Radiotherapy of skin adnexal carcinoma.

Skin adnexal carcinomas are rare skin cancer, developing from pilosebaceous, eccrine and apocrine unit. Treatment of localised tumours usually includes surgery and radiotherapy. Indications and modalities of radiotherapy depend on the pathological subtype with a lack of consensus for some histologies. This review summarises the place of radiotherapy in terms of indication, dose and fractionation, volumes to irradiate and discuss ongoing studies.

Radiotherapy of lymphomas.

Radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphomas has evolved a lot over time, but still plays an important role, almost always in addition to chemotherapy, for the management of the early stages. The major objective is to preserve the quality of life of patients who will be cured from this disease in the vast majority of cases. Also, the personalization of the indications for the purpose of de-escalating toxicity is very refined and is essentially based on the pre- and pertherapeutic assessment by FDG-PET. The indications for radiotherapy are more limited for non-Hodgkin lymphomas, but the same principles are found, regardless of the histological type. We present the update of the recommendations of the French society of oncological radiotherapy for radiotherapy of lymphomas, which remains a very evolving field in terms of therapeutic strategy and evaluation.

RadioTransNet: Preclinical research network coordinated at the SFRO and SFPM.

The RadioTransNet programme launched under the auspices of French societies for radiation oncology (SFRO) and medical physics (SFPM) was approved by the French national cancer institute (INCa) in December 2018 and is dedicated to proposing a relevant national and transversal structure for preclinical research including translational research in radiation oncology with well-defined priority areas of research. Its activities, coordinated by a scientific committee that includes radiation oncologists, medical physicists, academic biologists, are structured around several main areas, i.e.: target volume definition, interaction of radiation with normal tissues, combined treatments and modern dose calculation approaches. Four work packages have been created in these areas and are associated with other objectives pertaining to fundamental radiobiology, early implementation of new drugs in a preclinical setting, contribution of imaging in this task, research in medical physics including transversal components such as medical oncology, radiology, nuclear medicine and also cost/efficiency evaluation. All these tasks will be included in a national network that uses the complementary expertise provided by partners involved in the scheme. Calls for proposals will be selected by the scientific council to be submitted to INCa and the various academic associations to obtain funding for the human and technical resources required to conduct under optimal conditions projects in preclinical and translational research in radiation-oncology.

Total body irradiation using helical tomotherapy: Set-up experience and in-vivo dosimetric evaluation.

PURPOSE: Helical Tomotherapy (HT) appears as a valuable technique for total body irradiation (TBI) to create highly homogeneous and conformal dose distributions with more precise repositioning than conventional TBI techniques. The aim of this work is to describe the technique implementation, including treatment preparation, planning and dosimetric monitoring of TBI delivered in our institution from October 2016 to March 2019. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Prior to patient care, irradiation protocol was set up using physical phantoms. Gafchromic films were used to assess dose distribution homogeneity and evaluate imprecise patient positioning impact. Sixteen patients' irradiations with a prescribed dose of 12Gy were delivered in 6 fractions of 2Gy over 3 days. Pre-treatment quality assurance (QA) was performed for the verification of dose distributions at selected positions. In addition, in-vivo dosimetry was carried out using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLD). RESULTS: Planning evaluation, as well as results of pre-treatment verifications, are presented. In-vivo dosimetry showed the strong consistency of OSLD measured doses. OSLD mean relative dose differences between measurement and calculation were respectively +0,96% and -2% for armpit and hands locations, suggesting better reliability for armpit OSLD positioning. Repercussion of both longitudinal and transversal positioning inaccuracies on phantoms is depicted up to 2cm shifts. CONCLUSION: The full methodology to set up TBI protocol, as well as dosimetric evaluation and pre-treatment QA, were presented. Our investigations reveal strong correspondence between planned and delivered doses shedding light on the dose reliability of OSLD for HT based TBI in-vivo dosimetry.

Radioresistant tumours: From identification to targeting.

