A Single-Center Experience With Total Percutaneous Implantation of a Low-Profile Thoracic Aortic Stent-Graft.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of total percutaneous implantation of the Zenith Alpha Thoracic (ZTA) endograft in the treatment of diseases of the descending thoracic aorta. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 56 consecutive patients undergoing total percutaneous ZTA implantation between 2018 and 2020 was performed in a single center. Patients' demographics, clinical characteristics, anatomical parameters, operative details, device features, and postoperative outcomes were assessed. The primary endpoint was ongoing clinical success. A Cox regression model was used to determine the predictive factors of worse postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Eighty-three ZTA endografts were implanted in 35 men and 21 women with a mean age of 69±11 years for the treatment of 26 degenerative aneurysms, 15 type B dissections, and 8 penetrating ulcers, among others. Primary technical success was 100%, with a 30-day ongoing clinical success rate of 94.6%. The 1-year ongoing clinical success rate was 91.1% (51 patients), and freedoms from all-cause mortality, type 1 and 3 endoleaks, and any unplanned reintervention were, respectively, 95.3%, 91.4%, and 88.2% at 1 year. During follow-up, there was one case of surgical conversion for an aorto-esophageal fistula. On the contrary, neither aneurysmal rupture nor significant aneurysmal expansion was recorded. Repair of ruptured thoracic aorta and a high ratio of sheath outer diameter to external iliac artery diameter were found to be independently associated with worse outcomes, with adjusted odds ratios of 4.4 [1.5-15.3] and 4.9 [1.1-23.9], respectively. CONCLUSION: The outcomes of total percutaneous implantation of ZTA endograft show excellent primary technical success and favorable midterm ongoing clinical success. Factors associated with worse outcomes include the repair of ruptured aorta and a high sheath to access vessel ratio.

[Vascular injury-An underestimated entity?] / Die Gefäßverletzung ­ eine unterschätzte Entität?: Einfluss auf Prognose und Ergebnis in der Schwerverletztenversorgung.

Background: Vessels are not frequently affected in traumatology and isolated vascular trauma (VT) is rare; therefore, there is a lack of reliable and current data on the incidence and mortality. Objective: This article reports on the status of VT in trauma care of the severely injured in Germany based on selected references and data from our own published analyses and current studies from the data of the TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU). Material and methods: Selected review of the literature and report on 2 retrospective assessments of datasets of the TR-DGU. Records with moderate to severe VT in the injury pattern were compared to records of cases without VT (non-VT) with the same injury severity. Target parameters were morbidity, mortality and parameters of the clinical course and prognosis. Results: The 2002-2012 database evaluation (TR-DGU Project-ID 2013-011) revealed an impact of allocation and level of care of the trauma centers on expected mortality (EM) and observed mortality (OM) in 2961 cases with VT among 42,326 severely injured patients (7%). The difference between OM and EM in VT was + 3.4% vs. ±â€¯0.1% in non-VT. Due to an OM in severe VT of 33.8% vs. 16.4% in non-VT with identical injury severity, the subsequent analysis of 2008-2017 (TR-DGU Project-ID 2018-045) was initiated. The sub-stratification of isolated, main and concomitant VT could show a significant effect of the treatment level, allocation and transport on the OM in the treatment reality. A relevant mismatch of OM to EM could only be shown in VT, on average ca. + 2% and in high-risk constellations with VT up to + 29% as a measure for the relevance of VT in trauma care. Conclusion: These results indicate a substantial need for further optimization of emergency care of severely injured patients with VT, where VT vigilance, allocation, transportation and a low threshold early re-allocation can be derived as starting points.

Evaluation of a rapid deployment prosthesis strategy for the treatment of aortic valve endocarditis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcome of patients suffering from native aortic valve (NVE) or prosthetic aortic valve endocarditis (PVE) treated with the EDWARDS INTUITY Elite rapid-deployment valve prosthesis. METHODS: Between February 2019 and June 2020, 25 patients suffering from NVE (n = 9; 36%) and PVE (n = 16; 64%) of the aortic valve received an INTUITY valve at our institution. Preoperative, operative and follow-up data were collected. RESULTS: In our cohort, the mean EuroSCORE II was 13.4%. Eleven patients (44%) received concomitant aortic root patch plasty. Four patients (16%) received coronary artery bypass graft surgery, 3 patients (12%) received mitral valve repair and 2 patients (8%) underwent replacement of the ascending aorta. The cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times were 124 ± 56 and 75 ± 39 min, respectively. The mean intensive care unit stay was 5 days. The mean size of the implanted prostheses was 25 ± 2 mm and the mean prosthesis transvalvular gradient 3 months after surgery was 9 ± 4 mmHg. During follow-up, no case of recurrent endocarditis occurred, 1 patient died of multisystem organ failure which had already been present preoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for NVE and PVE of the aortic valve may be safely performed using the EDWARDS INTUITY Elite valve system. This procedure could be well implemented in cases with extensive infection, fragile root tissue and root abscesses requiring root reconstruction. In our institution, the rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement strategy has become an important tool in the armamentarium of the surgical endocarditis treatment.

