Comparing transplant outcomes in ALL patients after myeloablative conditioning in mismatch-related or unrelated donor settings.

The optimal myeloablative conditioning regimen for ALL patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) with an alternative donor is unknown. We analyzed HCT outcomes ALL patients (n = 269) who underwent HCT at our center from 2010 to 2020 in complete remission (CR) after FTBI-etoposide and CNI-based GvHD prophylaxis for matched donor HCT (ETOP-package; n = 196) or FTBI-Fludarabine and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based prophylaxis for HLA- mismatched (related or unrelated) donors (FLU-package; n = 64). Patients in FLU-package showed a significant delay in engraftment (p < 0.001) and lower cumulative incidence (CI) of any and extensive chronic GVHD (p = 0.009 and 0.001, respectively). At the median follow up of 4.6 years (range 1-12 years); non-relapse mortality, overall or leukemia-free survival and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival were not significantly impacted by the choice of conditioning. However, in patients at CR2 or with measurable residual disease (MRD+), there was a trend towards higher relapse after FLU-package (p = 0.08 and p = 0.07, respectively), while patients at CR1 regardless of MRD status had similar outcomes despite the package/donor type (p = 0.9 and 0.7, respectively). Our data suggests that FLU-package for alternative donors offers comparable outcomes to ETOP-package for matched donor HCT to treat ALL. Disease status and depth of remission at HCT were independent predictors for better outcomes.

Concurrent versus sequential or no triazole anti-fungal therapy in patients undergoing 7 + 3 plus midostaurin induction for FLT-3 acute myelogenous leukemia.

INTRODUCTION: Midostaurin is a multikinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of adult patients with newly diagnosed FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 mutated (FLT3m) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Azole antifungal medications are commonly used in AML and are known to interact with anti-cancer drugs such as midostaurin through the CYP3A pathway. However, there are no midostaurin related dose modifications recommended with strong CYP3A inhibitors. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 40 patients between 2017-2022 and compared efficacy and safety outcomes in patients who received azole antifungals concurrently to those who did not receive an azole or received it sequentially to midostaurin for treatment of FLT3m AML. RESULTS: Median age of both groups was approximately 55 years and 70% of patients harbored FLT-3 internal tandem duplication mutations. Most patients in the concurrent arm were on either posaconazole (33%) or isavuconazole (50%) for antifungal prophylaxis and micafungin (72%) for the sequential/no azole arm. Overall CR/CRi rate with concurrent versus sequential/no azole were 72% and 77%, and non-hematologic grade 3 toxicities were 22% and 40% (p = 0.21), respectively. Rates of dose reductions (6% vs. 0%, p = 0.26) and held doses (17% vs. 14%, p = 0.79) were not different between concurrent and sequential/no azole. There were no differences in the rates of new fungal infection during induction between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Azoles given concurrently or sequentially with midostaurin were found to be equally safe and effective in the treatment of newly diagnosed FLT3 AML. Additional confirmatory studies are needed due to our limited sample size.

Total Body Irradiation and Fludarabine with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide for Mismatched Related or Unrelated Donor HCT.

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains the only curative treatment for most patients with hematological malignancies. A well-matched donor (related or unrelated) remains as the preferred donor for patients undergoing allogeneic HCT; however, a large number of patients rely on alternative donor choices of mismatched related (haploidentical) or unrelated donors to access HCT. In this retrospective study, we described outcomes of patients who underwent mismatched donor (related or unrelated) HCT with radiation-based MAC regimen in combination with FLU, and PTCy as higher intensity GVHD prophylaxis. We analyzed outcomes based on donor type. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed HCT outcomes in 155 patients who underwent mismatched donor HCT [related/haploidentical vs unrelated (MMUD)] with fractionated-total body irradiation (FTBI) plus fludarabine and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis at City of Hope from 2015 to 2021. Diagnoses included ALL (46.5%), AML (36.1%) and MDS (6.5%). The median age at HCT was 38 years and 126 (81.3%) patients were from ethnic minorities. HCT-CI was ≥3 in 36.1% and 29% had a disease-risk-index (DRI) of high/very high. Donor type was haplo (67.1%) or MMUD (32.9%). RESULTS: At 2-years post-HCT, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for all subjects were 75.4% and 80.6%, respectively. Donor type did not impact OS [HR=0.72, (95% CI: 0.35,1.49), p=0.37] and DFS [HR=0.78, (95% CI: 0.41,1.48), p=0.44] but younger donors resulted in less grade III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD, [HR=6.60, (95% CI: 1.80,24.19), p=0.004] and less moderate or severe chronic GVHD [HR=3.53, (95% CI: 1.70,7.34), p<0.001] with a trend toward better survival (p=0.099). MMUD led to significantly faster neutrophil (median 15 vs 16 days, p=0.014) and platelet recovery (median 18 vs 24 days, p=0.029); however, there was no difference in GVHD outcomes between these groups. Non-relapse mortality [HR=0.86, (95% CI: 0.34,2.20), p=0.76] and relapse risk [HR=0.78, 95%CI: (0.33,1.85), p=0.57] were comparable between the two groups. Patient age <40-years and low-intermediate DRI showed a DFS benefit (p=0.004 and 0.029, respectively). High or very High DRI was the only predictor of increased relapse [HR=2.89, 95%CI: (1.32, 6.34), p=0.008]. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, FLU/FTBI with PTCy was well-tolerated in mismatched donor HCT, regardless of relationship with patient, provided promising results, and improved access to HCT for patients without a matched donor especially patients from ethnic minorities and mixed race.

