Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 72(2): 596-603, 2017 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27687074

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To estimate UK prevalence and incidence of clinically significant carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE), and to determine epidemiological characteristics, laboratory methods and infection prevention and control (IPC) measures in acute care facilities. METHODS: A 6 month survey was undertaken in November 2013-April 2014 in 21 sentinel UK laboratories as part of the European Survey on Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae (EuSCAPE) project. Up to 10 consecutive, non-duplicate, clinically significant and carbapenem-non-susceptible isolates of Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae were submitted to a reference laboratory. Participants answered a questionnaire on relevant laboratory methods and IPC measures. RESULTS: Of 102 isolates submitted, 89 (87%) were non-susceptible to ≥1 carbapenem, and 32 (36%) were confirmed as CPE. CPE were resistant to most antibiotics, except colistin (94% susceptible), gentamicin (63%), tigecycline (56%) and amikacin (53%). The prevalence of CPE was 0.02% (95% CI = 0.01%-0.03%). The incidence of CPE was 0.007 per 1000 patient-days (95% CI = 0.005-0.010), with north-west England the most affected region at 0.033 per 1000 patient-days (95% CI = 0.012-0.072). Recommended IPC measures were not universally followed, notably screening high-risk patients on admission (applied by 86%), using a CPE 'flag' on patients' records (70%) and alerting neighbouring hospitals when transferring affected patients (only 30%). Most sites (86%) had a laboratory protocol for CPE screening, most frequently using chromogenic agar (52%) or MacConkey/CLED agars with carbapenem discs (38%). CONCLUSIONS: The UK prevalence and incidence of clinically significant CPE is currently low, but these MDR bacteria affect most UK regions. Improved IPC measures, vigilance and monitoring are required.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Carbapenémicos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiología , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , beta-Lactamasas/genética , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana/genética , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamiento farmacológico , Escherichia coli/genética , Escherichia coli/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Control de Infecciones , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genética , Klebsiella pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reino Unido/epidemiología
2.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 66(11): 2628-31, 2011 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21810837

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Temocillin, a ß-lactam stable against most ß-lactamases [including extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBLs) and derepressed AmpC cephalosporinases (dAmpC)], has been suggested as an alternative to carbapenems when Pseudomonas can be excluded. Aims To assess temocillin clinical and microbiological cure rates (CCR and MCR) in infection caused by ESBL/dAmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae and the effects of different dosage regimens. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively from patients treated for at least 3 days with temocillin for urinary tract infection (n = 42), bloodstream infection (n = 42) or hospital-acquired pneumonia (n = 8) in six centres in the UK. RESULTS: Data on 92 infection episodes were collected. Overall CCR and MCR were 86% and 84% respectively; ESBL/dAmpC status had no effect. Significantly higher CCR and MCR occurred in patients treated with temocillin at optimal dosage [2 g twice daily or renally adjusted equivalent (ORAE)] compared with those treated with a suboptimal dosage (<2 g twice daily ORAE) (CCR 91% and MCR 92% versus CCR 73% and MCR 63%). This difference was more pronounced in the ESBL/dAmpC-positive subset (CCR 97% and MCR 97% versus CCR 67% and MCR 50%). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and microbiological efficacies of temocillin are unaffected by ESBL/dAmpC production, confirming its potential application as a carbapenem-sparing agent. Both CCR and MCR are optimized by a regimen of 2 g twice daily ORAE in ESBL/dAmpC-positive infection.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Bacterianas/metabolismo , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamiento farmacológico , Enterobacteriaceae/efectos de los fármacos , Penicilinas/uso terapéutico , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Clostridioides difficile/efectos de los fármacos , Inglaterra , Enterobacteriaceae/enzimología , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...