RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Vulvar dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans is an extremely rare disease. Its rarity can hamper the quality of treatment; deeper knowledge is necessary to plan appropriate management. The purpose of this review is to analyse the data reported in the literature to obtain evidence regarding appropriate disease management. METHODS: We made a systematic search of the literature, including the terms "dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans", "vulva", and "vulvar", alone or in combination. We selected articles published in English from two electronic databases, PubMed and MEDLINE, and we analysed their reference lists to include other potentially relevant studies. RESULTS: We selected 39 articles, with a total of 68 cases reported; they were retrospective case reports and case series. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the vulva tends towards local recurrence; an early and timely pathological diagnosis, together with an appropriate surgical approach, are of utmost importance to ensure free margins and maximise the curative potential. CONCLUSIONS: Even if this is an indolent disease and it generally shows a good prognosis, appropriate management may help in reducing the rate of local recurrences that may hamper patients' quality of life. Management by a multidisciplinary team is highly recommended.
RESUMEN
Mucosal melanomas (MM) are rare tumors, being less than 2% of all diagnosed melanomas, comprising a variegated group of malignancies arising from melanocytes in virtually all mucosal epithelia, even if more frequently found in oral and sino-nasal cavities, ano-rectum and female genitalia (vulva and vagina). To date, there is no consensus about the optimal management strategy of MM. Furthermore, the clinical rationale of molecular tumor characterization regarding BRAF, KIT or NRAS, as well as the therapeutic value of immunotherapy, chemotherapy and targeted therapy, has not yet been deeply explored and clearly established in MM. In this overview, focused on anorectal and genital MM as models of rare melanomas deserving of a multidisciplinary approach, we highlight the need of referring these patients to centers with experts in melanoma, anorectal and uro-genital cancers treatments. Taking into account the rarity, the poor outcomes and the lack of effective treatment options for MM, tailored research needs to be promptly promoted.
RESUMEN
As widely acknowledged, 40-50% of all melanoma patients harbour an activating BRAF mutation (mostly BRAF V600E). The identification of the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK (MAP kinase) signalling pathway and its targeting has represented a valuable milestone for the advanced and, more recently, for the completely resected stage III and IV melanoma therapy management. However, despite progress in BRAF-mutant melanoma treatment, the two different approaches approved so far for metastatic disease, immunotherapy and BRAF+MEK inhibitors, allow a 5-year survival of no more than 60%, and most patients relapse during treatment due to acquired mechanisms of resistance. Deep insight into BRAF gene biology is fundamental to describe the acquired resistance mechanisms (primary and secondary) and to understand the molecular pathways that are now being investigated in preclinical and clinical studies with the aim of improving outcomes in BRAF-mutant patients.
Asunto(s)
Melanoma/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/fisiología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/genética , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Ciclo Celular , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Análisis Mutacional de ADN , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/genética , Quinasas MAP Reguladas por Señal Extracelular/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Inmunoterapia , Sistema de Señalización de MAP Quinasas , Masculino , Oncología Médica/tendencias , Melanoma/metabolismo , Mutación , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacología , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Recurrencia , Neoplasias Cutáneas/metabolismoRESUMEN
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the primary tumour of the liver with the greatest incidence, particularly in the elderly. Additionally, improvements in the treatments for chronic liver diseases have increased the number of elderly patients who might be affected by HCC. Little evidence exists regarding HCC in old patients, and the elderly are still underrepresented and undertreated in clinical trials. In fact, this population represents a complex subgroup of patients who are hard to manage, especially due to the presence of multiple comorbidities. Therefore, the choice of treatment is mainly decided by the physician in the clinical practice, who often tend not to treat elderly patients in order to avoid the possibility of adverse events, which may alter their unstable equilibrium. In this context, the clarification of the optimal treatment strategy for elderly patients affected by HCC has become an urgent necessity. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the available data regarding the treatment of HCC in elderly patients, starting from the definition of "elderly" and the geriatric assessment and scales. We explain the possible treatment choices according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) scale and their feasibility in the elderly population.
