Performance benchmarks for open source porous electrode theory models.

The electrochemical response characteristics of existing and emerging porous electrode theory (PET) models was benchmarked to establish a common basis to assess their physical reaches, limitations, and accuracy. Three open source PET models: dualfoil, MPET, and LIONSIMBA were compared to simulate the discharge of a LiMn2O4-graphite cell against experimental data. For C-rates below 2C, the simulated discharge voltage curves matched the experimental data within 4% deviation for dualfoil, MPET, and LIONSIMBA, while for C-rates above 3C, dualfoil and MPET show smaller deviations, within 5%, against experiments. The electrochemical profiles of all three codes exhibit significant qualitative differences, despite showing the same macroscopic voltage response, leading the user to different conclusions regarding the battery performance and possible degradation mechanisms of the analyzed system.

Vericiguat, a novel sGC stimulator: Mechanism of action, clinical, and translational science.

Vericiguat, a novel soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) stimulator, is approved for the treatment of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Decreased nitric oxide (NO) availability, sGC desensitization to NO, sGC deficiency, and reduced cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) signaling are potential contributing factors for HF disease progression. Vericiguat works via stimulation of sGC in the critical NO-sGC-cGMP pathway. Vericiguat is primarily metabolized by glucuronidation via uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) isoforms UGT1A1 and UGT1A9. Urinary excretion and renal clearance of vericiguat are low. No intrinsic factor had a clinically relevant effect on vericiguat exposure. Vericiguat has low drug-drug interaction potential with no clinically relevant pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interactions observed with warfarin, digoxin, aspirin, or sacubitril/valsartan. The global phase III study VICTORIA included patients with HFrEF who had a recent HF hospitalization or intravenous diuretic treatment for HF. Treatment with vericiguat on top of standard of care resulted in a 10% relative reduction in the primary composite outcome of death from cardiovascular causes or first hospitalization for HF. Vericiguat was well-tolerated with low incidence of symptomatic hypotension and syncope compared to placebo. Given its positive benefit-risk profile, vericiguat is an important option for high-risk patients with HFrEF who are already on guideline-directed medical therapy and had recent worsening of HF. Future efforts to develop additional effective therapies are needed to further reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with HF.

Artificial intelligence inferred microstructural properties from voltage-capacity curves.

The quantification of microstructural properties to optimize battery design and performance, to maintain product quality, or to track the degradation of LIBs remains expensive and slow when performed through currently used characterization approaches. In this paper, a convolution neural network-based deep learning approach (CNN) is reported to infer electrode microstructural properties from the inexpensive, easy to measure cell voltage versus capacity data. The developed framework combines two CNN models to balance the bias and variance of the overall predictions. As an example application, the method was demonstrated against porous electrode theory-generated voltage versus capacity plots. For the graphite|LiMn[Formula: see text]O[Formula: see text] chemistry, each voltage curve was parameterized as a function of the cathode microstructure tortuosity and area density, delivering CNN predictions of Bruggeman's exponent and shape factor with 0.97 [Formula: see text] score within 2 s each, enabling to distinguish between different types of particle morphologies, anisotropies, and particle alignments. The developed neural network model can readily accelerate the processing-properties-performance and degradation characteristics of the existing and emerging LIB chemistries.

Pharmacodynamic interaction between intravenous nitroglycerin and oral sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) in healthy subjects.

PURPOSE: Sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) and nitroglycerin share the second messenger cGMP and lower blood pressure. Given the potential for co-administration of both drugs in patients with heart failure, this study was designed to investigate the potential for a pharmacodynamic drug interaction affecting blood pressure. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, crossover study, 40 healthy subjects received sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg bid (97/103 mg bid) or placebo for 5 days. Two hours after the morning dose of sacubitril/valsartan or placebo on day 5, subjects received intravenous nitroglycerin infusion at increasing doses up to 40 µg/min or placebo. Serial measurements of blood pressure (BP), heart rate, biomarkers and sacubitril/valsartan pharmacokinetics were conducted. RESULTS: Administration of nitroglycerin alone led to a dose- and time-dependent decrease in supine systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) which was similar when nitroglycerin was co-administered with sacubitril/valsartan. At the highest dose of nitroglycerin, the mean (95% CI) decrease from baseline of SBP/DBP was 19.54 (- 21.99, - 17.09)/12.38 (- 13.85, - 10.92) mmHg for nitroglycerin alone compared to 22.63 (- 25.06, - 20.21)/12.94 (- 14.38, - 11.49) mmHg when co-administered with sacubitril/valsartan. Co-administration of sacubitril/valsartan and nitroglycerin did not result in further plasma cGMP increase compared to sacubitril/valsartan alone. The co-administration of nitroglycerin and sacubitril/valsartan was safe and well tolerated and did not impact the pharmacokinetics of sacubitril/valsartan. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study demonstrate no pharmacodynamic drug interaction between nitroglycerin and sacubitril/valsartan in healthy subjects, suggesting that no change of dose selection and escalation recommendations or clinical monitoring during nitroglycerin administration is required.