MicroRNA-21 Controls Circadian Regulation of Apoptosis in Atherosclerotic Lesions.

BACKGROUND: The necrotic core partly formed by ineffective efferocytosis increases the risk of an atherosclerotic plaque rupture. Microribonucleic acids contribute to necrotic core formation by regulating efferocytosis and macrophage apoptosis. Atherosclerotic plaque rupture occurs at increased frequency in the early morning, indicating diurnal changes in plaque vulnerability. Although circadian rhythms play a role in atherosclerosis, the molecular clock output pathways that control plaque composition and rupture susceptibility are unclear. METHODS: Circadian gene expression, necrotic core size, apoptosis, and efferocytosis in aortic lesions were investigated at different times of the day in Apoe-/-Mir21+/+ mice and Apoe-/-Mir21-/- mice after consumption of a high-fat diet for 12 weeks. Genome-wide gene expression and lesion formation were analyzed in bone marrow-transplanted mice. Diurnal changes in apoptosis and clock gene expression were determined in human atherosclerotic lesions. RESULTS: The expression of molecular clock genes, lesional apoptosis, and necrotic core size were diurnally regulated in Apoe-/- mice. Efferocytosis did not match the diurnal increase in apoptosis at the beginning of the active phase. However, in parallel with apoptosis, expression levels of oscillating Mir21 strands decreased in the mouse atherosclerotic aorta. Mir21 knockout abolished circadian regulation of apoptosis and reduced necrotic core size but did not affect core clock gene expression. Further, Mir21 knockout upregulated expression of proapoptotic Xaf1 (XIAP-associated factor 1) in the atherosclerotic aorta, which abolished circadian expression of Xaf1. The antiapoptotic effect of Mir21 was mediated by noncanonical targeting of Xaf1 through both Mir21 strands. Mir21 knockout in bone marrow cells also reduced atherosclerosis and necrotic core size. Circadian regulation of clock gene expression was confirmed in human atherosclerotic lesions. Apoptosis oscillated diurnally in phase with XAF1 expression, demonstrating an early morning peak antiphase to that of the Mir21 strands. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the molecular clock in atherosclerotic lesions induces a diurnal rhythm of apoptosis regulated by circadian Mir21 expression in macrophages that is not matched by efferocytosis, thus increasing the size of the necrotic core.

Passing a Mechanical Aortic Valve With a Short Tip Dilator to Facilitate Aortic Arch Endovascular Branched Repair.

PURPOSE: To present a novel technique to successfully cross a mechanical aortic valve prosthesis. TECHNIQUE: A 55-year-old female patient with genetically verified Marfan syndrome presented with a 5-cm anastomotic aneurysm of the proximal aortic arch after previous ascending aortic replacement due to a type A aortic dissection in 2007. The patient also underwent mechanical aortic valve replacement in 1991. A 3-stage hybrid repair was planned. The first 2 steps included debranching of the supra-aortic vessels. In the third procedure, a custom-made double branched endovascular stent-graft with a short 35-mm introducer tip was implanted. The mechanical valve was passed with the tip of the dilator on the lateral site of the leaflet, without destructing the valve and with only mild symptoms of aortic insufficiency, as one leaflet continued to work. This allowed the implantation of the stent-graft directly distally of the coronary arteries. Postoperative computed tomography angiography showed no endoleaks and patent coronary and supra-aortic vessels. CONCLUSION: Passing a mechanical aortic valve prosthesis at the proper position is feasible and allows adequate endovascular treatment in complex arch anatomy. However, caution should be taken during positioning of the endovascular graft as the tip may potentially damage the valve prosthesis.

Technical Aspects of Fenestrated Arch TEVAR With Preloaded Fenestration.

Fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair (f-TEVAR) has expanded the possibilities of endovascular arch repair, allowing treatment of pathologies involving the aortic arch that require sealing in Ishimaru zones 1 and 2. The growing number of implantations has increased physician experience and helped identify critical procedural points, mainly wire entanglement and device malrotation. Herein we describe a step-by-step approach to a f-TEVAR procedure with the Zenith fenestrated preloaded thoracic endograft, identifying potential pitfalls and suggesting problem-solving solutions.

Blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injuries: a retrospective cohort analysis of 2 decades of experience.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyse and report the changes in the management of blunt traumatic aortic injuries (BTAIs) in a single centre during the last 2 decades. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients diagnosed with BTAI from January 1999 to January 2020 was performed. Data were collected from electronic/digitalized medical history records. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were included [median age 42.4 years (16-84 years), 71.7% males]. The predominant cause of BTAI was car accidents (54.5%, n = 24) and all patients presented with concomitant injuries (93% bone fractures, 77.8% abdominal and 62.2% pelvic injuries). Over 70% presented grade III or IV BTAI. Urgent repair was performed in 73.8% of patients (n = 31), with a median of 2.75 h between admission and repair. Thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) was performed in 87% (n = 49), open surgery (OS) in 10.9% (n = 5) and conservative management in 2.1% (n = 1). Technical success was 82.6% (92.1% TEVAR, 79% OS). In-hospital mortality was 19.5% (17.5% TEVAR, 40% OS). Of these, 3 died from aortic-related causes. Seven (15.2%) required an early vascular reintervention. The median follow-up was 34 months (1-220 months), with 19% of early survivors having a follow-up of >10 years. Only 1 vascular reintervention was necessary during follow-up: secondary TEVAR due to acute graft thrombosis. Of the patients who survived the initial event, 6.7% died during follow-up, none from aortic-related causes. CONCLUSIONS: Even with all the described shortcomings, in our experience TEVAR for BTAI proved to be feasible and effective, with few complications and stable aortic reconstruction at mid-term follow-up. With the current technical expertise and wide availability of a variety of devices, it should be pursued as a first-line therapy in these challenging scenarios.

Balloon-Assisted True Lumen Expansion and Fenestration of a Symptomatic, Triple-Barrel, Postdissection Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm with Collapsed True Lumen to Facilitate Endovascular Treatment with a t-Branch.

BACKGROUND: To present the challenging endovascular treatment of a symptomatic triple-barrel (3 lumens; 1 true and 2 false lumens) aortic dissection case. METHODS: A 43-year-old male was introduced with a symptomatic, 9 cm postchronic dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm with accompanying triple-barrel formation and true lumen collapse at the height of the distal thoracic aorta. The celiac axis and right renal artery were perfused from the true lumen, the left renal artery from the false lumen and the superior mesenteric artery from both lumens. Endovascular approach was decided due to the patient co-morbidities. Because of the collapsed true lumen, the aorta had to be preconditioned in order to facilitate the endovascular repair with a multibranched thoracoabdominal stent-graft. This was achieved through the dilation of the aortic true lumen with a 32 mm Coda balloon (COOK Medical, Bloomington, IN), then puncturing of the intimal flap in several places to create re-entries that were also dilated (first with a 12-mm noncompliant balloon and then with a compliant 32 mm Coda balloon), creating a single aortic lumen that could facilitate an endovascular repair with thoracic stent-grafts and an off-the-shelf multibranched endograft (t-Branch; COOK Medical). The patient was promptly discharged, and the 3-month follow-up CT-angiogram showed a satisfactory result with patent target vessels and only a small Type-IIb endoleak. CONCLUSIONS: Preconditioning of the aorta using this technique is a feasible and safe approach for the treatment of complex thoracoabdominal postdissection aortic aneurysms presenting with a true lumen collapse.

Emergent Triple-Branched TEVAR and Redistribution of the Branches to the Supra-Aortic Target Vessels for Treatment of a Contained Ruptured Descending Aortic Aneurysm Associated With a Chronic Type A Aortic Dissection.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the feasibility of urgent endovascular treatment of a chronic type A dissection and contained rupture of the false lumen using a noncustomized triple-branched arch endograft, which necessitated reassignment of the branches to the supra-aortic vessels. CASE REPORT:: A 57-year-old patient with a contained rupture of the descending thoracic aorta, in the setting of a chronic type A dissection and a maximum aortic diameter of 85 mm, was converted to endovascular repair after failure of an open surgical approach. A custom-made triple-branched arch endograft designed for another patient was employed, with concomitant occlusion of the false lumen using a Candy Plug occluder. To adjust the graft's configuration to the patient's anatomy, the supra-aortic vessels were not assigned to the originally planned branches. The 12-month follow-up angiography demonstrated a satisfactory result. CONCLUSION: A noncustomized triple-branched arch endograft can be used in an emergency setting to treat chronic type A dissection, reassigning the branches to the supra-aortic vessels as needed.

