How to treat chronic pain in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) - A pharmacological review.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic pain is a common symptom of rheumatic diseases that impacts patients' quality of life. While non-pharmacological approaches are often recommended as first-line treatments, pharmacological interventions are important for pain management. However, the effectiveness and safety of different pharmacological treatments for chronic pain in rheumatic diseases are unclear. METHODS: This review critically synthesizes the current evidence base to guide clinicians in selecting appropriate pharmacological treatments for their patients, considering the expected benefits and potential risks and side effects. RESULTS: For osteoarthritis, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, opioids, and antidepressants are commonly used, with NSAIDs being the most recommended. In addition, topical agents, such as topical NSAIDs, are recommended for localized pain relief. For fibromyalgia, amitriptyline, serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), and gabapentinoids are commonly used, with SNRIs being the most recommended. For back pain, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, opioids are used only for acute of flare-up pain, whereas neuropathic pain drugs are only used for chronic radicular pain. For inflammatory rheumatic diseases, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biological agents are recommended to slow disease progression and manage symptoms. CONCLUSION: While DMARDs and biological agents are recommended for inflammatory rheumatic diseases, pharmacological treatments for other rheumatic diseases only alleviate symptoms and do not provide a cure for the underlying condition. The use of pharmacological treatments should be based on the expected benefits and evaluation of side effects, with non-pharmacological modalities also being considered, especially for fibromyalgia.

A national media mass campaign improves beliefs and behaviours about low back pain in the general population and in general practitioners.

INTRODUCTION: Previous international mass-media campaigns for low back pain (LBP) have had conflicting impacts on the general population. The objective was to evaluate the impact of a national back pain campaign conducted between 2017 and 2019 on beliefs and behaviours of general practitioners and the general population in France. METHODS: Between 2017 and 2019, a mass-media campaign was used to disseminate positive messages about LBP using several media, along with a parallel campaign addressed to general practitioners. An email survey before the campaign and 6 and 18 months after the campaign started evaluated beliefs and behaviours among a representative sample of the 2 target populations (3500 people from the general population and 700 general practitioners before the campaign, and 2000 people and 300 general practitioners 6 and 18 months after). RESULTS: Overall, 56% of the general population respondents before the campaign and 74% and 75% at 6 and 18 months after adhered to the statement "One should maintain physical activity" when dealing with LBP. Conversely, the percentage adhering to the statement "The best treatment is resting" decreased significantly from 68% before the campaign to 45% at 6 and 18 months after. Physicians reported delivering more reassurance and giving more documentation to patients after the campaign. They prescribed less sick leave during the first consultation (65% before the campaign, 46% and 30% at 6 and 18 months after). CONCLUSION: A mass-media campaign aimed at the public and general practitioners in France significantly modified beliefs and behaviours about LBP.

Effects of COVID-19 lockdown on low back pain intensity in chronic low back pain patients: results of the multicenter CONFI-LOMB study.

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic and the extended lockdown are associated with numerous changes in behavior and lifestyles. The objective was to assess the impact of the first lockdown on LBP course among chronic LBP patients. METHODS: Descriptive and analytical, cross-sectional, multicenter study, conducted by questionnaire from mid-May to end of June 2020 among patients treated for chronic LBP in 6 French and 1 Swiss center. Collected data concerned changes in LBP intensity during lockdown, lockdown experience, physical activity (PA) practice and sedentary lifestyle prior and during lockdown, recourse to care, consumption of psychoactive substances for LBP, and professional activity and its conditions during lockdown. RESULTS: 360 participants (58.6% women, 52.1 ± 13.4 years) were included of which 65% were active (63% keep on working of which 54% teleworked). LBP got worse in 41.1%, mean VAS went from 49.5 ± 21.6 before to 53.5 ± 22.4 during lockdown (p < 0.001) and needed increase of treatment by 29% but very few people increased their consumption psychoactive substances for analgesia. Half of participants had well-experienced lockdown. Findings revealed a significant decrease in PA and increase of sedentary during lockdown (p < 0.0001). Good experience of lockdown was associated with LBP improvement (OR = 0.6 [0.3-0.9]) and decrease of PA with LBP worsening (OR = 1.9 [1.1-3.2]). Teleworking was also associated with LBP worsening. Gender, age, or BMI did not influence LBP course. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that chronic LBP people suffered from increase in self-perceived LBP during lockdown and help to better understand the factors associated with their condition.

