Effects of 10 to 30 years of lithium treatment on kidney function.

Long-term lithium treatment is associated with end-stage renal disease, but there is little evidence of a clinically significant reduction in renal function in most patients. We previously found that 1.5% of people who took lithium from the 1960s and 1970s developed end-stage renal disease; however, none of the patients who started after 1980 had end-stage renal disease. Here we aimed to study the prevalence and extent of kidney damage during the course of long-term lithium treatment since 1980. We retrieved serum lithium and creatinine levels from 4879 patients examined between 1 January 1981 and 31 December 2010. Only patients who started their lithium treatment during the study period and had at least 10 years of cumulative treatment were included. The study group comprised 630 adult patients (402 women and 228 men) with normal creatinine levels at the start of lithium treatment. There was a yearly increase in median serum creatinine levels already from the first year of treatment. About one-third of the patients who had taken lithium for 10-29 years had evidence of chronic renal failure but only 5% were in the severe or very severe category. The results indicate that a substantial proportion of adult patients who are treated with lithium for more than a decade develop signs of renal functional impairment, also when treated according to modern therapeutic principles. Our results emphasise that lithium treatment requires continuous monitoring of kidney function.

End-stage renal disease associated with prophylactic lithium treatment.

The primary aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of lithium associated end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and to compare the relative risk of ESRD in lithium users versus non-lithium users. Second, the role of lithium in the pathogenesis of ESRD was evaluated. We used the Swedish Renal Registry to search for lithium-treated patients with ESRD among 2644 patients with chronic renal replacement therapy (RRT)-either dialysis or transplantation, within two defined geographical areas in Sweden with 2.8 million inhabitants. The prevalence date was December 31, 2010. We found 30 ESRD patients with a history of lithium treatment. ESRD with RRT was significantly more prevalent among lithium users than among non-lithium users (p<0.001). The prevalence of ESRD with RRT in the lithium user population was 15.0‰ (95% CI 9.7-20.3), and close to two percent of the RRT population were lithium users. The relative risk of ESRD with RRT in the lithium user population compared with the general population was 7.8 (95% CI 5.4-11.1). Out of those 30 patients, lithium use was classified, based on chart reviews, as being the sole (n=14) or main (n=10) cause of ESRD in 24 cases. Their mean age at the start of RRT was 66 years (46-82), their mean time on lithium 27 years (12-39), and 22 of them had been on lithium for 15 years or more. We conclude that lithium-associated ESRD is an uncommon but not rare complication of lithium treatment.

The impact of modern treatment principles may have eliminated lithium-induced renal failure.

We have previously shown that lithium can cause end-stage renal disease (ESRD): however, this serious side-effect of lithium in prophylactic treatment of mood disorders may reflect the treatment regime of the 1960s and 1970s. Today's modern treatment routines, intended to reduce or eliminate lithium-induced ESRD (Li-ESRD), were introduced in Sweden in the early 1980s. The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that these routines have eliminated the risk of Li-ESRD. We used the Swedish Renal Registry to identify patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT), treated with dialysis or renal transplantation, with suspected Li-ESRD in two regions of Sweden with altogether about three million inhabitants. We reviewed their medical records to verify the exposure to lithium treatment, the diagnosis of Li-ESRD and the date of starting the lithium treatment. We found 32 RRT patients in whom lithium treatment was the sole or main contributing cause of ESRD. The starting year of their lithium treatment was between 1965-1980 in all patients. No patient started lithium treatment later than 1980. Modern lithium treatment may have eliminated the risk of Li-ESRD. Our findings support the continued use of lithium as a safe drug for the long-term treatment of mood disorders.

Renal failure occurs in chronic lithium treatment but is uncommon.

We sought to establish the prevalence of lithium-induced end-stage renal disease in two regions of Sweden with 2.7 million inhabitants corresponding to about 30% of the Swedish population. Eighteen patients with lithium-induced end-stage renal disease were identified among the 3369 patients in the general lithium-treated population, representing a sixfold increase in prevalence compared with the general population for renal replacement therapy. All lithium-treated patients were older than 46 years at end-stage renal disease with a mean lithium treatment time of 23 years with ten patients having discontinued lithium treatment an average of 10 years before the start of renal replacement therapy. The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (defined as plasma creatinine over 150 micromol/l) in the general lithium-treated population was about 1.2% (excluding patients on renal replacement therapy). Compared with lithium-treated patients without renal failure, those with chronic kidney disease were older and most were men but, as groups, their mean serum lithium levels and psychiatric diagnoses did not differ. We found that end-stage renal disease is an uncommon but not rare consequence of long-term lithium treatment and is more prevalent than previously thought. Time on lithium was the only identified risk factor in this study, suggesting that regular monitoring of renal function in these patients is mandatory.

Survival and quality of life after renal angioplasty: a five-year follow-up study.

