RESUMEN
AIMS: Knowledge on survival probabilities is essential for determining optimal treatment strategies. We studied overall survival and associated prognostic factors in Dutch patients with localised prostate cancer (PCa) selected for external beam radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this single-centre retrospective cohort study, we identified all T1-T3 PCa patients (aged 55-80 years) in the radiotherapy planning database with a start date between January 2006 and December 2013, treated with 72-78 Gy in 2 Gy fractions to the prostate ± seminal vesicles (n = 1536). Long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was predominantly prescribed in the case of extracapsular disease (>T3). Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were evaluated in Cox regression models for the intermediate-risk and high-risk groups. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 12 years for patients who were alive. Ten-year survival rates were 79.0% for low-risk (n = 120), 59.9% for intermediate-risk (n = 430) and 56.8% for high-risk patients (n = 986). A higher age, higher comorbidity score, active smoking and Gleason score ≥8 had a statistically significant negative impact on overall survival at multivariable analysis. ADT was associated with superior overall survival in the high-risk group translating into overall survival rates similar to the intermediate-risk group. CONCLUSIONS: Although PCa patients selected for external beam radiotherapy are typically in good health, their comorbidity score and smoking habits appeared to be dominant predictors for overall survival. Overall survival rates within the high-risk group varied, showing improved overall survival with ADT prescription and worse overall survival in the case of Gleason score ≥8.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Factores de Riesgo , Clasificación del Tumor , Antígeno Prostático EspecíficoRESUMEN
To gain insight into the availability of training for robot assisted surgery (RAS) and the possibility to perform RAS during Dutch residency curriculum and to analyze the effects on surgical skills by the introduction of an advanced course in RAS for residents. A combination of a validated snap shot survey and a prospective cohort study. Structured advanced RAS training including virtual reality (VR) simulation, dry and wet lab facility at ORSI academy (Belgium). A snap-shot survey has been sent to all the residents and specialists in Urology graduated during the years 2017-2020 in Netherlands. Among residents, only last year residents (5th and 6th year) have been considered for the RAS training. Although most of the residents (88.2%) and young urologists (95%) were asked to follow a basic training or meet basic requirements before starting RAS, the requirements set by the educators were different from center to center. Some of them were required to attend only an online course on RAS, whereas others were asked to achieve threshold scores at VR simulator and participate in a standardized course at a training institute. The attendance to a structured advanced course in RAS showed a significant increase in surgical skills. Our study shows residents in urology are allowed to perform RAS during their residency though the criteria for starting RAS differ significantly amongst the teaching hospitals. To guarantee a basic level of skills and knowledge a structured, (multi-step) training and certification program for RAS should be implemented.
Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Urología , Competencia Clínica , Curriculum , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Urología/educaciónRESUMEN
To understand the influence of proctored guidance versus simulator generated guidance (SGG) on the acquisition dexterity skills in novice surgeons learning RAS (robot assisted surgery). Prospective non-blinded 3-arm randomised controlled trial (RTC). Exclusion criteria: previous experience in RAS or robotic surgery simulation. The participants were assigned to three different intervention groups and received a different form of guidance: (1) proctored guidance, (2) simulator generated guidance, (3) no guidance, during training on virtual reality (VR) simulator. All participants were asked to complete multiple questionnaires. The training was the same in all groups with the exception of the intervention part. Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, The Netherlands. A total of 70 Dutch medical students, PhD-students, and surgical residents were included in the study. The participants were randomly assigned to one of the three groups. Overall, all the participants showed a significant improvement in their dexterity skills after the training. There was no significant difference in the improvement of surgical skills between the three different intervention groups. The proctored guidance group reported a higher participant satisfaction compared to the simulator-generated guidance group, which could indicate a higher motivation to continue the training. This study showed that novice surgeons. Significantly increase their dexterity skills in RAS after a short time of practicing on simulator. The lack of difference in results between the intervention groups could indicate there is a limited impact of "human proctoring" on dexterity skills during surgical simulation training. Since there is no difference between the intervention groups the exposure alone of novice surgeons to the robotic surgery simulator could possibly be sufficient to achieve a significant improvement of dexterity skills during the initial steps of RAS learning.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Simulación por Computador , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/educación , Entrenamiento Simulado/métodos , Cirujanos/educación , Evaluación Educacional/métodos , Humanos , Motivación , Países Bajos , Satisfacción Personal , Estudios Prospectivos , Cirujanos/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Realidad VirtualRESUMEN
