Orexin receptor antagonism, a new sleep-enabling paradigm: a proof-of-concept clinical trial.

The orexin system is a key regulator of sleep and wakefulness. In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover study, 161 primary insomnia patients received either the dual orexin receptor antagonist almorexant, at 400, 200, 100, or 50 mg in consecutive stages, or placebo on treatment nights at 1-week intervals. The primary end point was sleep efficiency (SE) measured by polysomnography; secondary end points were objective latency to persistent sleep (LPS), wake after sleep onset (WASO), safety, and tolerability. Dose-dependent almorexant effects were observed on SE , LPS , and WASO . SE improved significantly after almorexant 400 mg vs. placebo (mean treatment effect 14.4%; P < 0.001). LPS (­18 min (P = 0.02)) and WASO (­54 min (P < 0.001)) decreased significantly at 400 mg vs. placebo. Adverse-event incidence was dose-related. Almorexant consistently and dose-dependently improved sleep variables. The orexin system may offer a new treatment approach for primary insomnia.

Comparative pharmacodynamic time-course of bemiparin and enoxaparin in healthy volunteers.

UNLABELLED: Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are antithrombotic drugs that differ on biochemical and pharmacological properties. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare the pharmacodynamic time-course of two LMWHs, bemiparin and enoxaparin, at high prophylactic doses. METHODS: This was an open, randomized, single-blind, cross-over study to compare the pharmacodynamic time-course, safety and tolerability of two LMWHs, bemiparin 3500 IU and enoxaparin 4000 IU at subcutaneous single doses in 12 healthy male volunteers. Anti-Xa activity (main biomarker of heparin activity), anti-IIa activity, total and free tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thrombin time (TT) and thromboplastin-thrombomodulin mediated time (Tp-TmT) were investigated. RESULTS: Bemiparin 3500 IU achieved more anti-Xa activity than enoxaparin 4000 IU, measured by the area under the curve (geometric mean AUC0t) (bemiparin 3.69 vs. enoxaparin 3.33 IU h/ml; p < 0.001). Maximum anti-Xa activity was reached at 3 hours and there were anti-Xa measurable levels up to 16 h after subcutaneous administration. Anti-Xa activity half-life was 5.44 hours for bemiparin and 4.71 hours for enoxaparin. Anti-IIa activity was above the limit of quantification (0.05 IU/ml) in only 2 volunteers after bemiparin and in 8 after enoxaparin. The "in-vivo" anti-Xa:IIa ratios were: bemiparin 37.9 (95% CI: 28.0 - 55.3, n = 2) and enoxaparin 16.3 (95% CI: 12.2 - 23.4, n = 8). Enoxaparin induced a higher release of total TFPI, but not on free TFPI, and a longer prolongation of APTT and TT (Emax) than bemiparin, with no differences between groups on Tp-TmT. Adverse events (one in each group) were mild and transient. CONCLUSION: Bemiparin 3500 IU showed more anti-Xa activity and higher anti-Xa: anti-IIa relationship than enoxaparin 4000 IU in healthy volunteers. Both treatments were well tolerated.

A bioavailability/bioequivalence and pharmacokinetic study of two oral doses of torasemide (5 and 10 mg): prolonged-release versus the conventional formulation.

1. The main objective of the present study was to compare the bioavailability/bioequivalence of a new prolonged-release (PR) formulation of torasemide with an immediate-release (IR) formulation. In addition, we assessed the pharmacokinetics of both formulations, as well as the urine pharmacodynamics. 2. Two doses (5 and 10 mg) of PR torasemide were compared with the same doses of IR torasemide in a single-blind, single-dose, two-treatment, two-period, cross-over, sequence-randomized clinical trial in 20 healthy volunteers (two groups; n = 10 in each group). Torasemide plasma concentrations were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Torasemide urine concentrations, the diuretic effect of torasemide, urine electrolytes and urine density were also determined. 3. Plasma bioequivalence parameters, based on logged values, were as follows: (i) in the 5 mg group, the area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve from t = 0 to last measurable drug concentration at time t (AUC(0-t)) tablet ratio was 1.03 (90% confidence interval (CI) 0.91-1.17) and C(max) was 0.82 (90% CI: 0.68-0.98); and (ii) in the 10 mg group, the AUC(0-t) was 1.07 (90% CI 0.99-1.14) and C(max) was 0.68 (90% CI 0.60-0.78). The PR formulation showed a significantly prolonged t(max) compared with the IR formulation. The amount of torasemide recovered in the urine 24 h after administration was higher with the PR formulation for both doses. The natriuretic rate versus torasemide excretion rate for the PR and IR formulations were successfully regressed to a sigmoid E(max) model. Pharmacodynamic urine evaluations were similar with both formulations, although urine volume and urine electrolyte excretion were lower for the PR formulation in the first hour after administration. However, the PR formulation showed higher natriuretic efficiency. No significant adverse events were reported. 4. In conclusion, both formulations of torasemide showed similar systemic exposure (AUC). However, the PR formulation had a lower rate of absorption (lower C(max) and prolonged t(max)). The PR formulation had urinary excretion rates that were associated with a higher natriuretic efficiency and more constant diuresis.