RESUMEN
Gastric cancer (GC) is the third cause of cancer-related death worldwide; the prognosis is poor especially in the case of metastatic disease. Liver, lymph nodes, peritoneum, and lung are the most frequent sites of metastases from GC; however, bone metastases from GC have been reported in the literature. Nevertheless, it is unclear how the metastatic sites may affect the prognosis. In particular, knowledge about the impact of bone metastases on GC patients' outcome is scant, and this may be related to the rarity of bone lesions and/or their underestimation at the time of diagnosis. In fact, there is still a lack of specific recommendation for their detection at the diagnosis. Then, the majority of the evidences in this field came from retrospective analysis on very heterogeneous study populations. In this context, the aim of this narrative review is to delineate an overview about the evidences existing about bone metastases in GC patients, focusing on their incidence and biology, the prognostic role of bone involvement, and their possible implication in the treatment choice.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to collect data about of the outcome of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients who progressed after immune checkpoint inhibitors in order to enhance data about efficacy and safety of treatment beyond immune-oncology (IO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 162 eligible patients, progressing to IO, were enrolled from 16 Italian referral centers adhering to the Meet-Uro association. Baseline characteristics, outcome data and toxicities were retrospectively collected. Descriptive analysis was made using median values and ranges. Kaplan-Meier method and Mantel-Haenszel log-rank test were performed to compare differences between groups. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients (68.5%) were treated after IO progression. In all, 51 patients (31.5%) did not receive further treatment for clinical deterioration. Median IO progression free survival (PFS) was 4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.1-4.8). IO-PFS tends to be longer in patients reporting adverse events (AE) of any grade (5.03 [95% CI: 3.8-6.1] vs. 2.99 [95% CI: 2.4-3.5] months P=0.004). Subsequent therapies included cabozantinib (n=79, 48%), everolimus (n=11, 6.7%), and others (n=21, 12.9%).Median PFS post-IO was 6.5 months (95% CI: 5.1-7.8). Cabozantinib showed longer PFS compared with everolimus (7.6 mo [95% CI: 5.2-10.1] vs. 3.2 mo [95% CI: 1.8-4.5]) (hazard ratio: 0.2; 95% CI: 0.1026-0.7968) and other drugs (4.3 mo [95% CI: 1.3-7.4]) (hazard ratio: 0.6; 95% CI: 0.35-1.23). All grade AE were reported in 83 patients (74%) and G3 to G4 AE in 39 patients (35%). Target therapies post-IO showed median overall survival of 14.7 months (95% CI: 0.3-21.4). CONCLUSIONS: In our real world experience after progression to IO, vascular endotelial groth factor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, given to patients, proved to be active and safe choices. Cabozantinib was associated with a better outcome in terms of median PFS.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anilidas/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Everolimus/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Italia , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nivolumab/efectos adversos , Nivolumab/uso terapéutico , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/metabolismo , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Monoclonal antibodies targeting the checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs), programmed cell death protein-1 or programmed cell death ligand-1, are changing the landscape of urothelial carcinoma therapeutics. Overall, clinical studies in metastatic or advanced urothelial cancer showed that CPIs provided a slight improvement in survival and a relevant advantage in safety, compared with chemotherapy. After reviewing published and ongoing trials, the authors discuss expected answers to unmet needs, with a special attention to the research of biological markers for patients with urothelial cancer eligible for treatment with CPIs in this article.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/inmunología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/terapia , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/secundarioRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab is the standard therapy for patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer wild-type BRCA after primary surgery. The most frequent side effects of bevacizumab in this setting are hypertension, thrombosis, hemorrhage, and proteinuria, while arthralgia has been poorly described. OBJECTIVE: To examine the incidence, duration, and reversibility of arthralgia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed to describe the occurrence and outcome of arthralgia in 114 patients with advanced ovarian cancer, given first-line treatment with a combination of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab. Statistical analysis was performed to investigate a possible prognostic role of arthralgia, with progression-free survival as endpoint. RESULTS: 47 of 114 patients (41%) developed arthralgia during therapy. All patients had grade 1 or grade 2 arthralgia. Toxicity persisted after the end of bevacizumab in 17/47 patients (36%). Median progression-free survival for patients without arthralgia was 18 months (95% CI 14 to 24) compared with 29 months (95% CI 21 to not reached) for patients experiencing arthralgia (p=0.03). In order to avoid possible biases related to treatment duration, a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model including toxicity as a time dependent variable and age, stage, and residual disease after primary surgery was performed. In this model no variable showed a statistically significant association with progression-free survival. CONCLUSION: A high incidence of arthralgia (41%) was found and although rogression-free survival was worse for those patients who developed arthralgia, this was not maintained on multivariate analysis. Guidelines for treatment of this adverse event are needed.