Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
1.
JAMA Cardiol ; 8(8): 789-790, 2023 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37378971

RESUMEN

A woman in her early 40s who was 11 weeks post partum presented with acute pleuritic chest pain, shortness of breath, and nausea that started several hours after arriving on a flight.


Asunto(s)
Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios , Enfermedades Vasculares , Femenino , Humanos , Periodo Posparto , Enfermedades Vasculares/diagnóstico por imagen , Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/cirugía
3.
Case Rep Cardiol ; 2018: 6790120, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29682356

RESUMEN

Vascular complications from transradial percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are rare. We report an unusual case of stridor after PCI due to brachiocephalic artery perforation, pseudoaneurysm formation, and development of a large mediastinal hematoma with tracheal compression. Endovascular repair of the brachiocephalic artery was achieved with covered stent placement at the neck of the pseudoaneurysm. This case highlights the importance of careful guide catheter placement from the right radial approach. Ultimately, rapid diagnosis of vascular perforation, appropriate airway management, and prompt endovascular repair of the injured vessel is critical to the successful management of this life-threatening condition.

4.
Am J Cardiol ; 118(4): 477-81, 2016 Aug 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27328954

RESUMEN

Left transradial approach (TRA) for coronary angiography is associated with lower radiation parameters than right TRA in an all-comers population. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of left versus right TRA on radiation parameters in patients with predictors of TRA failure. Patients with predictors of TRA failure (≥3 of 4 following criteria: age ≥70 years, female gender, height ≤64 inches, and hypertension) referred to TRA operators were randomized to either right (n = 50) or left (n = 50) TRA, whereas those referred to transfemoral approach (TFA) operators were enrolled in a prospective registry (n = 50). The primary end point was the radiation measure of dose-area product (DAP). In an intention-to-treat analysis, DAP (34.1 Gy·cm(2) [24.9 to 45.6] vs 41.9 Gy·cm(2) [27.3 to 58.0], p = 0.08), fluoroscopy time (3.7 minutes [2.4 to 6.3] vs 5.6 minutes [3.1 to 8.7], p = 0.07), and operator radiation exposure (516 µR [275 to 967] vs 730 µR [503 to 1,165], p = 0.06) were not significantly different between left and right TRA, but total dose (411 mGy [310 to 592] vs 537 mGy [368 to 780], p = 0.03) was significantly lower with left versus right TRA. Radiation parameters were lowest in the TFA cohort (DAP 24.5 Gy·cm(2) [15.7 to 33.2], p <0.001; fluoroscopy time 2.3 minutes [1.5 to 3.7], p <0.001; operator radiation exposure 387 µR [264 to 557]; total dose 345 mGy [250 to 468], p = 0.001). Results were similar after adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics. In conclusion, median measurements of radiation were overall not significantly different between left versus right TRA in this select population of patients with predictors of TRA failure. All measurements of radiation were lowest in the TFA group.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Arteria Radial , Dosis de Radiación , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Estatura , Cardiólogos , Femenino , Fluoroscopía , Humanos , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Exposición Profesional , Factores Sexuales
5.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; 49(7): 188-94, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26490645

