The effect of bronchial thermoplasty on airway volume measured 12†months post-procedure.

Bronchial thermoplasty induces atrophy of the airway smooth muscle layer, but the mechanism whereby this improves patient health is unclear. In this study, we use computed tomography (CT) to evaluate the effects of bronchial thermoplasty on airway volume 12 months post-procedure. 10 consecutive patients with severe asthma were evaluated at baseline by the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), and high-resolution CT at total lung capacity (TLC) and functional residual capacity (FRC). The CT protocol was repeated 4 weeks after the left lung had been treated by bronchial thermoplasty, but prior to right lung treatment, and then again 12 months after both lungs were treated. The CT data were also used to model the implications of including the right middle lobe (RML) in the treatment field. The mean patient age was 62.7±7.7 years and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 42.9±11.5% predicted. 12 months post-bronchial-thermoplasty, the ACQ improved, from 3.4±1.0 to 1.5±0.9 (p=0.001), as did the frequency of oral steroid-requiring exacerbations (p=0.008). The total airway volume increased 12 months after bronchial thermoplasty in both the TLC (p=0.03) and the FRC scans (p=0.02). No change in airway volume was observed in the untreated central airways. In the bronchial thermoplasty-treated distal airways, increases in airway volume of 38.4±31.8% at TLC (p=0.03) and 30.0±24.8% at FRC (p=0.01) were observed. The change in distal airway volume was correlated with the improvement in ACQ (r=-0.71, p=0.02). Modelling outputs demonstrated that treating the RML conferred no additional benefit. Bronchial thermoplasty induces long-term increases in airway volume, which correlate with symptomatic improvement.

Bronchial thermoplasty versus mepolizumab: Comparison of outcomes in a severe asthma clinic.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: BT and interleukin-blocking monoclonal antibodies are both effective therapies for severe asthma, but there have been no direct comparisons between the two treatments. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of BT and mepolizumab, in a real-world setting. METHODS: Patients with severe asthma despite optimized inhaler therapy were drawn from a severe asthma clinic in a tertiary hospital. Every patient commencing therapy with BT or mepolizumab was prospectively included in a national registry. At predetermined assessment points over a 12-month period, assessments were made of ACQ, spirometry, oral corticosteroid requiring exacerbations, reliever medication and maintenance oral corticosteroid use. RESULTS: A total of 91 patients with severe asthma participated: mean ACQ score 3.5 ± 1.0, FEV1 51.4 ± 17.7%, maintenance oral steroids 48.3% and 11.5 ± 10.0 inhalations/day reliever therapy. Forty-seven patients received mepolizumab and 44 received BT. Baseline characteristics were similar except significantly higher blood eosinophil count in the mepolizumab group. At 12 months, there were no differences between treatment outcomes for ACQ (1.9 ± 1.3 mepolizumab vs 1.7 ± 1.3 BT), exacerbation rate (0.9 ± 1.1 vs 0.9 ± 1.5), reduction in reliever use (-6.3 ± 10.5 vs -5.0 ± 8.8 puffs/day) or reduction in oral corticosteroids (-3.3 ± 7.5 vs - 5.8 ± 6.7 mg/day). The FEV1 improved equally (160 ± 290 vs 150 ± 460 mL). Readmission or prolonged admission was observed in 18.2% of BT patients, whilst 25.5% of mepolizumab patients had discontinued treatment at 12 months, 14.9% due to an adverse event or non-compliance. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that BT is as efficacious as mepolizumab for the treatment of severe asthma.

Continued loss of asthma control following epidemic thunderstorm asthma.

BACKGROUND: Epidemic thunderstorm asthma (ETSA) severely affected Melbourne, Australia in November 2016. There is scant literature on the natural history of individuals affected by ETSA. OBJECTIVE: A multicentre 12-month prospective observational study was conducted assessing symptomatology and behaviors of ETSA-affected individuals. METHODS: We used a structured phone questionnaire to assess asthma symptom frequency, inhaled preventer use, asthma action plan ownership and healthcare utilization over 12 months since the ETSA. Analysis of results included subgroup analyses of the "current," "past," "probable," and "no asthma" subgroups defined according to their original 2016 survey responses. RESULTS: Four hundred forty-two questionnaires were analyzed. Eighty percent of individuals reported ongoing asthma symptoms at follow-up, of which 28% were affected by asthma symptoms at least once a week. Risk of persistent asthma symptoms was significantly higher in those with prior asthma diagnosis, current asthma, and probable undiagnosed asthma (all p < 0.01). Of 442 respondents, 53% were prescribed inhaled preventers, of which 51% were adherent at least 5 days a week. Forty-two percent had a written asthma action plan and 16% had sought urgent medical attention for asthma in the preceding year. CONCLUSIONS: Following an episode of ETSA, patients experience a pivotal change in asthma trajectory with both loss of asthma control and persistence of de novo asthma. Suboptimal rates of inhaled preventer adherence and asthma action plan ownership may contribute to asthma exacerbation risk and susceptibility to future ETSA episodes. Longer-term follow-up is needed to determine the extent and severity of this apparent change.