OBJECTIVE: Renal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) treatment of renal artery stenosis has been performed worldwide since 1978, but it is still a matter of debate as to what extent the patients benefit from the procedure in terms of quality of life and long-term survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Of 139 patients referred for renal angioplasty owing to hypertension or pending uraemia, 105 were subsequently treated with PTA. Eighty-eight patients survived for 5 years. Fifty-nine patients were re-examined according to a protocol including physical examination, blood pressure, drug therapy, glomerular filtration rate and quality of life assessment, and an additional 29 patients were interviewed by telephone regarding quality of life. PTA was not conducted in 34 patients owing to high risks as decided at joint radiology-nephrology conferences. RESULTS: The 5-year survival was 83% for PTA-treated patients with arteriosclerotic renovascular disease, 100% for patients with fibromuscular vascular disease and 47% for the non-PTA-treated patients. The main causes of death were cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in both groups. Reduced blood pressure and reduced need for antihypertensive drug treatment were observed in the PTA-treated patients. The renal function was stable. A majority of the PTA-treated patients stated that they had "unrestricted" physical activity, and the physical, mental and social well-being was self-rated as level 4-5 (mostly good and very good) on a five-grade scale by 53%, 67% and 75% of the patients, respectively, at the follow-up investigation. The untreated patients were not interviewed. CONCLUSION: The study showed a high survival rate, improved blood pressure control and stable renal function 5 years after renal PTA, and a vast majority of the patients rated their physical, mental and social well-being favourably.

Novel mutations in the SLC12A3 gene causing Gitelman's syndrome in Swedes.

PURPOSE: Gitelman's syndrome (GS) is an inherited autosomal recessive disorder due to loss of function mutations in the SLC12A3 gene encoding the Na-Cl co-transporter (NCCT), the target of thiazide diuretics. The defective function of the NCCT, which normally is expressed in the apical membrane of the distal convolute tubule in the kidney, leads to mild hypotension, hypokalemia, hyperreninemic hyperaldosteronism, mild metabolic alkalosis, hypomagnesemia and hypocalciuria. Up to now, more than 100 mutations of the SLC12A3 gene have been described in GS patients. METHODS: We have collected 30 patients from Sweden with a clinical diagnosis of GS and undertaken a mutation screening by SSCP and successive sequencing of the 26 exons and intronic boundaries. Both mutations were identified in most (n = 28, 93%) and at least one mutation was identified in all patients. RESULTS: We found 22 different mutations evenly distributed throughout the gene, 11 of which have not been described previously. The new variants include 8 missense mutations (Glu68Lys, His69Asn, Argl45His, Vall53Met, Gly230Asp, Gly342Ala, Val677Leu and Gly867Ser), 1 insertion (c.834_835insG on exon 6) and 2 splice-site mutations (c.2667 + lT>G substitution in splicing donor site after exon 22, c.1569-1G>A substitution in the splicing acceptor site before exon 13). CONCLUSION: In Swedish patients with the clinical features of GS, disease-causing mutations in the SLC12A3 gene were identified in most patients. The spectrum of GS mutations is wide making full mutation screening of the SLC12A3 gene necessary to confirm the diagnosis.

Moderate salt restriction effectively lowers blood pressure and degree of salt sensitivity is related to baseline concentration of renin and N-terminal atrial natriuretic peptide in plasma.

OBJECTIVE: The effect of salt restriction on blood pressure is under intense debate. We tested the effect of 100 mmol salt reduction on ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) in 46 Swedish individuals, 39 of whom completed the study, using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over design. Furthermore, we tested whether the basal plasma concentration of renin or N-terminal atrial natriuretic peptide (Nt-proANP) predict the degree of salt sensitivity. METHODS: Participants received all meals and drinks with a total daily NaCl content of 50 mmol during 8 weeks. In addition, NaCl capsules (100 mmol/day) and corresponding placebo capsules were administered for 4 weeks each in random order. ABP after high-salt intake (150 mmol/day) was compared with ABP after low-salt intake (50 mmol/day). Salt sensitivity was defined as the difference between 24-h systolic ABP at the high-salt versus the low-salt periods. Baseline renin and Nt-proANP were related to salt sensitivity. RESULTS: Lowering of salt intake from 150 to 50 mmol/day induced significant blood pressure reductions (mean reduction, 95% confidence interval) in systolic and diastolic 24-h ABP (5.8, 3.4-8.2 and 2.6, 0.91-4.4 mmHg), daytime ABP (5.5, 2.9-8.1 and 2.3, 0.42-4.1 mmHg) and night-time ABP (6.4, 3.5-9.3 and 3.4, 1.4-5.5 mmHg). Baseline ln(renin) correlated inversely with salt sensitivity (r = -0.50, P = 0.001) whereas baseline ln(Nt-proANP) correlated directly (r = 0.33, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Lowering of salt intake with 100 mmol/day induces clinically relevant ABP reductions. Renin and Nt-proANP, measured with individuals on their habitual diet, could be useful biomarkers to identify individuals with the greatest blood pressure-lowering benefit from reduced salt intake.

