Closing the RCT Gap-A Large Meta-Analysis on the Role of Surgery in Stage I-III Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Despite clear guideline recommendations, surgery is not consistently carried out as part of multimodal therapy in stage I small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. The role of surgery in stages II and III is even more controversial. In the absence of current randomized control trials (RCT), we performed a meta-analysis comparing surgery versus non-surgical treatment in stage I to III SCLC patients. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted on 1 July 2023, focusing on studies pertaining to the impact of surgery on small cell lung cancer (SCLC). These studies were evaluated using the ROBINS-I tool. Statistical analyses, including I² tests, Q-statistics, DerSimonian-Laird tests, and Egger regression, were performed to assess the data. In addition, 5-year survival rates were analyzed. The meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA standards. RESULTS: Among the 6826 records identified, 10 original studies encompassing a collective cohort of 95,323 patients were incorporated into this meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was observed across the included studies, with no discernible indication of publication bias. Analysis of patient characteristics revealed no significant differences between the two groups (p-value > 0.05). The 5-year survival rates in a combined analysis of patients in stages I-III were 39.6 ± 15.3% for the 'surgery group' and 16.7 ± 12.7% for the 'non-surgery group' (p-value < 0.0001). SCLC patients in stages II and III treated outside the guideline with surgery had a significantly better 5-year survival compared to non-surgery controls (36.3 ± 20.2% vs. 20.2 ± 17.0%; p-value = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of current RCTs, this meta-analysis provides robust suggestions that surgery might significantly improve survival in all SCLC stages. Non-surgical therapy could lead to a shortening of life. The feasibility of surgery in non-metastatic SCLC should always be evaluated as part of a multimodal treatment.

LIONS PREY: A New Logistic Scoring System for the Prediction of Malignant Pulmonary Nodules.

OBJECTIVES: Classifying radiologic pulmonary lesions as malignant is challenging. Scoring systems like the Mayo model lack precision in predicting the probability of malignancy. We developed the logistic scoring system 'LIONS PREY' (Lung lesION Score PREdicts malignancY), which is superior to existing models in its precision in determining the likelihood of malignancy. METHODS: We evaluated all patients that were presented to our multidisciplinary team between January 2013 and December 2020. Availability of pathological results after resection or CT-/EBUS-guided sampling was mandatory for study inclusion. Two groups were formed: Group A (malignant nodule; n = 238) and Group B (benign nodule; n = 148). Initially, 22 potential score parameters were derived from the patients' medical histories. RESULTS: After uni- and multivariate analysis, we identified the following eight parameters that were integrated into a scoring system: (1) age (Group A: 64.5 ± 10.2 years vs. Group B: 61.6 ± 13.8 years; multivariate p-value: 0.054); (2) nodule size (21.8 ± 7.5 mm vs. 18.3 ± 7.9 mm; p = 0.051); (3) spiculation (73.1% vs. 41.9%; p = 0.024); (4) solidity (84.9% vs. 62.8%; p = 0.004); (5) size dynamics (6.4 ± 7.7 mm/3 months vs. 0.2 ± 0.9 mm/3 months; p < 0.0001); (6) smoking history (92.0% vs. 43.9%; p < 0.0001); (7) pack years (35.1 ± 19.1 vs. 21.3 ± 18.8; p = 0.079); and (8) cancer history (34.9% vs. 24.3%; p = 0.052). Our model demonstrated superior precision to that of the Mayo score (p = 0.013) with an overall correct classification of 96.0%, a calibration (observed/expected-ratio) of 1.1, and a discrimination (ROC analysis) of AUC (95% CI) 0.94 (0.92-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Focusing on essential parameters, LIONS PREY can be easily and reproducibly applied based on computed tomography (CT) scans. Multidisciplinary team members could use it to facilitate decision making. Patients may find it easier to consent to surgery knowing the likelihood of pulmonary malignancy. The LIONS PREY app is available for free on Android and iOS devices.

Postoperative Tobacco Cessation Improves Quality of Life, Lung Function and Long-Term Survival in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients.

