RESUMEN
Background and objectives: Dimensional response is an unmet need in second lines of advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Indeed, the three approved drugs, pazopanib, trabectedin, and eribulin, achieved an overall response rate (ORR) of less than 10%. This fact potentially hinders the options for fast symptomatic relief or surgical rescue. The combination of trabectedin plus low-dose radiation therapy (T-XRT) demonstrated a response rate of 60% in phase I/II trial, while real-life data achieved 32.5% ORR, probably due to a more relaxed timing between treatments. These results were obtained in progressing and advanced STS. In this study, the merged databases (trial plus real life) have been analyzed, with a special focus on leiomyosarcoma patients. Design and methods: As responses were seen in a wide range of sarcoma histologies (11), this study planned to analyze whether leiomyosarcoma, the largest subtype with 26 cases (30.6%) in this series, exhibited a better clinical outcome with this therapeutic strategy. In addition, four advanced and progressing leiomyosarcoma patients, all with extraordinarily long progression-free survival of over 18 months, were collected. Results: A total of 847 cycles of trabectedin were administered to 85 patients, with the median number of cycles per patient being 7 (1-45+). A trend toward a longer progression-free survival (PFS) was observed in leiomyosarcoma patients with median PFS (mPFS) of 9.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1-18.7] versus 5.6 months (95% CI: 3.2-7.9) for the remaining histologies, p = 0.25. When leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma were grouped, this difference reached statistical significance, probably due to the special sensitivity of myxoid liposarcoma. The mPFS for L-sarcomas was 12.7 months (95% CI: 7-18.5) versus 4.3 months (95% CI: 3.3-5.3) for the remaining histologies, p = 0.001. Cases with long-lasting disease control are detected among leiomyosarcoma patients. Conclusion: Even when extraordinarily long-lasting responses do exist among leiomyosarcoma patients treated with T-XR, we were unable to demonstrate a significant difference favoring leiomyosarcoma patients in clinical outcomes.
RESUMEN
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most common form of skin cancer, the incidence of which has risen over the last years. Although cSCC rarely metastasizes, early detection and treatment of primary tumours are critical to limit progression and local invasion. Several prognostic factors related to patients' clinicopathologic profile and tumour features have been identified as high-risk markers and included in the stratification scales, but their association with regional control or survival is uncertain. Therefore, decision-making on the diagnosis and management of cSCC should be made based on each individual patient's characteristics. Recent advances in non-invasive imaging techniques and molecular testing have enhanced clinical diagnostic accuracy. Surgical excision is the mainstay of local treatment, whereas radiotherapy (RT) is recommended for patients with inoperable disease or in specific circumstances. Novel systemic treatments including immunotherapies and targeted therapies have changed the therapeutic landscape for cSCC. The anti-PD-1 agent cemiplimab is currently the only FDA/EMA-approved first-line therapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic cSCC who are not candidates for curative surgery or RT. Given the likelihood of recurrence and the increased risk of developing multiple cSCC, close follow-up should be performed during the first years of treatment and continued long-term surveillance is warranted.