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Artralgia/inducido químicamente , Bevacizumab/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Artralgia/inmunología , Bevacizumab/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and systemic inflammatory index (SII) are prognostic factors in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Their predictive value for platinum-sensitivity and their role in recurrent EOC are unknown. A total of 375 EOC patients were retrospectively analyzed. The correlation between baseline NLR and SII, and platinum-free interval (PFI) according to first line bevacizumab treatment were analyzed using logistic regression analyses adjusted for baseline patient characteristics. Subsequently NLR and SII calculated before second line treatment initiation were evaluated to identify a potential correlation with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in platinum-sensitive and in platinum-resistant population. In multivariate analysis, NLR ≥ 3 is an independent predictive factor for PFI at 6 months in the chemotherapy group (OR = 2.77, 95% CI 1.38-5.56, p = 0.004), not in bevacizumab treated patients. After having adjusted for ECOG performance status, histology, ascites, bevacizumab treatment at second line and BRCA status, NLR ≥ 3 and SII ≥ 730 are significantly associated with worse OS in platinum-sensitive (HR = 2.69, 95% CI 1.60-4.53, p = 0.002; HR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.29-3.43, p = 0.003, respectively), not in platinum-resistant EOC patients. Low NLR is an independent predictive factor for platinum-sensitivity in patients treated without bevacizumab. NLR and SII are prognostic factors in recurrent platinum-sensitive EOC patients.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/patología , Inflamación/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has overwhelmed the health systems worldwide. Data regarding the impact of COVID-19 on cancer patients (CPs) undergoing or candidate for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are lacking. We depicted the practice and adaptations in the management of patients with solid tumors eligible or receiving ICIs during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a special focus on Campania region. METHODS: This survey (25 questions), promoted by the young section of SCITO (Società Campana di ImmunoTerapia Oncologica) Group, was circulated among Italian young oncologists practicing in regions variously affected by the pandemic: high (group 1), medium (group 2) and low (group 3) prevalence of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients. For Campania region, the physician responders were split into those working in cancer centers (CC), university hospitals (UH) and general hospitals (GH). Percentages of agreement, among High (H) versus Medium (M) and versus Low (L) group for Italy and among CC, UH and GH for Campania region, were compared by using Fisher's exact tests for dichotomous answers and χ2 test for trends relative to the questions with 3 or more options. RESULTS: This is the first Italian study to investigate the COVID-19 impact on cancer immunotherapy, unique in its type and very clear in the results. The COVID-19 pandemic seemed not to affect the standard practice in the prescription and delivery of ICIs in Italy. Telemedicine was widely used. There was high consensus to interrupt immunotherapy in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients and to adopt ICIs with longer schedule interval. The majority of the responders tended not to delay the start of ICIs; there were no changes in supportive treatments, but some of the physicians opted for delaying surgeries (if part of patients' planned treatment approach). The results from responders in Campania did not differ significantly from the national ones. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the efforts of Italian oncologists to maintain high standards of care for CPs treated with ICIs, regardless the regional prevalence of COVID-19, suggesting the adoption of similar solutions. Research on patients treated with ICIs and experiencing COVID-19 will clarify the safety profile to continue the treatments, thus informing on the most appropriate clinical conducts.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Betacoronavirus/inmunología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Oncología Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Adulto , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Antígeno B7-H1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Antígeno B7-H1/inmunología , Betacoronavirus/patogenicidad , COVID-19 , Antígeno CTLA-4/antagonistas & inhibidores , Antígeno CTLA-4/inmunología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/inmunología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Geografía , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/normas , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Oncología Médica/normas , Neoplasias/inmunología , Oncólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/inmunología , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2 , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de TratamientoRESUMEN
The treatment approach to cervix cancer has remained unchanged for several decades and new therapeutic strategies are now required to improve outcomes, as the prognosis is still poor. In the last years, a better understanding of HPV tumor-host immune system interactions and the development of new therapeutics targeting immune checkpoints generated interest in the use of immunotherapy in cervix cancer. Preliminary phase I-II trials demonstrated the efficacy, the duration of responses and the manageable safety of this approach. Currently, many phase II and III studies are ongoing in both locally advanced and metastatic cervical cancer, assessing immunotherapy as a single agent or in combination with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. We reviewed the published data and the therapeutic implications of the most promising novel immunotherapeutic agents under investigation in cervix cancer.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/tratamiento farmacológico , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/inmunología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patologíaRESUMEN
Advanced, recurrent and metastatic endometrial cancer (EC) has a dismal prognosis due to poor response rates to conventional treatments. In the era of precision medicine, the improved understanding of cancer genetics and molecular biology has led to the development of targeted therapies, such as poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. This class of drugs that inhibit PARP enzymes has been investigated in many different types of tumors and its use in the treatment of gynecological malignancies has rapidly increased over the past few years. Data from several clinical trials showed that PARP inhibitors have a beneficial role in cancers with a defect in the homologous DNA recombination system, regardless of the BRCA mutational status. Since EC frequently shows mutations in PTEN and TP53 genes, indirectly involved in the homologous DNA recombination pathway, several in vivo and in vitro studies investigated the efficacy of PARP inhibitors in EC, showing promising results. This review will discuss the use of PARP inhibitors in endometrial cancer, summarizing data from preclinical studies and providing an overview of the ongoing trials, with a special focus on the development of combined treatment strategies with PARP inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors.