OBJECTIVES: About 90% of all non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases are associated with inhalative tabacco smoking. Half of patients continue smoking during lung cancer therapy. We examined the effects of postoperative smoking cessation on lung function, quality of life (QOL) and long-term survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 641 patients, who underwent lobectomy between 2012 and 2019, were identified from our single institutional data base. Postoperatively, patients that actively smoked at the time of operation were offered a structured 'smoking cessation' program. For this retrospective analysis, two patient groups (total n = 90) were selected by pair matching. Group A (n = 60) had no postoperative tobacco smoking. Group B (n = 30) involved postoperative continued smoking. Lung function (FEV1, DLCO) and QOL ('SF-36' questionnaire) were measured 12 months postoperatively. We compared long-term outcomes using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: The mean age in group A was 62.6 ± 12.5 years and that in group B was 64.3 ± 9.7 years (p = 0.82); 64% and 62%, respectively, were male (p = 0.46). Preoperative smoking habits were similar ('pack years': group A, 47 ± 31; group B, 49 ± 27; p = 0.87). All relevant baseline characteristics we collected were similar (p > 0.05). One year after lobectomy, FEV1 was reduced by 15% in both groups (p = 0.98). Smoking cessation was significantly associated with improved DLCO (group A: 11 ± 16%; group B: -5 ± 14%; p <0.001) and QOL (vitality (VT): +10 vs. -10, p = 0.017; physical role function (RP): +8 vs. -17, p = 0.012; general health perceptions (GH): +12 vs. -5, p = 0.024). Patients who stopped smoking postoperatively had a significantly superior overall survival (median survival: 89.8 ± 6.8 [95% CI: 76.6-103.1] months vs. 73.9 ± 3.6 [95% CI: 66.9-80.9] months, p = 0.034; 3-year OS rate: 96.2% vs. 81.0%, p = 0.02; 5-year OS rate: 80.0% vs. 64.0%, p = 0.016). The hazard ratio (HR) was 2.31 [95% CI: 1.04-5.13] for postoperative smoking versus tobacco cessation. CONCLUSION: Postoperative smoking cessation is associated with improved quality of life and lung function testing. Notably, a significant increase in long-term survival rates among non-smoking NSCLC patients was observed. These findings could serve as motivation for patients to successfully complete a non-smoking program.

Pneumonectomy for Primary Lung Tumors and Pulmonary Metastases: A Comprehensive Study of Postoperative Morbidity, Early Mortality, and Preoperative Clinical Prognostic Factors.

BACKGROUND: Pneumonectomy is a major surgical resection that still remains a high-risk operation. The current study aims to investigate perioperative risk factors for postoperative morbidity and early mortality after pneumonectomy for thoracic malignancies. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent pneumonectomy for thoracic malignancies at our institution between 2014 and 2022. Complications were assessed up to 30 days after the operation. Mortality for any reason was recorded after 30 days and 90 days. RESULTS: A total of 145 out of 169 patients undergoing pneumonectomy were included in this study. The postoperative 30-day complication rate was 41.4%. The 30-day-mortality was 8.3%, and 90-day-mortality 17.2%. The presence of cardiovascular comorbidities was a risk factor for major cardiopulmonary complications (54.2% vs. 13.2%, p < 0.01). Postoperative bronchus stump insufficiency (OR: 11.883, 95% CI: 1.288-109.591, p = 0.029) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score 4 (OR: 3.023, 95% CI: 1.028-8.892, p = 0.044) were independent factors for early mortality. CONCLUSION: Pneumonectomy for thoracic malignancies remains a high-risk major lung resection with significant postoperative morbidity and mortality. Attention should be paid to the preoperative selection of patients.

New Prognostic Score (Essen Score) to Predict Postoperative Morbidity after Resection of Lung Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) is a widely accepted surgical procedure. This study aims to investigate postoperative morbidity and mortality after PM and develop a score to predict high-risk patients. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated all patients undergoing a PM in our institution from November 2012 to January 2023. Complications were defined as the diagnosis of any new disease after the PM up to 30 days after the operation. RESULTS: 1284 patients were identified. At least one complication occurred in 145 patients (11.29%). Only one patient died during the hospital stay. Preoperative cardiovascular comorbidities (OR: 2.99, 95% CI: 1.412-3.744, p = 0.01), major lung resections (OR: 2.727, 95% CI: 1.678-4.431, p < 0.01), repeated pulmonary metastasectomy (OR: 1.759, 95% CI: 1.040-2.976, p = 0.03) and open thoracotomy (OR: 0.621, 95% CI: 0.415-0.930, p = 0.02) were identified as independent factors for postoperative complications. Based on the above independent factors for postoperative morbidity, the Essen score was developed (overall correct classification: 94.6%, ROC-Analysis: 0.828, 95% CI: 0.795-0.903). CONCLUSION: PM is a safe surgical procedure with acceptable morbidity and low mortality. The aim of the Essen score is to identify patients that are associated with risk for postoperative complications after PM.