From surviving fraction to tumour curability, definitions of tumour radioresistance may vary depending on the view angle. Yet, mechanisms of radioresistance have been identified and involve tumour-specific oncogenic signalling pathways, tumour metabolism and proliferation, tumour microenvironment/hypoxia, genomics. Correlations between tumour biology (histology) and imaging allow theragnostic approaches that use non-invasive biological imaging using tracer functionalization of tumour pathway biomarkers, imaging of hypoxia, etc. Modelling dose prescription function based on their tumour radio-resistant factor enhancement ratio, related to metabolism, proliferation, hypoxia is an area of investigation. Yet, the delivery of dose painting by numbers/voxel-based radiotherapy with low lineal energy transfer particles may be limited by the degree of modulation complexity needed to achieve the doses needed to counteract radioresistance. Higher lineal energy transfer particles or combinations of different particles, or combinations with drugs and devices such as done with radioenhancing nanoparticles may be promising.

Imaging issues specific to hadrontherapy (proton, carbon, helium therapy and other charged particles) for radiotherapy planning, setup, dose monitoring and tissue response assessment.

Imaging is critical to each step of precision radiation therapy, i.e. planning, setup, delivery and assessment of response. Hadrontherapy can be considered to deliver more precise dose distribution that may better spare normal tissues from intermediate low doses of radiation. In addition, hadrontherapy using high linear energy transfer ions may also be used for dose escalation on biological target volumes defined by functional imaging. However, the physical characteristics of hadrontherapy also make it more demanding in terms of imaging accuracy and image-based dose calculation. Some of the developments needed in imaging are specific to hadrontherapy. The current review addresses current status of imaging in proton therapy and the drawbacks of photon-based imaging for hadrons. It also addresses requirements in hadrontherapy planning with respect to multimodal imaging for proper target and organ at risk definition as well as to target putative radioresistant areas such as hypoxic ones, and with respect to dose calculation using dual energy CT, MR-proton therapy, proton radiography. Imaging modalities, such as those used in photon-based radiotherapy (intensity modulated and stereotactic radiotherapy), are somewhat already implemented or should be reaching "routine" hadrontherapy (at least proton therapy) practice in planning, repositioning and response evaluation optimizable within the next five years. Online monitoring imaging by PET, as currently developed for hadrontherapy, is already available. Its spatiotemporal limits restrict its use but similar to prompt gamma detection, represents an area of active research for the next 5 to 10 years. Because of the more demanding and specific dose deposit characteristics, developments image-guided hadrontherapy, such as specific proton imaging using tomography or ionoacoustics, as well as delivery with MR-proton therapy, may take another 10 years to reach the clinics in specific applications. Other aspects are briefly described such as range monitoring. Finally, the potential of imaging normal tissue changes and challenges to assess tumour response are discussed.

[Construction of radiobiological models as TCP (tumor control probability) and NTCP (normal tissue complication probability): from dose to clinical effects prediction]. / Construction des modèles radiobiologiques de type TCP (tumor control probability) et NTCP (normal tissue complication probability) : de la dose à la prédiction des effets cliniques.

In radiotherapy, the dose prescription is currently based on discretized dose-effects records that do not take into fully account for the complexity of the patient-dose-response relationship. Their predictive performance on both anti-tumour efficacy and toxicity can be optimized by integrating radiobiological models. It is with this in mind that the calculation models TCP (Tumor Control Probability) and NTCP (Normal Tissue Complication Probability) have been developed. Their construction involves several important steps that are necessary and important to understand. The first step is based on radiobiological models allowing to calculate according to more or less complexity the rate of surviving cells after irradiation. Two additional steps are required to convert the physical dose into an equivalent biological dose, in particular a 2Gy equivalent biological dose (EQD2): first to take into account the effect of the fractionation of the dose for both the target volume and the organs at risk; second to convert an heterogeneous dose to an organ into an homogeneous dose having the same effect (Niemierko generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD)). Finally, the process of predicting clinical effects based on radiobiological models transform doses into tumour control (TCP) or toxicity (NTCP) probabilities using parameters that reflect the radiobiological characteristics of the tissues in question. The use of these models in current practice is still limited, but since the radiotherapy softwares increasingly integrate them, it is important to know the principle and limits of application of these models.