The challenge of differentiating fibromyalgia from small-fiber neuropathy in clinical practice.

Fibromyalgia and small fibre neuropathy are two diseases leading to chronic widespread pain, and it is difficult to differentiate them in order to provide appropriate care. In this review, we will describe the pathophysiological and clinical differences between fibromyalgia and small fibre neuropathy. In fibromyalgia, pain is increased by dysregulation of central pain processing while small fibre neuropathy pain is related to loss or dysfunction of intraepidermal small nerve fibres. Higher pain intensity; stabbing pain and paraesthesia; allodynia; dry eyes/mouth; changed pattern or sweating on body; skin colour alterations/modifications; reduced hair/nail growth on lower extremities; warm or cold hypoesthesia could be more common in small fibre neuropathy whereas headache or temporo-mandibular disorder point toward fibromyalgia. Length-dependent distribution of pain is common in small fibre neuropathy but can also affect the whole body. Anxiety or depression are common in these two diseases, but post-traumatic stress disorder and physical or sexual abuse in childhood or adulthood suggest fibromyalgia. Inflammatory disease or musculoskeletal disease is frequently reported with fibromyalgia whereas metabolic disorders (especially diabetes mellitus), neurotoxic exposure, Sjogren's syndrome, sarcoidosis, HIV are the main diseases associated with small fibre neuropathy. Skin biopsy, quantitative sensory testing, laser evoked potentials, confocal corneal microscopy or electrochemical skin conductance can help to discriminate between fibromyalgia and small fibre neuropathy.

Clinical guidelines and care pathway for management of low back pain with or without radicular pain.

OBJECTIVE: To develop guidelines for low back pain management according to previous international guidelines and the updated literature. METHODS: A report was compiled from a review of systematic reviews of guidelines published between 2013 and 2018 and meta-analysis of the management of low back pain published between 2015 and 2018. This report summarized the state-of-the-art scientific knowledge for each predefined area of the guidelines from a critical review of selected literature. A multidisciplinary panel of experts including 17 health professionals involved in low back pain management and 2 patient representatives formulated preliminary guidelines based on the compilation report and a care pathway. The compilation report and preliminary guidelines were submitted to 25 academic institutions and stakeholders for the consultation phase. From responses of academic institutions and stakeholders, the final guidelines were developed. For each area of the guidelines, agreement between experts was assessed by the RAND/UCLA method. RESULTS: The expert panel drafted 32 preliminary recommendations including a care pathway, which was amended after academic institution and stakeholder consultation. The consensus of the multidisciplinary expert panel was assessed for each final guideline: 32 recommendations were assessed as appropriate; none was assessed as uncertain or inappropriate. Strong approval was obtained for 27 recommendations and weak for 5. CONCLUSION: These new guidelines introduce several concepts, including the need to early identify low back pain at risk of chronicity to provide quicker intensive and multidisciplinary management if necessary.

Part of pain labelled neuropathic in rheumatic disease might be rather nociplastic.

Pain in rheumatic diseases is primarily due to mechanical or inflammatory mechanism, but neuropathic pain (NP) component is also occurring in many conditions and is probably underdiagnosed. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of prevalence, pathophysiological and currently available treatment of NP in rheumatic diseases. When associated with clinical evaluation assessing neurological clinical signs and neuroanatomical distribution, Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions, painDETECT, Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs and Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire can detect NP component. Inflammatory or connective diseases, osteoarthritis, back pain or persistent pain after surgery are aetiologies that all may have a neuropathic component. Unlike nociceptive pain, NP does not respond to usual analgesics such as paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Entrapment neuropathy, peripheral neuropathy or small-fibre neuropathy are different aetiologies that can lead to NP. A part of the pain labelled neuropathic is rather nociplastic, secondary to a central sensitisation mechanism. Identifying the right component of pain (nociceptive vs neuropathic or nociplastic) could help to better manage pain in rheumatic diseases with pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments.

