Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee Points to Consider: Integration of Clinical Pathology Data With Anatomic Pathology Data in Nonclinical Toxicology Studies.

Integrating clinical pathology data with anatomic pathology data is a common practice when reporting findings in the context of nonclinical toxicity studies and aids in understanding and communicating the nonclinical safety profile of test articles in development. Appropriate pathology data integration requires knowledge of analyte and tissue biology, species differences, methods of specimen acquisition and analysis, study procedures, and an understanding of the potential causes and effects of a variety of pathophysiologic processes. Neglecting these factors can lead to inappropriate data integration or a missed opportunity to enhance understanding and communication of observed changes. In such cases, nonclinical safety information relevant to human safety risk assessment may be misrepresented or misunderstood. This "Points to Consider" manuscript presents general concepts regarding pathology data integration in nonclinical studies, considerations for avoiding potential oversights and errors in data integration, and focused discussion on topics relevant to data integration for several key organ systems, including liver, kidney, and cardiovascular systems.

Margin of safety of extended-duration transdermal buprenorphine solution following multiple-dose administrations to cats.

Transdermal buprenorphine solution (TBS) is approved for the control of postoperative pain in cats where a single preoperative dose provides 4 days of analgesia. It is administered as a unit dose of 8 mg to cats weighing 1.2-3 kg and 20 mg to cats weighing to >3-7.5 kg, which is equivalent to a dosage on a bodyweight basis of 2.7-6.7 mg/kg. In this safety study, the 1X dose was defined as 6.7 mg/kg. Thirty-two cats (16 males and 16 females) were randomly allocated to placebo, 1, 2, and 3X TBS administered topically to the dorsal cervical skin every 4 days for 3 doses. Clinical observations, behavioral scores, mydriasis score (yes/no), and physiological variables were assessed or measured prior to each dose administration (0 h) and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 h following each treatment and prior to euthanasia on Day 12 or 13. Blood samples for clinical pathology were collected on Days - 1, 4, 8, and prior to euthanasia. There was little evidence of respiratory, cardiovascular, or gastrointestinal effects. Respiratory rates were above the reference range in all groups and lower by 10 breaths/min in the 3X group during the third dosing interval compared to placebo. There were no differences in heart rates. Constipation was transiently observed in approximately equal numbers in placebo- and TBS-treated cats. Behavioral scores showed sedation or euphoria was transient in the first dosing interval but became more prolonged with each dosing interval. Mydriasis was prolonged in the first dosing interval and diminished by the third dosing interval consistent with accommodation. Mean body temperatures in TBS-treated cats were up to 0.6°C (1.8°F) greater than placebo-treated cats. There were no clinically relevant changes to serum chemistry, hematology, or urinalysis outcomes nor gross or microscopic observations attributable to TBS. These data demonstrate that TBS is safe and well-tolerated when administered to 16-week-old cats at multiples of the approved dose and duration and supports clinical safety in the event of delayed buprenorphine metabolism, medication errors, or alterations in the dosing regimen.

Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee Points to Consider: Integration of Clinical Pathology Data With Anatomic Pathology Data in Nonclinical Toxicology Studies.

Integrating clinical pathology data with anatomic pathology data is a common practice when reporting findings in the context of nonclinical toxicity studies and aids in understanding and communicating the nonclinical safety profile of test articles in development. Appropriate pathology data integration requires knowledge of analyte and tissue biology, species differences, methods of specimen acquisition and analysis, study procedures, and an understanding of the potential causes and effects of a variety of pathophysiologic processes. Neglecting these factors can lead to inappropriate data integration or a missed opportunity to enhance understanding and communication of observed changes. In such cases, nonclinical safety information relevant to human safety risk assessment may be misrepresented or misunderstood. This "Points to Consider" manuscript presents general concepts regarding pathology data integration in nonclinical studies, considerations for avoiding potential oversights and errors in data integration, and focused discussion on topics relevant to data integration for several key organ systems including liver, kidney, and cardiovascular system.

Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee Points to Consider: Biological Sample Retention From Nonclinical Toxicity Studies.