RESUMEN
Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most frequent gynecological cancer. In patients with relapsed and advanced disease, prognosis is still dismal and development of resistance is common. In this context, endometrial Cancer Stem Cells (eCSC), stem-like cells capable to self-renewal and differentiation in mature cancer cells, represent a potential field of expansion for drug development. The aim of this review is to characterize the role of eCSC in EC, their features and how they could be targeted. CSC are involved in progression, invasiveness and metastasis (though epithelial to mesenchimal transition, EMT), as well as chemoresistance in EC. Nevertheless, isolation of eCSC is still controversial. Indeed, CD133, Aldheyde dehydrogenase (ALDH), CD117, CD55 and CD44 are enriched in CSCs but there is no universal marker nowadays. The most frequently activated pathways in eCSC are Wingless-INT (Wnt)/ß-catenin, Notch1, and Hedghog, with a high expression of self-renewal transcription factors like Octamer binding transcription factor 4 (OCT), B Lymphoma Mo-MLV Insertion Region 1 Homolog (BMI1), North American Network Operations Group Homebox protein (NANOG), and SRY-Box 2 (SOX2). These pathways have been targeted with selective drugs alone or in combination with chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Unfortunately, although preclinical results are encouraging, few clinical data are available.
RESUMEN
The majority of patients with advanced ovarian germ cell cancer are treated by cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Despite adequate first-line treatment, nearly one third of patients relapse and almost half develop cisplatin-resistant disease, which is often fatal. The treatment of cisplatin-resistant disease is challenging and prognosis remains poor. There are limited data on the efficacy of specific chemotherapeutic regimens, high-dose chemotherapy with autologous progenitor cell support and targeted therapies. The inclusion of patients in clinical trials is strongly recommended, especially in clinical trials on the most frequent male germ cell tumors, to offer wider therapeutic opportunities. Here, we provide an overview of current and potential new treatment options including combination chemotherapy, high-dose chemotherapy and molecular targeted therapies, for patients with cisplatin-resistant ovarian germ cell tumors.
RESUMEN
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors still play a very important role in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma despite a continuously changing scenario, in which immunotherapy and several combination-based approaches are also available. In this light, patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life are important factors in the selection of the best first-line treatment. This Review focuses on the existing evidence on patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life with several tyrosine kinase inhibitors (pazopanib, sunitinib, cabozantinib and tivozanib) used as first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Humanos , Indazoles , Indoles/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Niacinamida/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Sorafenib/uso terapéutico , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Sunitinib/uso terapéutico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) has been associated with improved prognosis in several cancer conditions. Contrasting data have been produced in ovarian cancer.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias Ováricas/sangre , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Carboplatino/efectos adversos , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/efectos adversos , Doxorrubicina/análogos & derivados , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Polietilenglicoles/administración & dosificación , Polietilenglicoles/efectos adversos , Pronóstico , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
The proportion of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving second or further lines of treatment has not been widely studied. To shed light on this issue, we retrospectively analysed the treatments administered for metastatic disease, and investigated prognostic factors after a diagnosis of metastases, in a consecutive cohort of mCRC patients. Three hundred forty-six mCRC patients were enrolled: 173 were stage II or III (metachronous group), and 173 stage IV (synchronous group) at diagnosis. Survival was calculated between the date of metastatic disease and the date of death or last follow-up. Patients with synchronous lesions more frequently had multiple disease sites, peritoneal carcinomatosis and massive liver deposits, whereas significantly more patients with metachronous lesions developed lung metastases as the sole disease site. 97.4% patients received at least one, 62.4% two, 41.9% three and 23.7% four treatment lines. Patients with metachronous metastases more frequently underwent surgery of metastases in first-line treatment (48.5 versus 24.8%), and more of them were progression-free at the time of the analysis (44 versus 34.9%). At univariate analysis, age > 70 years, multiple disease sites and peritoneal carcinomatosis were associated with significantly decreased survival, whereas surgery of metastases and isolated lung metastases predicted better survival. At multivariate analysis, only peritoneal carcinomatosis and surgery of metastases independently affected survival. The percentage of patients who received an active treatment decreased going from first- to fourth-line treatment. However, the proportion of patients who received efficacious treatment in advanced line remained high. Surgery of metastases was the most important prognostic factors.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Anciano , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