RESUMEN
AIM: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long term tolerability of hypofractionated helical tomotherapy (HT) in localized prostate cancer patients. BACKGROUND: Previous hypofractionated schedules with conventional RT were associated with excessive toxicity, likely due to inadequate sophistication of treatment delivery. There are few data about late toxicity after HT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 38 patients with primary adenocarcinoma of the prostate. There were 9 (24%), 15 (39%), and 14 (37%) patients with high, intermediate, and low risk, respectively. Patients were treated with hypofractionated HT from May 2008 to February 2011. Hypofractionation regimens included: 68.04 Gy at 2.52 Gy/fraction (N = 25; 66%), 70 Gy at 2.5 Gy/fraction (N = 4; 11%) and 70.2 Gy at 2.6 Gy/fraction (N = 9; 23%). Late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity was scored using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scoring system. RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis was 70 years (range 49-80) and median follow-up, 5.8 years. Late grade 1, 2 and 3 GI toxicity were 13%, 24%, and 2.6%, respectively. Late grade 1, 2, 3 GU toxicity were 29%, 21%, and 8%, respectively. Sexual toxicity was evaluated in 19 patients to be grade 1, 2 in 11% and grade 3 in 16%. Multivariate analysis showed that patients with higher values of rectum V50 associated with late GI toxicity (P = 0.025). Patients with PSA ≤8 (P = 0.048) or comorbidities (P = 0.013) at diagnosis were associated with higher late GU toxicity. Additionally, PSA ≤8 also associated with moderate (grade ≥2) late GU toxicity in the multivariate analysis (P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Hypofractionated HT can be delivered safely with limited rates of moderate and severe late toxicity. The proportion of the rectum that receives a moderate and high dose, having comorbidities, and PSA at diagnosis seem to associate with long term toxicity.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: High dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) provides a highly conformal method of dose delivery to the prostate. The purpose of this study is to prospectively determine the toxicity of the treatment protocol of 13.5â¯Gyâ¯×â¯2 fractions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2010 through 2017, 119 patients with low (71%) or intermediate-risk prostate cancer were prospectively treated in a single institute with HDR-BT at 13.5â¯Gyâ¯×â¯2 fractions within one day. Median follow-up time was 4.4â¯years. RESULTS: Actuarial rates of no biochemical evidence of disease, overall survival and metastasis-free survival for all patients were 96%,98% and 98%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of acute grade 2 and 3 genitourinary (GU) toxicity was 9% and 2%, respectively. The corresponding incidences of late GU toxicity were 18% and 1%. No grade ≥4 of either type of toxicity was detected. Multivariate analysis showed that having higher international prostate symptom score (IPSS; Pâ¯=â¯0.041) or higher V200 (Pâ¯=â¯0.013) was associated with a higher risk of experiencing any grade of acute GU toxicity. In addition, patients having a higher IPSS (Pâ¯=â¯0.019) or a higher V150 (Pâ¯=â¯0.033) were associated with a higher grade >1 acute GU toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study show that HDR-BT 13.5â¯Gyâ¯×â¯2 as monotherapy was safe and effective for prostate cancer patients with low-intermediate risk.
Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Braquiterapia/métodos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermedades Urogenitales Masculinas/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Ameloblastoma is a benign aggressive odontogenic tumor which requires early diagnosis and appropriate treatment. It commonly affects the mandible and radical surgery is the gold standard treatment. We report the case of a patient with ameloblastoma in extremely advanced phase affecting the maxillary sinus who was treated with intensity modulated conformal radiation therapy. Patient's evolution was marked by complete remission maintained after 24 months follow-up. Maxillary ameloblastoma is not well documented in the literature. It is usually diagnosed at the later stage when optimal surgery cannot be performed. This case study aimed to demonstrate that radiation therapy is a real therapeutic alternative in the treatment of advanced and inoperable forms of ameloblastoma.
Asunto(s)
Ameloblastoma/radioterapia , Neoplasias Maxilares/radioterapia , Seno Maxilar/patología , Anciano , Ameloblastoma/patología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Maxilares/patología , Inducción de Remisión , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
AIM: This study evaluates the toxicity and outcome in patients treated with robotic radiosurgery for liver metastases. BACKGROUND: Modern technologies allow the delivery of high doses to the liver metastases while lowering the dose to the neighboring organs at risk. Whether this dosimetric advantage translates into clinical benefit is not well known yet. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 9 patients with 17 liver metastases have been treated with robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy SBRT from March 2011 to December 2014. Local response to SBRT was graded by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria to describe change in treated tumor lesion. Adverse events after SBRT were graded on a 1-5 scale according to the National Cancer Institute common terminology criteria for adverse events v4.0. RESULTS: Patients received either three (78%) or five (22%) fractions. Patients were treated with a mean fraction dose of 14 Gy with a range from 9 to 20 Gy. The median total radiation dose provided to patients was 45 Gy with a range of 45-60 Gy. Four out of the 17 (23.5%) treated lesions had a complete response, 9 (53%) partial response and 3 (17.6%) stable disease. With a median follow-up of 15.2 months after SBRT treatment, local control and overall survival rated were 89% and 66%, respectively. No patient experienced grade ≥3 toxicity. The most common toxicity reported was asthenia. Only two patients had nausea and diarrhea, 10 and 14 days after SBRT, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic radiosurgery is a safe and effective local treatment option for secondary liver tumors. Further prospective studies are ongoing to determine long-term response and survival after robotic-SBRT for liver metastases.