Effectiveness of a short functional restoration program for patients with chronic low back pain: A cohort study of 193 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Functional restoration programs (FRPs) are integrative programs to improve function in chronic low back pain (cLBP). They are costly and time-consuming. The aim was to assess the effectiveness of a condensed FRP (CFRP) for patients with cLBP in professional activity. METHODS: Longitudinal 3 months study of patients with cLBP in one tertiary care hospital, participating in a CFRP over 4 separate days. The primary outcome was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Secondary outcomes included pain, quality of life (EQ5D), patient acceptable symptom state, presenteeism, absenteeism and psychological distress. Outcomes were compared using paired sample Student's t-test or Chi2 between baseline and last follow-up. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with better response (improvement of ODI higher than 12.8). RESULTS: In all, 193 patients were analysed, mean age 44.6 (standard deviation (SD) 10.4) years, mean cLBP duration 9.0 (SD 8.8) years. A small improvement was observed for ODI (mean difference -5.9, 95% confidence interval: -7.6, -4.1), as well as most other outcomes. Multivariate analysis showed an association between ODI improvement and higher duration of low back pain (odds ratio for 5 years: 1.41 (1.06,1.88)) and lower baseline back strength (Sorensen, odds ratio for 1min: 0.54 [0.29,0.99]). CONCLUSION: This CFRP showed small effect to improve function, pain and other quality of life, in cLBP. Four-day programs may be an interesting option in cLBP patients still in professional activity for whom a long 1-month FRP is difficultly manageable. Further studies with randomized controlled designs are needed to confirm the benefits.

Criteria for inclusion in programs of functional restoration for chronic low back pain: Pragmatic Study.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with chronic low back pain (cLBP) may benefit from multimodal functional restoration programs (FRPs). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze characteristics of individuals with cLBP who were referred or not to an FRP. Because cLBP is a bio-psycho-social disorder, medical and social parameters were analysed. METHODS: This was an observational cross-sectional study performed in 2017 in 6 tertiary centres in France. Consecutive individuals with cLBP visiting a rheumatologist or physical medicine and rehabilitation physician were included. Individuals referred or not to an FRP were compared by demographic characteristics, duration of sick leave over the past year, self-reported physical activity>1h/week, pain (numeric rating scale 0-10), anxiety/depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), disability (Oswestry Disability Index) and kinesiophobia (Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed, estimating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: We included 147 individuals with cLBP. The mean (SD) age was 49 (12) years and 88 (60%) were women; 58 (38%) were referred to an FRP. On multivariate analysis, referral to an FRP was associated with reduced pain level (OR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.91-0.99, for each 1-point increase in pain score), self-reported lack of physical activity (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.72-0.98) and longer sick leave (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05, for 30 more days of sick leave). CONCLUSION: In this multicentric observational study, referral to an FRP was linked to pain, self-reported physical activity and sick leave but not medical characteristics assessed. These findings confirm the bio-psycho-social approach of FRPs for cLBP.

A simplified radiographic score effectively predicts radiographic progression of early arthritis in a large nationwide French cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluating radiographic progression is a key component of the follow-up of patients with RA. Existing scores are ill-suited to everyday clinical practice. The objective here was to validate a new simplified radiographic score (SRS) for evaluating radiographic progression in patients with early arthritis. METHODS: Patients with arthritis of <6 months' duration were included in the large, prospective, nationwide, French ESPOIR cohort. Radiographs of the hands and feet were obtained at inclusion then 1 and 5 years later. The modified Sharp scores and SRS were determined by blinded readers. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver repeatability of each score, as well as agreement between the two scores, were assessed by computing the intraclass correlation coefficients. The rates of progression over the first year and the next 4 years were determined. RESULTS: The 506 patients with complete data for the first 5 years were included. At inclusion, the intraclass correlation coefficient between the two scores was good for erosions (0.715, P < 0.001), joint space narrowing (0.892, P < 0.001) and the total score (0.896, P < 0.001). Agreement between the two scores was also good for radiographic progression after 1 year (0.781, P < 0.001). The SRS had good positive and negative predictive values for slow and for rapid progression. SRS determination was less time consuming. CONCLUSION: The SRS is effective for monitoring radiographic progression in early arthritis and is easier to use and less time-consuming than the Sharp score. The usefulness of the SRS in clinical practice deserves further evaluation.

