Diagnosis, therapeutic advances, and key recommendations for the management of factor X deficiency.

Factor X deficiency is a rare coagulation disorder that can be hereditary or acquired. The typology and severity of the associated bleeding symptoms are highly heterogeneous, adding to the difficulties of diagnosis and management. Evidence-based guidelines and reviews on factor X deficiency are generally limited to publications covering a range of rare bleeding disorders. Here we provide a comprehensive review of the literature on factor X deficiency, focusing on the hereditary form, and discuss the evolution in disease management and the evidence associated with available treatment options. Current recommendations advise clinicians to use single-factor replacement therapy for hereditary disease rather than multifactor therapies such as fresh frozen plasma, cryoprecipitate, and prothrombin complex concentrates. Consensus in treatment guidelines is still urgently needed to ensure optimal management of patients with factor X deficiency across the spectrum of disease severity.

An Open-Label Extension Study to Assess the Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of a Plasma-Derived von Willebrand Factor (VWF)/Factor VIII (FVIII) Concentrate in Patients with von Willebrand Disease (SWIFT-VWDext Study).

OBJECTIVE: Plasma-derived von Willebrand factor/factor VIII (pdVWF/FVIII; VONCENTO®, CSL Behring) is a high-concentration, low-volume, high-purity concentrate, which contains a high level of high-molecular-weight multimers and a VWF/FVIII ratio of ~2.4:1. The SWIFT ("Studies with von Willebrand factor/Factor VIII") program is evaluating pdVWF/FVIII in patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD). The long-term efficacy and safety profile of pdVWF/FVIII was investigated in this multicenter, open-label, extension study. METHODS: Pediatric, adolescent, and adult patients with VWD who required treatment of non-surgical bleeds (NSBs), treatment during surgical events or who were receiving prophylaxis and who had completed one of two previous clinical trials of pdVWF/FVIII were included. Efficacy and safety analyses were performed for on-demand (n=10), prophylaxis (n=8), or on-demand and prophylaxis (n=2) treatment in patients pre-treated with pdVWF/FVIII for ≥12 months. RESULTS: Seven patients experienced a total of 402 NSBs in the on-demand arm, of which 77 required treatment and nine NSB events in three patients were considered major. Nine patients reported 118 NSBs in the prophylaxis arm, with 96 events requiring treatment and seven patients experiencing 12 major NSB events. Excellent or good hemostatic efficacy was reported by the investigator for 98.7% (on-demand) and 97.9% (prophylaxis) of NSB events treated with pdVWF/FVIII, without relevant differences between subgroups by age. pdVWF/FVIII was well tolerated, and the adverse events seen were mild-moderate and consistent with the safety profile for this product seen in other studies. There were no cases of anaphylactic reactions and angioedema, development of VWF/FVIII inhibitors, thromboembolic events, or viral infections. CONCLUSION: This contemporary comprehensive development program evaluating pdVWF/FVIII across all ages demonstrates long-term safety and efficacy for treatment and prevention of bleeds in patients with severe VWD, supporting the benefit-risk profile of pdVWF/FVIII.

Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy and Safety of a Plasma-Derived VWF/FVIII Concentrate (Formulation V) in Pediatric Patients with von Willebrand Disease (SWIFTLY-VWD Study).