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The Tissue Removal Assessment with Ultrasound of the SFA and Popliteal (TRUTH) study assessed the performance of the orbital atherectomy system (OAS) to treat femoropopliteal arteries, including determining its effect on plaque removal. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal peripheral arterial disease were treated with the OAS followed by adjunctive balloon angioplasty (BA). Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images were collected pre- and post-OAS and post-OAS BA. Patients were followed through 12 months post-procedure. RESULTS: Twenty-nine lesions were treated with OAS-BA in 25 patients. The mean maximum balloon inflation pressure was 5.2 ± 1.2 atm. Virtual histology IVUS (VH-IVUS) analysis revealed at the maximum calcium ablation site that calcium reduction was responsible for 86% of the lumen area increase. The minimum lumen area increased from 4.0 mm(2) to 9.1 mm(2) (<.0001), and the percentage of area stenosis decreased from 76.9% to 43.0% (<.0001) after OAS-BA. At 12 months, the target lesion revascularization rate was 8.2%, and ankle-brachial index and Rutherford classification improved significantly from baseline through follow-up. CONCLUSION: The VH-IVUS analysis reveals that OAS modifies the calcified component of the plaque burden. It is hypothesized that calcium modification by OAS changes the lesion compliance, allowing for low pressure adjunctive BA. The clinical outcomes were favorable through 12-month follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia de Balón , Aterectomía/métodos , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Placa Aterosclerótica , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Calcificación Vascular/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Índice Tobillo Braquial , Aterectomía/instrumentación , Constricción Patológica , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ciudad de Nueva York , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Arteria Poplítea/fisiopatología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Calcificación Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Calcificación Vascular/fisiopatología , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
6.
Am J Cardiol ; 113(9): 1474-80, 2014 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24630791

RESUMEN

Periprocedural hyperglycemia is an independent predictor of mortality in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, periprocedural management of blood glucose is not standardized. The effects of routinely continuing long-acting glucose-lowering medications before coronary angiography with possible PCI on periprocedural glycemic control have not been investigated. Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM; n = 172) were randomized to continue (Continue group; n = 86) or hold (Hold group; n = 86) their clinically prescribed long-acting glucose-lowering medications before the procedure. The primary end point was glucose level on procedural access. In a subset of patients (no DM group: n = 25; Continue group: n = 25; and Hold group: n = 25), selected measures of platelet activity that change acutely were assessed. Patients with DM randomized to the Continue group had lower blood glucose levels on procedural access compared with those randomized to the Hold group (117 [97 to 151] vs 134 [117 to 172] mg/dl, p = 0.002). There were two hypoglycemic events in the Continue group and none in the Hold group, and no adverse events in either group. Selected markers of platelet activity differed across the no DM, Continue, and Hold groups (leukocyte platelet aggregates: 8.1% [7.2 to 10.4], 8.7% [6.9 to 11.4], 10.9% [8.6 to 14.7], p = 0.007; monocyte platelet aggregates: 14.0% [10.3 to 16.3], 20.8% [16.2 to 27.0], 22.5% [15.2 to 35.4], p <0.001; soluble p-selectin: 51.9 ng/ml [39.7 to 74.0], 59.1 ng/ml [46.8 to 73.2], 72.2 ng/ml [58.4 to 77.4], p = 0.014). In conclusion, routinely continuing clinically prescribed long-acting glucose-lowering medications before coronary angiography with possible PCI help achieve periprocedural euglycemia, appear safe, and should be considered as a strategy for achieving periprocedural glycemic control.


Asunto(s)
Glucemia/análisis , Angiografía Coronaria , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Anciano , Plaquetas/fisiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Preoperatorio
7.
Am Heart J ; 165(3): 286-92, 2013 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23453094

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Studies demonstrate an increase in radiation exposure with transradial approach (TRA) when compared with transfemoral approach (TFA) for coronary angiography. Given the learning curve associated with TRA, it is not known if this increased radiation exposure to patients is seen when procedures are performed by experienced operators. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 1,696 patients who underwent coronary angiography with or without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by experienced operators at a tertiary center from October 2010 to June 2011. Experienced operators were defined as those that perform >75 PCIs/year with >95% of cases performed using the TRA or TFA approach for ≥5 years. The outcomes of interest were dose area product (DAP) and fluoroscopy time (FT). RESULTS: Of the 1,696 patients, 1,382 (81.5%) were performed by experienced femoral operators using TFA and 314 (18.5%) were performed by experienced radial operators using TRA. Most of these cases (65.4%) were diagnostic only (870 TFA and 240 TRA) with both DAP (6040 [3210-8786] vs 5019 [3377-6869] µGy·m(2), P = .003] and FT [6.2 [4.0-10.3] vs 3.3 [2.6-5.0] minutes, P < .001) significantly higher using TRA versus TFA. For procedures involving PCI, despite similar baseline patient, procedural and lesion characteristics, DAP and FT remained significantly higher using TRA versus TFA (19,649 [11,996-25,929] vs 15,395 [10,078-21,617] µGy·m(2), P = .02 and 22.1 [13.3-31.0] vs. 13.8 [9.8-20.3] minutes, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing coronary angiography by experienced operators, TRA was associated with higher radiation exposure when compared with TFA.


Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria/efectos adversos , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Radial/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Seguridad del Paciente , Competencia Profesional , Radiación , Estudios Retrospectivos
9.
Circulation ; 125(23): 2873-91, 2012 Jun 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22586281

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting stents (DES) have been in clinical use for nearly a decade; however, the relative short- and long-term efficacy and safety of DES compared with bare-metal stents (BMS) and among the DES types are less well defined. METHODS AND RESULTS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched for randomized clinical trials, until March 2012, that compared any of the Food and Drug Administration-approved durable stent and polymer DES (sirolimus-eluting stent [SES], paclitaxel-eluting stent [PES], everolimus-eluting stent [EES], zotarolimus-eluting stent [ZES], and ZES-Resolute [ZES-R]) with each other or against BMS for de novo coronary lesions, enrolling at least 100 patients and with follow-up of at least 6 months. Short-term (≤ 1 year) and long-term efficacy (target-vessel revascularization, target-lesion revascularization) and safety (death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis) outcomes were evaluated and trial-level data pooled by both mixed-treatment comparison and direct comparison analyses. From 76 randomized clinical trials with 117 762 patient-years of follow-up, compared with BMS, each DES reduced long-term target-vessel revascularization (39%-61%), but the magnitude varied by DES type (EES~SES~ZES-R>PES~ZES>BMS), with a >42% probability that EES had the lowest target-vessel revascularization rate. There was no increase in the risk of any long-term safety outcomes, including stent thrombosis, with any DES (versus BMS). In addition, there was reduction in myocardial infarction (all DES except PES versus BMS) and stent thrombosis (with EES versus BMS: Rate ratio, 0.51; 95% credibility interval, 0.35-0.73). The safest DES appeared to be EES (>86% probability), with reduction in myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis compared with BMS. Short-term outcomes were similar to long-term outcomes, with SES, ZES-R, and everolimus-eluting stent being the most efficacious and EES being the safest stent. CONCLUSIONS: DES are highly efficacious at reducing the risk of target-vessel revascularization without an increase in any safety outcomes, including stent thrombosis. However, among the DES types, there were considerable differences, such that EES, SES, and ZES-R were the most efficacious and EES was the safest stent.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/epidemiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Reestenosis Coronaria/epidemiología , Reestenosis Coronaria/prevención & control , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos/efectos adversos , Everolimus , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Metales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Sirolimus/análogos & derivados , Sirolimus/uso terapéutico , Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Moduladores de Tubulina/uso terapéutico
10.
Circulation ; 124(13): 1414-25, 2011 Sep 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21900087

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is no angiographically demonstrable obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in a significant minority of patients with myocardial infarction, particularly women. We sought to determine the mechanism(s) of myocardial infarction in this setting using multiple imaging techniques. METHODS AND RESULTS: Women with myocardial infarction were enrolled prospectively, before angiography, if possible. Women with ≥50% angiographic stenosis or use of vasospastic agents were excluded. Intravascular ultrasound was performed during angiography; cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed within 1 week. Fifty women (age, 57±13 years) had median peak troponin of 1.60 ng/mL; 11 had ST-segment elevation. Median diameter stenosis of the worst lesion was 20% by angiography; 15 patients (30%) had normal angiograms. Plaque disruption was observed in 16 of 42 patients (38%) undergoing intravascular ultrasound. There were abnormal myocardial cardiac magnetic resonance imaging findings in 26 of 44 patients (59%) undergoing cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in 17 patients, and T2 signal hyperintensity indicating edema in 9 additional patients. The most common LGE pattern was ischemic (transmural/subendocardial). Nonischemic LGE patterns (midmyocardial/subepicardial) were also observed. Although LGE was infrequent with plaque disruption, T2 signal hyperintensity was common with plaque disruption. CONCLUSIONS: Plaque rupture and ulceration are common in women with myocardial infarction without angiographically demonstrable obstructive coronary artery disease. In addition, LGE is common in this cohort of women, with an ischemic pattern of injury most evident. Vasospasm and embolism are possible mechanisms of ischemic LGE without plaque disruption. Intravascular ultrasound and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging provide complementary mechanistic insights into female myocardial infarction patients without obstructive coronary artery disease and may be useful in identifying potential causes and therapies. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00798122.


Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Isquemia Miocárdica/complicaciones , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Vasoespasmo Coronario/complicaciones , Vasoespasmo Coronario/diagnóstico , Electrocardiografía , Embolia/complicaciones , Embolia/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Placa Aterosclerótica/complicaciones , Placa Aterosclerótica/diagnóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Cardiomiopatía de Takotsubo/complicaciones , Cardiomiopatía de Takotsubo/diagnóstico , Ultrasonografía Intervencional
11.
Clin Cardiol ; 33(8): 495-501, 2010 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20734447

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A substantial minority of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) do not have a diameter stenosis of any major epicardial coronary artery on angiography ("no obstruction at angiography") of > or = 50%. We examined the frequency of this finding and its relationship to race and sex. HYPOTHESIS: Among patients with myocardial infarction, younger age, female sex and non-white race are associated with the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease at angiography. METHODS: We reviewed the results of all angiograms performed from May 19, 2006 to September 29, 2006 at 1 private (n = 793) and 1 public (n = 578) urban academic medical center. Charts were reviewed for indication and results of angiography, and for demographics. RESULTS: The cohort included 518 patients with ACS. There was no obstruction at angiography in 106 patients (21%), including 48 (18%) of 258 patients with myocardial infarction. Women were more likely to have no obstruction at angiography than men, both in the overall cohort (55/170 women [32%] vs 51/348 men [15%], P < 0.001) and in the subset with MI (29/90 women [32%] vs 19/168 men [11%], P < 0.001). Black patients were more likely to have no obstruction at angiography relative to any other subgroup (24/66 [36%] vs 41/229 [18%] Whites, 31/150 [21%] Hispanics, and 5/58 [9%] Asians, P = 0.001). Among women, Black patients more frequently had no obstruction at angiography compared with other ethnic groups (16/27 [59%] vs 17/59 [29%] Whites, 17/60 [28%] Hispanics, and 3/19 [6%] Asians, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of a multiethnic sample of patients with ACS were found to have no stenosis > or = 50% in diameter at coronary angiography. This was particularly common among women and Black patients.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/etnología , Angiografía Coronaria , Estenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Coronaria/etnología , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Médicos Académicos , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Asiático/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio/etnología , Ciudad de Nueva York , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos
12.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv ; 2(2): 113-23, 2009 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20031704