Entzündliche und infektiöse Erkrankungen der Lunge und Pleura bei Kindern und Jugendlichen.

Inflammatory diseases of the lung and pleura in children and adolescents cover a broad spectrum, including complicated pneumonia, tuberculosis, mycoses, and hydatid disease. Their frequency strongly depends on the geographical origin. The following article gives an overview - from diagnosis to surgical treatment of these diseases in the paediatric population.

Multimodal and palliative treatment of patients with pulmonary metastases.

Pulmonary metastasectomy has become an important part of the multimodality treatment. Surgical practice is based on observational studies published during the last decades, since no randomized clinical trials exist on the topic. However, the overall survival can be improved after pulmonary metastasectomy in carefully selected patients. The objective of resection of pulmonary metastases is to remove all tumor while preserving as much normal pulmonary parenchyma as possible and reduce invasiveness. Contrary, nonsurgical local treatment options for pulmonary metastases include thermal ablation techniques and stereotactic ablative body radiation. Thermal ablation techniques include microwave, cryotherapy and radiofrequency ablation. The present review article gives an overview on the topic and should help thoracic surgeons to make the right decisions in their daily practice.

[Robot-Assisted Lung Surgery]. / Roboterassistierte Lungenchirurgie.

Anatomical lung resection is the standard treatment for patients with early-stage lung cancer. The conventional surgical techniques are thoracotomy and video-assisted thoracic surgery, but new methods have been added as technology has developed. The latest technological development is the robot-assisted anatomical lung resection. In this technique, a robot is used to perform an anatomical lobectomy or segmentectomy as well as lymph node dissection, as determined by oncological criteria. Comparison between the robot-assisted and video-assisted thoracic surgery is still of the greatest interest, since both minimally invasive approaches have their advantages and disadvantages. The aim of this work is to describe the development and performance of robot-assisted thoracic surgery, as well as the comparison with other surgical methods.

Standard and extended sleeve resections of the tracheobronchial tree.

Anatomic resections with bronchial and/or vascular resections and reconstruction, so called sleeve resections were originally performed in patients with impaired cardio-pulmonary reserves. Nowadays, sleeve resections are established surgical procedures of first choice for tracheobronchial pathologies, whenever anatomically and oncologically feasible. Experienced thoracic surgeons have a broad surgical armentarium to avoid a pneumonectomy and the morbidity and mortality associated with it. Sleeve resections are associated with better outcomes in all aspects. Thus, sleeve resection is not an alternative for pneumonectomy and vice versa. In this review article we set out to provide a contemporary overview on this topic.

[Postoperative Arrhythmias]. / Postoperative Herzrhythmusstörungen.

Arrhythmias are common after pulmonary resection. They often complicate the patient's recovery and can have an effect on the short-term and long-term prognosis. The aim of the following review is to give an overview of risk factors, prevention and therapy of arrhythmias following lung surgery.

Survival following Multimodality Treatment Including Surgery for Stage IA-IIIB Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Prognosis in limited disease small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) after concurrent chemoradiotherapy is poor. While some studies show better survival after multimodality treatment including surgery, other trials failed to prove a surgery-related survival benefit. Therefore, this study investigated survival in stage IA-IIIB SCLC following surgery combined with chemotherapy and/or thoracic radiotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all stage IA-IIIB SCLC patients without supraclavicular lymph node involvement at a single institution between January 1999 and August 2016 after multimodality treatment with curative intent. This comprised surgery consisting of primary tumor resection and systematic lymph node dissection combined with chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, or thoracic radiotherapy. Survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences were compared using log-rank tests. The risk of locoregional relapse was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients (29 men, 18 women; mean age: 62 years) were included. Thirty-day mortality was 0%. Overall median survival was 56 months, and 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 69, 54, 46, and 30%, respectively. The only significant prognostic factor (p = 0.006) was R0 resection (n = 40) increasing median survival to 64 versus 17 months in case of technical inoperability (n = 5). The risk of locoregional relapse was 2.5% (n = 1) after R0 resection. CONCLUSIONS: Multimodality treatment including surgery was safe and led to considerable survival. R0 resection was the only factor extending survival. It could be achieved in most patients and was associated with a low risk of locoregional relapse. Prospective randomized controlled studies are needed to define best practice in stage IA-IIIB SCLC.