RESUMEN
Treatment delays in completing radiotherapy (RT) for many neoplasms are a major problem affecting treatment outcome, as increasingly shown in the literature. Overall treatment time (OTT) could be a critical predictor of local tumor control and/or survival. In an attempt to establish a protocol for managing delays during RT, especially for heavily overloaded units, we have extensively reviewed the available literature on head and neck cancer. We confirmed a large deleterious effect of prolonged OTT on both local control and survival of these patients.
RESUMEN
AIMS AND BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the influence of ethnicity on toxicity in patients treated with dynamic arc radiation therapy (ART) for prostate cancer (PC). METHODS: From June 2006 to May 2012, 162 cT1-T3 cN0 cM0 PC patients were treated with ART (primary diagnosis, n = 125; post-prostatectomy/brachytherapy biochemical recurrence, n = 26; adjuvant post-prostatectomy, n = 11) at 2 institutions. Forty-five patients were Latin Americans and 117 were Europeans. The dose prescribed to the prostate ranged between 68 Gy and 81 Gy. RESULTS: The median age was 69 years (range 43-87 years). The median follow-up was 18 months (range 2-74 months). Overall, only 3 patients died, none due to a cancer-related cause. Biochemical recurrence was seen in 7 patients. The rates of acute grade 2 gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities were 19.7% and 17%, respectively. Only 1 patient experienced acute grade 3 GI toxicity, whereas 11 patients (6.7%) experienced acute grade 3 GU toxicity. Multivariate analysis showed that undergoing whole pelvic lymph node irradiation was associated with a higher grade of acute GI toxicity (OR: 3.46; p = 0.003). In addition, older age was marginally associated with a higher grade of acute GI toxicity (OR: 2.10; p = 0.074). Finally, ethnicity was associated with acute GU toxicity: Europeans had lower-grade toxicity (OR: 0.27; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest an ethnic difference in GU toxicity for PC patients treated with ART. In addition, we found that ART is associated with a very low risk of severe toxicity and a low recurrence rate.
Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/efectos adversos , Tracto Gastrointestinal/efectos de la radiación , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/etnología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Traumatismos por Radiación/etnología , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Radioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Sistema Urogenital/efectos de la radiación , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Ganglios Linfáticos/efectos de la radiación , Metástasis Linfática/radioterapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Oportunidad Relativa , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Radioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) constitutes a treatment modality that combines a photosensitizing agent with exposure to laser light in order to elicit phototoxic reactions that selectively destroy tumor cells and spare normal cells. PDT is a local treatment modality without long-term systemic effects. Its application can be repeated more than once to the same area without accumulative effects. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with primary brain tumors were treated with PDT. Treatment consisted in administration of the photosensitizer followed by craniotomy, surgical resection and laser illumination of the surgical bed. Primary brain tumors received also temozolomide-based chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT). RESULTS: From May 2000 to December 2010, 41 patients (27 male, 14 female) with a median age of 49 years (range 13-70) diagnosed of primary brain tumors were included in the study. In 7 patients PDT was repeated at the time of the relapse. In 22 episodes PDT was part of the initial treatment of primary brain tumors and in 26 episodes was part of the treatment at relapse. Median PFS observed was 10 months for GBM (95% confidence interval 5.7-14.3), 26 months for AA (95% CI 4.5-47.5), and 43 months for OD (95% CI 4.5-47.5). Median OS was 9 months for GBM (95% CI 2.3-15.7), 20 months for AA (95% CI 0.0-59) and 50 months for OD (95% CI 32.5-67.5). The apparent discrepancy between PFS and OS data is due to patients not censored for PFS because they die from causes other than tumor progression. Median OS since first diagnosis was 17 months for GBM (95% CI 15.2-17.8), 66 months for AA (95% CI 2.9-129.1) and 122 months for OD (95% CI 116.1-127.8). Side effects were mild and manageable. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that PDT can be considered as an adjunctive to surgery and/or RT and chemotherapy in the treatment of brain tumors, excluding those patients with thalamic or brain stem locations. It adds therapeutic effect without adding significant toxicity. In order to improve its contribution, it is essential to find new drugs with more penetration in order to destroy tumor cells more deeply at resection margins.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Éter de Dihematoporfirina/uso terapéutico , Mesoporfirinas/uso terapéutico , Fotoquimioterapia/métodos , Fármacos Fotosensibilizantes/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Dacarbazina/análogos & derivados , Dacarbazina/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Análisis de Supervivencia , Temozolomida , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess the toxicity and efficacy of salvage wide resection (SWR) with intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy (IOERT) or perioperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy (PHDRB) in previously unirradiated patients (PUP) vs. previously irradiated patients (PIP) with isolated local recurrence of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the extremities and the superficial trunk. METHODS AND MATERIALS: PUP received SWR and IOERT/PHDRB with external beam radiation therapy. PIP received SWR and IOERT/PHDRB only. RESULTS: Fifty patients were analyzed retrospectively. PUP (n = 24; 48%) received IOERT (n = 13) or PHDRB (n = 11). PIP (n = 26; 52%) received IOERT (n = 10) or PHDRB (n = 16). Reintervention because of complications was not required in PUP. Nine of 26 (34%) PIP required reintervention (p = 0.01). After a median followup of 3.7 years (range, 0.2-18.3), the 5-year rates of locoregional control, distant control, and overall survival were 54%, 66%, and 56%, respectively. Five-year locoregional control was higher in PUP than in PIP (81% vs. 26%, p = 0.01) and in the extremity locations compared with trunk locations (68% vs. 28%, p = 0.001). Five-year overall survival was superior in unifocal vs. multifocal presentations (70% vs. 36%, p = 0.03) and for tumor sizes <4 vs. ≥4 cm (74% vs. 50%, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Prior irradiation is the main determinant of locoregional control in patients with isolated local recurrence of STS. The locoregional control rates in PUP were similar to those described in primary STS. In PIP, SWR + IOERT/PHDRB reirradiation yielded modest locoregional control rates and was associated with significant morbidity, especially in PHDRB cases.
Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/métodos , Electrones/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Sarcoma/radioterapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Braquiterapia/efectos adversos , Extremidades , Femenino , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Terapia Recuperativa/efectos adversos , Terapia Recuperativa/métodos , Sarcoma/cirugía , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We report the clinical results and prognostic factors of image-guided radiation therapy (RT) with helical tomotherapy (HT) for localized and recurrent prostate cancer (PC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated 70 patients with PC (primary diagnosis, n = 48; adjuvant, n = 5; salvage, n = 17) treated with HT from May 2006 through January 2011. The dose prescribed to the prostate/surgical bed ranged between 60 and 78 Gy. Potential risk factors for genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity were assessed. RESULTS: The median age was 68 years (range 51-87 years). The median follow-up was 37 months (range 3-74 months). The rates of acute grade 2 GI and GU toxicities were 10 and 13%, respectively. Only 1 patient experienced acute grade 3 GU toxicity. The rates of late grade ≥ 2 GI and GU toxicities were 1% each. Multivariate analysis showed an association between rectum mean dose > median (39 Gy) and bladder median dose > median (46 Gy) with a higher grade of acute GI (p = 0.017) and GU (p = 0.019) toxicity, respectively. Additionally, older age was associated with late GU toxicity (p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: Toxicity with HT is low and is associated with higher median/mean doses in organs at risk as well as with older age. A prospective validation would be necessary to confirm these results.