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: AVID (Angiography Versus Intravascular ultrasound-Directed stent placement) is a multicenter, randomized controlled trial designed to assess the effect of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-directed stent placement on the 12-month rate of target lesion revascularization (TLR). METHODS AND RESULTS: After elective coronary stent placement and an optimal angiographic result (<10% stenosis), 800 patients were randomized to Angiography- or IVUS-directed therapy. Blinded IVUS was performed in the Angiography group without further therapy. In the IVUS group, IVUS criteria for optimal stent placement (<10% area stenosis, apposition, and absence of dissection) were applied. Final minimum stent area was 6.90+/-2.43 mm(2) in the Angiography group and 7.55+/-2.82 mm(2) in the IVUS group (P=0.001). In the IVUS group, only 37% with inadequate expansion (<90%) received further therapy. The 12-month TLR rate was 12.0% in the Angiography group and 8.1% in the IVUS group (P=0.08, 95% confidence level [CI], [-8.3% to 0.5%]). When vessels with a distal reference diameter <2.5 mm by core laboratory angiography measurement were excluded from analysis, the 12-month TLR rate was 10.1% in the Angiography group and 4.3% in the IVUS group (P=0.01, 95% CI, [-10.6% to -1.2%]). With a pre-stent angiographic stenosis of > or =70%, the TLR rate was lower in the IVUS group compared with the Angiography group (3.1% versus 14.2%; P=0.002; 95% CI, [-18.4% to -4.2%]). CONCLUSIONS: IVUS-directed bare-metal stent placement results in larger acute stent dimensions without an increase in complications and a significantly lower 12-month TLR rate for vessels > or =2.5 mm by angiography and for vessels with high-grade pre-stent stenosis. However, for the entire sample analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis, IVUS-directed bare-metal stent placement does not significantly reduce the 12-month TLR rate when compared with stent placement guided by angiography alone. In addition, IVUS evaluation of adequate stent expansion is underutilized by experienced operators.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Angiografía Coronaria , Estenosis Coronaria/terapia , Metales , Radiografía Intervencional , Stents , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Anciano , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/mortalidad , Reestenosis Coronaria/etiología , Estenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Coronaria/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Diseño de Prótesis , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Trombosis/etiología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
13.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 2(5): 384-92, 2009 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19463459

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated demographic, clinical, and angiographic factors influencing the selection of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) in the BARI 2D (Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation in Type 2 Diabetes) trial. BACKGROUND: Factors guiding selection of mode of revascularization for patients with diabetes mellitus and multivessel CAD are not clearly defined. METHODS: In the BARI 2D trial, the selected revascularization strategy, CABG or PCI, was based on physician discretion, declared independent of randomization to either immediate or deferred revascularization if clinically warranted. We analyzed factors favoring selection of CABG versus PCI in 1,593 diabetic patients with multivessel CAD enrolled between 2001 and 2005. RESULTS: Selection of CABG over PCI was declared in 44% of patients and was driven by angiographic factors including triple vessel disease (odds ratio [OR]: 4.43), left anterior descending stenosis >or=70% (OR: 2.86), proximal left anterior descending stenosis >or=50% (OR: 1.78), total occlusion (OR: 2.35), and multiple class C lesions (OR: 2.06) (all p < 0.005). Nonangiographic predictors of CABG included age >or=65 years (OR: 1.43, p = 0.011) and non-U.S. region (OR: 2.89, p = 0.017). Absence of prior PCI (OR: 0.45, p < 0.001) and the availability of drug-eluting stents conferred a lower probability of choosing CABG (OR: 0.60, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of diabetic patients with multivessel disease were selected for PCI rather than CABG. Preference for CABG over PCI was largely based on angiographic features related to the extent, location, and nature of CAD, as well as geographic, demographic, and clinical factors. (Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation in Type 2 Diabetes [BARI 2D]; NCT00006305).


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatología , Anciano , Angioplastia de Balón , Intervalos de Confianza , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/fisiopatología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Revascularización Miocárdica , Oportunidad Relativa , Factores de Riesgo
14.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 51(17): 1645-52, 2008 Apr 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18436116

