Long-term outcomes after aortic root repair using selective sinus replacement.

OBJECTIVES: The study aim was to evaluate long-term results after anatomic restoration of the aortic root. METHODS: During an 18-year period, a total of 669 patients underwent valve-sparing root repair (aneurysm 554, dissection 115) using selective sinus replacement. None/trivial, mild, moderate, and severe (grades 3+ and 4+) insufficiency were present in 57, 146, 204, and 262 patients, respectively. RESULTS: The anatomic repair was adjusted to the existing aortic annulus diameter, which was 27.0 ± 3.0 mm on average. Replacement of 1, 2, or 3 sinuses of Valsalva was performed in 209, 234, and 226 patients, respectively. Altogether, 454 additional procedures on the cusps were performed, mostly as cusp patch plasty with pericardium (210). Thirty-day mortality was 0.6%. The mean follow-up duration was 7.1 ± 4.1 years (range, 0.01-19.1 years). The estimated freedom from relevant aortic insufficiency grade 3+ or greater (15 events) was 98% ± 1%, 97% ± 1%, and 94% ± 3% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. On echocardiogram, no patient revealed a considerable change of the form or size of the repaired root, which was confirmed radiologically in 160 patients who received computed tomography angiography for any reason. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified cusp prolapse/pseudo-prolapse as the only independent risk factor for the development of recurrent insufficiency grade 2+ or greater (41 occurrences), with a hazard ratio of 3.258 (95% confidence interval, 1.658-6.403; P = .001). An association between aortic annulus size and functional results could not be demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-tailored root repair using isolated sinus replacement offers excellent functional long-term results regardless of underlying root pathology or annulus size. Aortic cusp pathology was decisive for long-term valve function.

Selective sinus replacement for aortic root repair in bicuspid aortopathy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the results after selective sinus replacement (SSR) for aortic root remodeling in bicuspid aortopathy. METHODS: Among 662 patients who underwent root repair using SSR between 2005 and 2020, there were 114 with bicuspid aortopathy. SSR was performed either as an isolated procedure (31) or as an adjunct to aortic valve repair (83) and was adjusted to the existing aortic annulus diameter rather than a downsized diameter. In valves with asymmetrical commissural orientation, the repair aimed for the achievement of a 180°-commissural orientation. RESULTS: Abolishment of aortic insufficiency (AI) ≥2+ using root repair alone was only possible in 2 patients with acute-dissection-related AI, yet isolated root repair was also performed in 29 further patients with no/mild AI. All remaining patients with AI ≥2+ presented cusp-related regurgitation and necessitated an additional valve repair. During the mean follow-up of 91 months (range, 13-196), a relevant valve defect (AI ≥3+ in 8, stenosis in 2) occurred in 10 patients (all after combined repair) resulting in an estimated freedom from a relevant aortic valve defect and/or reoperation of 96 ± 2%, 89 ± 4%, and 82 ± 6% at 5, 10, and 12 years, respectively. Echocardiographically, no patient revealed a considerable change of form or size of the repaired root nor was any root reintervention necessary. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-tailored root repair using SSR is a very effective and durable valve-sparing approach for bicuspid aortopathy. Aortic cusp repair is decisive for both abolishment of AI in bicuspid aortopathy and for the functional durability of the repaired aortic valve.

Long-term outcomes after valve-sparing anatomical aortic root reconstruction in acute dissection involving the root.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate long-term results after valve-sparing surgery of acutely dissected aortic root in which a restoration of root anatomy adjusted to the existing aortic annulus diameter, rather than any kind of downsizing, was performed. METHODS: Among 286 consecutive patients operated on because of type A aortic dissection during the last 17 years were 100 patients (35.0%), mean age 63 ± 13 years (range, 29-88 years), in whom an anatomical restoration of the involved root was performed. Twenty-eight patients presented with severe (3+ or 4+), 37 with mild to moderate (2+), and 24 with mild (1+) insufficiency. In 5 patients, the valve was bicuspid. In all patients, a curative root repair with replacement of all dissected aortic wall was performed, containing a selective replacement of pathologic/dissected aortic sinuses, which were 1, 2, or all 3 sinuses in 62, 32, and 6 patients, respectively. Concomitant cusp repair was necessary in 18 patients. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was 1.0%. Survival was estimated starting with surgery and was 89.4 ± 3.4% (95% confidence interval, 80.5-94.4) and 68.8 ± 6.4% (95% confidence interval, 54.4-79.5) at 5 and 12 years, respectively. No patient required reoperation on the aortic root and/or valve during the follow-up period of 70 ± 50 (range, 3-202) months. A freedom from any aortic valve/root reintervention and/or relevant (>2+) aortic insufficiency at 12 years was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Selective replacement of pathologic sinuses offers an anatomophysiological albeit curative restoration of acutely dissected aortic root resulting in excellent and durable outcomes in selected patients with acute aortic dissection.

Innominate artery pathology in the setting of aortic arch surgery: incidences, surgical considerations and operative outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the incidences of innominate artery (IA) involvement in aortic arch pathology necessitating surgery, the surgical strategies and the operative results. METHODS: Among the 366 patients who underwent total/subtotal arch replacement because of non-acutely dissected aortic pathology between 2004 and June 2017, there were 46 (12.6%) patients (29 males; mean age 69 ± 10, range 35-84 years) with IA involvement. Pathologies necessitating replacement of the IA were chronic aneurysm including progression of chronic dissection, severe atherosclerosis with or without an aneurysmatic dilatation, and inflammatory vasculitis in 34, 11 and 1 patient, respectively. All data were collected prospectively, and intention-to-treat analysis was performed. RESULTS: All patients underwent total/subtotal aortic arch replacement using unilateral cerebral perfusion (mean duration 44.6 ± 15.7 min) under mild hypothermia (30.6 ± .4°C). In addition to arch and IA replacement, repair of one or two further supra-aortic arteries was performed in 20 and 23 patients, respectively. One patient underwent complete thoracic aorta replacement via clamshell thoracotomy. The aortic valve, which was the most frequent object of concomitant surgery, was replaced in 18 (including 3 valve composite-grafts) and repaired in 20 (18 valve-sparing root repairs) patients. Early (30-day and/or in-hospital) mortality was 0. The rate of permanent neurological deficit was 2.2% (1 patient with a huge, partially thrombosed arch and innominate aneurysm). Transient neurological dysfunctions such as agitation were observed in 6 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Involvement of the IA in aortic arch surgery is not infrequent, and its concomitant replacement using well-considered cannulation, perfusion and surgical strategy offers excellent operative outcomes.