PURPOSE: Formulation V (VONCENTO®) is a plasma-derived high-concentration/low-volume, high-purity von Willebrand factor (VWF)/factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate, originally indicated for von Willebrand disease (VWD) in adults and adolescents. This multicenter, open-label study (SWIFTLY-VWD) evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK), as well as hemostatic efficacy and safety, of Formulation V in pediatric patients (<12 years) with severe VWD requiring treatment or prophylaxis of bleedings. METHODS: PK investigations were performed following one dose of Formulation V at Day 1 and 180. Nonsurgical bleeds were analyzed, while hemostatic efficacy was graded as excellent/good/moderate/none. Safety assessments included adverse events, and presence of VWF and/or FVIII inhibitors. RESULTS: Formulation V was administered as on-demand (N=13) or prophylaxis therapy (N=4) for 12 months (<6 years, N=9; 6 to <12 years, N=8). PK parameters for VWF markers were generally comparable to adults but showed lower VWF:ristocetin cofactor (RCo) exposure. Incidence of major bleeds was lower for prophylaxis (3.3%) than on-demand therapy (27.1%); joint bleeds were also lower (3.3% vs 11.5%, respectively). Investigator-reported excellent/good hemostatic efficacy against nonsurgical bleeds was 100%. No clinically relevant differences in PK, hemostatic efficacy, or safety were observed between age-groups (<6 years and 6 to <12 years). Formulation V was well tolerated. Adverse events were mild-moderate and consistent with the adult safety profile. No cases of anaphylactic reactions or angioedema, development of FVIII/VWF inhibitors, thromboembolic events, or viral infections were reported. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence for use of Formulation V to treat and prevent bleeding in pediatric patients with severe VWD, and led to the European approval of Formulation V in children.

Inhibitors in haemophilia A and B: Management of bleeds, inhibitor eradication and strategies for difficult-to-treat patients.

The standard therapy for patients with haemophilia is prophylactic treatment with replacement factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX). Patients who develop inhibitors against FVIII/FIX face an increased risk of bleeding, and the likelihood of early development of progressive arthropathy, alongside higher treatment-related costs. Bypassing agents can be used to prevent and control bleeding, as well as the recently licensed prophylaxis, emicizumab, but their efficacy is less predictable than that of factor replacement therapy. Antibody eradication, by way of immune tolerance induction (ITI), is still the preferred management strategy for treating patients with inhibitors. This approach is successful in most patients, but some are difficult to tolerise and/or are unresponsive to ITI, and they represent the most complicated patients to treat. However, there are limited clinical data and guidelines available to help guide physicians in formulating the next treatment steps in these patients. This review summarises currently available treatment options for patients with inhibitors, focussing on ITI regimens and those ITI strategies that may be used in difficult-to-treat patients. Some alternative, non-ITI approaches for inhibitor management, are also proposed.

The burden of inhibitors in haemophilia patients.

The burden of disease in haemophilia patients has wide ranging implications for the family and to society. There is evidence that having a current inhibitor increases the risk of morbidity and mortality. Morbidity is increased by the inability to treat adequately and its consequent disabilities, which then equates to a poor quality of life compared with non-inhibitor patients. The societal cost of care, or `burden of inhibitors', increases with the ongoing presence of an inhibitor. Therefore, it is clear that successful eradication of inhibitors by immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the single most important milestone one can achieve in an inhibitor patient. The type of factor VIII (FVIII) product used in ITI regimens varies worldwide. Despite ongoing debate, there is in vitro and retrospective clinical evidence to support the use of plasma-derived VWF-containing FVIII concentrates in ITI regimens in order to achieve early and high inhibitor eradication success rates.

Prophylaxis in congenital factor VII deficiency: indications, efficacy and safety. Results from the Seven Treatment Evaluation Registry (STER).

Because of the very short half-life of factor VII, prophylaxis in factor VII deficiency is considered a difficult endeavor. The clinical efficacy and safety of prophylactic regimens, and indications for their use, were evaluated in factor VII-deficient patients in the Seven Treatment Evaluation Registry. Prophylaxis data (38 courses) were analyzed from 34 patients with severe factor VII deficiency (<1-45 years of age, 21 female). Severest phenotypes (central nervous system, gastrointestinal, joint bleeding episodes) were highly prevalent. Twenty-one patients received recombinant activated factor VII (24 courses), four received plasma-derived factor VII, and ten received fresh frozen plasma. Prophylactic schedules clustered into "frequent" courses (three times weekly, n=23) and "infrequent" courses (≤ 2 times weekly, n=15). Excluding courses for menorrhagia, "frequent" and "infrequent" courses produced 18/23 (78%) and 5/12 (41%) "excellent" outcomes, respectively; relative risk, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-3.79; P=0.079. Long term prophylaxis lasted from 1 to >10 years. No thrombosis or new inhibitors occurred. In conclusion, a subset of patients with factor VII deficiency needed prophylaxis because of severe bleeding. Recombinant activated factor VII schedules based on "frequent" administrations (three times weekly) and a 90 µg/kg total weekly dose were effective. These data provide a rationale for long-term, safe prophylaxis in factor VII deficiency.