[Use of nanoparticles as radiosensitizing agents in radiotherapy: State of play]. / Utilisation de nanoparticules comme agent radiosensibilisant en radiothérapie : où en est-on ?

Nanomedicine has undergone significant development since the 2000s and it is only very recently that two metallic nanoparticles have emerged in clinical trials. The mechanism of these radiosensitizing agents is based on the presence of atoms with a high atomic number (Z) allowing a higher dose deposition into the tumor during irradiation. The first nanoparticle used in humans is NBTXR3, composed of hafnium (Z=79), with intratumor injection for the treatment of sarcoma. Another gadolinium-based nanoparticle (Z=64), AGuIX, has been used for intravenous injection in the treatment of brain metastases. The preliminary results are promising in terms of feasibility, safety and efficacy, as evidenced by the significant number of ongoing clinical trials. The upcoming challenges for the development of nanoparticles will be the targeting of cancer cells, their biodistribution into the body, their eventual toxicity and their industrial production. In the coming years, modalities of administration and optimal combinations with radiotherapy should be defined in connection with fundamental research.

[Proton therapy in France in 2019]. / État des lieux de la protonthérapie en France en 2019.

Among over 100 proton therapy centres worldwide in operation or under construction, French proton therapy is coming to full maturity with the recent opening of the Nice (1991, upgrade in 2016) and Caen (2018) facilities next to the Orsay (1991, upgrade in 2010) centre. Proton therapy is a national priority for children and young adults in all three centres. The patient-related activity of the three French centres is coordinated via the Protonshare portal to optimise referral by type of indication and available expertise in coordination with the French society of radiation oncology SFRO and French radiotherapy centres. The centres are recognised by the French Health Care excellence initiative, promoted by the ministry of Foreign Affairs. The three centres collaborate structurally in terms of clinical research and are engaged at the international level in the participation to European databases and research initiatives. Concerted actions are now also promoted in preclinical research via the Radiotransnet network. Ongoing French developments in proton therapy are well presented in international hadron therapy meetings, including European Proton Therapy Network and Particle Therapy Cooperative Oncology Group. Proton therapy teaching in France is offered at several levels and is open to colleagues from all radiation oncology centres, so that they are fully informed, involved and trained to facility recognition of possible indications and thereby to contribute to appropriate patient referral. This close collaboration between all actors in French radiation oncology facilitates the work to demonstrate the required level of medical and scientific evidence for current and emerging indications for particle therapy. Based on that, the future might entail a possible creation of more proton therapy facilities in France.

[RadioTransNet, the French network for preclinical research in oncological radiotherapy]. / RadioTransNet, le réseau national de radiothérapie oncologique préclinique.

The ambition of the RADIOTRANSNET network, launched by the INCa at the end of 2018, is to create a French research consortium dedicated to preclinical radiotherapy to foster scientific and clinical interactions at the interface of radiotherapy and radiobiology, and to identify research priorities dedicated to innovation in radiotherapy. The activities of the network are organized around four major axes that are target definition, normal tissue, combined treatments and dose modelling. Under the supervision of the Scientific Council, headed by a coordinator designated by the SFRO and a co-coordinator designated by the SFPM, three leaders coordinate each axis: a radiation-oncologist, a medical physicist and a biologist, who are responsible for organizing a scientific meeting based on the consensus conference methodology to identify priority issues. The selected themes will be the basis for the establishment of a strategic research agenda and a roadmap to help coordinate national basic and translational research efforts in oncological radiotherapy. This work will be published and will be transmitted to the funding institutions and bodies with the aim of opening dedicated calls to finance the necessary human and technical resources. Structuration of a preclinical research network will allow coordinating the efforts of all the actors in the field and thus promoting innovation in radiotherapy.

A step towards international prospective trials in carbon ion radiotherapy: investigation of factors influencing dose distribution in the facilities in operation based on a case of skull base chordoma.

BACKGROUND: Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) has been delivered to more than 20,000 patients worldwide. International trials have been recommended in order to emphasize the actual benefits. The ULICE program (Union of Light Ion Centers in Europe) addressed the need for harmonization of CIRT practices. A comparative knowledge of the sources and magnitudes of uncertainties altering dose distribution and clinical effects during the whole CIRT procedure is required in that aim. METHODS: As part of ULICE WP2 task group, we sent a centrally reviewed questionnaire exploring candidate sources of uncertainties in dose deposition to the ten CIRT facilities in operation by February 2017. We aimed to explore native beam characterization, immobilization, anatomic data acquisition, target volumes and organs at risks delineation, treatment planning, dose delivery, quality assurance prior and during treatment. The responders had to consider the clinical case of a clival chordoma eligible for postoperative CIRT according to their clinical practice. With the results, our task group discussed ways to harmonize CIRT practices. RESULTS: We received 5 surveys from facilities that have treated 77% of the patients worldwide per November 2017. We pointed out the singularity of the facilities and beam delivery systems, a divergent definition of target volumes, the multiplicity of TPS and equieffective dose calculation approximations. CONCLUSION: Multiple uncertainties affect equieffective dose definition, deposition and calculation in CIRT. Although it is not possible to harmonize all the steps of the CIRT planning between the centers, our working group proposed counter-measures addressing the improvable limitations.

Concepts and terms for dose/volume parameters in carbon-ion radiotherapy: Conclusions of the ULICE taskforce.

PURPOSE: The Union of Light Ion Centers in Europe (ULICE) program addressed the need for uniting scientific results for carbon-ion radiation therapy obtained by several institutions worldwide in different fields of excellence, and translating them into a real benefit to the community. Particularly, the concepts for dose/volume parameters developed in photon radiotherapy cannot be extrapolated to high linear energy transfer particles. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The ULICE-WP2 taskforce included radiation oncologists involved in carbon-ion radiation therapy and International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, radiation biologists, expert physicists in the fields of carbon-ion radiation therapy, microdosimetry, biological modeling and image-guided radiotherapy. Consensual reports emerged from multiple discussions within both the restricted group and the wider ULICE community. Public deliverables were produced and disseminated to the European Commission. RESULTS: Here we highlight the disparity in practices between treating centers, then address the main topics to finally elaborate specific recommendations. Although it appears relatively simple to add geometrical margins around the clinical target volume to obtain the planning target volume as performed in photon radiotherapy, this procedure is not appropriate for carbon-ion radiation therapy. Due to the variation of the radiation quality in depth, there is no generic relative biological effectiveness value for carbon-ions outside of an isolated point, for a given fractionation and specific experimental conditions. Absorbed dose and "equieffective dose" for specified conditions must always be reported. CONCLUSIONS: This work contributed to the development of standard operating procedures for carbon-ion radiation therapy clinical trials. These procedures are now being applied, particularly in the first phase III international, multicenter trial (PHRC Étoile).

Significant dose reduction using synchrotron radiation computed tomography: first clinical case and application to high resolution CT exams.

Since the invention of Computed Tomography (CT), many technological advances emerged to improve the image sensitivity and resolution. However, no new source types were developed for clinical use. In this study, for the first time, coherent monochromatic X-rays from a synchrotron radiation source were used to acquire 3D CTs on patients. The aim of this work was to evaluate the clinical potential of the images acquired using Synchrotron Radiation CT (SRCT). SRCTs were acquired using monochromatic X-rays tuned at 80 keV (0.350 × 0.350 × 2 mm3 voxel size). A quantitative image quality comparison study was carried out on phantoms between a state of the art clinical CT and SRCT images. Dedicated iterative algorithms were developed to optimize the image quality and further reduce the delivered dose by a factor of 12 while keeping a better image quality than the one obtained with a clinical CT scanner. We finally show in this paper the very first SRCT results of one patient who received Synchrotron Radiotherapy in an ongoing clinical trial. This demonstrates the potential of the technique in terms of image quality improvement at a reduced radiation dose for inner ear visualization.

