Concordance between ER, PR, Ki67, and HER2-low expression in breast cancer by MammaTyper RT-qPCR and immunohistochemistry: implications for the practising pathologist.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the role of multigene tests and their correlation with immunohistochemistry (IHC), especially on core biopsy. MammaTyper is a quantitative conformite Europeeanne (CE) marked, National Institute for Health and Care excellence (NICE) approved, in in vitro diagnostic quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) test for assessment of mRNA expression of four biomarkers (ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, MKI67). METHODS: We evaluated the concordance of MammaTyper with oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, and Ki67 by IHC on 133 core needle biopsies of breast cancer. HER2 was positive if IHC 3+ or 2+ and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-amplified. Global and hotspot Ki67 expression was analysed using a cutoff of ≥20% assessed manually and by digital image analysis. Agreements were expressed as overall percent agreement (OPA), positive percent agreement (PPA), negative percent agreement (NPA), and Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: RT-qPCR results of ESR1 were highly concordant with IHC with OPA of 94.7% using 1% cutoff and 91.7% when the low ER-positive category was included. The PPA and NPA between RT-qPCR and IHC for PR was 91.5% and 88.0%, respectively, when using the 1% cutoff. For ERBB2/HER2, the OPA was 95% and the PPA was 84.6%. 40 of 72 HER2 IHC score 0 tumours were classified as ERBB2 low. Best concordance between MKI67 by MammaTyper and Ki67 IHC was achieved using hotspot digital image analysis (OPA: 87.2%, PPA: 90.6%, NPA: 80%). CONCLUSION: RT-qPCR-based assessment of the mRNA expression of ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKI67 showed high concordance with IHC, suggesting that the MammaTyper test on core needle biopsies represents a reliable, efficient, and reproducible alternative for breast cancer classification and refining HER2 low categorisation.

Inter- and Intra-Observer Agreement of PD-L1 SP142 Scoring in Breast Carcinoma-A Large Multi-Institutional International Study.

The assessment of PD-L1 expression in TNBC is a prerequisite for selecting patients for immunotherapy. The accurate assessment of PD-L1 is pivotal, but the data suggest poor reproducibility. A total of 100 core biopsies were stained using the VENTANA Roche SP142 assay, scanned and scored by 12 pathologists. Absolute agreement, consensus scoring, Cohen's Kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were assessed. A second scoring round after a washout period to assess intra-observer agreement was carried out. Absolute agreement occurred in 52% and 60% of cases in the first and second round, respectively. Overall agreement was substantial (Kappa 0.654-0.655) and higher for expert pathologists, particularly on scoring TNBC (6.00 vs. 0.568 in the second round). The intra-observer agreement was substantial to almost perfect (Kappa: 0.667-0.956), regardless of PD-L1 scoring experience. The expert scorers were more concordant in evaluating staining percentage compared with the non-experienced scorers (R2 = 0.920 vs. 0.890). Discordance predominantly occurred in low-expressing cases around the 1% value. Some technical reasons contributed to the discordance. The study shows reassuringly strong inter- and intra-observer concordance among pathologists in PD-L1 scoring. A proportion of low-expressors remain challenging to assess, and these would benefit from addressing the technical issues, testing a different sample and/or referring for expert opinions.

Characterization of the Immune Microenvironment in Inflammatory Breast Cancer Using Multiplex Immunofluorescence.

INTRODUCTION: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is an aggressive form of breast cancer with a poorly characterized immune microenvironment. METHODS: We used a five-colour multiplex immunofluorescence panel, including CD68, CD4, CD8, CD20, and FOXP3 for immune microenvironment profiling in 93 treatment-naïve IBC samples. RESULTS: Lower grade tumours were characterized by decreased CD4+ cells but increased accumulation of FOXP3+ cells. Increased CD20+ cells correlated with better response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and increased CD4+ cells infiltration correlated with better overall survival. Pairwise analysis revealed that both ER+ and triple-negative breast cancer were characterized by co-infiltration of CD20 + cells with CD68+ and CD4+ cells, whereas co-infiltration of CD8+ and CD68+ cells was only observed in HER2+ IBC. Co-infiltration of CD20+, CD8+, CD4+, and FOXP3+ cells, and co-existence of CD68+ with FOXP3+ cells correlated with better therapeutic responses, while resistant tumours were characterized by co-accumulation of CD4+, CD8+, FOXP3+, and CD68+ cells and co-expression of CD68+ and CD20+ cells. In a Cox regression model, response to therapy was the most significant factor associated with improved patient survival. CONCLUSION: Those results reveal a complex unique pattern of distribution of immune cell subtypes in IBC and provide an important basis for detailed characterization of molecular pathways that govern the formation of IBC immune landscape and potential for immunotherapy.

