. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to (1) evaluate the trends in the use of intraoperative neuromonitoring (ION) for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery in the United States and (2) assess the incidence of neurological injuries after ACDFs with and without ION. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs) and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) are the commonly used ION modalities for ACDFs. Controversy exists on the routine use of ION for ACDFs and there is limited literature on national practice patterns of its use. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed using the PearlDiver Patient Record Database to identify cases of spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy that underwent ACDF from 2007 to 2014. The type of ION modality used and the rates of neurological injury after surgery were assessed. RESULTS: During the study period, 15,395 patients underwent an ACDF. Overall, ION was used in 2627 (17.1%) of these cases. There was a decrease in the use of ION for ACDFs from 22.8% in 2007 to 4.3% use in 2014 (P < 0.0001). The ION modalities used for these ACDFs were quite variable: SSEPs only (48.7%), MMEPs only (5.3%), and combined SSEPs and MMEPs (46.1%). Neurological injuries occurred in 0.23% and 0.27% of patients with and without ION, respectively (P = 0.84). Younger age was associated with a higher utility of ION (<45: 20.3%, 45-54: 19.3%, 55-64: 16.6%, 65-74: 14.3%, and >75: 13.6%, P < 0.0001). Significant regional variability was observed in the utility of ION for ACDFs across the country (West; 21.9%, Midwest; 12.9% (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: There has been a significant decrease in the use of ION for ACDFs. Furthermore, there was significant age and regional variability in the use of ION for ACDFs. Use of ION does not further prevent the rate of postoperative neurological complications for ACDFs as compared with the cases without ION. The utility of routine ION for ACDFs is questionable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Tendon sheath fibroma in the thigh.

Tendon sheath fibromas are rare, benign soft tissue tumors that are predominantly found in the fingers, hands, and wrists of young adult men. This article describes a tendon sheath fibroma that developed in the thigh of a 70-year-old man, the only known tendon sheath fibroma to form in this location. Similar to tendon sheath fibromas that develop elsewhere, our patient's lesion presented as a painless, slow-growing soft tissue nodule. Physical examination revealed a firm, nontender mass with no other associated signs or symptoms. Although the imaging appearance of tendon sheath fibromas varies, our patient's lesion appeared dark on T1- and bright on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. It was well marginated and enhanced with contrast.Histologically, tendon sheath fibromas are composed of dense fibrocollagenous stromas with scattered spindle-shaped fibroblasts and narrow slit-like vascular spaces. Most tendon sheath fibromas can be successfully removed by marginal excision, although 24% of lesions recur. No lesions have metastasized. Our patient's tendon sheath fibroma was removed by marginal excision, and the patient remained disease free 35 months postoperatively. Despite its rarity, tendon sheath fibroma should be included in the differential diagnosis of a thigh mass on physical examination or imaging, especially if it is painless, nontender, benign appearing, and present in men.

Impact of close surgical margin on local recurrence and survival in osteosarcoma.

PURPOSE: Whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy safely allows close margins in osteosarcoma patients is still unknown. This study investigates the impact of close margins on local recurrence (LR) and overall survival (OS) for osteosarcoma patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 47 cases of conventional osteosarcoma who were treated at our institution. Patient and treatment factors such as age, gender, MSTS stage, tumour site, surgery type, pathological type, tumour size, surgical margin, tumour necrosis rate, chemotherapy regimens and cycles were recorded. A close margin was defined as tumour present less than 5 mm from the closest resection margin. The average followup was 87.6 months (range, 25-135 months). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were alive, 22 patients had died, and eight had LR. Twenty-eight patients had wide margins, seven had positive margins and 12 had close margins. Positive margins had a greater risk of LR (57.1%) than wide margins and close margins. There was no difference in LR (8.3% vs 10.7%) between close margins and wide margins. Margin status was not correlated with OS. CONCLUSION: Compared with wide margins, close margins did not lead to increased local recurrence in our study group. Whether close margins, as defined in our study, are just as acceptable as wide margins in terms of patient outcomes for osteosarcoma patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy needs to be further confirmed in the future.

