Factors that influence owner consent for exploratory laparotomy in horses with colic in Australia and New Zealand.

BACKGROUND: Horse owners' motivators and barriers for consent to exploratory laparotomy are poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: To (1) determine the proportion of Australian and New Zealand horse owners who would consent to exploratory laparotomy and (2) identify motivators and barriers for consent. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed and distributed online. Descriptive statistics were calculated by tabulating respondents by their answers to whether they would consent to exploratory laparotomy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify variables associated with consenting to exploratory laparotomy. RESULTS: Two thousand two hundred horse owners participated with a 68.3% survey completion rate. Most were female (95.6%), and 18.7% stated they would consent to exploratory laparotomy, 55.2% would consider exploratory laparotomy and 26.1% would not consent to exploratory laparotomy being performed on their horse. Geographical location, intended use of the horse and perceptions regarding the cost and prognosis of exploratory laparotomy, as well as the previous experience of respondents significantly impacted the decision. Self-reported level of financial comfort, gender of respondents, number of horses owned and pre-existing relationship with nearest equine referral clinic did not impact the decision. Top motivators for exploratory laparotomy were high probability of survival, trust in hospital, emotional value of horse and the alternative being euthanasia. Top barriers for exploratory laparotomy were financial cost, uncertain outcome, welfare concern and age of the horse. MAIN LIMITATIONS: Self-selection bias and acquiescence in responses. CONCLUSIONS: Most respondents indicated that they would consider or consent to exploratory laparotomy. Several factors for owners to decide for exploratory laparotomy could be identified. Improved owner education regarding the positively reported survival rates for exploratory laparotomy would be beneficial.

INTRODUCTION/CONTEXTE: Les motivateurs et les obstacles derrières la décision des propriétaires d'autoriser ou pas une laparotomie exploratrice (LE) sur leurs chevaux demeurent mal compris. OBJECTIFS: (1) Déterminer la proportion des propriétaires de chevaux en Australie et Nouvelle-Zélande qui consentiraient à une LE et (2) identifier les motivateurs et obstacles contribuant à leur consentement. TYPE D'ÉTUDE: Étude transversale. MÉTHODES: Un questionnaire a été développé et distribué en ligne. Des statistiques descriptives ont été calculées en classifiant les répondants selon s'ils consentiraient ou non à une LE. Des analyses uni et multivariées ont été utilisées pour identifier les variables associées au consentement à la LE. RÉSULTATS: Deux milles deux cents propriétaires de chevaux ont participé et le taux de remplissage du sondage était de 68.3%. La majorité étaient des femmes (95.6%) et 18.7% donneraient leur consentement pour une LE, 55.2% considéraient une LE et 26.1% ne consentiraient pas à une LE pour leur cheval. La localisation géographique, la discipline du cheval et les perceptions relativement aux coûts et au pronostic pour une LE, de même que leurs expériences précédentes influenceraient la décision des participants de façon significative. La situation monétaire des participants (rapportés de leur plein gré), leur genre, le nombre de chevaux dont ils sont propriétaires et une relation pré-existante avec une clinique de référence à proximité n'influenceraient pas leur décision. Les motivateurs les plus importants pour le consentement à la LE étaient une chance de survie élevée, leur confiance envers le centre de référence, la valeur émotionnelle du cheval et les alternatives possibles à l'euthanasie. Les obstacles les plus flagrants étaient les coûts, une chance de survie incertaine, des préoccupations par rapport au bien-être du cheval et son âge. LIMITES PRINCIPALES: Biais de sélection et degré d'accord des réponses. CONCLUSIONS: La plupart des répondants consentiraient ou au moins considéraient une LE. Plusieurs facteurs influençant la décision des propriétaires ont pu être identifiés. Il est impératif pour les vétérinariares traitants d'éduquer les clients en ce qui concerne les taux de survie plus positifs suivant les laparotomies exploratrices.

Effect of exercise on serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin concentration in racehorses.

Serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (sNGAL) is a marker of renal injury, and its concentrations are affected by inflammation. Therefore, it could serve as a useful biomarker of disease or fitness in high-level competition. However, it has not yet been determined if sNGAL concentrations are affected by exercise. The aim of this study was to determine whether concentrations of equine sNGAL were affected by 1000 m galloping as the form of exercise used in the study. Pre- and post-gallop sNGAL, serum amyloid A, and creatinine concentrations were evaluated in 14 healthy Thoroughbred racehorses. The results showed that short, high-intensity exercise did not significantly affect sNGAL concentrations in healthy horses (P = .42), and no significant difference was found in either creatinine or serum amyloid A before and after galloping (P > .05). Therefore, it was determined that sNGAL was not influenced by the type of exercise used in the study and could have the potential to be used as a routine laboratory screening tool in horses even after strenuous exercise. Future research should clarify its use in a larger population and a broader range of equine sport disciplines, including endurance-related exercise.

Perforations of tri-layer nitrile-latex and natural rubber latex gloves during ex-vivo equine intestinal anastomoses.

OBJECTIVE: To compare perforation rates between tri-layer nitrile-latex and natural rubber latex surgical gloves after single-layer end-to-end jejunojejunal anastomoses in equine cadavers. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized ex-vivo study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Pairs of surgical gloves (n = 46) worn during jejunojejunal anastomoses. METHODS: Tri-layer nitrile-latex and rubber latex pairs of gloves were equally but randomly allocated to a right-handed surgeon performing 46 single-layer end-to-end jejunojejunal anastomoses on cadaveric material. Number and location of perforations were determined with the water leak test after each procedure. Ten unused pairs of both glove types were tested as controls. RESULTS: At least one perforation occurred in 41% (19/46) of the pairs of gloves. Glove perforations were present in 22% (5/23; 95% CI: 9-42) of tri-layer glove pairs and 61% (14/23; 95% CI: 41-78) of the rubber glove pairs. The odds of glove perforation were 5.6 times (p = .009, 95% CI: 1.5-20.5) lower when tri-layer rather than rubber gloves were used. The duration of procedure did not affect the risk of glove perforation (p = .679). No perforations were observed in the unused gloves. CONCLUSION: Perforations were less common when the surgeon wore tri-layer nitrile-latex gloves rather than to the natural rubber latex gloves tested in this study. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Tri-layer nitrile-latex gloves were more resistant to perforations in experimental settings; further studies may confirm that they are also superior in a clinical setting.

Effect of three different needle holders on gastrointestinal anastomosis construction time and bursting pressure in equine jejunal segments.

BACKGROUND: Equine small intestinal resection and anastomosis is a procedure where optimizing speed, without compromising integrity, is advantageous. There are a range of different needle holders available, but little is published on the impact surgical instrumentation has on surgical technique in veterinary medicine. The objectives of this study were to investigate if the needle holder type influences the anastomosis construction time, the anastomosis bursting pressure and whether the bursting pressure is influenced by the anastomosis construction time. Single layer end-to-end jejunojejunal anastomoses were performed on jejunal segments harvested from equine cadavers. These segments were randomly allocated to four groups. Three groups based on the needle holder type that was used: 16.5 cm Frimand (Group 1), 16 cm Mayo-Hegar (Group 2) or 20.5 cm Mayo-Hegar (Group 3) needle holders. One (Group 4) as control without anastomoses. Anastomosis construction time was recorded. Bursting pressure was determined by pumping green coloured fluid progressively into the lumen whilst recording intraluminal pressures. Maximum pressure reached prior to failure was recorded as bursting pressure. Construction times and bursting pressures were compared between needle holder, and the correlation between bursting pressure and construction time was estimated. RESULTS: Construction times were not statistically different between groups (P = 0.784). Segments from Group 2 and Group 3 burst at a statistically significantly lower pressure than those from Group 4; P = 0.031 and P = 0.001 respectively. Group 4 and Group 1 were not different (P = 0.125). The mean bursting pressure was highest in Group 4 (189 ± 61.9 mmHg), followed by Group 1 (166 ± 31 mmHg) and Group 2 (156 ± 42 mmHg), with Group 3 (139 ± 34 mmHg) having the lowest mean bursting pressure. Anastomosis construction time and bursting pressure were not correlated (P = 0.792). CONCLUSIONS: The tested needle holders had a significant effect on bursting pressure, but not on anastomosis construction time. In an experimental setting, the Frimand needle holder produced anastomoses with higher bursting pressures. Further studies are required to determine clinical implications.