Sustainability of TNF-blocker tapering in rheumatoid arthritis over 3 years: long-term follow-up of the STRASS (Spacing of TNF-blocker injections in Rheumatoid ArthritiS Study) randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: We have limited data on the sustainability of tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-blocker tapering in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in remission over the long term in real-life settings. This study aimed to assess the probability of sustained dose reduction of TNF-blockers in an observational 3-year extended follow-up of the Spacing of TNF-blocker injections in Rheumatoid ArthritiS Study (STRASS), a randomised controlled trial comparing progressive TNF-blocker injections (spacing arm (S-arm) to maintenance arm (M-arm)) in patients with RA in stable remission. METHODS: In 2015, clinical data for the completer population were retrospectively collected at 1, 2 and 3 years after the end of the trial. The endpoints were the proportion of patients free of a biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) treatment, a sustainably spaced injection of TNF-blockers and a full-dose regimen as well as the mean dose of bDMARD intake and treatment switch rate. RESULTS: Overall, 96 patients (76.8% of the completers) had data available up to 3 years; 11.5% discontinued TNF-blockers (5.8% vs 18.2% in the M-arm and S-arm, p=0.06), 30.2% had a tapered regimen (28.8% vs 31.8%, p=0.76) and 37.5% retained a full dose (44.2% vs 29.5%, p=0.14). The mean TNF-blocker dose quotient was 66% of the full dose (74% vs 58% in the M-arm and S-arm, p=0.06); 20.8% switched to another bDMARD (21.2% vs 20.5%, p=0.94). CONCLUSION: Sustained TNF-blocker de-escalation or withdrawal is achievable in 41% of patients over 3 years with limited dose reduction. Optimal strategies remain to be determined to maintain remission after TNF-blocker tapering or discontinuation.

Development and validation of a questionnaire categorizing behavioral strategies in patients with chronic low back pain.

OBJECTIVE: The identification of helpful or unhelpful behavioral strategies for coping with pain would assist in optimizing the management of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). The objective was to develop and validate a questionnaire for categorizing behavioral strategies in patients with nonspecific CLBP. METHODS: (1) Development of a preliminary questionnaire based on a qualitative study in 25 patients with CLBP; (2) Item reduction and questionnaire validation by a multicenter international prospective study in patients with CLBP, with multiple correspondence analysis to identify behavioral profiles, whose characteristics and internal and external validities were assessed; 12-month study of treatments in 58 patients; (3) Evaluation of reproducibility in 30 patients. RESULTS: (1) The preliminary questionnaire had 87 items in eight pain-coping domains. (2) Three behavioral profiles were identified: effective coping, emotional distress, and kinesiophobia. The questionnaire was reduced to 21 items in seven domains. Cronbach's α indicated moderate internal consistency (0.47-0.66). External validity versus anxiety, depression, and coping strategies was good. As expected, functional restoration program was used more often by patients with kinesiophobia than by those with effective coping (50% vs. 25%, P<0.05). (3) Reproducibility was good (κ=0.70). CONCLUSION: This new, simple questionnaire allows the identification of three behavioral profiles, thus guiding the development of personalized management programs for NCLBP.

Multireader assessment as an alternative to reference assessment to improve the detection of radiographic progression in a large longitudinal cohort of rheumatoid arthritis (ESPOIR).

INTRODUCTION: Structural damage progression is a major outcome in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Its evaluation and follow-up in trials should involve radiographic scoring by 1 or 2 readers (reference assessment), which is challenging in large longitudinal cohorts with multiple assessments. OBJECTIVES: To compare the reproducibility of multireader and reference assessment to improve the feasibility of detecting radiographic progression in a large cohort of patients with early arthritis (ESPOIR). METHODS: We used 3 sessions to train 12 rheumatologists in radiographic scoring by the van der Heijde-modified Sharp score (SHS). Multireader scoring was based on 10 trained-reader assessments, each reader scoring a random sample of 1/5 of all available radiographs (for double scoring for each X-ray set) for patients included in the ESPOIR cohort with complete radiographic data at M0 and M60. Reference scoring was performed by 2 experienced readers. Scoring was performed blindly to clinical data, with radiographs in chronological order. We compared multireader and reference assessments by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for SHS and significant radiographic progression (SRP). RESULTS: The intrareader and inter-reader reproducibility for trained assessors increased during the training sessions (ICC 0.79 to 0.94 and 0.76 to 0.92), respectively. For the 524 patients included, agreement between multireader and reference assessment of SHS progression between M0 and M60 and SRP assessment were almost perfect, ICC (0.88 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.93)) and (0.99 (95% CI 0.99 to 0.99)), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Multireader assessment of radiographic structural damage progression is comparable to reference assessment and could be used to improve the feasibility of radiographic scoring in large longitudinal cohort with numerous X-ray evaluations.

