Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Biomech ; 152: 111528, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36989970

RESUMEN

Following cervical spine fusion there is a reduction in maximum range of motion (ROM) but how this impacts activity of daily living (ADLs) and quality of life is unknown. This study's purpose is to quantify maximum and functional cervical spine ROM in patients with multi-level cervical fusion (>3 levels) compared to controls during ADLs and to correlate functional range of motion with scores from patient reported outcomes measures (PROs) including the Comparative Pain Scale (CPS), Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire (FABQ), and Neck Disability Index (NDI). An inertial measurement unit (IMU) system quantified ROM during ADLs in the extension/flexion, lateral bending, and axial rotation directions of motion. The reliability of this system was compared to standard optical motion tracking. Fourteen participants (8 females, age = 60.0 years (18.7) (median, (interquartile range)) with a history of multi-level cervical fusion (years post-op 0.9 (0.7)) were compared to 16 controls (13 females, age = 52.1 years (15.8)). PROs were collected for each participant. Fusion participants had significantly decreased maximum ROM in all directions of motion. Fusion participants had decreased ROM for some ADLs (backing up a car, using a phone, donning socks, negotiating stairs). CPS, FABQ, and NDI scores were significantly increased in fusion participants. Reductions in two activities (backing up a car, stair negotiation) correlated with a combination of increased PRO scores. Cervical fusion decreases maximum ROM and is correlated with increased PROs in some ADLs, however there is minimal impact on functional ROM. Investigation into velocity and acceleration may yield categorization of pathologic movement.


Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Fusión Vertebral , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Vértebras Cervicales , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Rotación , Fenómenos Biomecánicos
2.
Exp Brain Res ; 239(5): 1417-1426, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33675379

RESUMEN

Postural control impairments have been reported in adults with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Balance relies on the integration of multisensory cues, a process that requires attention. The purpose of this study was to determine if the influence of attention demands on sensory integration abilities relevant for balance partially contributes to postural control impairments in ASD. Young adults with ASD (N = 24) and neurotypical participants (N = 24) were exposed to sensory perturbations during standing. An established dual-task paradigm was used, requiring participants to maintain balance in these sensory challenging environments and to perform auditory information processing tasks (simple reaction time task and choice reaction time task). Balance was assessed using sway magnitude and sway speed, and attention demands were evaluated based on the response time in the auditory tasks. While young adults with ASD were able to maintain balance in destabilizing sensory conditions, they were more challenged (greater sway speed) than their neurotypical counterparts. Additionally, when exposed for an extended amount of time (3 min) to the most challenging sensory condition included in this study, adults with ASD exhibited a reduced ability to adapt their postural control strategies (sway speed was minimally reduced), demonstrating a postural inflexibility pattern in ASD compared to neurotypical counterparts. Finally, the impact of performing an auditory information processing task on balance and the dual-task cost on information processing (response time) was similar in both groups. ASD may disrupt temporal adaptive postural control processes associated with sensory reweighting that occurs in neurotypicals.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno del Espectro Autista , Equilibrio Postural , Adaptación Fisiológica , Humanos , Tiempo de Reacción , Trastornos de la Sensación/etiología , Adulto Joven
3.
Spine J ; 21(9): 1440-1449, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33785473

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Psychological comorbidities are important prognostic factors for low back pain (LBP). To develop improved treatment paradigms, it is first necessary to characterize and determine current patterns of treatment in this population. PURPOSE: Identify how comorbid depression or anxiety in patients with LBP is related to use of healthcare resources. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study using electronic health records from outpatient offices at a large multisite academic medical center. PATIENT SAMPLE: Data from 513,088 unique patients seen between January 2010 and July 2020 (58.0% female, 52.6±19.5 years) with a diagnosis of LBP, indicated by predetermined ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. OUTCOME MEASURES: Average self-reported pain scores, absolute differences and unadjusted risk ratios to compare opioid use, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, advanced imaging orders, spinal injections, and back surgeries between cohorts. METHODS: Clinical characteristics and data regarding use of healthcare resources were extracted from the electronic health record. Clinical features and patterns in healthcare utilization were determined for patients with depression or anxiety compared to those without. RESULTS: Depression or anxiety was coded for 21.4% of patients at first LBP visit. Those with depression or anxiety were more likely to be on opioids (unadjusted risk ratio: 1.22, CI: [1.22,1.23]), go to the emergency department (1.31 [1.30-1.33]), be hospitalized (1.15 [1.13, 1.17]), receive advanced imaging (1.09 [1.08, 1.11]), receive an epidural steroid injection (1.16 [1.15, 1.18]), and less likely to have back surgery (0.74 [0.72, 0.77]). Differences in pain scores for those with depression/anxiety compared to those without were not clinically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Depression/anxiety is associated with increased use of healthcare resources, and is not associated with clinically meaningful elevated pain scores. Limitations come from use of an aggregate data set and reliance on administrative coding.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/diagnóstico , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/epidemiología , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Masculino , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 99(5): 994-1010, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29277373

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature to identify and summarize strategies for evaluating responses to physical exertion after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) for clinical and research purposes. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and EBSCOhost through December 31, 2016. STUDY SELECTION: Two independent reviewers selected studies based on the following criteria: (1) inclusion of participants with mTBI/concussion, (2) use of a measurement of physiological or psychosomatic response to exertion, (3) a repeatable description of the exertion protocol was provided, (4) a sample of at least 10 participants with a mean age between 8 and 65 years, and (5) the article was in English. The search process yielded 2685 articles, of which 14 studies met the eligibility requirements. DATA EXTRACTION: A quality assessment using a checklist was conducted for each study by 2 independent study team members and verified by a third team member. Data were extracted by one team member and verified by a second team member. DATA SYNTHESIS: A qualitative synthesis of the studies revealed that most protocols used a treadmill or cycle ergometer as the exercise modality. Protocol methods varied across studies including differences in initial intensity determination, progression parameters, and exertion duration. Common outcome measures were self-reported symptoms, heart rate, and blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: The strongest evidence indicates that exertional assessments can provide important insight about mTBI recovery and should be administered using symptoms as a guide. Additional studies are needed to verify optimal modes and protocols for post-mTBI exertional assessments.


Asunto(s)
Conmoción Encefálica/fisiopatología , Prueba de Esfuerzo/métodos , Tolerancia al Ejercicio/fisiología , Esfuerzo Físico/fisiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...