The Munich Valsalva Implantation Technique (MuVIT) for Cardiac Output Reduction During TEVAR: Vena Cava Occlusion With the Valsalva Maneuver.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate a physiologically induced alternative to the typical methods of reducing cardiac output during deployment of stent-grafts in the aortic arch and proximal aorta. TECHNIQUE: A modified Valsalva maneuver, the Munich Valsalva implantation technique (MuVIT), to raise the intrathoracic pressure, minimize backflow, and reduce the cardiac output is illustrated in a patient undergoing a triple-branch thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). During manual mechanical ventilation, the adjustable pressure-limiting valve is carefully closed to 25 mm Hg, creating "manual bloating" of the lungs and sustained apnea. The increased intrathoracic pressure causes compression of the vena cava and pulmonary veins, reducing the venous backflow and gradually decreasing the arterial pressure. Once the desired pressure is obtained, the stent-graft is accurately deployed. The airway pressure is thereupon slowly reduced, and the patient is taken back to normal ventilation. The procedure is then finished following standard practice. CONCLUSION: The MuVIT is a simple, noninvasive technique for cardiac output reduction during aortic arch TEVAR, eliminating the need for other invasive techniques.

[Aortic Aneurysm: Fenestrated/Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair (EVAR) and Fenestrated/Branched Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR). Is Total Endovascular Repair Already Here?] / Aortenaneurysma: fenestrierte/gebranchte abdominale EVAR (fbEVAR) und fenestrierte/gebranchte thorakale EVAR (fbTEVAR). Ist die komplette endovaskuläre Therapie schon da?

Five years after the first endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), Park et al. reported the first implantation of a fenestrated endoprosthesis. In the meantime, advanced generations of new fenestrated and branched endografts evolved. Endografts for complex pathologies are either so-called "off-the-shelf" grafts with predetermined length, width, diameter and clock position of the branches and fenestrations, predetermined by the manufacturer, "custom-made" grafts which need to be sized and planned individually for patients with specific thoracoabdominal anatomy. Open aortic repair in the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) still remains challenging and is associated with high morbidity and mortality, even in the elective setting. The ongoing development of endovascular treatment modalities, such as fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F-EVAR, B-EVAR), enables less invasive procedures for more challenging aortic pathologies. In recent years, extensive endovascular treatment of the aortic arch to the thoracoabdominal segment has become more and more important, but its outcomes have not been completely evaluated. The aim of this is article is to provide an overview of the currently available endovascular treatment options for complex aortic aneurysms requiring extensive coverage from the aortic arch to the infrarenal aorta.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies on endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms with the t-Branch off-the-shelf multibranched endograft.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms is becoming increasingly popular in clinical practice, mainly because of its reduced perioperative mortality and morbidity. However, the custom-made stent graft platform that companies offer requires detailed preoperative planning and production time that can take up to 12 weeks. This may delay surgery in elective patients and is not an option for urgent or emergent cases. To surpass this limitation, the t-Branch (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) was launched in 2012 in Europe as the first off-the-shelf standardized multibranched endograft for the endovascular treatment of thoracoabdominal aneurysms. Our aim was to systematically evaluate all published experience with this commercially available off-the-shelf thoracoabdominal stent graft. METHODS: We performed a systematic inquiry of the medical databases to identify all published studies that reported on the outcomes of patients treated with the t-Branch stent graft and then conducted a qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis of the results. The main end points studied were technical success, mortality, major stroke, spinal cord ischemia, primary branch patency, and renal insufficiency during the first 30 days along with midterm mortality and reintervention rate. We estimated pooled proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: We identified seven retrospective studies published between 2014 and 2018, with a total of 197 patients (mean age, 72.3 ± 7 years; 70% male). Among 165 patients, 45% were symptomatic and 19% were treated for a ruptured aortic aneurysm. In 197 patients, pooled technical success was 92.75% (95% CI, 83.9%-98.7%), and in 10% of the cases, an early endoleak was detected (95% CI, 0%-43.7%). Early mortality was 5.8% (95% CI, 2.5%-10%), and major stroke was observed in 4% of the patients (95% CI, 0.96%-8.40%). The rate of spinal cord ischemia was 12.2% (95% CI, 4.1%-23.2%), with the rate of permanent paraplegia at 1.3% (95% CI, 0%-8.7%). Acute renal failure was 18.7% (95% CI, 9.1%-30.4%), whereas primary branch patency was calculated at 98.2% (95% CI, 96.7%-99.2%). Mean follow-up was 15 ± 7 months. During this time, midterm mortality (after 30 days) was 6.9% (95% CI, 2.44%-12.8%) and pooled reintervention rate was 5.7% (95% CI, 1.70%-11.4%). CONCLUSIONS: This pooled analysis indicated good technical success rate after t-Branch endograft implantation, with acceptable mortality and neurologic complications despite a high rate of urgent procedures. Thoracoabdominal endovascular repair with the t-Branch endograft is a feasible and safe therapeutic option for elective and urgent patients.