Efficacy and safety of febuxostat in 73 gouty patients with stage 4/5 chronic kidney disease: A retrospective study of 10 centers.

OBJECTIVES: The allopurinol dose is limited in chronic kidney disease, particularly stage 4/5 chronic kidney disease. Febuxostat has a hepatic metabolism and has been approved without dose adaptation in gouty patients with stage 1-3 chronic kidney disease. We aimed to study the safety and efficacy of febuxostat for stage 4/5 chronic kidney disease. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included patients with (1) a diagnosis of gout, (2) febuxostat treatment, (3) estimated glomerular filtration rate≤30mL/min/1.73m2 (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula) at febuxostat initiation and (4) follow-up for at least 3 months after febuxostat initiation. Efficacy, safety and variation in estimated glomerular filtration rate were analyzed. RESULTS: We included 73 patients (mean age 70.2±11.8, 61 men, 31 with vascular chronic kidney disease and 18 renal transplantation) with gout (baseline serum uric acid level=9.86±2.85mg/dL, mean gout duration 6.2±7.0 years) from 10 academic centers. Comorbidities included cardiac failure (17.8%), hypertension (98.6%), diabetes mellitus (30.1%), dyslipidemia (64.8%) and history of cardiovascular events (38.4%). At the last visit (mean follow-up 68.5±64.8 weeks), the daily dose of febuxostat was 40mg for 7 patients (10.5%), 80mg for 50 (74.6%) and 120mg for 10 (14.9%). Serum uric acid level was<6mg/dL for 49 patients (67%). Renal function improved for 18 patients, was unchanged for 24 and worsened for 31; 19 patients experienced flares and 1 patient, limb edema. CONCLUSION: Febuxostat seemed efficient in gouty patients with stage 4/5 chronic kidney disease. However, safety data were not clear regarding renal function. Larger studies are needed to assess safety.

Pain assessment in rheumatology - How can we do better? A literature review.

Patients' symptoms have a place of prominence in the rheumatology landscape, and among them pain is the most conspicuous. Several pain assessment tools have been validated. One-dimensional pain scales such as visual analog scales (VASs) and numeric rating scales (NRSs) are fast to administer but have limitations that must be acknowledged. Some clinical situations require the use of multidimensional scales such as the McGill Pain Questionnaire or the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI). These tools allow the assessment and management of the diverse components of pain. Here, we review the main patient-reported outcomes that can serve to evaluate pain and the psychometric properties of pain assessment tools. We also discuss the selection of the tool most appropriate for each situation (e.g., everyday practice and research).

The impact of chronic low back pain is partly related to loss of social role: A qualitative study.

OBJECTIVES: Chronic low back pain (LBP) has an important impact on quality of life, through pain and functional incapacity, but also psychosocial distress. The social participation consequences of LBP have been less explored. The objective was to better understand experiences of patients living with chronic LBP, with a focus on impact on relationships with family, friends and work colleagues. METHODS: Monocentric qualitative study in a tertiary-referral centre in Paris, France. Participants had chronic mechanical LBP. Semi-structured interviews were conducted during 4 focus groups discussions focusing on living with LBP. Verbatim was categorized and coded using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-five persons (11 men, 14 women) participated; ages ranged 25-81 years. Participants often reported a negative self-perception in social interactions, with shame and frustration regarding their difficulties to perform activities of daily living. They often felt misunderstood and unsupported, partly due to the absence of visible signs of the condition. Participants suffered from the negative collective image attached to LBP ("benign/psychological disease"). LBP resulted in some patients in a significant loss of social identity with perceived impossibility to perform one's social role at home and at work. In contrast, family and friends were sometimes a support and helped in pain management. CONCLUSION: A systematic assessment of social role is needed in LBP care.