Erectile dysfunction (ED), affecting men worldwide, is associated with worse mental health. The severity of ED as well as the effect of its treatment can be assessed using valid self-reported outcome measures. A widely used measure is the International Index of Erectile Function short form (IIEF-5) which is not yet validated in Dutch. The objective of this study was to translate the IIEF-5 into Dutch and to investigate its reliability and validity to provide a useful evaluation tool. The IIEF-5 was translated into Dutch following standardized forward-backward procedures. To conduct this observational study, men with symptoms of ED completed the Dutch IIEF-5 at inclusion, 1 week later, and 6 months after inclusion. A population-based sample (reference group) completed the IIEF-5 once. The quality domains reliability and validity were addressed by testing the measurement properties internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, and content validity. Data of 82 patients and 253 reference group participants were analyzed. Internal consistency was adequate with Cronbach's alpha of 0.94 in both patient and reference group. In patients, the test-retest reliability was adequate with an intra-class correlation coefficient for agreement of 0.88. A floor effect was present in the patient group (42%), though not in the reference group (3%). There was no ceiling effect in patients (0%), while this was present in the reference group (17%). Analysis of responsiveness was not possible due to the limited number of patients receiving treatment. The Dutch IIEF-5 is a reliable and valid measure to determine severity of symptoms of ED. This evaluation tool is valuable for clinical use and interpreting results across international clinical studies. The context of a patient's sexual life is, however, indispensable and should be taken into account.
Asunto(s)
Disfunción Eréctil/diagnóstico , Erección Peniana , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Comprensión , Disfunción Eréctil/fisiopatología , Disfunción Eréctil/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Calidad de Vida , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Conducta Sexual , TraducciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The results of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) trial showed a statistically significant 29% prostate cancer mortality reduction for the men screened in the intervention arm and a 23% negative impact on the life-years gained because of quality of life. However, alternative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening strategies for the population may exist, optimizing the effects on mortality reduction, quality of life, overdiagnosis, and costs. METHODS: Based on data of the ERSPC trial, we predicted the numbers of prostate cancers diagnosed, prostate cancer deaths averted, life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) gained, and cost-effectiveness of 68 screening strategies starting at age 55 years, with a PSA threshold of 3, using microsimulation modeling. The screening strategies varied by age to stop screening and screening interval (one to 14 years or once in a lifetime screens), and therefore number of tests. RESULTS: Screening at short intervals of three years or less was more cost-effective than using longer intervals. Screening at ages 55 to 59 years with two-year intervals had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $73000 per QALY gained and was considered optimal. With this strategy, lifetime prostate cancer mortality reduction was predicted as 13%, and 33% of the screen-detected cancers were overdiagnosed. When better quality of life for the post-treatment period could be achieved, an older age of 65 to 72 years for ending screening was obtained. CONCLUSION: Prostate cancer screening can be cost-effective when it is limited to two or three screens between ages 55 to 59 years. Screening above age 63 years is less cost-effective because of loss of QALYs because of overdiagnosis.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/economía , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/economía , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/economía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Calidad de Vida , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Simulación por Computador , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Europa (Continente) , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients' preferences are important for shared decision making. Therefore, we investigated patients' and urologists' preferences for treatment alternatives for early prostate cancer (PC). METHODS: A discrete choice experiment was conducted among 150 patients who were waiting for their biopsy results, and 150 urologists. Regression analysis was used to determine patients' and urologists' stated preferences using scenarios based on PC treatment modality (radiotherapy, surgery, and active surveillance (AS)), and risks of urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction. RESULTS: The response rate was 110 out of 150 (73%) for patients and 50 out of 150 (33%) for urologists. Risk of urinary incontinence was an important determinant of both patients' and urologists' stated preferences for PC treatment (P<0.05). Treatment modality also influenced patients' stated preferences (P<0.05), whereas the risk of erectile dysfunction due to radiotherapy was mainly important to urologists (P<0.05). Both patients and urologists preferred AS to radical treatment, with the exception of patients with anxious/depressed feelings who preferred radical treatment to AS. CONCLUSION: Although patients and urologists generally may prefer similar treatments for PC, they showed different trade-offs between various specific treatment aspects. This implies that urologists need to be aware of potential differences compared with the patient's perspective on treatment decisions in shared decision making on PC treatment.