Samples of biologic specimens and their derivatives (eg, wet tissues, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks, histology slides, frozen tissues, whole blood, serum/plasma, and urine) are routinely collected during the course of nonclinical toxicity studies. Good Laboratory Practice regulations and/or guidance specify minimum requirements for specimen retention duration, with the caveat that retention of biologic specimens need not extend beyond the duration of sample stability. However, limited availability of published data regarding stability for various purposes following storage of each specimen type has resulted in confusion, uncertainty, and inconsistency as to the appropriate duration for storage of these specimens. To address these issues, a working group of the Society of Toxicologic Pathology Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee was formed to review published information, regulations, and guidance pertinent to this topic and to summarize the current practices and rationales for retention duration through a survey-based approach. Information regarding experiences reaccessing biologic specimens and performing sample stability investigations was also collected. Based on this combined information, the working group developed several points to consider that may be referenced when developing or revising sample retention practices. [Box: see text].

Interpretative considerations for clinical pathology findings in nonclinical toxicology studies.

The interpretation of clinical pathology results from nonclinical safety studies is a fundamental component in hazard identification of new drug candidates. The ever-increasing complexity of nonclinical safety studies and sophistication of modern analytical methods have made the interpretation of clinical pathology information by a highly trained subject matter expert imperative. Certain interpretive techniques are particularly effective in the identification and characterization of clinical pathology effects. The purpose of this manuscript is to provide an overview of contemporary interpretive practices for clinical pathology results and to provide nonbinding recommendations aimed at improving consistency, quality, and overall value of clinical pathology interpretations generated in support of nonclinical toxicology studies.

Overview and considerations for the reporting of clinical pathology interpretations in nonclinical toxicology studies.

Clinical pathology reporting practices are diverse among individuals and organizations involved in nonclinical toxicology studies. Clear, informative, and consistent reporting of clinical pathology results increases their value and avoids misinterpretation, resulting in decreased drug development costs. In recent years, certain common practices in clinical pathology reporting have been embraced by industry leaders and more consistently utilized across the pharmaceutical industry. The purpose of this manuscript is to review current clinical pathology reporting practices and to provide nonbinding suggestions to improve consistency, quality, and value of clinical pathology reports generated in support of nonclinical toxicology studies.

Current Practices and Challenges in Method Validation.

Method validation is a cornerstone on which biomarker development and utilization rest. However, given the abundance of biomarker candidates that are being identified and characterized, validation of these entities for the use in nonclinical studies can be complex. The objective of this continuing education course was to review current practices and challenges encountered during the validation of methods for the analysis of novel biomarkers. Additionally, the importance of biological validation and correlation with pathology end points for biomarker candidates was discussed. This article is a summary of the materials presented at the 36th Annual Symposium of the Society of Toxicologic Pathology for a continuing education course titled "Current Practices and Challenges in Method Validation." The speakers were subject-matter experts in the validation of quantitative mass spectrometry, multiplex binding assays, biological biomarkers, and immunophenotyping and anatomic and clinical pathology considerations in biomarker qualification.

Influence of Study Design Variables on Clinical Pathology Data.

A number of factors related to study design have the potential to impact clinical pathology test results during the conduct of nonclinical safety studies. A thorough understanding of these factors is paramount in drawing accurate conclusions from clinical pathology data generated during such studies, particularly when attempting to make the distinction between test article and nontest article-related effects. Study design and conduct variables with potential to impact clinical pathology data discussed in this overview include those related to species and test system, animal age, animal care and husbandry practices, fasting, acclimatization periods, effects of transportation and stressors, route of administration, effects of in-life and surgical procedures, influence of study length, timing of blood collections, impact of vehicle/formulation composition, and some general concepts related to drug class. The material presented here is a summary based on information presented at the 35th Annual Symposium of the Society of Toxicologic Pathology (June 2016), during Symposium Session 2 titled "Deciphering Sources of Variability in Clinical Pathology-It's Not Just about the Numbers."

Cytological Bone Marrow Cell Differential Counts and Morphologic Findings in Healthy Cynomolgus Monkeys ( Macaca fascicularis) from Nonclinical Toxicology Studies.

