Rare presence and function of neuroendocrine cells in the nasal mucosa.

There is growing evidence that neurogenic inflammation contributes to the pathophysiology of upper airway diseases, with nasal hyperreactivity (NHR) being a key symptom. The rare neuroendocrine cells (NECs) in the epithelium have been linked to the pathophysiology of bronchial and intestinal hyperreactivity, however their presence in the nasal mucosa and their potential role in NHR remains unclear. Therefore, we studied the presence of NECs in the nasal epithelium of controls, allergic rhinitis patients and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps patients, and their link to NHR. The expression of typical NECs markers, CHGA, ASCL1 and CGRP, were evaluated on gene and protein level in human samples using real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), western blot, immunohistochemistry fluorescence staining, RNA scope assay, flow cytometry and single cell RNA-sequencing. Furthermore, the change in peak nasal inspiratory flow after cold dry air provocation and visual analogue scale scores were used to evaluate NHR or disease severity, respectively. Limited gene expression of the NECs markers CHGA and ASCL1 was measured in patients with upper airway diseases and controls. Gene expression of these markers did not correlate with NHR severity nor disease severity. In vitro, CHGA and ASCL1 expression was also evaluated in primary nasal epithelial cell cultures from patients with upper airway disease and controls using RT-qPCR and western blot. Both on gene and protein level only limited CHGA and ASCL1 expression was found. Additionally, NECs were studied in nasal biopsies of patients with upper airway diseases and controls using immunohistochemistry fluorescence staining, RNA scope and flow cytometry. Unlike in ileum samples, CHGA could not be detected in nasal biopsies of patients with upper airway diseases and control subjects. Lastly, single cell RNA-sequencing of upper airway tissue could not identify a NEC cluster. In summary, in contrast to the bronchi and gut, there is only limited evidence for the presence of NECs in the nasal mucosa, and without correlation with NHR, thereby questioning the relevance of NECs in upper airway pathology.

Protocol for postmortem bedside endoscopic procedure to sample human respiratory and olfactory cleft mucosa, olfactory bulbs, and frontal lobe.

We present a protocol for the rapid postmortem bedside procurement of selected tissue samples using an endoscopic endonasal surgical technique that we adapted from skull base surgery. We describe steps for the postmortem collection of blood, cerebrospinal fluid, a nasopharyngeal swab, and tissue samples; the clean-up procedure; and the initial processing and storage of the samples. This protocol was validated with tissue samples procured postmortem from COVID-19 patients and can be applied in another emerging infectious disease. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Khan et al. (2021)1 and Khan et al. (2022).2.

Evaluation of skin prick location on the forearm using a novel skin prick automated test device.

Background: The skin prick test (SPT) is the gold standard for identifying allergic sensitization in individuals suspected of having an inhalant allergy. Recently, it was demonstrated that SPT using a novel skin prick automated test (SPAT) device showed increased reproducibility and tolerability compared to the conventional SPT, among other benefits. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate prick location bias using the novel SPAT device. Methods: A total of 118 volunteers were enrolled in this study and underwent SPATs with histamine (nine pricks) and glycerol control (one prick) solutions on the volar side of their forearms. Imaging of the skin reactions was performed using the SPAT device, and the physician determined the longest wheal diameter by visually inspecting the images using a web interface. Prick location bias was assessed along the medial vs. lateral and proximal vs. distal axes of the forearm. Results: In total, 944 histamine pricks were analyzed. Four medial and four lateral histamine pricks were grouped, and wheal sizes were compared. The longest wheal diameters were not significantly different between the medial and lateral prick locations (p = 0.41). Furthermore, the pricks were grouped by two based on their position on the proximal-distal axis of the forearm. No significant difference was observed among the four groups of analyzed prick locations (p = 0.73). Conclusion: The prick location on the volar side of the forearm did not influence wheal size in SPAT-pricked individuals.

Anatomical barriers against SARS-CoV-2 neuroinvasion at vulnerable interfaces visualized in deceased COVID-19 patients.