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/etiología , Enfermedades Urogenitales Masculinas/etiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/efectos adversos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/prevención & control , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermedades Urogenitales Masculinas/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos por Radiación/prevención & control , Protección Radiológica/métodos , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagen/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada Espiral/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: About one-third of patients with relapsed B-cell malignancies develop human anti-mouse antibody (HAMA) following mouse antibody treatment. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between HAMA and survival in patients given a mouse anti-lymphoma monoclonal antibody (mAb), Lym-1, directed against a unique epitope of HLA-DR antigen that is up-regulated on malignant B-cells. METHODS: ELISA was used to quantify HAMA in 51 patients with B-cell malignancies treated with iodine-131 (131I) labeled Lym-1. Sera were collected prior to and following radioimmunotherapy (RIT) with 131I-Lym-1 until documented to be HAMA negative or throughout lifetime. Univariate, then multivariate analyses including other risk factors, were used to analyze the relationship of HAMA to survival. The relationships of HAMA to prior chemotherapies and to absolute lymphocyte counts prior to RIT were also assessed. RESULTS: Eighteen of 51 patients (35%) developed HAMA following RIT (range of ultimate maximum titers, 6.6-1,802 microg/ml). Using the time dependent Cox proportional hazards model, maximum HAMA titers were associated with survival (P=0.02). HAMA continued to be significant for survival in multivariate analyses that included known risk factors. In Landmark analysis of 39 patients that survived at least 16 weeks, median survival of patients with HAMA less than 5 microg/ml was 61 versus 103 weeks for patients with HAMA equal or greater than 5 microg/ml at 16 weeks (P=0.02). The median survival of the five patients with highest maximum HAMA titers was 244 weeks. At 16 weeks, there was an inverse correlation between the maximum HAMA titer and the number of previous chemotherapies (P<0.003). Absolute lymphocyte counts prior to 131I-Lym-1 treatment for patients that seroconverted were higher than those for patients that did not seroconvert (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with B-cell malignancies that developed high HAMA titers had longer survival that was not explained by risk factors or histologic grade, suggesting the importance of the immune system.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Heterófilos/sangre , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Leucemia de Células B/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucemia de Células B/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Animales , Anticuerpos Monoclonales de Origen Murino , Femenino , Antígenos HLA-DR/inmunología , Humanos , Masculino , Ratones , Persona de Mediana Edad , PronósticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To analyze the patterns of failure and the toxicity profile of intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy (IOERT) after resection of soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities (STS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients with extremity STS were treated with IOERT and moderate-dose postoperative radiotherapy (45-50 Gy). Twenty-six patients were treated for primary disease (PD) and 19 patients for an isolated recurrence (ILR). Tumor size was >5 cm (maximum diameter) in 36 patients (80%), and high-grade histology in PD patients was present in 14 patients (54%). In nine patients, IOERT was used alone, due to previous irradiation or patient refusal. Chemotherapy (neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant) was mainly given to high-grade tumors. RESULTS: Nine patients relapsed in the extremity (20%), and 12 patients in distant sites (28%). Actuarial local control at 5 years was 88% for patients with negative/close margins and 57% for patients presenting positive margins (P=0.04). Five patients (11%) developed neuropathy associated with the treatment. Extremity preservation was achieved in 40 patients (88%). With a median follow-up of 93 months (range: 27-143 months) for the patients at risk, 25 patients remain alive (a 7-year actuarial survival rate of 75% for PD and 47% for ILR; P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: IOERT combined with moderate doses of external beam irradiation yields high local control and extremity preservation rates in resected extremity STS. Peripheral nerves in the IOERT field are dose-limiting structures requiring a dose compromise in the IOERT component to avoid severe neurological damage.