Cytological bone marrow evaluation is utilized in nonclinical toxicology studies to characterize hematopoietic effects when the combined interpretation of histologic and complete blood count data does not yield sufficient information. Results from cytological bone marrow examination should be interpreted in the context of variability observed in concurrent control animals with consideration of cytologist experience and historical/published data. Cytological bone marrow differential counts and cellular morphologic findings from 130 (66 male, 64 female) healthy control cynomolgus monkeys from nonclinical toxicology studies were retrospectively analyzed. Myeloid to erythroid (M:E) ratios and the percentage of total cells for each cell type were determined from differential cell count data. M:E ratios ranged from 0.6:1 to 2.3:1. Percentages of total granulocytic cells, total erythroid cells, and lymphocytes ranged from 26.6% to 60.6%, 25.7% to 52.2%, and 5.5% to 40.4%, respectively. Monocytes, plasma cells, mast cells, and mitotic figures were typically <1% of total cells. Notable morphologic findings included occasional giant neutrophilic metamyelocytes and band neutrophils, ring-shaped band neutrophil nuclei, metarubricyte nuclear blebbing and binucleation, multiple or nonfused megakaryocyte nuclei, and emperipolesis. These results represent cytological bone marrow findings from healthy control cynomolgus monkeys utilized in nonclinical toxicology studies and provide insight into expected background variability.

Deciphering Sources of Variability in Clinical Pathology.

The objectives of this session were to explore causes of variability in clinical pathology data due to preanalytical and analytical variables as well as study design and other procedures that occur in toxicity testing studies. The presenters highlighted challenges associated with such variability in differentiating test article-related effects from the effects of experimental procedures and its impact on overall data interpretation. These presentations focused on preanalytical and analytical variables and study design-related factors and their influence on clinical pathology data, and the importance of various factors that influence data interpretation including statistical analysis and reference intervals. Overall, these presentations touched upon potential effect of many variables on clinical pathology parameters, including animal physiology, sample collection process, specimen handling and analysis, study design, and some discussion points on how to manage those variables to ensure accurate interpretation of clinical pathology data in toxicity studies. This article is a brief synopsis of presentations given in a session entitled "Deciphering Sources of Variability in Clinical Pathology-It's Not Just about the Numbers" that occurred at the 35th Annual Symposium of the Society of Toxicologic Pathology in San Diego, California.

Reducing blood volume requirements for clinical pathology testing in toxicologic studies-points to consider.

In preclinical safety assessment, blood volume requirements for various endpoints pose a major challenge. The goal of this working group was to review current practices for clinical pathology (CP) testing in preclinical toxicologic studies, and to discuss advantages and disadvantages of methods for reducing blood volume requirements. An industry-wide survey was conducted to gather information on CP instrumentation and blood collection practices for hematology, clinical biochemistry, and coagulation evaluation in laboratory animals involved in preclinical studies. Based on the survey results and collective experience of the authors, the working group proposes the following "points to consider" for CP testing: (1) For most commercial analyzers, 0.5 mL and 0.8 mL of whole blood are sufficient for hematology and biochemistry evaluation, respectively. (2) Small analyzers with low volume requirements and low throughput have limited utility in preclinical studies. (3) Sample pooling or dilution is inappropriate for many CP methods. (4) Appropriate collection sites should be determined based on blood volume requirements and technical expertise. (5) Microsampling does not provide sufficient volume given current analyzer and quality assurance requirements. (6) Study design considerations include: the use of older/larger animals (rodents), collection of CP samples before toxicokinetic samples, use of separate subsets of mice for hematology and clinical biochemistry testing, use of a priority list for clinical biochemistry, and when possible, eliminating coagulation testing.

Factors affecting urine reagent strip blood results in dogs and nonhuman primates and interpretation of urinalysis in preclinical toxicology studies: a Multi-Institution Contract Research Organization and BioPharmaceutical Company Perspective.

BACKGROUND: Urinalysis data in preclinical toxicology studies can be influenced by preanalytic and analytic factors which have the potential to confound interpretation. There is a paucity of information regarding positive reagent strip urinary blood reactions in healthy nonhuman primates (NHP) and Beagle dogs used in preclinical toxicology studies. OBJECTIVES: The objectives were (1) to establish historical control data for reagent strip urinary blood reactions in healthy NHP and Beagle dogs, (2) to determine the incidence of positive urinary blood reactions during predose and dosing phases, and (3) to determine if collection practice was a relevant parameter. METHODS: Historical control data from 2 institutions in the biopharmaceutical industry were retrospectively analyzed for reagent strip urinary blood reactions in healthy NHP and Beagles. The incidence of positive results between the 2 institutions with different urine collection practices and between males and females was compared. RESULTS: The incidence of positive urinary blood reactions in NHP was comparable between institutions (≤ 14% in males; ≤ 33% in females), while the incidence of positive urinary blood reactions in Beagles was more variable (≤ 77% in males; ≤ 69% in females), and higher in females during the dosing phase. CONCLUSIONS: Positive urinary blood results that could potentially be misinterpreted as toxicologically relevant were identified in healthy NHP and Beagles during predose and dosing phases. Different incidences of positive results between the 2 institutions were likely related to collection practices. Strategies to reduce feces and food contamination of collected urine samples should help minimize false-positive urinary blood reactions.