Can SARS-CoV-2 hitchhike on the olfactory projection and take a direct and short route from the nose into the brain? We reasoned that the neurotropic or neuroinvasive capacity of the virus, if it exists, should be most easily detectable in individuals who died in an acute phase of the infection. Here, we applied a postmortem bedside surgical procedure for the rapid procurement of tissue, blood, and cerebrospinal fluid samples from deceased COVID-19 patients infected with the Delta, Omicron BA.1, or Omicron BA.2 variants. Confocal imaging of sections stained with fluorescence RNAscope and immunohistochemistry afforded the light-microscopic visualization of extracellular SARS-CoV-2 virions in tissues. We failed to find evidence for viral invasion of the parenchyma of the olfactory bulb and the frontal lobe of the brain. Instead, we identified anatomical barriers at vulnerable interfaces, exemplified by perineurial olfactory nerve fibroblasts enwrapping olfactory axon fascicles in the lamina propria of the olfactory mucosa.

Visualizing in deceased COVID-19 patients how SARS-CoV-2 attacks the respiratory and olfactory mucosae but spares the olfactory bulb.

Anosmia, the loss of smell, is a common and often the sole symptom of COVID-19. The onset of the sequence of pathobiological events leading to olfactory dysfunction remains obscure. Here, we have developed a postmortem bedside surgical procedure to harvest endoscopically samples of respiratory and olfactory mucosae and whole olfactory bulbs. Our cohort of 85 cases included COVID-19 patients who died a few days after infection with SARS-CoV-2, enabling us to catch the virus while it was still replicating. We found that sustentacular cells are the major target cell type in the olfactory mucosa. We failed to find evidence for infection of olfactory sensory neurons, and the parenchyma of the olfactory bulb is spared as well. Thus, SARS-CoV-2 does not appear to be a neurotropic virus. We postulate that transient insufficient support from sustentacular cells triggers transient olfactory dysfunction in COVID-19. Olfactory sensory neurons would become affected without getting infected.

A TRiP Through the Roles of Transient Receptor Potential Cation Channels in Type 2 Upper Airway Inflammation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite their high prevalence, the pathophysiology of allergic rhinitis (AR) and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) remains unclear. Recently, transient receptor potential (TRP) cation channels emerged as important players in type 2 upper airway inflammatory disorders. In this review, we aim to discuss known and yet to be explored roles of TRP channels in the pathophysiology of AR and CRS with nasal polyps. RECENT FINDINGS: TRP channels participate in a plethora of cellular functions and are expressed on T cells, mast cells, respiratory epithelial cells, and sensory neurons of the upper airways. In chronic upper airway inflammation, TRP vanilloid 1 is mostly studied in relation to nasal hyperreactivity. Several other TRP channels such as TRP vanilloid 4, TRP ankyrin 1, TRP melastatin channels, and TRP canonical channels also have important functions, rendering them potential targets for therapy. The role of TRP channels in type 2 inflammatory upper airway diseases is steadily being uncovered and increasingly recognized. Modulation of TRP channels may offer therapeutic perspectives.

Diagnostic approach to occupational rhinitis: the role of nasal provocation tests.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The diagnosis of occupational rhinitis is a challenge. Underdiagnosis is substantial as the clinical presentation is nonspecific and often no occupational history is taken. Detection of occupational rhinitis can be improved by including screening questions on occupational exposure in the assessment of every patient with adult-onset rhinitis. RECENT FINDINGS: Case reports, case series and epidemiological studies continuously demonstrate new sensitizers and irritants capable of inducing allergic or nonallergic (irritant-induced) occupational rhinitis. Recent reviews have focused on the value of immunological tests with specific IgE, skin prick tests or basophil activation tests in demonstrating sensitization to occupational agents. Nasal provocation tests (NPT) can establish a definite diagnosis of allergic occupational rhinitis. Several NPT guidelines have been published, however, focusing exclusively on standardized high-molecular weight allergens. When performing NPT with nonstandardized agents -- like most occupational sensitizers -- adapted protocols are needed. SUMMARY: We provide pragmatic guidance to clinicians taking care of rhinitis patients on how to diagnose occupational rhinitis, based on recent insights from the literature. We focus on the challenges in the diagnostic work-up, on how to identify suspected causes, and on the role of NPT.