Effect of the angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single dose of furosemide.

AIMS: Sacubitril/valsartan is indicated for the treatment of heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Furosemide, a loop diuretic commonly used for the treatment of HFrEF, may be coadministered with sacubitril/valsartan in clinical practice. The effect of sacubitril/valsartan on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of furosemide was evaluated in this open label, two-period, single-sequence study in healthy subjects. METHODS: All subjects (n = 28) received 40 mg oral single-dose furosemide during period 1, followed by a washout of 2 days. In period 2, sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg (97/103 mg) was administered twice daily for 5 days and a single dose of 40 mg furosemide was coadministered on day 6. Serial plasma and urine samples were collected to determine the pharmacokinetics of furosemide and sacubitril/valsartan and the pharmacodynamics of furosemide. The point estimates and the associated 90% confidence intervals for pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: Coadministration of furosemide with sacubitril/valsartan decreased the maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax ) [estimated geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval): 0.50 (0.44, 0.56)], area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to infinity [0.72 (0.67, 0.77)] and 24-h urinary excretion of furosemide [0.74 (0.69, 0.79)]. When coadministered with sacubitril/valsartan, 0-4-h, 4-8-h and 0-24-h diuresis in response to furosemide was reduced by ~7%, 21% and 0.2%, respectively, while natriuresis was reduced by ~ 28.5%, 7% and 15%, respectively. Post hoc analysis of the pivotal phase III Prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and morbidity in Heart Failure trial (PARADIGM-HF) indicated that the median furosemide dose was similar at baseline and at the end of the study in the sacubitril/valsartan group. CONCLUSIONS: Sacubitril/valsartan reduced plasma Cmax and AUC and 24-h urinary excretion of furosemide, while not significantly affecting its pharmacodynamic effects in healthy subjects.

Erratum to: Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696): A Novel Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor.

Sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) is indicated for the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Absorption of sacubitril/valsartan and conversion of sacubitril (prodrug) to sacubitrilat (neprilysin inhibitor) was rapid with maximum plasma concentrations of sacubitril, sacubitrilat, and valsartan (angiotensin receptor blocker) reaching within 0.5, 1.5-2.0, and 2.0-3.0 h, respectively. With a twofold increase in dose, an increase in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve was proportional for sacubitril, ~1.9-fold for sacubitrilat, and ~1.7-fold for valsartan in healthy subjects. Following multiple twice-daily administration, steady-state maximum plasma concentration was reached within 3 days, showing no accumulation for sacubitril and valsartan, while ~1.6-fold accumulation for sacubitrilat. Sacubitril is eliminated predominantly as sacubitrilat through the kidney; valsartan is eliminated mainly by biliary route. Drug-drug interactions of sacubitril/valsartan were evaluated with medications commonly used in patients with heart failure including furosemide, warfarin, digoxin, carvedilol, levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol combination, amlodipine, omeprazole, hydrochlorothiazide, intravenous nitrates, metformin, statins, and sildenafil. Co-administration with sacubitril/valsartan increased the maximum plasma concentration (~2.0-fold) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (1.3-fold) of atorvastatin; however, it did not affect the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin. Age, sex, or ethnicity did not affect the pharmacokinetics of sacubitril/valsartan. In patients with heart failure vs. healthy subjects, area under the plasma concentration-time curves of sacubitril, sacubitrilat, and valsartan were higher by approximately 1.6-, 2.1-, and 2.3-fold, respectively. Renal impairment had no significant impact on sacubitril and valsartan area under the plasma concentration-time curves, while the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of sacubitrilat correlated with degree of renal function (1.3-, 2.3-, 2.9-, and 3.3-fold with mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment, and end-stage renal disease, respectively). Moderate hepatic impairment increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curves of valsartan and sacubitrilat ~2.1-fold.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696): A Novel Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor.

Sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) is indicated for the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Absorption of sacubitril/valsartan and conversion of sacubitril (prodrug) to sacubitrilat (neprilysin inhibitor) was rapid with maximum plasma concentrations of sacubitril, sacubitrilat, and valsartan (angiotensin receptor blocker) reaching within 0.5, 1.5-2.0, and 2.0-3.0 h, respectively. With a two-fold increase in dose, an increase in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve was proportional for sacubitril, ~1.9-fold for sacubitrilat, and ~1.7-fold for valsartan in healthy subjects. Following multiple twice-daily administration, steady-state maximum plasma concentration was reached within 3 days, showing no accumulation for sacubitril and valsartan, while ~1.6-fold accumulation for sacubitrilat. Sacubitril is eliminated predominantly as sacubitrilat through the kidney; valsartan is eliminated mainly by biliary route. Drug-drug interactions of sacubitril/valsartan were evaluated with medications commonly used in patients with heart failure including furosemide, warfarin, digoxin, carvedilol, levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol combination, amlodipine, omeprazole, hydrochlorothiazide, intravenous nitrates, metformin, statins, and sildenafil. Co-administration with sacubitril/valsartan increased the maximum plasma concentration (~2.0-fold) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (1.3-fold) of atorvastatin; however, it did not affect the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin. Age, sex, or ethnicity did not affect the pharmacokinetics of sacubitril/valsartan. In patients with heart failure vs. healthy subjects, area under the plasma concentration-time curves of sacubitril, sacubitrilat, and valsartan were higher by approximately 1.6-, 2.1-, and 2.3-fold, respectively. Renal impairment had no significant impact on sacubitril and valsartan area under the plasma concentration-time curves, while the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of sacubitrilat correlated with degree of renal function (1.3-, 2.3-, 2.9-, and 3.3-fold with mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment, and end-stage renal disease, respectively). Moderate hepatic impairment increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curves of valsartan and sacubitrilat ~2.1-fold.

Evaluation of Drug-Drug Interaction Potential Between Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696) and Statins Using a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model.

Sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) has been approved for the treatment of heart failure. Sacubitril is an in vitro inhibitor of organic anion-transporting polypeptides (OATPs). In clinical studies, LCZ696 increased atorvastatin Cmax by 1.7-fold and area under the plasma concentration-time curve by 1.3-fold, but had little or no effect on simvastatin or simvastatin acid exposure. A physiologically based pharmacokinetics modeling approach was applied to explore the underlying mechanisms behind the statin-specific LCZ696 drug interaction observations. The model incorporated OATP-mediated clearance (CLint,T) for simvastatin and simvastatin acid to successfully describe the pharmacokinetic profiles of either analyte in the absence or presence of LCZ696. Moreover, the model successfully described the clinically observed drug effect with atorvastatin. The simulations clarified the critical parameters responsible for the observation of a low, yet clinically relevant, drug-drug interaction DDI between sacubitril and atorvastatin and the lack of effect with simvastatin acid. Atorvastatin is administered in its active form and rapidly achieves Cmax that coincide with the low Cmax of sacubitril. In contrast, simvastatin requires a hydrolysis step to the acid form and therefore is not present at the site of interactions at sacubitril concentrations that are inhibitory. Similar models were used to evaluate the drug-drug interaction risk for additional OATP-transported statins which predicted to maximally result in a 1.5-fold exposure increase.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696) After Single-Dose Administration in Healthy Chinese Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) is a first-in-class angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) and has been recently approved in several countries for the treatment of patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. This was the first study conducted to characterise the pharmacokinetics of LCZ696 analytes (pro-drug sacubitril, active neprilysin inhibitor LBQ657 and valsartan) after single-dose administration of LCZ696 in healthy Chinese subjects. METHODS: In this open-label, randomised, parallel-group study, following screening and baseline evaluation, eligible healthy subjects received single oral doses of LCZ696 50, 100, 200 or 400 mg. The pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of LCZ696 were assessed up to 72 h after dosing. A total of 40 healthy male subjects were enrolled, and all completed the study. RESULTS: Following oral administration, LCZ696 delivered systemic exposure to sacubitril, LBQ657 and valsartan with a median time to reach maximum plasma concentration (T max) ranging from 0.50 to 1.25, 2.00 to 3.00 and 1.50 to 2.50 h, respectively, over the investigated dose range. The mean terminal elimination half-life (T 1/2) ranged from 0.89 to 1.35, 8.57 to 9.24 and 5.33 to 7.91 h for sacubitril, LBQ657 and valsartan, respectively. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-last), and maximum plasma concentration (C max) for LBQ657 increased dose proportionally over the entire dose range. Dose linear increase in the exposure was observed across the dose range for sacubitril and valsartan. LCZ696 was safe and well tolerated at all doses in this study. Adverse events of only mild intensity, which required no treatment, were reported in 6 (15 %) subjects. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetic profiles of LCZ696 analytes in Chinese subjects are similar to those reported previously in Caucasian subjects.