Morphological and molecular changes following neoadjuvant endocrine therapy of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: implications for clinical practice.

AIMS: Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NAET) is used in the management of oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. The optimal method for histological assessment of response and the effect of NAET on the tumour morphology, grade and molecular profile remain unclear. The aim of this study is to investigate the NAET effect on tumour type, grade and molecular profile by analysing a well-characterised cohort of breast cancer samples in a single large UK tertiary referral centre, and to provide guidance on the pathological assessment of those lesions to inform adjuvant management and prognosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: A single large-institution cohort of 132 patients who received NAET over a 13-year period was identified. Comprehensive clinical, histopathological and follow-up data were collected. A detailed histological review of a subset with residual post-treatment carcinoma was undertaken. Two carcinomas (both of the lobular type) achieved complete pathological response. Central scarring was seen in 49.3% of tumours post-treatment. Significant changes in tumour type (41.6%), tumour grade (downgrading in one-third of tumours), and progesterone receptor (PR) expression (22.3%), with a switch to PR-negative status in 17.6% of cases, were observed. The last of these was associated with an absence of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (P = 0.005). Ten per cent of cases showed a change in HER2 expression (P = 0.002). The median patient survival was 60 months, and downgrading of tumours was associated with better overall survival (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We propose a histological method for assessment of residual carcinoma following NAET, and recommend repeat ER/PR/HER2 testing to inform management and prognosis.

The Immune Microenvironment in Breast Carcinoma: Predictive and Prognostic Role in the Neoadjuvant Setting.

The prognostic value of the immune cell infiltrate in the breast carcinoma microenvironment is still uncertain. We reviewed published articles analysing the infiltration of inflammatorycells in the microenvironment of breast carcinoma. Data revealed the importance of infiltration of these immune cells in the prognosis of breast carcinoma, particularly the triple-negative and HER2-positive phenotypes. Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and their subtypes play a fundamental role in predicting the pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. More research aiming to dissect a complex network of communication between cancer cells and other cellular components of the tumour microenvironment is necessary to develop more effective therapeutic approaches.

Extramedullary Haematopoiesis in Axillary Lymph Nodes of Breast Carcinoma Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall.

Extramedullary haematopoiesis (EMH) in the axillary lymph node of breast cancer patients is extremely rare but when encountered can represent a diagnostic challenge. We aim to highlight this incidental finding as a diagnostic pitfall which can be mistaken for metastatic carcinoma (particularly of the metaplastic type). We report the case of a 68-year-old Caucasian female with a family history of cancer. Core biopsy revealed that she had grade II oestrogen receptor-negative, Her2-positive invasive ductal carcinoma. She was offered neoadjuvant chemotherapy with Herceptin and subsequently underwent breast-conserving surgery. Microscopic examination of the post-treatment breast surgical specimen showed a partial pathological response with large areas of tumour regression. The sentinel lymph node showed frequent large single and multinucleate giant cells with hyperchromatic nuclei located predominantly within the subcapsular and medullary sinuses. The morphological differentials of metastatic carcinoma, sinus histiocytosis and extramedullary haematopoiesis were considered. A panel of immunohistochemistry showed these large cells to be negative for epithelial markers and CD68. They were strongly positive for CD42b (megakaryocyte marker). Smaller myeloperoxidase and factor VIII-positive cells were identified. The findings confirmed EMH. Sentinel nodes are often well scrutinised by pathologists for evidence of metastatic carcinoma as an important prognostic parameter both in the standard and neoadjuvant setting. Nodal megakaryocytes have been described in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy particularly in association with Herceptin treatment. Pathologists' awareness of this finding in the neoadjuvant setting is crucial to avoid a mistaken diagnosis of malignancy. A relevant immunohistochemical panel together with careful attention to morphology should help establish the correct diagnosis.