Corrigendum: Enteric Budesonide in Transplant and Native IgA Nephropathy: Real-World Clinical Practice.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10693.].

Comparing transplant glomerulopathy in the absence of C4d deposition and donor-specific antibodies to chronic antibody-mediated rejection.

INTRODUCTION: Transplant glomerulopathy (TG) is the characteristic lesion of chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). However, in some patients presents with no circulating HLA antibodies or C4d positivity. AIM: Patients with TG accomplishing criteria for chronic AMR were compared to patients with isolated TG. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed late (>6 months) graft biopsies performed between 2007 and 2010 (n = 75). Biopsies with C4d-negative TG and no circulating donor-specific antibody were called isolated TG (n = 12), and chronic AMR was defined according to Banff consensus (n = 17). HLA antibodies were evaluated by Luminex technology. Immunohistochemistry was performed to quantify graft infiltrating cells. RESULTS: Patients with isolated TG were older (52 ± 14 vs. 35 ± 14; p = 0.0048), received grafts from older donors (54 ± 16 vs. 41 ± 18; p = 0.0554), and displayed a lower inflammation in the glomerular (g-score: 0.5 ± 0.5 vs. 1.0 ± 0.9; p = 0.0865; CD3 positive cells/glomeruli: 1.5 ± 2.9 vs. 4.4 ± 4.1; p = 0.0147), interstitial (i-score: 1.2 ± 0.9 vs. 1.9 ± 1.0; p = 0.0685; CD45 positive cells/hpf: 18 ± 11 vs. 57 ± 68; p = 0.0132), and peritubular capillary (ptc-score 0.2 ± 0.6 vs. 1.1 ± 0.9; p = 0.0089; CD45 positive cells/hpf: 3.7 ± 3.1 vs. 10.1 ± 7.4; p = 0.0290) compartments. Fifteen grafts were lost and graft survival was significantly lower in patients with chronic AMR (p = 0.0122). CONCLUSION: Isolated TG is associated with less severe allograft inflammation and with a better outcome than chronic AMR.

The reproducibility and predictive value on outcome of renal biopsies from expanded criteria donors.

Reproducibility and predictive value on outcome are the main criteria to evaluate the utility of histological scores. Here we analyze the reproducibility of donor biopsy assessment by different on-call pathologists and the retrospective evaluation by a single renal pathologist blinded to clinical outcomes. We also evaluate the predictive value on graft outcome of both evaluations. A biopsy was performed in donors with any of the following: age≥55 years, hypertension, diabetes, creatinine>1.5 mg/dl, or stroke. Glomerulosclerosis, interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy, intimal thickening, and arteriolar hyalinosis evaluated according to the Banff criteria were added to obtain a chronic score. Biopsies were classified as mild (≥3), intermediate (4-5), or advanced (6-7) damage, and unacceptable (≥8) for transplantation of 127 kidneys biopsied. Weighted κ value between both readings was 0.41 (95% CI: 0.28-0.54). Evaluation of biopsies by the renal pathologist was significantly and independently associated with estimated 12-month glomerular filtration rate and a significant composite outcome variable, including death-censored graft survival and time to reach an estimated glomerular filtration rate<30 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Thus, there was no association between readings of on-call pathologists and outcome. The lack of association between histological scores obtained by the on-call pathologists and graft outcome suggests that a specific training on renal pathology is recommended to optimize the use of kidneys retrieved from expanded criteria donors.

Estimation of renal allograft half-life: fact or fiction?

INTRODUCTION: Renal allograft half-life time (t½) is the most straightforward representation of long-term graft survival. Since some statistical models overestimate this parameter, we compare different approaches to evaluate t½. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a 1-year functioning graft transplanted in Spain during 1990, 1994, 1998 and 2002 were included. Exponential, Weibull, gamma, lognormal and log-logistic models censoring the last year of follow-up were evaluated. The goodness of fit of these models was evaluated according to the Cox-Snell residuals and the Akaike's information criterion (AIC) was employed to compare these models. RESULTS: We included 4842 patients. Real t½ in 1990 was 14.2 years. Median t½ (95% confidence interval) in 1990 and 2002 was 15.8 (14.2-17.5) versus 52.6 (35.6-69.5) according to the exponential model (P < 0.001). No differences between 1990 and 2002 were observed when t½ was estimated with the other models. In 1990 and 2002, t½ was 14.0 (13.1-15.0) versus 18.0 (13.7-22.4) according to Weibull, 15.5 (13.9-17.1) versus 19.1 (15.6-22.6) according to gamma, 14.4 (13.3-15.6) versus 18.3 (14.2-22.3) according to the log-logistic and 15.2 (13.8-16.6) versus 18.8 (15.3-22.3) according to the lognormal models. The AIC confirmed that the exponential model had the lowest goodness of fit, while the other models yielded a similar result. CONCLUSIONS: The exponential model overestimates t½, especially in cohorts of patients with a short follow-up, while any of the other studied models allow a better estimation even in cohorts with short follow-up.