Assessment of Drug-Drug Interaction Potential Between Atorvastatin and LCZ696, A Novel Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor, in Healthy Chinese Male Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: LCZ696 (sacubitril/valsartan), a novel angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor has been recently approved for the treatment of patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction. As several HF patients are likely to use statins as co-medications, the potential for a pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between atorvastatin and LCZ696 was evaluated. METHODS: This was an open-label, three-period, single-sequence study in 28 healthy Chinese male subjects wherein LCZ696 200 mg was administered twice daily for 5 days in period 1. Following a washout period, atorvastatin 80 mg was administered once daily for 4 days (period 2) and subsequently co-administered with LCZ696 200 mg for 5 days (period 3). Serial plasma samples were collected to determine pharmacokinetic parameters of LCZ696 analytes (sacubitril, LBQ657, and valsartan) and atorvastatin and its metabolites. RESULTS: Atorvastatin co-administration had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of LBQ657, while the AUCτ,ss and C max,ss of sacubitril increased by 30 and 19 %, respectively, and the corresponding values for valsartan decreased by 19 and 9 %, respectively. Co-administration with LCZ696 increased C max,ss of atorvastatin, o-hydroxyatorvastatin, and p-hydroxyatorvastatin by 74, 68, and 108 %, respectively, and the AUCτ,ss of corresponding analytes increased by 34, 22, and 26 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: While atorvastatin had no significant impact on the pharmacokinetics of LCZ696 analytes upon co-administration, the C max of atorvastatin and its metabolites increased twofold, with a marginal increase in AUC (<1.3-fold). Multiple-dose administration of LCZ696 200 mg twice daily and atorvastatin 80 mg once daily either alone or in combination was generally safe and well tolerated in healthy subjects.

Pharmacokinetics After Single Ascending Dose, Food Effect, and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696), an Angiotensin Receptor and Neprilysin Inhibitor, in Healthy Japanese Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: LCZ696 (sacubitril/valsartan) is a novel angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) that has been developed for treatment of heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction and approved in the US, Europe, and many other countries. METHODS: This randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted in healthy Japanese male subjects (N = 50) to assess the pharmacokinetics and safety of single ascending oral doses (20-600 mg) of LCZ696. Food effect was also evaluated following administration of 200 mg dose. Plasma and urine samples from 40 subjects receiving LCZ696 were collected to assess pharmacokinetics of LCZ696 analytes (sacubitril, sacubitrilat, and valsartan). RESULTS: Following single oral dose administration of LCZ696, sacubitril and valsartan rapidly appeared in systemic circulation with a dose-linear increase in the exposure to the LCZ696 analytes. Of the administered dose, approximately 0.85 %, 54.0 %, and 8.19 % of sacubitril, sacubitrilat, and valsartan, respectively, were recovered in urine. Food reduced AUC of sacubitril, sacubitrilat, and valsartan by 21, 8, and 40 %, respectively, and C max by 72, 27, and 51 %, respectively. CONCLUSION: Single oral doses of up to 600 mg of LCZ696 were safe and generally well tolerated in healthy Japanese male subjects.

Effect of food on the oral bioavailability of the angiotensin receptor - neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) in healthy subjects
.

