Safety and clinical impact of FEES - results of the FEES-registry.

BACKGROUND: At present, the flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) is one of the most commonly used methods for the objective assessment of swallowing. This multicenter trial prospectively collected data on the safety of FEES and also assessed the impact of this procedure on clinical dysphagia management. METHODS: Patients were recruited in 23 hospitals in Germany and Switzerland from September 2014 to May 2017. Patient characteristics, professional affiliation of the FEES examiners (physicians or speech and language therapists), side-effects and cardiorespiratory parameters, severity of dysphagia and clinical consequences of FEES were documented. RESULTS: 2401 patients, mean age 69.8 (14.6) years, 42.3% women, were included in the FEES-registry. The most common main diagnosis was stroke (61%), followed by Parkinson's disease (6.5%). FEES was well tolerated by patients. Complications were reported in 2% of examinations, were all self-limited and resolved without sequelae and showed no correlation to the endoscopist's previous experience. In more than 50% of investigations FEES led to changes of feeding strategies, in the majority of cases an upgrade of oral diet was possible. DISCUSSION: This study confirmed that FEES, even when performed by less experienced clinicians is a safe and well tolerated procedure and significantly impacts on the patients' clinical course. Implementation of a FEES-service in different clinical settings may improve dysphagia care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03037762, registered January 31st 2017.

Spasticity treatment with onabotulinumtoxin A: data from a prospective German real-life patient registry.

This study aimed at providing real-life baseline, injection and outcome data for the treatment of various forms of spasticity with onabotulinumtoxin A in Germany. Prospective data were collected in an open multicenter patient registry from 2005 until 2010, encompassing the experience of ten specialized German centers in the treatment of spasticity using onabotulinumtoxin A in 508 patients with a total of 2005 treatment sessions. Disease entities comprised spasticity following stroke (both ischemic and hemorrhagic), traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, and anoxia. Sustained improvement was observed in a variety of outcome parameters including goal attainment and motor performance scores for up to five repeated injection sessions. No significant differences between disease entities or between upper and lower limb treatment were observed with regard to efficacy and safety following onabotulinumtoxin A treatment. Minor to moderate side effects were reported in <1 % of the study population. We conclude that repetitive treatment of focal and multifocal spasticity with onabotulinumtoxin A provides a safe and efficacious therapeutic strategy for patients with different disease entities of the central nervous system.

Botulinum neurotoxin type A injections reduce spasticity in mild to moderate hereditary spastic paraplegia--report of 19 cases.

Hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) is characterized by lower extremity spasticity. Symptomatic therapy generally includes physical therapy and oral antispastic agents, in selected cases intrathecal baclofen. Because of the positive results in other treatments of spasticity, the use of botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) might also be considered for patients with HSP. We report the effect of BoNT-A injections in 19 unselected patients with HSP treated by the members of the German Spasticity Education Group. In 17 patients, the modified Ashworth scale had improved by one point. In one patient, it improved by three points. Most of the patients reported reduction of spasticity. BoNT-A injections were continued in 11 of 19 patients (57.9%). All of the patients with continued injections had a good or very good global subjective improvement. Patients with less pronounced spasticity and patients with accompanying physical therapy tended to exhibit a better effect. Only four patients reported adverse effects which were increased weakness in three patients and pain in one patient. BoNT-A injections appear to reduce spasticity effectively and safely, especially in patients with mild to moderate spasticity. The preliminary results of our case series should encourage larger studies of BoNT-A injections in HSP.