Asunto(s)
Prioridad del Paciente/psicología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Anciano , Toma de Decisiones , Disfunción Eréctil/etiología , Disfunción Eréctil/prevención & control , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/psicología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiología , Incontinencia Urinaria/prevención & controlRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Men with screen-detected prostate cancer can choose to undergo immediate curative treatment or enter into an expectant management programme. We quantified how the benefits and harms of immediate treatment vary according to the prognostic factors of clinical T-stage, Gleason score, and patient age. METHODS: A microsimulation model based on European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer data was used to predict the benefits and harms of immediate treatment versus delayed treatment of local-regional prostate cancer in men aged 55-74 years. Benefits included life-years gained and reduced probability of death from prostate cancer. Harms included lead time and probability of overdiagnosis. RESULTS: The ratio of mean lead time to mean life-years gained ranged from 1.8 to 31.2, and the additional number of treatments required per prostate cancer death prevented ranged from 0.3 to 11.6 across the different prognostic groups. Both harm-benefit ratios were lowest, most favourable, for men aged 55-59 years and diagnosed with moderate-risk prostate cancer. Ratios were high for men aged 70-74 years regardless of clinical T-stage and Gleason score. CONCLUSION: Men aged 55-59 years with moderate-risk prostate cancer are predicted to derive greatest benefit from immediate curative treatment. Immediate treatment is least favourable for men aged 70-74 years with either low-risk or high-risk prostate cancer.
Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Anciano , Humanos , Longevidad/fisiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Pronóstico , Antígeno Prostático Específico/análisis , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Screening for prostate cancer (PC) may save lives, but overdiagnosis and overtreatment are serious drawbacks. We aimed to determine men's preferences for PC screening, and to elicit the trade-offs they make. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted among a population-based random sample of 1000 elderly men (55-75-years-old). Trade-offs were quantified with a panel latent class model between five PC screening aspects: risk reduction of PC-related death, screening interval, risk of unnecessary biopsies, risk of unnecessary treatments, and out-of-pocket costs. RESULTS: The response rate was 46% (459/1000). Men were willing to trade-off 2.0% (CI: 1.6%-2.4%) or 1.8% (CI: 1.3%-2.3%) risk reduction of PC-related death to decrease their risk of unnecessary treatment or biopsy with 10%, respectively. They were willing to pay 188 per year (CI: 141-258) to reduce their relative risk of PC-related death with 10%. Preference heterogeneity was substantial, with men with higher educational levels having a lower probability to opt for PC screening than men with lower educational levels. CONCLUSION: Men were willing to trade-off some risk reduction of PC-related death to be relieved of the burden of biopsies or unnecessary treatments. Increasing knowledge on overdiagnosis and overtreatment, especially for men with lower educational levels, is warranted to prevent unrealistic expectations from PC screening.