Paediatric brain tumours: A review of radiotherapy, state of the art and challenges for the future regarding protontherapy and carbontherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Brain tumours are the most frequent solid tumours in children and the most frequent radiotherapy indications in paediatrics, with frequent late effects: cognitive, osseous, visual, auditory and hormonal. A better protection of healthy tissues by improved beam ballistics, with particle therapy, is expected to decrease significantly late effects without decreasing local control and survival. This article reviews the scientific literature to advocate indications of protontherapy and carbon ion therapy for childhood central nervous system cancer, and estimate the expected therapeutic benefits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was performed on paediatric brain tumour treatments using Medline (from 1966 to March of 2014). To be included, clinical trials had to meet the following criteria: age of patients 18 years or younger, treated with radiation, and report of survival. Studies were also selected according to the evidence level. A secondary search of cited references found other studies about cognitive functions, quality of life, the comparison of photon and proton dosimetry showing potential dose escalation and/or sparing of organs at risk with protontherapy; and studies on dosimetric and technical issues related to protontherapy. RESULTS: A total of 7051 primary references published were retrieved, among which 40 clinical studies and 60 papers about quality of life, dose distribution and dosimetry were analysed, as well as the ongoing clinical trials. These papers have been summarized and reported in a specific document made available to the participants of a final 1-day workshop. Tumours of the meningeal envelop and bony cranial structures were excluded from the analysis. Protontherapy allows outstanding ballistics to target the tumour area, while substantially decreasing radiation dose to the normal tissues. There are many indications of protontherapy for paediatric brain tumours in curative intent, either for localized treatment of ependymomas, germ-cell tumours, craniopharyngiomas, low-grade gliomas; or panventricular irradiation of pure non-secreting germinoma; or craniospinal irradiation of medulloblastomas and metastatic pure germinomas. Carbon ion therapy is just emerging and may be studied for highly aggressive and radioresistant tumours, as an initial treatment for diffuse brainstem gliomas, and for relapse of high-grade gliomas. CONCLUSION: Both protontherapy and carbon ion therapy are promising for paediatric brain tumours. The benefit of decreasing late effects without altering survival has been described for most paediatric brain tumours with protontherapy and is currently assessed in ongoing clinical trials with up-to-date proton devices. Unfortunately, in 2015, only a minority of paediatric patients in France can receive protontherapy due to the lack of equipment.

Preliminary testing of GaN-based dosimeters for electron beam radiotherapy.

The response of an implantable in vivo dosimetric system based on gallium nitride radioluminescence was investigated for electron beam radiotherapy using ELEKTA SLi and VARIAN Clinac 2100 CD Linear Accelerators. A bi-channel method has been implemented for fibre background rejection. The percentage depth dose (PDD) profiles were measured in polymethyl methacrylate for 6, 12 and 18 MeV electron beams. The PDD results were in excellent agreement with those measured with reference to ionisation chambers.

Fiber background rejection and crystal over-response compensation for GaN based in vivo dosimetry.

For dosimetric measurements using an implantable optical fiber probe with GaN (Gallium Nitride) scintillator as radioluminescence (RL) transducer, a bi-channel method is proposed to reject the background contribution of the irradiated fiber segment. It is based on spectral differences between the narrow-band light emission from GaN and the large-band background from the irradiated optical fiber. Experimental validation of this method using 6 MV photon beam has shown that the remaining background contribution after subtraction is below 1.2% for square field sizes ranging from 3 cm to 20 cm. Furthermore, a compensation method for the over-response of GaN is also proposed, since GaN is not tissue equivalent. The over-response factor of GaN exhibits a linear increase with square field aperture and depends on depth from phantom surface. This behaviour is modelled to allow compensation in specific conditions. The proposed method has been evaluated and has shown a maximum deviation of 3% for a 6 MV photon beam and 1% for an 18 MV photon beam at a depth beyond the build-up region.