Background variability in standard clinical pathology biomarkers in beagle dogs instrumented with chronic indwelling telemetry devices.

INTRODUCTION: Contemporary best practice recommendations in preclinical cardiovascular safety assessment promote 3Rs principles. This includes the employment of within-subjects experimental designs to evaluate discrete, acute doses of investigational new drugs, as well as the maintenance of stock colonies of appropriate large animal test systems. Such colony species are often tested repeatedly on independent studies with provision of appropriate recovery periods and requisite health status evaluations (e.g., physical examinations, electrocardiographic assessments, clinical pathology evaluations). METHODS: To investigate the utility of the often reiterative process of pre- or inter-study clinical pathology testing to help ascertain health status of non-naïve, telemetered canines (beagle dogs), the present study collated the results of a randomly selected set of animals approximately every three months for a period of three years. RESULTS: Although occasionally a few routine hematology or clinical chemistry endpoints did demonstrate evidence of systematic trending over time, none of the observed fluctuations fell outside the range of expected biological variability, nor would have prevented assignment of any given animal to study. DISCUSSION: The present findings illustrate a high degree of consistency in routinely assessed clinical pathology parameters during the course of chronic telemetry instrumentation in the canine, including relative to historical control data in healthy, experimentally naïve animals of the same species and source, maintained under analogous laboratory conditions. The data suggest that routine assessment of such parameters for the purposes of facilitating judgments concerning suitability for study may represent a pursuit of little overall value, and which may be reasonably accomplished based on alternative, observation-based screening procedures.

Best practices for veterinary toxicologic clinical pathology, with emphasis on the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries.

The purpose of this paper by the Regulatory Affairs Committee (RAC) of the American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology (ASVCP) is to review the current regulatory guidances (eg, guidelines) and published recommendations for best practices in veterinary toxicologic clinical pathology, particularly in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, and to utilize the combined experience of ASVCP RAC to provide updated recommendations. Discussion points include (1) instrumentation, validation, and sample collection, (2) routine laboratory variables, (3) cytologic laboratory variables, (4) data interpretation and reporting (including peer review, reference intervals and statistics), and (5) roles and responsibilities of clinical pathologists and laboratory personnel. Revision and improvement of current practices should be in alignment with evolving regulatory guidance documents, new technology, and expanding understanding and utility of clinical pathology. These recommendations provide a contemporary guide for the refinement of veterinary toxicologic clinical pathology best practices.

Optimized processing of fine-needle lymph node biopsies for automated immunostaining.

A straightforward, reliable technique for postcollection processing and evaluation of cytologic specimens for antigen detection using an automated immunostainer was developed. Visual assessment of cell suspension turbidity was used in parallel with light microscopic examination of concentrated cytospin preparations to verify the diagnostic utility of samples for immunocytochemical staining. Fine-needle lymph node biopsies from 81 dogs with lymphadenomegally and a cytologic or histologic diagnosis of lymphoma were introduced into ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid tubes containing standardized storage media. Cell suspension turbidity was assessed to estimate cell concentration and resultant volume required for cytospin preparations with optimal cellularity. Preliminary cytospin preparations (using estimated volumes based upon turbidity) were stained using modified Wright stain and examined microscopically for intact neoplastic cell concentration. Once an optimal volume for cytospin preparations was established, additional concentrated slides were prepared for immunophenotyping, using an automated immunostainer and antibodies specific for cluster of differentiation (CD)79a and CD3e. All cell suspension samples with adequate gross turbidity had ample intact neoplastic cell concentration for immunocytochemical staining. Based on CD79a and CD3e expression, 51 (63%) B cell, 19 (23%) T cell, 3 mixed T and B cells (4%), and 3 non-T- and non-B-cell lymphomas (4%), as well as 5 (6%) nondiagnostic samples were identified. Three out of 5 of the nondiagnostic samples were submitted early in the investigation prior to the establishment of gross specimen turbidity guidelines. Immunocytochemical staining results were in complete agreement with all 6 available immunohistochemical correlates. The ability to visually assess sample adequacy prior to sample submission may encourage more widespread use of immunocytochemical techniques.