Failure of angiotensin II to suppress plasma renin activity in normotensive subjects with a positive family history of hypertension.

The renin-angiotensin system is implicated in the pathophysiology of hypertension. Renin release is regulated by a number of factors, including circulating Ang II (angiotensin II), the so-called short feedback loop. The aim of the present study was to investigate the responsiveness of circulating Ang II on PRA (plasma renin activity) in normotensive subjects with a PFH or NFH (positive or negative family history of hypertension respectively). PRA, renal haemodynamics and urinary sodium excretion were measured during infusion of Ang II without and with pretreatment with the AT1 (Ang II type 1) receptor blocker irbesartan. Normotensive men with a PFH (n=13) and NFH (n=10), with a mean age of 38 years, were given on different occasions intravenous Ang II infusions of 0.1, 0.5 and 1.0 ng.kg-1 of body weight.min-1 before and after pretreatment with 150 mg of irbesartan once a day for 5 consecutive days. RPF (renal plasma flow) and GFR (glomerular filtration rate) were also measured. Before Ang II infusion, the PFH and NFH groups did not differ with respect to BP (blood pressure), body mass index, PRA, RBF (renal blood flow) or urinary sodium. There was no difference in BP or renal haemodynamic response to the highest Ang II dose between the groups. PRA declined with the highest Ang II dose (P<0.01) in subjects with a NFH, but not in subjects with a PFH. After treatment with irbesartan when Ang II had no effect on BP in either group, Ang II also suppressed PRA in subjects with a PFH (P<0.01), and the difference between the groups at baseline was thus eliminated. In conclusion, these findings indicate that subjects with a PFH have a defective Ang II suppression of PRA, which is corrected by AT1 receptor blockade.

[Adverse effects of lithium treatment and safety routines]. / Litiumbehandlingens biverkningar och säkerhetsrutiner.

Successful lithium treatment of manic disorders was reported in 1949 by John Cade. This marked the beginning of the pharmacological era in psychiatry. In spite of the emergence of alternative drugs with antimanic and moodstabilising properties, lithium remains the primary long-term treatment for preventing relapse of bipolar disorders. Among the adverse effects of lithium treatment are unintentional lithium intoxication, nephropathy, hypothyroidism, hypercalcemia, hyperparathyroidism, diarrhoea, tremor, weight gain, and effects on the fetus and the newborn child. Early detection or prevention of adverse effects, particularly lithium intoxication, is vital for safety. Therefore, P-lithium and P-creatinine are assessed every 4 months (and pre-lithium) while thyroid and parathyroid function, weight, 24 h consumption of liquids (or 24 h urinary output), B-glucose, and blood pressure are assessed annually (and pre-lithium). Urinary concentrating capacity and glomerular filtration rate are always measured after 5 years of lithium treatment, and always when clinically indicated. Patient education and annual reinforcement of his/her knowledge of pertinent aspects of the treatment and of risk factors for lithium intoxication are important aspects for ensuring safety.

Increased renal vascular sensitivity to angiotensin II in hypertension is due to decreased response to prostaglandins.

OBJECTIVES: An enhanced sensitivity to angiotensin II in the renal circulation has been demonstrated in the pre-hypertensive phase both in the spontaneously hypertensive rat and in man. To further characterize this abnormality and the role of prostanoids, renal haemodynamics in normotensive young men with a positive (PFH) or a negative (NFH) family history of hypertension were studied. METHODS: Renal vascular reactivity was assessed during infusion of angiotensin II with and without inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis. Normotensive men with PFH (n = 13) and with NFH (n = 10) with a mean age of 38 years were given on two different occasions: (i). angiotensin II infusion i.v. (0.1, 0.5 and 1.0 ng/kg per min) and (ii). angiotensin II infusion after inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis with indomethacin (150 mg daily three consecutive days). Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal plasma flow were measured with renal clearances of chromium edetic acid and para-aminohippuric acid. RESULTS: Before angiotensin II challenge, the groups did not differ with respect to blood pressure, body mass index, plasma renin activity, GFR, renal blood flow (RBF) or urinary sodium excretion. There was no significant difference in systolic or diastolic blood pressure response to angiotensin II between the two groups. In PFH, the lowest angiotensin II dose caused a significant decrease in RBF and increase in renal vascular resistance (RVR) from baseline (P < 0.01 for both). In NFH, only the highest angiotensin II dose produced a significant decrease in RBF and increase in RVR (P < 0.01 for both). During inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis, all three angiotensin II doses caused a significant decrease in RBF (P < 0.02) and increase in RVR (P < 0.02) also in NFH. The renal haemodynamic difference between PFH and NFH was thus eliminated. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that young human subjects with a positive family history of hypertension have a defective vasodilator prostaglandin system, which is responsible for increased renal vascular sensitivity to angiotensin II. Enhanced renal vasoconstriction may be an early event leading to the generation of primary hypertension.