Intensive Induction Chemotherapy versus Hypomethylating Agents in Combination with Venetoclax in NPM1-mutant AML.

While intensive induction chemotherapy (IC) remains the standard of care for younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), data from older patients shows that hypomethylating agents + venetoclax (HMA/VEN) can lead to durable remissions among patients with NPM1 mutations. Whether IC or HMA/VEN is superior in patients ≥60 years-old with NPM1-mutant AML is unknown. To compare IC and HMA/VEN, we performed an international, multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients with newly diagnosed, NPM1-mutant AML.We included 221 patients (147 IC, 74 HMA/VEN) with previously untreated NPM1-mutant AML. Composite complete remission (cCR; defined as CR + CR with incomplete count recovery [CRi]) rate was similar for IC and HMA/VEN (cCR: 85% vs. 74%; p=0.067). While OS was favorable with IC in unselected patients compared to HMA/VEN (24-month OS 59% [95% CI: 52-69%] vs. 38% [95% CI 27-55%]; p=0.013), it was not statistically different among patients 60-75 years-old (60% [95% CI 52-70%] vs. 44% [95% CI 29-66%]; p=0.069) and patients who received an allogeneic stem cell transplant (70% [95% CI: 58-85%] vs. 66% [95% CI: 44-100%]; p=0.56). Subgroup analyses suggested that patients with normal cytogenetics (24-month OS with IC 65% [95% 56-74%] vs. 40% [95% CI: 26-60%] with HMA/VEN; p=0.009) and without FLT3-ITD mutations might benefit from IC compared with HMA/VEN (24-month OS: 68% [95% CI: 59-79%] vs. 43% [95% CI: 29-63%]; p=0.008). In multivariable analysis, OS was not statistically different for patients treated with IC and HMA/VEN (hazard ratio for death HMA/VEN vs. IC: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.40-1.27; p=0.25).

Hypomethylating agents plus venetoclax compared with intensive induction chemotherapy regimens in molecularly defined secondary AML.

Molecularly defined secondary acute myeloid leukemia is associated with a prior myeloid neoplasm and confers a worse prognosis. We compared outcomes of molecularly defined secondary AML patients (n = 395) treated with daunorubicin and cytarabine (7 + 3, n = 167), liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine (CPX-351, n = 66) or hypomethylating agents (HMA) + venetoclax (VEN) (n = 162). Median overall survival (OS) was comparable between treatment groups among patients aged >60 years. In a multivariable model HMA + VEN vs. 7 + 3 was associated with better OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42-0.98, p = 0.041]), whereas CPX-351 vs. 7 + 3 was not (HR 0.79 [CI 95% 0.50-1.25, p = 0.31]). Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, BCOR and IDH mutations were associated with improved OS; older age, prior myeloid disease, NRAS/KRAS mutations, EZH2 mutation, and monosomal karyotype were associated with worse OS. When analyzed in each treatment separately, the IDH co-mutations benefit was seen with 7 + 3 and the detrimental effect of NRAS/KRAS co-mutations with HMA + VEN and CPX-351. In pairwise comparisons adjusted for age, HMA + VEN was associated with improved OS vs. 7 + 3 in patients with SF3B1 mutation and improved OS vs. CPX-351 in those with RNA splicing factor mutations. In molecularly defined secondary AML treatment with HMA + VEN might be preferred but could further be guided by co-mutations.

Treatment of relapsed or refractory FLT-3 acute myelogenous leukemia with a triplet regimen of hypomethylating agent, venetoclax, and gilteritinib.

Relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutations remains a difficult and hard to treat entity. Gilteritinib is a potent oral FLT-3 inhibitor that improves overall survival in R/R AML, but studies are limited in combining gilteritinib with a hypomethylating agent and venetoclax treatment backbone (HMA-VEN-GILT). Here we report our experience with HMA-VEN-GILT for 22 R/R FLT3 AML patients. HMA-VEN-GILT yielded an ORR of 77.3% (17/22), CR 4.5% (1/22), CRi 13.6% (3/22), MLFS 59.1% (13/22). Median follow-up was 10.4 months with a relapse rate of 29.4% (5/17), median time to relapse of 69 days (range 35-298 days), 6-month overall survival of 84%, and median OS of 10.1 months. Additionally, 36.4% (8/22) of patients proceeded to hematopoietic stem cell transplant. In conclusion, HMA-VEN-GILT for the treatment of R/R FLT3 AML is feasible and can be used as a bridge to allogeneic transplantation.