OBJECTIVE: Sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) provides a novel therapeutic approach of neurohormonal modulation in heart failure via simultaneous inhibition of neprilysin and blockade of the angiotensin II type-1 receptor. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of food on the oral bioavailability of LCZ696 analytes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an open-label, randomized, 3-period crossover study in healthy subjects. Eligible subjects (N = 36) were randomized to 6 treatment sequences, each comprising 3 treatment periods during which subjects received a single oral dose of 400 mg LCZ696 under fasting condition and following a low- and high-fat meal. RESULTS: Following administration of LCZ696 after low- and high-fat meals, the mean Cmax of sacubitril and sacubitrilat (the active neprilysin inhibitor) decreased by 42 - 54% and 19 - 28%, respectively, while the tmax values increased. However, systemic exposure (AUCinf and AUClast) of sacubitril was slightly decreased (by 16% with low-fat meal) and that of sacubitrilat was unchanged in the presence of food. For valsartan, the Cmax decreased by ~ 40% when LCZ696 was administered after low- and high-fat meals. The systemic exposure of valsartan decreased by ~ 33% with a low-fat meal; however, it was unchanged with a high-fat meal. LCZ696 was generally safe and well tolerated in healthy subjects when administered under fasting or fed condition. CONCLUSION: Overall, administration of LCZ696 with meals decreased the rate and extent of absorption of sacubitril with little impact on the systemic exposure to sacubitrilat, its active metabolite. The systemic exposure to valsartan was decreased in the presence of food.
.

Effect of renal function on the pharmacokinetics of LCZ696 (sacubitril/valsartan), an angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor.

PURPOSE: LCZ696 (sacubitril/valsartan), an angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, is indicated for chronic heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for HF. Following oral administration, LCZ696 provides systemic exposure to valsartan and sacubitril (a prodrug), and its metabolite sacubitrilat (the active neprilysin inhibitor, formerly named as LBQ657), which is eliminated primarily via renal route. Since renal dysfunction is a common comorbidity in patients with HF, two open-label studies assessing the effect of mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment were conducted. METHODS: Patients with mild (N = 8; creatinine clearance [CrCl] 50 to ≤80 mL/min), moderate (N = 8; CrCl 30 to <50 mL/min), and severe (N = 6; CrCl <30 mL/min) renal impairment and matching healthy subjects (CrCl >80 mL/min) for each severity group were enrolled to assess the pharmacokinetics of LCZ696 analytes following administration of LCZ696 400 mg once daily (QD) on days 1 and 5. RESULTS: The steady-state Cmax and AUC0-24h of sacubitril and valsartan were unchanged in patients with renal impairment compared with healthy subjects. However, the steady-state Cmax of sacubitrilat was increased by ∼60 % in patients irrespective of degree of renal impairment; half-life increased from 12 h (in healthy subjects) to 21.1, 23.7, and 38.5 h, respectively; and AUC0-24h was increased 2.10-, 2.24-, and 2.70-fold, respectively, in patients with mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment. CONCLUSION: Renal dysfunction increases exposure to sacubitrilat while not impacting sacubitril and valsartan exposure. LCZ696 was generally well tolerated in patients with renal impairment.

Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696) in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction.

AIMS: Concomitant renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade and natriuretic peptide system enhancement may provide unique therapeutic benefits to patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This study assessed the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of LCZ696 in patients with HFrEF. METHODS: This was an open-label, noncontrolled single-sequence study. After a 24-h run-in period, patients (n = 30) with HFrEF (EF ≤ 40%; NYHA class II-IV) received LCZ696 100 mg twice daily (bid) for 7 days and 200 mg bid for 14 days, along with standard treatment for heart failure (HF) (except angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors [ACEIs] or angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs]). RESULTS: On Day 21, significant increases were observed in the plasma biomarkers indicative of neprilysin and RAAS inhibition (ratio-to-baseline: cyclic guanosine monophosphate [cGMP], 1.38; renin concentration and activity, 3.50 and 2.27, respectively; all, P < 0.05). Plasma NT-proBNP levels significantly decreased at all the time points on Days 7 and 21; plasma aldosterone and endothelin-1 levels significantly decreased on Day 21 (all, P < 0.05). Following administration of LCZ696, the Cmax of sacubitril (neprilysin inhibitor prodrug), LBQ657 (active neprilysin inhibitor), and valsartan were reached within 0.5, 2.5, and 2 h. Between 100- and 200-mg doses, the Cmax and AUC0-12 h for sacubitril and LBQ657 were approximately dose-proportional while that of valsartan was less than dose-proportional. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with LCZ696 for 21 days was well tolerated and resulted in plasma biomarker changes indicative of neprilysin and RAAS inhibition in patients with HF. The pharmacokinetic exposure of the LCZ696 analytes in patients with HF observed in this study is comparable to that observed in the pivotal Phase III study.

