Outcomes of patients with cardiac amyloidosis undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion.

BACKGROUND: There is limited data on the safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) devices in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. We examined the outcomes of patients with cardiac amyloidosis undergoing LAAO device implantation in a nationally representative cohort of patients. METHODS: The National Readmissions Database (NRD) was analyzed from 2016 to 2019 to identify patients ≥ 18 years old with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing LAAO. Patients were divided into those with cardiac amyloidosis and those without cardiac amyloidosis. A multivariable logistic regression model was utilized to assess the independent association of cardiac amyloidosis with in-hospital, 30-day/90-day/180-day outcomes after adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: Our cohort included 54,900 LAAO implantation procedures, of which 220 (0.4%) had cardiac amyloidosis. Patients with cardiac amyloidosis had a lower proportion of women and a lower prevalence of comorbidities including anemia, obesity, diabetes, and peripheral vascular disorders but a higher prevalence of stroke, as compared to those without cardiac amyloidosis. On multivariable analysis, cardiac amyloidosis was associated with significantly higher odds of peri-procedural major adverse events (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.69; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41-5.14; p<0.01) and neurological complications (aOR: 5.48; 95% CI: 2.47-12.8; p<0.01). There was no difference in the odds of other peri-procedural complications, in-hospital mortality, hospital resource utilization, and 30/90/180-day all-cause/bleeding/stroke-related readmissions between both groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with cardiac amyloidosis undergoing LAAO device implantation have an increased risk of peri-procedural complications without any difference in bleeding/stroke-related readmissions. These hypothesis-generating findings need validation in future prospective studies.

Comparison of Contemporary Treatment Strategies in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Due to Severe Aortic Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to understand the incidence and outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) due to severe aortic stenosis (AS), and the impact of conventional treatment strategies in this population. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients admitted to the Cleveland Clinic cardiac intensive care unit between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2021 with CS were retrospectively identified and categorized into those with CS in the setting of severe AS versus CS without AS. The impact of various treatment strategies on mortality was further assessed. We identified 2754 patients with CS during the study period, of whom 216 patients (8%) had CS in the setting of severe AS. Medical management was associated with the highest 30-day mortality when compared with either balloon aortic valve replacement or aortic valve replacement (surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement) (hazard ratio, 3.69 [95% CI, 2.04-6.66]; P<0.0001). Among patients who received transcatheter therapy, 30-day mortality was significantly higher in patients who received balloon aortic valvuloplasty versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement (26% versus 4%, P=0.02). Both surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement had considerably lower mortality than medical management and balloon aortic valvuloplasty at 30 days and 1 year (P<0.05 for both comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: CS due to severe AS is associated with high in-hospital and 30-day mortality, worse compared with those with CS without AS. In suitable patients, urgent surgical aortic valvuloplasty or transcatheter aortic valve replacement is associated with favorable short- and long-term outcomes. Although balloon aortic valvuloplasty may be used to temporize patients with CS in the setting of severe AS, mortality is ≈50% if not followed by definitive aortic valve replacement within 90 days.

Sex Differences in the Progression and Long-Term Outcomes of Native Mild to Moderate Aortic Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the sex differences in the hemodynamic progression and outcomes of early-stage aortic stenosis (AS). OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to determine sex differences in hemodynamic progression and outcomes of mild to moderate native AS. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational cohort study including patients with mild to moderate native tricuspid AS from the Cleveland Clinic echocardiographic database between 2008 and 2016 and followed until 2018. All-cause mortality, aortic valve replacement (AVR), and disease progression assessed by annualized changes in echocardiographic parameters were analyzed based on sex. RESULTS: The authors included 2,549 patients (mean age, 74 ± 7 years and 42.5% women) followed over a median duration of 5.7 years. There was no difference in all-cause mortality between sexes irrespective of age, baseline disease severity, progression to severe AS, and receipt of AVR. Relative to men, women had similar all-cause mortality but lower risk of AVR (adjusted HR: 0.81 [95% CI: 0.67-0.91]; P = 0.009) at 10 years. On 1:1 propensity-matched analysis, men had a significantly faster disease progression represented by greater increases in the median of annualized change in mean gradient (2.10 vs 1.15 mm Hg/y, respectively, P < 0.001), maximum transvalvular velocity (0.42 vs 0.28 m/s/y), left ventricular end-diastolic diameters (0.15 vs 0.048 mm/m2.7/y) (P = 0.014). Women have significantly higher left ventricular ejection fraction, filling pressures, and left ventricular septum thickness over time on follow-up echocardiograms compared with men. CONCLUSIONS: Women with mild to moderate AS had slower hemodynamic progression of AS, were more likely to have preserved left ventricular ejection fraction and concentric left ventricular hypertrophy in addition to lower incidence of AVR compared with men despite similar mortality. These findings provide further evidence that there are distinct sex-specific longitudinal echocardiographic and clinical profiles in patients with AS.

Current status of global research on pericardial diseases: a bibliometric analysis of the top 100 from Web of Science.