PRO-PACT: retrospective observational study on the prophylactic use of recombinant factor VIIa in hemophilia patients with inhibitors.

INTRODUCTION: Hemophilia patients with inhibitors have frequent bleeding episodes and often develop hemophilic arthropathy which is in contradistinction to non-inhibitor patients for whom prophylaxis prevents joint disease. Recently, two prospective trials have demonstrated that secondary prophylaxis with bypassing agents in inhibitor patients offers benefit by reducing bleeding episodes. This report describes the clinical experience of secondary prophylaxis in a large population of inhibitor patients. PATIENTS/METHODS: This retrospective, observational study was performed by abstracting data from medical records of patients in whom secondary prophylaxis with rFVIIa was prescribed. Data were collected by professional medical record abstractors and included patient demographics, dosing regimens, bleeding events, and healthcare resource utilization. Data analysis was descriptive and included sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Data from 86 patients from 14 countries were collected. The primary outcome measure (% reduction in bleeding) was 46% (95% CI, -54.0 to -38.2) in patients with at least one bleeding episodes prior to starting prophylaxis and 52% (95% CI, -60.7 to -43.3) in patients with at least one bleeding episode per month prior to starting prophylaxis. A variety of subanalyses were performed, including among age and bleed location; the results for pediatric patients, adults, target and non-target joint bleeds categorizations were similar to the overall primary outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The results in this large observational study are similar to those from the previously reported prospective study of prophylaxis with rFVIIa in inhibitor positive patients, although this study represents a more typical inhibitor population who utilized prophylaxis in the clinical setting. As such, prophylaxis should be considered a potentially effective therapy in hemophilia patients with inhibitors.

Experience of Advate rAHF-PFM in previously untreated patients and minimally treated patients with haemophilia A.

We report a prospective trial of 55 previously untreated patients (PUPs) and minimally treated patients (MTPs) with severe/moderately severe haemophilia A (baseline factor VIII [FVIII] ≤2%) treated with a single FVIII replacement product. It was the objective of this study to evaluate the immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety of rAHF-PFM (Advate®). On-demand or prophylactic treatment regimens were determined at the discretion of the investigator. rAHF-PFM was also permitted for perioperative management. There were 633 bleeding episodes (BEs), including 517 treated, and 466 rated for efficacy. Haemostatic efficacy was considered excellent/good in 93% of 466 rated treatments. Of 517 treated BEs, 463/517 (90%) were managed with one (356/517 [69%]) or two infusions (107/517 [21%]). There were 27 surgeries. Intraoperative (n=22) and postoperative (n=25) haemostatic efficacies were considered excellent or good in 100% of rated surgeries. Related serious adverse events (SAEs) were inhibitor development in 16/55 (29.1%) subjects who received at least one infusion of rAHF-PFM. Non-serious, related adverse events (AEs) were few in number (14 in eight subjects). The odds ratio (OR [95% Confidence Interval, CI]) of developing inhibitors was significantly higher in subjects with a family history of inhibitor (4.95[1.29-19.06]), non-Caucasian ethnicity (4.18, [1.18-14.82]), and intensive treatment at high dose (4.5 [1.05-19.25]) within ≤20 exposure days (EDs). In conclusion, rAHF-PFM was safe and effective for the management and perioperative coverage of PUPs/MTPs with severe/moderately severe haemophilia A. This report supports previous findings from studies in which family history of inhibitor, non-Caucasian ethnicity, and high intensity treatment were associated with high risk of inhibitor development.

Homozygous Factor X gene mutations Gly380Arg and Tyr163delAT are associated with perinatal intracranial hemorrhage.

Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a severe complication of Factor X (FX) deficiency. We report 6 homozygous patients with central nervous system (ICH) bleeds. Five patients are homozygous for the mutation Gly380Arg and one for the novel deletion Tyr163delAT. We describe the association of these mutations with ICH bleeding.