The effect of LCZ696 (sacubitril/valsartan) on amyloid-ß concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid in healthy subjects.

AIMS: LCZ696 (angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor) is a novel drug developed for the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Neprilysin is one of multiple enzymes degrading amyloid-ß (Aß). Its inhibition may increase Aß levels. The potential exists that treatment of LCZ696, through the inhibition of neprilysin by LBQ657 (an LCZ696 metabolite), may result in accumulation of Aß. The aim of this study was to assess the blood-brain-barrier penetration of LBQ657 and the potential effects of LCZ696 on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of Aß isoforms in healthy human volunteers. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized, parallel group, placebo-controlled study, healthy subjects received once daily LCZ696 (400 mg, n = 21) or placebo (n = 22) for 14 days. RESULTS: LCZ696 had no significant effect on CSF AUEC(0,36 h) of the aggregable Aß species 1-42 or 1-40 compared with placebo (estimated treatment ratios 0.98 [95% CI 0.73, 1.34; P = 0.919] and 1.05 [95% CI 0.82, 1.34; P = 0.702], respectively). A 42% increase in CSF AUEC(0,36 h) of soluble Aß 1-38 was observed (estimated treatment ratio 1.42 [95% CI 1.05, 1.91; P = 0.023]). CSF levels of LBQ657 and CSF Aß 1-42, 1-40, and 1-38 concentrations were not related (r(2) values 0.022, 0.010, and 0.008, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: LCZ696 did not cause changes in CSF levels of aggregable Aß isoforms (1-42 and 1-40) compared with placebo, despite achieving CSF concentrations of LBQ657 sufficient to inhibit neprilysin. The clinical relevance of the increase in soluble CSF Aß 1-38 is currently unknown.

Evaluation of food effect on the oral bioavailability of pradigastat, a diacylglycerol acyltransferase 1 inhibitor.

Pradigastat, a diacylglycerol acyltransferase 1 inhibitor, is being developed for the treatment of familial chylomicronemia syndrome. The results of two studies that evaluated the effect of food on the oral bioavailability of pradigastat using randomized, open-label, parallel group designs in healthy subjects (n=24/treatment/study) are presented. In study 1, a single dose of 20 mg pradigastat was administered under the fasted condition or with a high-fat meal. In study 2, a single dose of 40 mg pradigastat was administered under the fasted condition or with a low- or high-fat meal. At the 20 mg dose, the pradigastat Cmax and AUClast increased by 38% and 41%, respectively, with a high-fat meal. When 40 mg pradigastat was administered with a low-fat meal, the Cmax and AUClast increased by 8% and 18%, respectively, whereas with a high-fat meal the increase was 20% and 18%, respectively. The population pharmacokinetic analysis with the pooled data from 13 studies indicated that administration of pradigastat with a meal resulted in an increase of 30% in both the Cmax and AUC parameters. Based on these results, food overall increased pradigastat exposure in the range of less than 40%, which is not considered clinically significant. Both 20 and 40 mg doses of pradigastat were well tolerated under fasted or fed conditions.

Assessment of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between pradigastat and acetaminophen in healthy subjects.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of pradigastat, a diacylglycerol acyltransferase-1 inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics of acetaminophen, a gastric emptying marker. METHODS: Twenty-five healthy subjects were enrolled and received 1000 mg acetaminophen with meal in period 1, pradigastat (100 mg × 3 days followed by 40 mg × 7 days, 1 h before meal) in period 2, and 1000 mg acetaminophen at -2, -1, 0, +1, and +3 h with respect to meal timing in presence of steady-state pradigastat (40-mg maintenance dose) during periods 3-7. RESULTS: The geometric mean ratio and 90% confidence interval of Cmax and AUC of acetaminophen were within 80-125% suggesting that the rate ad extent of acetaminophen were not affected when given at various time points with respect to pradigastat/meal timing. The acetaminophen Tmax was also not impacted under all treatment conditions but increased from 0.75 to 2.00 h when administered 1 h after food. CONCLUSION: In the presence of steady-state pradigastat, the pharmacokinetics of acetaminophen is unchanged, when given before, with, or 3 h after a meal. However, when given 1 h after a meal, the Tmax of acetaminophen was delayed by ∼1.25 h without affecting Cmax or AUC.