Asunto(s)
Conducta de Elección , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Neoplasias de la Próstata/prevención & control , Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo , Anciano , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Estadísticos , Pronóstico , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Men with a history of congenital undescended testes (UDT) have an increased risk of fertility problems. Despite no definitive proof, current guidelines recommend early surgical intervention because this may have a positive effect on future fertility potential by preventing degenerative changes of the testes in early life. Also surgical intervention facilitates observability of the testes in view of possible malignancy. We evaluated testicular function in adult men with previous UDT treated at different ages before puberty. A long-term follow-up study of men with previous UDT was performed. Andrological evaluation included medical history taking, physical examination, scrotal ultrasound, determination of reproductive hormones, and semen analysis. Findings were compared with those of a control group of men with normal testicular descent. The influence of age at orchiopexy on future fertility parameters was evaluated in a multivariate regression analysis. 62 men were included of whom seven had had bilateral UDT. Twenty-four patients had had their orchiopexy before the age of 24 months of whom eight men had it before 12 months of age. Forty-eight men had had unsuccessful luteinizing-hormone-releasing-hormone (LHRH) nasal spray treatment during childhood, whereas 14 of 24 men operated before 24 months of age had not received LHRH treatment before orchiopexy. Fertility potential in men with a history of UDT is compromised in comparison with controls. We could not detect any influence of age at orchiopexy on fertility parameters. However, the number of patients operated before the age of 12 months is limited. This study does not support the assumption that early orchiopexy results in better fertility potential.
Asunto(s)
Criptorquidismo/complicaciones , Fertilidad , Infertilidad Masculina/etiología , Administración Intranasal , Adolescente , Adulto , Aerosoles , Factores de Edad , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Criptorquidismo/diagnóstico , Criptorquidismo/fisiopatología , Criptorquidismo/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Lactante , Infertilidad Masculina/diagnóstico , Infertilidad Masculina/fisiopatología , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Orquidopexia , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) can reduce prostate cancer mortality, but may advance diagnosis and treatment in time and lead to overdetection and overtreatment. We estimated benefits and adverse effects of PSA screening for individuals who are deciding whether or not to be screened. METHODS: Using a microsimulation model, we estimated lifetime probabilities of prostate cancer diagnosis and death, overall life expectancy and expected time to diagnosis, both with and without screening. We calculated anticipated loss in quality of life due to prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment that would be acceptable to decide in favour of screening. RESULTS: Men who were screened had a gain in life expectancy of 0.08 years but their expected time to diagnosis decreased by 1.53 life-years. Of the screened men, 0.99% gained on average 8.08 life-years and for 17.43% expected time to diagnosis decreased by 8.78 life-years. These figures imply that the anticipated loss in quality of life owing to diagnosis and treatment should not exceed 4.8%, for screening to have a positive effect on quality-adjusted life expectancy. CONCLUSION: The decision to be screened should depend on personal preferences. The negative impact of screening might be reduced by screening men who are more willing to accept the side effects from treatment.
Asunto(s)
Modelos Estadísticos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/análisis , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Humanos , Esperanza de Vida , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequent male malignancy and the second most common cause of cancer-related death in Western countries. Current clinical and pathological methods are limited in the prediction of postoperative outcome. It is becoming increasingly evident that small non-coding RNA (ncRNA) species are associated with the development and progression of this malignancy. To assess the diversity and abundance of small ncRNAs in PCa, we analyzed the composition of the entire small transcriptome by Illumina/Solexa deep sequencing. We further analyzed the microRNA (miRNA) expression signatures of 102 fresh-frozen patient samples during PCa progression by miRNA microarrays. Both platforms were cross-validated by quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR. Besides the altered expression of several miRNAs, our deep sequencing analyses revealed strong differential expression of small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) and transfer RNAs (tRNAs). From microarray analysis, we derived a miRNA diagnostic classifier that accurately distinguishes normal from cancer samples. Furthermore, we were able to construct a PCa prognostic predictor that independently forecasts postoperative outcome. Importantly, the majority of miRNAs included in the predictor also exhibit high sequence counts and concordant differential expression in Illumina PCa samples, supported by quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR. Our findings provide miRNA expression signatures that may serve as an accurate tool for the diagnosis and prognosis of PCa.