Perioperative infection rate in patients with osteosarcomas treated with resection and prosthetic reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of perioperative infection after segmental tumor endoprosthetic replacement in previous reports varies from a high of 7.4% to a low of 2.6%. Appropriate antibiotic use for this group is unknown and controversial, whereas the relationship of antibiotic use and perioperative infection is unclear. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined the incidence of perioperative infection in patients with osteosarcoma treated with segmental prosthetic replacement using a standard perioperative antibiotic regimen and the incidence of late infections and wound complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 53 patients with osteosarcoma undergoing segmental prosthetic replacements from 1993 to 2008. There were 30 males and 23 females ranging from 10 to 78 years of age. All patients were given intraoperative antibiotics (intravenous cefazolin), continued for 3 days postoperatively and then given orally for 5 days. Patients who were allergic to penicillin or cefazolin were given vancomycin followed by clindamycin. A perioperative infection was defined as a deep infection within 2 months after prosthetic reconstruction. The minimum followup was 1 year (range, 1-15 years). RESULTS: We identified one confirmed perioperative prosthetic infection (1/53; 1.9%) (Enterobacter cloacae and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus) in a 78-year-old woman after proximal tibial replacement, gastrocnemius flap, and skin graft. Her infection was controlled with débridement, drainage, and intravenous antibiotics. Three patients had late infections, two of which were culture negative. Four patients had wound complications that required further surgery. CONCLUSION: The antibiotic regimen we used is longer than that recommended for patients having routine total joint arthroplasty. Its appropriateness will require comparison with alternate regimens, including those of shorter duration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The relation of tumour necrosis and survival in patients with osteosarcoma.

PURPOSE: We investigated whether tumour necrosis was associated with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of osteosarcoma patients treated in our institution. METHODS: We retrospectively studied the predictive value of percentage of necrosis in 40 cases of IIB osteosarcoma treated from 1999 to 2008 in our institution. Patient and treatment factors such as age, gender, tumour site, surgery type, pathological type, tumour size, margin status, percentage of tumour necrosis, chemotherapy regimens and cycles were recorded. The average follow-up was 85.9 months (range, 25-135 months). RESULTS: Two patients had local recurrence (LR) alone, five patients had both LR and metastasis, 14 patients had metastasis alone. Twenty-four patients were alive and 16 had died. The five-year DFS and OS were 47.8% and 65.9%, respectively. Tumour necrosis grouped by 90% was not associated with DFS and OS. Patients with greater than 70% necrosis rate had a significantly higher DFS than those with less than 70%. CONCLUSION: We found no survival advantage at 90% tumour necrosis in our study. Further study with more patients should be performed to evaluate the predictive value of necrosis rate at the cutoff of 70%.

Breast cancer screening prior to cosmetic breast surgery: ASPS members' Adherence to American Cancer Society Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to determine the self-reported breast cancer screening practices of American plastic surgeons and the degree to which those practices adhere to the American Cancer Society guidelines. An independent analysis of subgroups divided by gender, years in practice, and practice setting was performed and the implications of the results are discussed. METHODS: The authors conducted an online survey of the members of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Questions assessed practice composition, American Cancer Society guideline familiarity, and preoperative breast cancer screening in patients seeking aesthetic breast surgery. Responses were summarized, subgroup comparisons were made, and logistic regression was used to determine predictors of physician practices. RESULTS: The 1066 respondents were predominantly male (82 percent) and consisted largely of private practitioners (73 percent). In total, 47 percent appeared to follow the American Cancer Society guidelines, while 64 percent claimed familiarity. Being male predicted more accurate guideline knowledge, but being female resulted in more aggressive screening and possibly more diagnoses. Number of years in practice and familiarity with the American Cancer Society guidelines also resulted in more perioperative diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of the American Cancer Society guidelines is an essential component of effective cancer screening, but only two-thirds of plastic surgeons claim familiarity with them, and fewer than half report concordant practices. As plastic surgeons who often perform surgical procedures on the breast in women with no history of breast disease, we have an obligation to understand and apply consistent, reliable breast cancer screening practices to ensure the well-being of our patients.