RESUMEN
Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors play an important role in targeted treatment of B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders. However, adverse events may limit the proper course of treatment in many patients. The purpose of this study is to compare the risk of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular adverse events in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small cell lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) treated with the first-generation BTK inhibitor ibrutinib versus second-generation acalabrutinib, using real-world data from a collaborative multinational network. We used data from the network (TriNetX), which encompasses more than 100 healthcare organizations worldwide. We queried the database for patients aged ≥ 18 years with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small-cell lymphomas treated with ibrutinib or acalabrutinib in the past ten years before the analysis. We used propensity score matching to balance the cohorts. The 3-year cumulative incidences and hazard ratios for the following outcomes were calculated: atrial flutter or fibrillation, other arrhythmias, heart failure, ischemic stroke or peripheral embolism, acute coronary syndrome, bleeding, and sepsis. We compared 2,107 patients in each group. Atrial fibrillation or flutter occurred in 150 (7.1%) patients with acalabrutinib and 310 (14.7%) patients with ibrutinib during the 3-year follow-up (hazard ratio, 0.68, 95% CI 0.55-0.84). New-onset hypertension occurred in 342 (16.3%) patients in the acalabrutinib group and 584 (27.7%) patients in the ibrutinib group (hazard ratio 0.81, 95% CI 0.66-0.98). Sepsis was diagnosed in 136 (6.5%) patients in the acalabrutinib group versus 239 (11.3%) patients in the ibrutinib group (hazard ratio 0.77, 95 CI 0.60-0.98). The two groups had no significant differences concerning the other adverse events. In a large retrospective cohort using real-world data from electronic medical registers, patients with CLL or SLL treated with acalabrutinib had a better cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular safety profile than those treated with ibrutinib, with lower risks of atrial flutter or fibrillation, new-onset arterial hypertension, and sepsis.
RESUMEN
Background: Breakpoint cluster region-Abelson gene (BCR-ABL) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionized the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, concern has arisen about the cardiac safety profile of these drugs. Objectives: This study aims to compare long-term risks of adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (ACE), heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50%, and venous thromboembolic events (VTE) in patients with CML treated with BCR-ABL TKIs, using data from a large multinational network. Methods: Patients aged ≥ 18 years with CML treated with imatinib, dasatinib, or nilotinib without prior cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease were included. We used propensity score matching to balance the cohorts. The 5-year cumulative incidences and hazard ratios were calculated. Results: We identified 3,722 patients with CML under treatment with imatinib (n = 1,906), dasatinib (n = 1,269), and nilotinib (n = 547). Patients with imatinib compared to dasatinib showed a higher hazard ratio (HR) for ACE (HR 2,13, 95% CI 1.15-3.94, p = 0.016). Patients with imatinib presented a lower HR than nilotinib for ACE (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30-0.83, p = 0.0074). In relation to heart failure or LVEF < 50%, patients with imatinib had a higher HR than dasatinib (HR 9.41, 95% CI 1.22-72.17, p = 0.03), but no significant difference was observed between imatinib and nilotinib (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.215-1.01, p = 0.064). Conclusion: In this retrospective study with a large number of patients with CML, those treated with nilotinib had a higher 5-year ratio of ACE, while patients with dasatinib showed a lower ratio than patients with imatinib. The ratio of heart failure was higher in patients with imatinib than in patients with dasatinib, but not when compared to nilotinib.
RESUMEN
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a contagious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a highly pathogenic infection responsible for the world pandemic in 2020. COVID-19 is characterized by an increased number of critically ill patients with a high risk of health care system collapse. Therefore, the search for severity biomarkers and potential therapies is crucial. In this study, we evaluated SARS-CoV-2 -induced cytokines, cytokines receptors and growth factors profile, in critical COVID-19 patients admitted in intensive care unit (ICU) aiming to identify potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets. We designed a prospective study enrolling 62 adults with severe COVID-19 during the first two Brazilian COVID-19 waves (from May to July 2020 and December 2020 to May 2021), convenience samples recruitment in first 24 hours and then, every 4 days until day 20 of ICU admission from a tertiary hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. Controls were healthy blood donors. Whole blood was used to evaluate 17 cytokines, cytokines receptors and growth factors. Due to low mortality rate, we used the need of mechanical ventilation as primary endpoint. In our analysis, we found a different pattern in soluble CD137 (sCD137) in critically ill patients with COVID-19, with a direct relationship between increased levels and worse clinical outcome. sCD137 was related with increased risk of mechanical ventilation and World Health Organization (WHO) clinical score for disease severity. CD137 is a tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNF) family member, mainly responsible for T-cell activation. Soluble isoforms of immune checkpoints competitively regulate function of their membrane-bound counterparts. Our study demonstrated the onward increase in sCD137 levels during severe SARS-CoV-2 infection and its correlation with worse outcomes, suggesting sCD137 as a potential reliable severity biomarker.