Effect of food on the oral bioavailability of amlodipine/valsartan and amlodipine/valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide fixed dose combination tablets in healthy subjects.

A double fixed dose combination of amlodipine/valsartan and triple fixed dose combination of amlodipine/valsartan/HCTZ tablets have been developed to treat patients with moderate-to-severe hypertension. Here, we present the effect of food on the oral bioavailability of these two fixed dose combination tablets from two separate clinical studies in healthy subjects. Single oral doses of amlodipine/valsartan (10/160 mg) and amlodipine/valsartan/HCTZ (10/320/25 mg were administered under fasted or fed conditions. Blood samples were collected in both studies to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of amlodipine, valsartan, and/or HCTZ using non-compartmental analysis. Following amlodipine/valsartan administration, the geometric mean ratios (GMRs, 90% CI) of AUC0-∞ and Cmax were 1.09 (1.05-1.13) and 1.03 (0.97-1.09) for amlodipine, and 0.94 (0.81-1.10) and 0.86 (0.73-1.02) for valsartan, respectively. Following amlodipine/valsartan/HCTZ administration, the GMRs (90%CI) of AUC0-∞ and Cmax were 1.09 (1.04-1.15) and 1.11 (1.05-1.08) for amlodipine, 1.14 (0.99-1.31) and 1.12 (0.98-1.29) for valsartan, and 1.09 (1.02-1.16) and 0.86 (0.79-0.93) for HCTZ, respectively. Considering the sample size and pharmacokinetic variability associated with analytes, these study results indicate that food effect is minimal or none when fixed dose combination tablets are administered with food. In conclusion, both fixed dose combination tablets can be administered without regards to meals.

Evaluation of pharmacokinetic interactions between amlodipine, valsartan, and hydrochlorothiazide in patients with hypertension.

The steady-state pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction potential between amlodipine (10 mg), valsartan (320 mg), and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ; 25 mg) was evaluated in patients with hypertension in a multicenter, multiple-dose, open-label, 4-cohort, parallel-group study. Eligible patients were randomly allocated to the dual combination of valsartan + HCTZ, amlodipine + valsartan, or amlodipine + HCTZ and nonrandomly allotted to amlodipine + valsartan + HCTZ triple combination treatment. After 6 days of treatment with a half-maximal dose of different combinations, patients were up-titrated to the maximal drug doses from day 7 through day 17. PK parameters of corresponding analytes from the triple- and dual-treatment groups were estimated on day 17 and compared. Safety and tolerability of all treatments was assessed. The C ( ssmax ) and AUC(0-τ) values of amlodipine or HCTZ remained unaffected when administered with valsartan + HCTZ or valsartan + amlodipine, respectively. On the other hand, valsartan exposure increased by 10% to 25% when coadministered with HCTZ and amlodipine, which is not considered clinically relevant. In conclusion, there were no clinically relevant PK interactions with amlodipine, valsartan, and HCTZ triple combination compared with the corresponding dual combinations. All treatments were safe and well tolerated.

Treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease with L-4F, an apo-A1 mimetic, did not improve select biomarkers of HDL function.

L-4F, an apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) mimetic peptide (also known as APL180), was administered daily by either intravenous (IV) infusion for 7 days or by subcutaneous (SC) injection for 28 days in patients with coronary heart disease in two distinct clinical studies. L-4F was well tolerated at all doses tested. Despite achieving plasma levels (mean maximal plasma concentration of 2,907 ng/ml and 395 ng/ml, following IV infusion and SC injection, respectively), that were effective in previously published animal models, treatment with L-4F, as assessed by biomarkers of HDL function such as HDL-inflammatory index (HII), and paraoxonase activity, did not improve. Paradoxically, there was a 49% increase in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels after seven IV infusions of 30 mg L-4F (P < 0.05; compared with placebo) and a trend for hs-CRP increase in subjects receiving 30 mg SC injection for 28 days. In a subsequent, ex vivo study, addition of L-4F at concentrations of 150, 375, or 1,000 ng/ml to plasma from subjects prior to L-4F treatment resulted in significant dose-dependent HII improvement. In conclusion, in vivo L-4F treatment, delivered by either SC injection or IV infusion, did not improve HDL functional biomarkers despite achieving plasma levels that improved identical biomarkers ex vivo and in animal models.