The majority of patients with advanced ovarian cancer progress after first-line therapy and require further treatment. Tumor biology, prior chemotherapy, responses to previous therapy, performance status, and toxicity are the characteristics that influence treatment choice. These criteria have been linked to the time between relapse and last platinum therapy: the platinum-free interval. Today, patients are classified as either those who are eligible for a new platinum-based therapy or those for whom platinum is not an option. A nonplatinum regimen should be administered to patients who are not candidates for platinum re-treatment. This group includes patients with early relapse after, or progression during, previous platinum-based chemotherapy and patients with platinum intolerability. A single agent such as weekly paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), gemcitabine, or topotecan represents the standard. For patients not treated with bevacizumab in the first line, this drug should be added to chemotherapy. For patients for whom platinum rechallenge is an option (because they are potentially platinum-responsive), different strategies are available with the incorporation of biological drugs targeting angiogenesis or the mechanisms of DNA repair. A BRCA mutation status predicts a better response to platinum and poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition. PARP inhibitors and antiangiogenic drugs have proven efficacy as maintenance therapy after chemotherapy and concurrently with chemotherapy, respectively. These agents have changed current practice, although few biomarkers are available to guide decisions. Patients potentially responsive to platinum who cannot receive the drug again can be treated with a combination of trabectedin and PLD, the most active nonplatinum therapy in this setting.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/terapia , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de NeoplasiaRESUMEN
RATIONALE: Paraneoplastic limbic encephalitis (PLE) is one of the most common causes of neurologic paraneoplastic syndromes, with unclear pathogenesis. While several reports published in the last decades showed the occurrence of PLE in a variety of cancers, only a few cases have been associated with colon cancer. PATIENT CONCERNS: In February 2017, a 54-year-old man with clinical history of radically resected colon cancer started first line chemotherapy with FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab, after radiological diagnosis of multiple liver and bone metastases. During the third cycle of treatment, the patient developed psychomotor agitation and hallucinations followed by severe consciousness level reduction and cognitive impairment. DIAGNOSES: Magnetic resonance imaging showed hyperintense signals in both hippocampal areas, insula and right cingulate gyrus on fluid attenuated inversion recovery, diffusion weighted imaging, and T2-weighted images, highly suggestive of limbic encephalitis. Other causes (brain metastases, toxicity of chemotherapeutic agents, and infections) were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Empirical immunosuppressive treatment (high-dose immunoglobulins and corticosteroids) was administered and chemotherapy was resumed. OUTCOMES: A slowly progressive improvement in neurological condition has been observed, even though radiological signs of limbic encephalitis are still evident. LESSONS: The present case highlights the complex diagnostic process of PLE, and the lack of a standard treatment. Moreover, the absence of correlation between PLE and tumor progression or tumor burden, and the opportunity of treating underlying neoplasm is discussed.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Encefalitis Límbica/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Neoplasias del Colon/complicaciones , Electroencefalografía , Humanos , Encefalitis Límbica/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Analysis of K- and N-RAS mutations is mandatory before planning treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, because only RAS wild-type (WT) patients can benefit from treatment with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (cetuximab and panitumumab). CASE REPORT: Here we report the case of a 69-year-old male patient affected by metastatic sigmoid cancer. He underwent left hemicolectomy, and histology diagnosed a well-differentiated, pT4, node-positive adenocarcinoma; KRAS analysis performed with direct sequencing identified a mutation in exon 2 of the KRAS gene (GGT->GTT). After first-line chemotherapy with FOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab, the patient underwent surgical resection of residual liver metastases. Histology showed metastatic deposits from colic adenocarcinoma with extensive coagulative necrosis. Mutational analysis of the KRAS gene was also performed on liver metastases by pyrosequencing assay, and no mutation was identified. Due to the discordant results (GGT->GTT exon 2 KRAS mutation in the primary tumor, and KRAS-WT in the liver metastases), mutational analysis on liver metastasis was repeated using next-generation sequencing and enriching the sample in tumor cells by manual microdissection; the same type of mutation of the primary tumor (GGT->GTT exon 2 KRAS gene) was confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate tissue sampling and adequately sensitive assays are essential to correctly identify colorectal cancer patients who can be treated with an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody.