FDA, CDC, and NIH Co-sponsored Public Workshop Summary-Development Considerations of Antimicrobial Drugs for the Treatment of Gonorrhea.

There is an unmet need for developing drugs for the treatment of gonorrhea, due to rapidly evolving resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae against antimicrobial drugs used for empiric therapy, an increase in globally reported multidrug resistant cases, and the limited available therapeutic options. Furthermore, few drugs are under development. Development of antimicrobials is hampered by challenges in clinical trial design, limitations of available diagnostics, changes in and varying standards of care, lack of robust animal models, and clinically relevant pharmacodynamic targets. On April 23, 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health co-sponsored a workshop with stakeholders from academia, industry, and regulatory agencies to discuss the challenges and strategies, including potential collaborations and incentives, to facilitate the development of drugs for the treatment of gonorrhea. This article provides a summary of the workshop.

FDA Public Workshop Summary-Addressing Challenges in Inhaled Antifungal Drug Development.

Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis and invasive fungal diseases represent distinct infectious entities that cause significant morbidity and mortality. Currently, administered inhaled antifungal therapies are unapproved, have suboptimal efficacy, and are associated with considerable adverse reactions. The emergence of resistant pathogens is also a growing concern. Inhaled antifungal development programs are challenged by inadequate nonclinical infection models, highly heterogenous patient populations, low prevalence rates of fungal diseases, difficulties defining clinical trial enrollment criteria, and lack of robust clinical trial endpoints. On September 25, 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) convened a workshop with experts in pulmonary medicine and infectious diseases from academia, industry, and other governmental agencies. Key discussion topics included regulatory incentives to facilitate development of inhaled antifungal drugs and combination inhalational devices, limitations of existing nonclinical models and clinical trial designs, patient perspectives, and industry insights.

Food and Drug Administration Public Workshop Summary-Development Considerations of Antifungal Drugs to Address Unmet Medical Need.

Pressing challenges in the treatment of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) include emerging and rare pathogens, resistant/refractory infections, and antifungal armamentarium limited by toxicity, drug-drug interactions, and lack of oral formulations. Development of new antifungal drugs is hampered by the limitations of the available diagnostics, clinical trial endpoints, prolonged trial duration, difficulties in patient recruitment, including subpopulations (eg, pediatrics), and heterogeneity of the IFIs. On 4 August 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration convened a workshop that included IFI experts from academia, industry, and other government agencies to discuss the IFI landscape, unmet need, and potential strategies to facilitate the development of antifungal drugs for treatment and prophylaxis. This article summarizes the key topics presented and discussed during the workshop, such as incentives and research support for drug developers, nonclinical development, clinical trial design challenges, lessons learned from industry, and potential collaborations to facilitate antifungal drug development.

Geographic Shifts in Antibacterial Drug Clinical Trial Enrollment: Implications for Generalizability.

BACKGROUND: As drug development has globalized, trials have increasingly enrolled participants from all parts of the world rather than just the United States and Western Europe. For antibacterial drug trials, understanding enrollment trends and regional differences is important for generalizability considerations. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 42 phase 3 trials submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration after 2001 for complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP), and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) (n = 29 282 participants). Enrollment numbers, demographics, clinical characteristics, and microbiological data were compared to identify temporal and geographic trends. RESULTS: For cUTI, cIAI, and CABP trials, Eastern European enrollment greatly increased over the study period. For ABSSSI trials, North American enrollment increased. Demographic characteristics and regional microbiology among regions were broadly similar with several exceptions. For cIAI trials, Eastern European participants had the lowest proportion of participants with prior antibacterial drug therapy. For ABSSSI trials, North American participants more commonly reported intravenous drug use. Microbiological differences relative to North America included a greater proportion of Klebsiella pneumoniae among Asian cIAI isolates (17.8% vs 9.0%, P = .0057), a higher proportion of cephalosporin resistance in South American Enterobacteriaceae cUTI isolates (26.8% vs 15.7%, P = .044), and a lower proportion of Staphylococcus aureus in Eastern European ABSSSI isolates (43.7% vs 61.9%, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Geographic trends in recruitment for recent antibacterial clinical trials differ by indication. Regional similarities in demographic characteristics and microbiology across regions lessen concerns regarding generalizability due to shifting enrollment trends.

Use of biomarkers to improve immunosuppressive drug development and outcomes in renal organ transplantation: A meeting report.

On September 27-28, 2018 the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Critical Path Institute's Transplant Therapeutics Consortium convened a public workshop titled "Evidence-Based Treatment Decisions in Transplantation: The Right Dose & Regimen for the Right Patient/Individualized Treatment." The workshop facilitated cooperative engagement of transplant community stakeholders, including pharmaceutical industry, academic researchers, clinicians, patients, and regulators to discuss methods to advance the development of novel immunosuppressive drugs for use in solid organ transplantation. Day 1 focused on the utility of biomarkers in drug development, with considerations for seeking regulatory endorsement for use in clinical trials. Biomarkers add value to drug development by improving patient selection criteria, safety monitoring, endpoint selection, and more. Regulatory endorsement through the FDA Biomarker Qualification Program encourages the use of biomarkers in drug development by instilling confidence and consistency in biomarker interpretation across trials. Public-private partnerships or consortia allow stakeholders to share expertise, resources, and data in pursuit of biomarker qualification. Biomarkers relevant to pretransplant risk assessment, early posttransplant care, and assessment of immune response, immunosuppressive drug efficacy, and graft function as discussed on day 1 of the workshop are described.

Summary of 2017 FDA Public Workshop: Antibody-mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation.

Despite major advances in understanding the pathophysiology of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR); prevention, diagnosis and treatment remain unmet medical needs. It appears that early T cell-mediated rejection, de novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) formation and AMR result from patient or physician initiated suboptimal immunosuppression, and represent landmarks in an ongoing process rather than separate events. On April 12 and 13, 2017, the Food and Drug Administration sponsored a public workshop on AMR in kidney transplantation to discuss new advances, importance of immunosuppressive medication nonadherence in dnDSA formation, associations between AMR, cellular rejection, changes in glomerular filtration rate, and challenges of clinical trial design for the prevention and treatment of AMR. Key messages from the workshop are included in this summary. Distinction between type 1 (due to preexisting DSA) and type 2 (due to dnDSA) phenotypes of AMR needs to be considered in patient management and clinical trial design. Standardization and more widespread adoption of routine posttransplant DSA monitoring may permit timely diagnosis and understanding of the natural course of type 2 and chronic AMR. Clinical trial design, especially as related to type 2 and chronic AMR, has specific challenges, including the high prevalence of nonadherence in the population at risk, indolent nature of the process until the appearance of graft dysfunction, and the absence of accepted surrogate endpoints. Other challenges include sample size and study duration, which could be mitigated by enrichment strategies.

Population mobility, globalization, and antimicrobial drug resistance.

Population mobility is a main factor in globalization of public health threats and risks, specifically distribution of antimicrobial drug-resistant organisms. Drug resistance is a major risk in healthcare settings and is emerging as a problem in community-acquired infections. Traditional health policy approaches have focused on diseases of global public health significance such as tuberculosis, yellow fever, and cholera; however, new diseases and resistant organisms challenge existing approaches. Clinical implications and health policy challenges associated with movement of persons across barriers permeable to products, pathogens, and toxins (e.g., geopolitical borders, patient care environments) are complex. Outcomes are complicated by high numbers of persons who move across disparate and diverse settings of disease threat and risk. Existing policies and processes lack design and capacity to prevent or mitigate adverse health outcomes. We propose an approach to global public health risk management that integrates population factors with effective and timely application of policies and processes.

Clinical relevance of preclinical testing for allergic side effects.

Immune-mediated hypersensitivity reactions include exaggerated humoral or cell mediated responses to specific antigens and may culminate in adverse, potentially life threatening effects. The immune status of the host and presence of infections or other disorders can alter the kind and extent of immune mediated side effects in individuals. Such variability in the immune status may influence the type of idiosyncratic reaction(s) that patients manifest. The issues typically encountered from a drug development standpoint include the potential for contact hypersensitivity, respiratory sensitivity, systemic hypersensitivity, photoallergy, and pseudoallergy. There are no accepted in vitro or in vivo models available to measure and predict all types of hypersensitivity reactions in humans. There is a need for the development of preclinical models to predict all types of hypersensitivity reactions in humans. The FDA immunotoxicology guidance document recommends doing preclinical testing in animal models for topical and inhalational drugs before initiation of multiple dose studies in humans. Any signs of potential immune related drug hypersensitivity should be further evaluated in an attempt to further understand the potential for hypersensitivity reactions in humans. In summary, existing preclinical models have limited capability for prediction of drug allergy in humans except for topical and inhalational drugs. Additional tools are needed to evaluate drugs in early development and improve performance of existing assays.