Quercetin decreases the antinociceptive effect of diclofenac in an arthritic gout-pain model in rats.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the antinociceptive interaction between quercetin (QUER) and diclofenac (DIC) in experimental arthritic gout-pain. METHODS: The antinociceptive effect of DIC and QUER alone and in combination were evaluated using an arthritic gout-pain model. Pain was induced through intra-articular administration of uric acid in the rats and the treatments were administered 2 h later. Additionally, the cyclooxygenase (COX) activity was determined in rats treated with DIC, QUER and their combination. KEY FINDINGS: DIC induced a maximal effect of 69.7 ± 2.7% with 3.1 mg/kg; whereas QUER only produced 17.6 ± 2.6% with the maximal dose (316 mg/kg). Ten of twelve DIC + QUER combinations showed a lesser antinociceptive effect than DIC alone did (P < 0.05). Moreover, DIC reduced total-COX (70.4 ± 1.3 versus 52.4 ± 1.8 and 77.4 ± 9.0 versus 56.1 ± 1.3, P < 0.05) and COX-2 (60.1 ± 1.0 versus 42.4 ± 1.8 and 58.1 ± 2.4 versus 48.7 ± 1.3, P < 0.05) activity after 1 and 3 h, respectively. Nevertheless, only the COX-2 activity induced by DIC was prevented in the presence of QUER (63.2 ± 3.0 versus 60.1 ± 1.0 and 56.6 ± 1.3 versus 58.1 ± 2.4 at 1 and 3 h, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: All these data demonstrated that the simultaneous administration of QUER + DIC produces an unfavorable interaction on the antinociceptive effect of DIC. Therefore, this combination might not be recommendable to relieve arthritic gout-pain.

Antinociceptive Synergy Between Metamizole and Hesperidin in a Model of Visceral Pain in Mice.

BACKGROUND: Metamizole is used to relieve the visceral pain but its adverse effects limit its use. An alternative to improve its efficacy with lower doses is to combine it with a natural product as hesperidin. AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to evaluate the antinociceptive interaction between metamizole and hesperidin in a visceral pain model using an isobolographic analysis. METHODS: Antinociception was evaluated in the writhing model using acetic acid (1%) to induce writhes in mice. Metamizole (1-316 mg/kg), hesperidin (3-300 mg/kg), or combinations with a fixed-dose ratio of 1:1 were administered intraperitoneally 30 min before the acetic acid and the number of writhes was counted for 30 min. Isobolographic analysis was employed to define the nature of the compound interaction. RESULTS: Metamizole and hesperidin in individual administration induced dose-dependent antinociceptive effects, reached an efficacy of 84.2 ± 5.9% and 66.3 ± 7.4%, respectively. The ED50 values calculated from their dose-response curves were 84.5 ± 22.7 and 108.9 ± 17.9 mg/kg, respectively. The analysis of DRC for the metamizole + hesperidin combination, in a ratio 1:1 showed a ED50 COMB value lower than the ED50 ADD estimated from the additivity line from the isobologram (46.7 ± 6.3 vs. 96.7 ± 11.9 mg/kg, respectively). In addition, the pharmacological interaction calculated was of 0.48. These results suggest a synergistic interaction for the antinociceptive activity of metamizole + hesperidin combination. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that metamizole + hesperidin combination could be useful in treating visceral pain as it can interact synergistically using low dose of both drugs with the possibility of reducing the risk of adverse effects.