Introduction: Bibliometric studies can help guide researchers and funding bodies toward fields where more research activity is warranted. Bibliometric analyses have previously been published in many specialties and sub-specialties. Our literature search did not show a bibliometric analysis on pericardial diseases. We performed a bibliometric analysis of the top 100 cited manuscripts on pericardial diseases to identify knowledge. Material and methods: Bibliometric analysis is a quantitative method to assess research performance and analyze publication trends. Web of Science was searched in April 2020 to identify the top 100 cited manuscripts in pericardial diseases. Results: Twenty-six out of the top 100 cited manuscripts were published between 2000 and 2009. These manuscripts were cited on average189 times (range: 110-743) since publication. Only two manuscripts were cited > 500 times. Among the top-ten cited manuscripts, there were 6 original articles, 1 case series, and 3 review articles. Of the 3 review articles, 2 were society guidelines. 90% of the authors had written just 1 manuscript. There were ten manuscripts with women as first authors with a significant association between gender of the first and corresponding author (odds ratio = 44, p < 0.001). Only 20% of manuscripts were funded. Most publications came from institutions in the United States (n = 40), Italy (n = 10), and Spain (n = 5). Conclusions: Our study provides an insight into the characteristics and quality of the highly cited literature in the field of pericardial diseases. This can be used to guide further research in the field of pericardial diseases.

MitraCox Score Predicts In-Hospital Mortality in Patients Admitted for Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair.

As mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) is evolving as an effective treatment for high-risk surgical patients with mitral regurgitation, there is a pressing need for cardiologists to optimize resources through risk stratification of in-hospital mortality for this patient population. Although current risk-prediction models have been shown to predict adverse outcomes with reasonable accuracy, models trained using the US nationwide population are lacking. This study aimed to identify clinical, demographic, and procedural features that predict in-hospital mortality, and to derive and validate an in-hospital mortality risk-prediction tool in patients who have undergone M-TEER. A total of 9,373 admissions from the Nationwide Readmissions Database of patients who underwent M-TEER between 2015 and 2018 were used to develop and validate the model. We first performed least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regularization of Cox regression (Coxnet) that is 10-fold cross-validated. The non-zero coefficients were multiplied with the respective values of each observation of the predictors to build the scoring formula. Out of 9,373 admissions, 196 patients (2%) died in-hospital during index admission. In descending order, the top variables that were most predictive of in-hospital mortality were higher age, presence of fluid and electrolyte disturbance, and large metropolitan location of the hospital. The validation C-statistic of the MitraCox score was 0.82. Using X-tile software (Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut), 2 cutoffs of the score were determined on the basis of in-hospital mortality and length of stay, and the survival of the population was classified into 3 risk groups: low, intermediate, and high. The scoring system deployed online as a web-based calculator can be accessed at https://kathavs.shinyapps.io/Mitracox_Kapadia/. In conclusion, MitraCox score is easy to calculate and predicts in-hospital mortality depending on length of stay in a dynamic manner.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence, Characteristics, and Impact of Mitral Annular Calcification on Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

There is a paucity of data on the prognostic impact of mitral annular calcification (MAC) in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with conflicting results being reported by the studies that are published. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the short-term and long-term outcomes of MAC in patients after TAVI. Of 25,407 studies identified after the initial database search, 4 observational studies comprising 2,620 patients (2,030 patients in the nonsevere MAC arm and 590 patients in the severe MAC arm) were included in the final analysis. Compared with patients with nonsevere MAC, the severe MAC group was associated with significantly higher incidences of overall bleeding (0.75 [0.57 to 0.98], p = 0.03, I2 = 0%) at 30 days. However, no significant difference was observed between the 2 groups for the rest of the 30-day outcomes: all-cause mortality (0.79 [0.42 to 1.48], p = 0.46, I2 = 9%), myocardial infarction (1.62 [0.37 to 7.04], p = 0.52, I2 = 0%), cerebrovascular accident or stroke (1.22 [0.53 to 2.83], p = 0.64, I2 = 0%), acute kidney injury (1.48 [0.64 to 3.42], p = 0.35, I2 = 0%), and pacemaker implantation (0.70 [0.39 to 1.25], p = 0.23, I2 = 68%). Similarly, follow-up outcomes also showed no significant difference between the 2 groups: all-cause mortality (0.69 [0.46 to 1.03], p = 0.07, I2 = 44%), cardiovascular mortality (0.52 [0.24 to 1.13], p = 0.10, I2 = 70%) and stroke (0.83 [0.41 to 1.69], p = 0.61, I2 = 22%). The sensitivity analysis, however, demonstrated significant results for all-cause mortality (0.57 [0.39 to 0.84], p = 0.005, I2 = 7%) by removing the study by Okuno et al5 and cardiovascular mortality (0.41 [0.21 to 0.82], p = 0.01, I2 = 66%) by removing the study by Lak et al.7 In conclusion, our meta-analysis corroborates the notion that isolated MAC is not an independent predictor of long-term mortality after TAVI and determines severe MAC to be a predictor of mortality at follow-up because of the higher incidence of mitral valve dysfunction associated with it.

Advances in multi-modality imaging for constrictive pericarditis and pericardial inflammation: role of imaging-guided therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Constrictive pericarditis (CP) can result from uncontrolled inflammation of the pericardium. This can be due to various etiologies. CP can lead to both left- and right-sided heart failure with associated poor quality of life, so early recognition is key. The evolving role of multimodality cardiac imaging allows for earlier diagnosis and facilitates management to help mitigate this adverse outcome. AREAS COVERED: This review discusses the pathophysiology of constrictive pericarditis, chronic inflammation and autoimmune etiologies, clinical presentation of CP, and advances in multimodality cardiac imaging for diagnosis and management. Echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging remain cornerstone modalities to evaluate this condition, whereas additional imaging modalities such as computed tomography and FDG-positron emission tomography can provide complementary information. EXPERT OPINION: Advances in multimodality imaging allow for a more precision diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis. There has been a paradigm shift in pericardial disease management with advances in multimodality imaging, especially CMR, to detect subacute and chronic inflammation. This has enabled imaging-guided therapy (IGT) to both help prevent and potentially reverse established constrictive pericarditis.