RESUMEN
Background: Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) and matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) are performed to treat focal chondral defects (FCDs); both are 2-step procedures involving a biopsy, followed by transplantation. There is little published research evaluating ACI/MACI in patients who undergo a biopsy alone. Purpose: To determine (1) the value of ACI/MACI cartilage biopsies and concomitant procedures in patients with FCDs of the knee and (2) the conversion rate to cartilage transplantation as well as the rate of reoperation. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of 46 patients (63% female) who underwent a MACI (or ACI) biopsy between January 2013 and January 2018. Preoperative data, intraoperative data, and postoperative outcomes were assessed at a minimum of 2 years after the biopsy. The conversion rate from a biopsy to transplantation and the reoperation rate were calculated and analyzed. Results: Among the 46 patients included, 17 (37.0%) underwent subsequent surgery, with only 12 undergoing cartilage restoration surgery, for an overall transplantation rate of 26.1%. Of these 12 patients, 9 underwent MACI/ACI, 2 underwent osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA), and 1 underwent particulated juvenile articular cartilage implantation at 7.2 ± 7.5 months after the biopsy. The reoperation rate was 16.7% (1 patient after MACI/ACI and 1 patient after OCA) at 13.5 ± 2.3 months after transplantation. Conclusion: Arthroscopic surgery with debridement, chondroplasty, loose body removal, meniscectomy/meniscal repair, and other treatment approaches of knee compartment abnormalities at the time of a biopsy appeared to be sufficient in improving function and reducing pain in patients with knee FCDs.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the current literature in an effort to investigate sleep quality and disturbances and the association with clinical outcomes of patients undergoing shoulder surgery. METHODS: A systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. All English-language literature reporting clinical outcomes and sleep quality and disturbance after shoulder surgery was reviewed by 2 independent reviewers. Outcomes assessed included patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and sleep quality. Specific PROs included the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Rating Scale, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES). Study methodology was assessed using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score. Descriptive statistics are presented. RESULTS: Sixteen studies (11 level IV, 2 level III, 3 level II) with a total of 2748 shoulders were included (age, 12-91 years; follow-up, 0.25-132 months). In total, 2198 shoulders underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR), 131 shoulders underwent arthroscopic capsular release, 372 shoulders underwent total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), 18 shoulders underwent comprehensive arthroscopic management, and 29 shoulders underwent sternoclavicular joint procedures. All shoulder surgeries improved self-reported sleep and PROs from before to after surgery. In RCR patients, PSQI scores were significantly associated with VAS scores, SST scores (r = 0.453, r = -0.490, P < .05, respectively), but not significantly associated with UCLA Shoulder rating scale or the ASES scores (r = 0.04, r = 0.001, P > .05, respectively). In TSA patients, PSQI scores were significantly associated with ASES scores (r = -0.08, P < .05). All 4 RCR studies and 1 TSA study using PSQI found significant improvements in mean PSQI scores within 6 to 24 months (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical intervention for rotator cuff tear and glenohumeral osteoarthritis significantly improves self-reported sleep in patients with shoulder pain. However, there remains a dearth of available studies assessing the effects of surgical intervention for adhesive capsulitis, sternoclavicular joint instability, and sternoclavicular osteoarthritis on sleep. Future studies should use sleep-specific PROs and quantitative measures of sleep to further elucidate the relationship between sleep and the effect of shoulder surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level II-IV studies.