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate clinical outcomes of patients with diabetes mellitus in the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial, overall and by treatment arm. BACKGROUND: In the ACUITY trial, 13,819 patients with moderate- or high-risk acute coronary syndromes (ACS) were randomized to heparin (unfractionated or enoxaparin) plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition (GPI), bivalirudin plus GPI, or bivalirudin monotherapy. Compared with heparin plus GPI, bivalirudin monotherapy resulted in similar protection from ischemic events with less major bleeding. Whether these results apply to patients with diabetes is unknown. METHODS: We evaluated the impact of diabetes on 30-day net adverse clinical outcomes (composite ischemia [death, myocardial infarction, or unplanned ischemic revascularization] or major bleeding), overall and by antithrombotic strategy. RESULTS: Diabetes was present in 3,852 randomized patients (27.9%). Compared with nondiabetic patients, diabetic patients had higher 30-day rates of net adverse clinical outcomes (12.9% vs. 10.6%; p < 0.001), composite ischemia (8.7% vs. 7.2%; p = 0.003), and major bleeding (5.7% vs. 4.2%; p < 0.001). Among diabetic patients, compared with heparin plus GPI, bivalirudin plus GPI resulted in similar rates of net adverse clinical outcomes (14.0% vs. 13.8%; p = 0.89), while bivalirudin monotherapy resulted in a similar rate of composite ischemia (7.9% vs. 8.9%; p = 0.39) and less major bleeding (3.7% vs. 7.1%; p < 0.001), yielding fewer net adverse clinical outcomes (10.9% vs. 13.8%; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic patients with ACS managed invasively have higher rates of composite ischemia and major bleeding. Compared with treatment with heparin plus GPI, bivalirudin monotherapy provides similar protection from ischemic events with less major bleeding, resulting in a significant reduction in net adverse clinical outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/complicaciones , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/metabolismo , Fragmentos de Péptidos/uso terapéutico , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/metabolismo , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/fisiopatología , Enoxaparina/uso terapéutico , Heparina/uso terapéutico , Hirudinas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fragmentos de Péptidos/efectos adversos , Complejo GPIIb-IIIa de Glicoproteína Plaquetaria/antagonistas & inhibidores , Proteínas Recombinantes/efectos adversos , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapéutico , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
Am J Cardiol ; 100(9): 1364-9, 2007 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17950791

RESUMEN

Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have a significant risk of hemorrhagic complications. Predictors of major hemorrhage and its relation to mortality in PCI are not well defined. Baseline and periprocedural predictors of major hemorrhage and its impact on mortality in patients undergoing elective or urgent PCI randomly assigned to heparin plus planned glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI) versus bivalirudin plus provisional GPIs in the REPLACE-2 Trial were determined. Of 6,001 patients, 3.2% experienced a major hemorrhage. Independent baseline predictors of major hemorrhage included advanced age, female gender, impaired creatinine clearance, and anemia. Independent periprocedural predictors of major hemorrhage included treatment with heparin plus GPI, increased procedural duration, provisional use of GPI, increased time to sheath removal, length of intensive care unit stay, and use of an intra-aortic balloon pump (all p <0.05). Mortality rates were higher in patients with than without major hemorrhage at 30 days (5.1% vs 0.2%), 6 months (6.7% vs 1.0%), and 1 year (8.7% vs 1.9%; p <0.001 for all). Furthermore, major hemorrhage was an independent predictor of 1-year mortality (odds ratio 2.66, 95% confidence interval 1.44 to 4.92, p = 0.002). In conclusion, in patients undergoing elective or urgent PCI, major hemorrhage was an independent predictor of 1-year mortality. A number of baseline and periprocedural factors independently predicted major hemorrhage, including treatment with heparin plus GPI.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Coronaria/terapia , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Anciano , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/mortalidad , Antitrombinas/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Coronaria/mortalidad , Femenino , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Hirudinas , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Fragmentos de Péptidos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapéutico
16.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 67(6): 956-60, 2006 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16649236

RESUMEN

Percutaneous intervention with balloon expandable stents has proven to be an effective measure to enhance renal blood flow and control blood pressure in subjects with severe ostial renal artery lesions. A small cohort of these subjects have an ostial bifurcation, which complicates the approach to revascularization. In these cases there is a concern of creating a total side-branch occlusion during balloon expansion. We report two cases of an ostial lesion at a renal artery bifurcation revascularized by employing a sequential dilatation double guidewire technique. Using a single 7F sheath in each case, both renal artery branches were wired, and each branch was predilated and stented in a sequential fashion. Excellent angiographic results were obtained in both cases.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia de Balón , Obstrucción de la Arteria Renal/terapia , Stents , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Masculino , Radiografía Intervencional , Arteria Renal/diagnóstico por imagen , Obstrucción de la Arteria Renal/diagnóstico por imagen , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...