Asunto(s)
Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Radioterapia de Alta Energía/efectos adversos , Radioterapia de Alta Energía/métodos , Sarcoma/radioterapia , Sarcoma/cirugía , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/radioterapia , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Terapia Combinada , Extremidades/efectos de la radiación , Extremidades/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Periodo Intraoperatorio/efectos adversos , Periodo Intraoperatorio/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nervios Periféricos/efectos de la radiación , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Sarcoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Sarcoma/patología , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/patología , Análisis de Supervivencia , Insuficiencia del TratamientoRESUMEN
Simultaneous chemoradiation is used in unresectable pancreatic cancer for palliation. It is not known if the use of adjuvant surgery will benefit this group of patients. From November 1991 to September 1998, 47 patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer were treated with simultaneous preoperative radiation therapy (45 Gy) and chemotherapy. Chemotherapy followed three different protocols: cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil +/- paclitaxel; cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil (protracted infusion); and docetaxel and gemcitabine. Whipple pancreatoduodenectomy was performed 1 month after the end of radiation in patients selected for resection. Twenty-three unresectable tumors after preoperative treatment (47%) received an additional dose (10-12 Gy) of radiotherapy using intraoperative or external radiation therapy. Twelve patients (26%) were considered to have clinically resectable tumors after the preoperative treatment. Nine patients had surgery (19% of the total number of patients), and 2 of them had complete pathologic response. After chemoradiation, two patients died of pneumonia and gastrointestinal bleeding, respectively, and another two patients died in the postoperative period. Local recurrence was observed in 22% of the patients and 57% had distant metastases. Three-year survival rates for patients with unresectable and resectable tumors was 0% (median survival 10 months) and 48% (median survival 23 months), respectively (p = 0.0004). Preoperative treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer is feasible. In some patients, the tumor can be resected, and in addition some cases of complete pathologic response were found. Long-term survivors were observed in the group of resected tumors. More effective chemotherapy regimens are needed because the majority of the patients died of metastatic disease.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/radioterapia , Adenocarcinoma/secundario , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/radioterapia , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Multidisciplinary treatment in high-risk breast cancer improves survival and local control. The feasibility and patterns of failure after several induction and high-dose consolidation regimens of chemotherapy were evaluated in this study. Between November 1990 and January 1997, 65 patients with histologically proven breast cancer American Joint Committee on Cancer stages II-III with four or more axillary lymph nodes positive or locally advanced breast cancer underwent high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with peripheral stem cell support after surgery and induction chemotherapy. All patients were subsequently treated with radiotherapy (up to total doses of 50-60 Gy), which included the ipsilateral axilla and supraclavicular fossa and the chest wall or breast. A minimum follow-up period of 2 years from the completion of radiotherapy was required for analysis. Local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were evaluated. With a median follow-up of 62 months (range: 32-107 months), LC was 89%, and 5-year OS and DFS were 78% and 63%, respectively. Symptomatic pneumonitis developed in six patients (9%); only one patient had her radiotherapy interrupted because of hematologic toxicity. No treatment-related mortality was observed. Radiation therapy after HDC provides excellent local control rates without excessive toxicity. Delaying the start of irradiation until recovery from HDC does not seem to increase local failure rates.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Mastectomía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Análisis de Supervivencia , Insuficiencia del TratamientoRESUMEN
The goal of IMRT is to achieve an isodose distribution conformed to the tumor while avoiding the organs at risk. For these tasks several gantry angles are selected, each one containing a series of different leaf configurations for the multileaf collimator (MLC) (segments). Verifying the relative distributions as well as the absolute doses is an important step for quality assurance issues. We have observed that an accurate modeling of the transmission of the primary x-ray fluence through the jaws and MLC as well as the head scatter is crucial for a precise calculation of relative doses and monitor units. Also, an inaccurate calculation of the output factor for small size segments can lead to important differences in the absolute dose for points under these segments. Incorrect models could lead to systematic errors of around 5% to 10% in the calculated monitor units and a shift in the isodose curves.