Extension of Iliac Branch Device Repair Into the Superior Gluteal Artery Is a Safe and Effective Maneuver.

BACKGROUND: In some cases of complex aortoiliac endovascular repair, the hypogastric landing zone is suboptimal or even insufficient. This study aimed at the technical feasibility and at the outcome of iliac branch device (IBD) deployment with extension of the IBD into the superior gluteal artery (SGA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study involves a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained single-center cohort of patients with implantation of IBD for aortoiliac and postdissection aneurysms. The IBD cohort with landing zones in the hypogastric main trunk (IIA IBD) was compared with the IBD cohort with landing zones in the SGA (SGA IBD). The main outcome parameters were primary technical success, patency of the hypogastric branch, and freedom from IBD-specific secondary interventions within 30 days. Other outcomes of interest were long-term patency and freedom from buttock claudication, as well as the incidence of endoleaks. Group comparisons were made by univariate significance tests, and freedom from reintervention was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier-method. RESULTS: From January 2015 to October 2017, a total of 46 IBDs were implanted in 40 patients (39 male; mean age, 71.9 ± 9.1 years). Nineteen of 46 (41.3%) IBDs were extended with at least one bridging stent graft into the SGA because of aneurysmal or short internal iliac artery (IIA). Technical success was achieved in 97.8% (96.3% for IIA IBD vs. 100% for SGA IBD, P = 0.163), and the primary ipsilateral limb patency rate was 100% within 30 days after the procedure. During a mean follow-up period of 19.8 ± 10.0 months (24.7 ± 10.8 for IIA IBD vs. 25.1 ± 9.8 for SGA IBD, P = 0.461), 11.1% IBDs in the IIA IBD group and 15.8% IBDs in the SGA IBD group needed secondary interventions (P = 0.33). Follow-up revealed no patients suffering from persistent buttock claudication or erectile dysfunction. One patient in the SGA IBD group died at late follow-up from a non-aneurysm-related cause. CONCLUSIONS: Extension of IBD into the SGA is a technically feasible and safe maneuver in the treatment of aortoiliac aneurysms with outcomes comparable to those when IBDs extend to the main trunk of the hypogastric artery.

[Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms - Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies]. / Das thorakale Aortenaneurysma ­ Diagnostik und Behandlungsstrategien.

Thoracic aortic aneurysms are a relatively uncommon disease, with an incidence of 10.4/100 000, with an increase in the last decades, due to the increased quality of vascular screening. Several imaging techniques like thoracic radiography, echocardiography, magnetic resonance (MRI) or positron emission tomography (PET) can be used for the diagnosis of such condition, whose first diagnosis is usually incidental. The gold standard for aneurysm evaluation is computed tomography angiography (CTA), which allows precise diameter assessment and accurate preoperative planning. Advancements in imaging techniques, through electrocardiography (ECG)-gated CTA, permit to avoid movement artifacts and have a more precise definition of proximal aortic segments (aortic arch, ascending aorta).The urgent or emergent treatment of thoracic aneurysms is indicated in symptomatic patients and in case of rupture, respectively. The current European Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines recommend the elective treatment of thoracic aneurysms with a diameter > 55 mm, since diameters of 55 - 60 mm are associated with a rupture risk of 10 %/year. Lower perioperative morbidity and mortality rates have been demonstrated for endovascular repair in comparison with open surgery. According to the current guidelines, the treatment of choice is endovascular, through the implantation of an aortic stent graft (thoracic endovascular aortic repair, TEVAR), while open surgery is reserved to young patients, fit for open surgery. Hybrid procedures, introduced in 2000, include the debranching of supra aortic vessels and TEVAR and are a well established procedure for the treatment of aneurysms involving the aortic arch. The increasing research and expertise in endovascular surgery lead to the development of complex procedures, like chimney TEVAR, fenestrated and branched TEVAR which allowed to reach proximal landing zone to the ascending aorta.