[From the carbon track to therapeutic efficiency of hadrontherapy]. / De la trace des ions carbone à l'efficacité thérapeutique de l'hadronthérapie.

Carbon ions, thanks to their relative biological effectiveness much higher than that of photons and protons and their ballistic characteristics similar to those of protons, can effectively treat radioresistant tumours. The reasons for this increased efficiency are found in the microdosimetric and radiobiological features of ions. The energy deposit or linear energy transfer increases along the range and reaches a very high level at the end producing the Bragg peak, where the linear energy transfer is about hundred times higher than that of photons. These massive energy deposits create multiple DNA lesions that are difficult to repair. DNA repair is associated with longer blockage of the cell cycle and more frequent chromosomal aberrations that are lethal to cells. The types of cell death are identical to those triggered in response to photon irradiation, but the response is earlier and more important at equivalent physical dose. Radiobiological differences between carbon ions and photons have been studied for some years and many aspects remain to be explored. In general, these phenomena tend to reduce the differences of radiosensitivity among different tissues. It is therefore in situation where tumours are relatively radioresistant compared to healthy tissue, that carbon ions must be used and not in the opposite situations where the fractionation of low linear energy transfer radiation is sufficient to provide the necessary differential effect to cure the tumour.

[Radiotherapy for sarcoma: hadrontherapy, for whom and what for?]. / Radiothérapie des sarcomes : hadronthérapie, pour qui, pour quoi ?

The radiobiological properties of the hadrons (neutrons, protons, carbon ions) led to their therapeutic use in sarcomas, as a referent therapy or as an alternative to photon therapy. An extensive review of the literature has been conducted to assess the present indications and the perspectives for hadrontherapy. Compared to photons, neutrons are characterized by a higher biological efficiency that is on particular importance for these tumours usually considered as radio-resistant. Neutrons have been considered as a standard therapy for sarcoma' patients, contra-indicated for surgery or with a definitive R2 resection, but their indications and use have been restricted due to the occurrence of late severe toxicities related to their poor ballistic' properties. Thanks to their physical properties (Bragg Peak), protons are characterized by a higher conformity index compared to photons (and neutrons) with optimal organs at risk preservation that permits a dose escalation. Protontherapy is to date the standard of care for base of skull, spinal and paraspinal sarcomas. Carbon ions combined both advantages from protons and neutrons. Literature data permits to consider this radiation modality as a referent therapy for unresectable sarcomas. The ongoing diffusions of protons and carbon ions radiotherapy facilities will permit to offer these therapies to more patients and to conduct studies that are warranted to determine their indications and their results.

Rationale for carbon ion therapy in high-grade glioma based on a review and a meta-analysis of neutron beam trials.

PURPOSE: The standard treatment of high-grade glioma is still unsatisfactory: the 2-year survival after radiotherapy being only 10-25%. A high linear energy transfer (LET) ionising radiotherapy has been used to overcome tumour radioresistance. An overview of the field is needed to justify future prospective controlled studies on carbon ion therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A meta-analysis of clinical trials on neutron beam therapy and a literature review of clinical investigations on light ion use in high-grade glioma were carried out. RESULTS: Four randomised controlled trials on neutron beam therapy were retained. The meta-analysis showed a non-significant 6% increase of two-year mortality (Relative risk [RR]=1.06 [0.97-1.15]) in comparison with photon therapy. Two phase I/II trials on carbon and neon ion therapy reported for glioblastoma 10% and 31% two-year overall survivals and 13.9 and 19.0 months median survivals, respectively. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that neutron beam therapy does not improve the survival of high-grade glioma patients while there is no definitive conclusion yet regarding carbon therapy. The ballistic accuracy and the improved biological efficacy of carbon ions renew the interest in prospective clinical trials on particle beam radiotherapy of glioma and let us expect favourable effects of dose escalation on patients' survival.