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , MicroARNs/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/metabolismo , Transcriptoma , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Línea Celular Tumoral , Expresión Génica , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , MicroARNs/genética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Secuencia por Matrices de Oligonucleótidos , Cultivo Primario de Células , Pronóstico , Próstata/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , ARN Nucleolar Pequeño/genética , ARN Nucleolar Pequeño/metabolismo , ARN de Transferencia/genética , ARN de Transferencia/metabolismo , Curva ROC , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la PolimerasaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Prostate cancer (PC) is a major health problem. Overexpression of the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) in PC, but not in the hyperplastic prostate, provides a promising target for staging and monitoring of PC. Based on the assumption that cancer cells have increased metabolic activity, metabolism-based tracers are also being used for PC imaging. We compared GRPR-based targeting using the (68)Ga-labelled bombesin analogue AMBA with metabolism-based targeting using (18)F-methylcholine ((18)F-FCH) in nude mice bearing human prostate VCaP xenografts. METHODS: PET and biodistribution studies were performed with both (68)Ga-AMBA and (18)F-FCH in all VCaP tumour-bearing mice, with PC-3 tumour-bearing mice as reference. Scanning started immediately after injection. Dynamic PET scans were reconstructed and analysed quantitatively. Biodistribution of tracers and tissue uptake was expressed as percent of injected dose per gram tissue (%ID/g). RESULTS: All tumours were clearly visualized using (68)Ga-AMBA. (18)F-FCH showed significantly less contrast due to poor tumour-to-background ratios. Quantitative PET analyses showed fast tumour uptake and high retention for both tracers. VCaP tumour uptake values determined from PET at steady-state were 6.7 ± 1.4%ID/g (20-30 min after injection, N = 8) for (68)Ga-AMBA and 1.6 ± 0.5%ID/g (10-20 min after injection, N = 8) for (18)F-FCH, which were significantly different (p <0.001). The results in PC-3 tumour-bearing mice were comparable. Biodistribution data were in accordance with the PET results showing VCaP tumour uptake values of 9.5 ± 4.8%ID/g (N = 8) for (68)Ga-AMBA and 2.1 ± 0.4%ID/g (N = 8) for (18)F-FCH. Apart from the GRPR-expressing organs, uptake in all organs was lower for (68)Ga-AMBA than for (18)F-FCH. CONCLUSION: Tumour uptake of (68)Ga-AMBA was higher while overall background activity was lower than observed for (18)F-FCH in the same PC-bearing mice. These results suggest that peptide receptor-based targeting using the bombesin analogue AMBA is superior to metabolism-based targeting using choline for scintigraphy of PC.
Asunto(s)
Bombesina/análogos & derivados , Bombesina/metabolismo , Colina/metabolismo , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/metabolismo , Receptores de Bombesina/metabolismo , Animales , Bombesina/farmacocinética , Línea Celular Tumoral , Transformación Celular Neoplásica , Colina/análogos & derivados , Colina/química , Colina/farmacocinética , Radioisótopos de Flúor , Radioisótopos de Galio , Humanos , Masculino , Ratones , Oligopéptidos/química , Oligopéptidos/metabolismo , Oligopéptidos/farmacocinética , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of targeted prostate cancer screening in men with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, an international study, IMPACT (Identification of Men with a genetic predisposition to ProstAte Cancer: Targeted screening in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and controls), was established. This is the first multicentre screening study targeted at men with a known genetic predisposition to prostate cancer. A preliminary analysis of the data is reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men aged 40-69 years from families with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations were offered annual prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing, and those with PSA > 3 ng/mL, were offered a prostate biopsy. Controls were men age-matched (± 5 years) who were negative for the familial mutation. RESULTS: In total, 300 men were recruited (205 mutation carriers; 89 BRCA1, 116 BRCA2 and 95 controls) over 33 months. At the baseline screen (year 1), 7.0% (21/300) underwent a prostate biopsy. Prostate cancer was diagnosed in ten individuals, a prevalence of 3.3%. The positive predictive value of PSA screening in this cohort was 47·6% (10/21). One prostate cancer was diagnosed at year 2. Of the 11 prostate cancers diagnosed, nine were in mutation carriers, two in controls, and eight were clinically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that the positive predictive value of PSA screening in BRCA mutation carriers is high and that screening detects clinically significant prostate cancer. These results support the rationale for continued screening in such men.
Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Genes BRCA1 , Genes BRCA2 , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad/genética , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/normas , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/genéticaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The prognosis of bladder cancer (BC) depends mainly on its histology, grade, and stage. Patients with superficial BC (70% of the urothelial carcinomas) have a relatively good prognosis, but patients diagnosed with invasive, high grade BC, and those who progress to invasive BC, have a poor prognosis and will not survive their disease in many cases due to their metastases, despite the currently available treatment options. Early detection can only be beneficial regarding mortality if the high risk cancers are recognized and treated at a localized stage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Previous pilot studies on early detection consisted of home-based repeated hematuria testing and, in case of hematuria, a urologic evaluation with cytology and cystoscopy was carried out. This design resulted in too many cystoscopies. The recently initiated [Bladder Cancer Urine Marker Project (BLU-P) study www.blu-project.org] assesses the feasibility of a population-based screening for BC and at the same time evaluates a screening algorithm using next to hematuria testing, sensitive specific urine markers for BC (NMP22, FGFR3, MA analyses and MLPa) in an attempt to circumvent the high number of cystoscopies. RESULTS: So far 1,611 men are included and 23.5% tested positive for hematuria (11.6% had one or more true positive test results). The additional molecular-based screening tests before referring to cystoscopy resulted in a decrease of the number of cystoscopies from 378 to 66 (82.5%). In those men referred for cystoscopy, so far only 1 BC case was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Further research is needed to evaluate whether this extremely low detection rate is caused by, e.g., a healthy screenee bias or that the additional selection step using the molecular urine tests is too strict and diagnoses are missed.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/orina , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/orina , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Metilación de ADN , Estudios de Factibilidad , Hematuria/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Repeticiones de Microsatélite , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Proteínas Nucleares/orina , Receptor Tipo 3 de Factor de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/genética , Receptor Tipo 3 de Factor de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/orina , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/genéticaRESUMEN
The objective of this study was to determine whether screening for prostate cancer (PC) reduces PC mortality and, if so, whether the required criteria to be introduced as a population-based screening program are satisfied. A literature review was conducted through electronic scientific databases. The screening tests, that is, PSA and digital rectal examination, have limited sensitivity and specificity for detecting PC; screening produces a beneficial stage shift and reduces PC mortality. Nevertheless, PC screening causes a large increase in the cumulative incidence, and the understanding of the economic cost and quality-of-life parameters are limited. PC screening cannot be justified yet in the context of a public health policy.
Asunto(s)
Tacto Rectal , Implementación de Plan de Salud , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Tamizaje Masivo/métodosAsunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Terapia Combinada , Tacto Rectal , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/mortalidad , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/terapia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Radioterapia , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Medición de Riesgo , Prevención Secundaria , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Prostate Cancer (PC) is a type of cancer that is often diagnosed at very early stages due to improved detection among man in the Western world. Current imaging techniques are not optimal to determine extent of minimal early stage PC even though this is of great clinical importance. Human PC and high-grade PIN have shown high Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor (GRPR) expression, while normal prostate tissue and BPH revealed to be predominantly GRPR-negative. Radiolabelled Gastrin-Releasing Peptide (GRP) or bombesin (BN) analogues targeting the GRPR can be used as non-invasive tools to diagnose, monitor and potentially treat PC. These BN analogues have already proven to be able to image PC in both tumour-bearing mice and clinical patients showing no important side effects. It's desirable that new peptides require fast-track standardised comparative testing in relevant PC models to select the best performing BN analogues for further evaluation in patients. Although knowledge about GRPR expression and development of new BN analogues can be extended, it is time to study performance of BN analogues for peptide receptor based imaging in patients validating results of PC imaging using histopathology as a golden standard.
Asunto(s)
Bombesina , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Receptores de Bombesina/metabolismo , Secuencia de Aminoácidos , Animales , Bombesina/análogos & derivados , Péptido Liberador de Gastrina , Humanos , Masculino , Ratones , Datos de Secuencia Molecular , RadiofármacosRESUMEN
With docetaxel as effective chemotherapy for hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC), the number of new treatment combinations for HRPC is expanding demanding a fast-track screening system. This review elaborates on the use of xenograft models to select the most promising combination therapies for entering into phase II clinical trials.