RESUMEN
Our aim was to identify RB1 alterations causing hereditary low penetrance retinoblastoma and to evaluate how the parental origin of an RB1 mutation affects its phenotypic expression. By NGS and MLPA, RB1 mutations were found in 191 from 332 unrelated retinoblastoma patients. Among patients with identified RB1 mutations but without clinical family history of retinoblastoma, 7% (12/175) were found to have hereditary disease with one of the parents being an asymptomatic carrier of an RB1 mutation. Additionally, in two families with retinoblastoma history, mutations were inherited by probands from unaffected parents. Overall, nine probands inherited RB1 mutations from clinically unaffected fathers and five, from mothers. Yet, we gained explanations of maternal "unaffectedness" in most cases, either as somatic mosaicism or as clinical presentation of retinomas in involution, rendering the proportion of paternal to maternal truly asymptomatic mutation carriers as 9:1 (p = 0.005). This observation supports an assumption that parental origin of an RB1 mutation influences the likelihood of developing retinoblastoma. Additionally, our study revealed a relatively high frequency of asymptomatic carriage of the RB1 mutations among the parents of retinoblastoma patients, highlighting the utmost necessity of molecular analysis among the probands' relatives irrespective of their clinical status and family history of retinoblastoma.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Loss of BIN1 tumor suppressor expression is abundant in human cancer and its frequency exceeds that of genetic alterations, suggesting the role of epigenetic regulators (DNA methylation). BIN1 re-expression in the DU145 prostate cancer cell line after 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine treatment was recently reported but no methylation of the BIN1 promoter CpG island was found in DU145. METHODS: Methylation-sensitive arbitrarily-primed PCR was used to detect genomic loci abnormally methylated in breast cancer. BIN1 CpG island fragment was identified among the differentially methylated loci as a result of direct sequencing of the methylation-sensitive arbitrarily-primed PCR product and subsequent BLAST alliance. BIN1 CpG island cancer related methylation in breast and prostate cancers was confirmed by bisulphite sequencing and its methylation frequency was evaluated by methylation sensitive PCR. Loss of heterozygosity analysis of the BIN1 region was performed with two introgenic and one closely adjacent extragenic microsatellite markers.BIN1 expression was evaluated by real-time RT-PCR. RESULTS: We have identified a 3'-part of BIN1 promoter CpG island among the genomic loci abnormally methylated in breast cancer. The fragment proved to be methylated in 18/99 (18%) and 4/46 (9%) breast and prostate tumors, correspondingly, as well as in MCF7 and T47D breast cancer cell lines, but was never methylated in normal tissues and lymphocytes as well as in DU145 and LNCaP prostate cancer cell lines. The 5'-part of the CpG island revealed no methylation in all samples tested. BIN1 expression losses were detected in MCF7 and T47D cells and were characteristic of primary breast tumors (10/13; 77%), while loss of heterozygosity was a rare event in tissue samples (2/22 informative cases; 9%) and was ruled out for MCF7. CONCLUSION: BIN1 promoter CpG island is composed of two parts differing drastically in the methylation patterns in cancer. This appears to be a common feature of cancer related genes and demands further functional significance exploration. Although we have found no evidence of the functional role of such a non-core methylation in BIN1 expression regulation, our data do not altogether rule this possibility out.
