Turkish Adaptation, Validity and Reliability Study of the Bush Francis Catatonia Rating and KANNER Scales. / Bush Francis Katatoni Degerlendirme ve KANNER Katatoni Ölçeklerinin Türkçe Uyarlama, Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalismasi.

OBJECTIVE: Catatonia is a common syndrome which can be lifethreatening due to its complications. The aims of the study were to translate the Bush Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS) and the KANNER Scale into Turkish, conduct the validity and reliability analyses and to compare the two scales. METHOD: During the study period extending over 20 consecutive months, the Turkish versions of the scales were administered to 84 patients who were hospitalized in the psychiatry ward or who were admitted to the hospitalization list. The clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of all patients were evaluated. The scales were administered to the patients by two raters, one of whom was permanently involved. RESULTS: Convergent and criterion validities revealed a high correlation between the screening instruments of both scales and between the BFCRS total score and 2nd and 3rd part scores of the KANNER Scale. BFCRS total score of ≥6, KANNER Scale 2nd part score of ≥15, or 3rd part score of ≥1 can be used with high accuracy in diagnosing catatonia according to DSM-5. Internal consistency for both scales was found to be high (Cronbach's alpha 0.902 for BFCRS and 0.9, 0.891, 0.806 for KANNER Scale subsections). Inter-rater reliability was also high for most of the scale items (mean Kappa coefficient: 0.885 for BFCRS and 0.904 for KANNER Scale). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the Turkish adaptations of both scales were found to be valid and reliable, showing strong psychometric properties. This study is the first validity and reliability study for the KANNER Scale.

Relationship of depression, impulsivity, distress intolerance and coping styles with maladaptive eating patterns in bariatric candidates.

PURPOSE: The study aimed to investigate the problematic eating patterns and understand their relationship to psychological constructs, including stress intolerance, coping mechanisms and impulsivity, and psychiatric symptoms among bariatric surgery candidates. METHODS: The bariatric candidates were evaluated by psychiatric interview and standard scales assessing maladaptive eating behaviors (Eating Attitudes Test (EAT), Bulimia Investigatory Test-Edinburgh (BITE), Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ)), depression (Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)), psychiatric symptoms (Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI)), and psychological constructs (Distress Intolerance Index (DSI), Coping Styles Scale (CSS), UPPS Impulsive Behavior Scale(UPPS)). RESULTS: More than half (57.8%) had maladaptive eating behaviors, and 23.6% had binge-eating behavior. Depression and anxiety predicted EAT, BITE, and DEBQ emotional and external eating sub-scale scores; distress intolerance, helpless coping style, and impulsivity predicted maladaptive eating behaviors in bariatric candidates. CONCLUSION: Maladaptive eating patterns play an essential role in the failure to lose weight and regain weight and are predicted by depression, anxiety, and psychological constructs in this study. Evaluation of pathological trait characteristics besides discrete psychiatric syndromes should be recommended in the pre-operation process to plan relevant interventions in the long-term management of weight. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, evidence obtained from well-designed cohort analytic studies.

Mild Behavioral Impairment: A New Prodromal Syndrome for Dementia. / Hafif Davranissal Bozulma: Demans Öncülü Yeni Bir Sendrom.

In this review, it is aimed to discuss neuropsychiatric symptoms as prodromal symptoms of dementia syndromes, to define the concept of 'Mild Behavioral Impairment', and to introduce the 'Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist'. Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) represent non-cognitive symptoms and behaviors in dementia patients. The frequency of NPS accompanying dementia increases as the disease progresses. Studies reveal that NPS are seen in patients with dementia as well as in the elderly without cognitive complaints, individuals with subjective cognitive complaints, and individuals diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment. Based on these findings, identifying and detecting these symptoms were thought to be useful in predicting the development of dementia in cases where cognitive symptoms have not yet appeared. 'Mild Behavioral Impairment' was first defined by Taragano and Allegri, and it was introduced as a concept that includes neurobehavioral symptoms seen in elderly people for at least 6 months and that do not meet the diagnostic criteria of any other psychiatric syndrome. Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist (MBI-C) has been developed recently which consists of 34 questions including apathy, mood, impulse dyscontrol, social inappropriateness, abnormal thinking, and perception. Studies on the neurobiological basis of these sub-domains and their relationship with biomarkers gained momentum with the definition of the concept and the development of MBI-C. However, the concept is still very new and it is possible for people to be over-diagnosed and to face the risk of stigmatization during the evaluation. Therefore, studies with large samples are needed. Demonstrating the validity of this concept will also serve the purpose of identifying the subjects with a neurodegenerative disease without any cognitive complaints yet at a very early stage in clinical studies. Keywords: Mild behavioral impairment, neuropsychiatric symptoms, prodromal dementia.