Sternal Resection for Breast Cancer Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Sternal infiltration of breast cancer (BC) is a rare but known phenomenon. Sternal resection for this cancer is not completely investigated. For this reason, the aim of this study was to examine long-term survival and prognosticators for prolonged survival of our patients after sternal resection. Also, morbidity and mortality were investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed our prospective database of 20 patients who underwent a sternum resection (partial/complete) for BC in our institution between 2003 and 2014. Furthermore, patients with additional lung metastases were included. All patients received a mesh-methyl methacrylate technique ("sandwich technique") and soft tissue coverage with myocutaneous muscle flap. Long-term outcomes and survival curves were performed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival differences and prognosticators were investigated using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Median survival was 32 months (95% confidence interval, 8-56 months). One-, 3-, and 5-year overall survivals were 79, 39, and 39%. There was a low morbidity and mortality with 35% (minor complications 30% and major complications 5%) and 0%. As prognosticators for longer survival, a positive hormone status (estrogen or progesterone) (p = 0.070) showed a trend. Neither age, primary mastectomy, disease-free interval < 24 months, primary N-status, nor preoperative chemotherapy showed a significant influence on survival. Furthermore, additional lung metastases did not influence survival significantly (p = 0.826). CONCLUSION: Sternal resections for BC patients can be associated with promising long-term survival. R0 resection, good functional and cosmetic results are achievable with low morbidity and mortality. Patients with additional lung metastases should not be routinely excluded from resection and should be discussed in interdisciplinary tumor boards.

Repeat resection for recurrent pulmonary metastasis of colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Resection of recurrent lung metastases from colorectal cancer is not completely investigated. We analyzed overall survival and prognosticators after metastasectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our database of 238 patients with lung metastases of colorectal cancer, undergoing metastasectomy with systematic lymph node dissection from 1999 to 2014. Lymph node metastases were found in 55 patients, and liver metastases were found in 79 patients. RESULTS: The 5- and 10-year survival rates for all patients were 48 and 32%. Of the 238 patients included in the study, 101 developed recurrent lung metastases (42.4%). Recurrence had no impact on survival (p = 0.474). The 5- and 10-year survival rates from the beginning of recurrence for all patients with recurrence were 40 and 25%. Overall, 52 patients had been reoperated for recurrent lung metastases. 5-year survival for reoperated patients was 75% and significantly prolonged compared with nonreoperated patients (p < 0.001). Also, survival from beginning of recurrence was significantly longer (p < 0.001). Recurrence was more often detected in the case of multiple metastases (p = 0.002) and atypical resections (p = 0.029) at first metastasectomy. Lymph node metastases (p = 0.084) and liver metastases (p = 0.195) had no influence on recurrence. For reoperated patients, lower grading of the primary tumor was the only independent prognosticator for survival in multivariate analyses (p = 0.044). CONCLUSION: Good long-term survival is achievable for patients with resectable recurrent lung metastases. Multiple metastases and atypical resection at first metastasectomy were associated with recurrent disease. Neither lymph node metastases nor liver metastases were significantly associated with recurrence. Lower grading of the primary tumor was the only independent prognosticator for survival. All in all, the factors that can be influenced by the surgeon are patient selection and R0 resection.

Primary and Secondary Tumors of the Diaphragm.

Primary tumors of the diaphragm are rare. Secondary tumors of the diaphragm with origin in thoracic or abdominal cavity occur more frequent than primary tumors. In most cases, the therapy of choice includes a complete surgical resection of these tumors. This article reports on different types of tumors of the diaphragm, as well as surgical and reconstructive techniques.