Current evidence on aortic remodeling after endovascular repair.

Anatomical changes after endovascular repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are thoroughly studied as they could affect the long-term postoperative outcome. The aim of the present study was to review the literature and summarize the recent data regarding the aortic remodeling and its clinical significance. A continuous aortic neck expansion is observed after EVAR and is more rapid at the first month and during the third postoperative year. This aortic neck dilation is not influenced by the type of proximal stent-graft fixation, is comparable to open surgical aneurysm repair and is most probably related with the natural progression of aneurismal disease. Aortic neck angulation reduces significantly immediately after EVAR and then continues to reduce slowly and gradually. Neck angulations ≥60° have a greater reduction compared to neck angulations <60°. An expansion of the common iliac arteries at the distal landing zone is also observed after EVAR and is more prominent in the first six postoperative months. A postoperative increase of the distance between superior mesenteric artery and iliac bifurcations (aortoiliac elongation) is described and is associated with increased type I endoleaks and reinterventions. The aneurysm sac diameter most frequently reduces after EVAR in absence of an endoleak and this aneurysm sac regression has been associated with the stent-graft type.

Outcomes After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair With Overstenting of the Left Subclavian Artery.

BACKGROUND: Our study aim was to evaluate the impact of left subclavian artery (LSA) flow preservation during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) on outcome. METHODS: Between August 2001 and October 2016, 176 patients (mean age, 61.3 ± 15.8 years) underwent TEVAR with complete LSA coverage. Fifty-five of those patients (31.3%) also underwent LSA revascularization, whereas 121 patients (68.7%) did not. Perioperative data were acquired retrospectively for statistical analysis at the three study institutions. RESULTS: Overall in-hospital and follow-up mortality was 8.5% (n = 15) and 9.1% (n = 16), respectively, including 88 urgent and emergent cases (50%). Stroke (independent of location) and permanent paraplegia rates were 6.8% and 6.3%, respectively, for the entire cohort. Isolated upper-left extremity malperfusion exclusively occurred in 12 (9.9%) of the 121 patients without LSA revascularization. Left-hemispheric stroke was observed four times more often in patients without LSA revascularization and left arm malperfusion (16.7% versus 3.7%, p = 0.095). Multivariate analysis identified no LSA revascularization (odds ratio [OR] 3.779, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.096 to 13.029, p = 0.035), two or more endografts (OR 3.814, 95% CI: 1.557 to 9.343, p = 0.003), and coronary artery disease (OR 3.276, 95% CI: 1.262 to 8.507, p = 0.015) as independent risk factors for procedure-related adverse events (left-hemispheric stroke, left arm malperfusion, and permanent paraplegia) after TEVAR with complete LSA overstenting. CONCLUSIONS: Every 10th patient with LSA overstenting and no revascularization experienced left arm malperfusion. No LSA revascularization, extensive aortic coverage with two or more endografts, and coronary artery disease increased the risk of permanent paraplegia, left-hemispheric stroke, and left arm malperfusion. Patients should undergo LSA revascularization to prevent left vertebral artery-associated central neurologic complications and to maintain upper-left extremity perfusion.

Vascular compression syndromes.

Dealing with vascular compression syndromes is one of the most challenging tasks in Vascular Medicine practice. This heterogeneous group of disorders is characterised by external compression of primarily healthy arteries and/or veins as well as accompanying nerval structures, carrying the risk of subsequent structural vessel wall and nerve damage. Vascular compression syndromes may severely impair health-related quality of life in affected individuals who are typically young and otherwise healthy. The diagnostic approach has not been standardised for any of the vascular compression syndromes. Moreover, some degree of positional external compression of blood vessels such as the subclavian and popliteal vessels or the celiac trunk can be found in a significant proportion of healthy individuals. This implies important difficulties in differentiating physiological from pathological findings of clinical examination and diagnostic imaging with provocative manoeuvres. The level of evidence on which treatment decisions regarding surgical decompression with or without revascularisation can be relied on is generally poor, mostly coming from retrospective single centre studies. Proper patient selection is critical in order to avoid overtreatment in patients without a clear association between vascular compression and clinical symptoms. With a focus on the thoracic outlet-syndrome, the median arcuate ligament syndrome and the popliteal entrapment syndrome, the present article gives a selective literature review on compression syndromes from an interdisciplinary vascular point of view.