Comparison of repeated-dose pharmacokinetics of prolonged-release and immediate-release torasemide formulations in healthy young volunteers.

The major aim of the study was to compare the pharmacokinetic profile of repeated-dose administration of a prolonged-release (PR) formulation of torasemide with that of an immediate-release (IR) dosage. Sixteen volunteers received one daily dose, on four consecutive days, of 10 mg of torasemide-PR or torasemide-IR in a single-blind, two-treatment, two-period, repeated-dose, cross-over, sequence-randomized clinical trial. Blood samples were collected at various time points on day 1 (single-dose) and on day 4 (repeated-dose) and torasemide concentrations were analysed by LC/MS/MS. Diuretic effect and urine electrolytes were measured. Urinary urgency was subjectively assessed by visual analogue scales. Safety and tolerability were also determined. Based on logged values, bioequivalence parameters, were: on day 1, ratio = 1.07 (90% CI 1.02-1.1), C(max) ratio = 0.69 (90% CI 0.67-0.73); and on day 4, ratio = 1.02 (90% CI 0.98-1.05), C(max) ratio = 0.62 (90% CI 0.55-0.70). PR had longer t(max) than IR and showed significantly lower fluctuations of plasma concentrations. Urine evaluations were similar with both formulations, although PR showed a lower urine volume in the first hours post-administration. Episodes of acute urinary urgency occurred later and were subjectively less intensive with PR. No significant adverse events were reported.

Ocular reduction in EEG signals based on adaptive filtering, regression and blind source separation.

Quantitative electroencephalographic (EEG) analysis is very useful for diagnosing dysfunctional neural states and for evaluating drug effects on the brain, among others. However, the bidirectional contamination between electrooculographic (EOG) and cerebral activities can mislead and induce wrong conclusions from EEG recordings. Different methods for ocular reduction have been developed but only few studies have shown an objective evaluation of their performance. For this purpose, the following approaches were evaluated with simulated data: regression analysis, adaptive filtering, and blind source separation (BSS). In the first two, filtered versions were also taken into account by filtering EOG references in order to reduce the cancellation of cerebral high frequency components in EEG data. Performance of these methods was quantitatively evaluated by level of similarity, agreement and errors in spectral variables both between sources and corrected EEG recordings. Topographic distributions showed that errors were located at anterior sites and especially in frontopolar and lateral-frontal regions. In addition, these errors were higher in theta and especially delta band. In general, filtered versions of time-domain regression and of adaptive filtering with RLS algorithm provided a very effective ocular reduction. However, BSS based on second order statistics showed the highest similarity indexes and the lowest errors in spectral variables.

Different acute tolerance development to EEG, psychomotor performance and subjective assessment effects after two intermittent oral doses of alprazolam in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Benzodiazepines (BZDs) are the most effective of the psychotropic drugs in the treatment of anxiety disorders. Tolerance has been reported for the majority of BZDs after chronic administration. However, little attention has been paid to the possibility that tolerance might be present after the intermittent oral administration of BZDs. The objectives of the present study were to assess tolerance development after the administration of two intermittent single oral doses of alprazolam given 15 days apart in healthy volunteers, and to compare the results obtained using measures from different domains: neurophysiological, psychomotor and subjective. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy volunteers received 2 mg of alprazolam orally on two experimental days, 15 days apart. Plasma concentrations and pharmacodynamics (PD) were assessed before drug intake and at different times in the following 24 h. PD was assessed through EEG (relative alpha and relative beta-1 activities), cancellation task (total and correct number of responses) and visual analogue scales (activity and drowsiness). RESULTS: No differences were observed in the PKs of alprazolam between occasions. A proteresis was present in both administrations for impairments of psychomotor performance and relative beta-1 activity, whereas it was present only after the second administration for subjective assessments and relative alpha activity. The proteresis on the second occasion was higher than on the first one. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of two single oral doses of alprazolam, 2 weeks apart in healthy volunteers, yielded the same PKs on both occasions, but significant changes were observed in the PD profile. Acute tolerance was observed after the second administration. Two patterns of acute tolerance development were obtained: (1) impairments of psychomotor performance and relative beta-1 activity, and (2) subjective assessments and relative alpha activity.

Quantifying drug-drug interactions in pharmaco-EEG.

A drug interaction refers to an event in which the usual pharmacological effect of a drug is modified by other factors, most frequently additional drugs. When two drugs are administered simultaneously, or within a short time of each other, an interaction can occur that may increase or decrease the intended magnitude or duration of the effect of one or both drugs. Drugs may interact on a pharmaceutical, pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic basis. Pharmacodynamic interactions arise when the alteration of the effects occurs at the site of action. This is a wide field where not only interactions between different drugs are considered but also drug and metabolites (midazolam/alpha-hydroxy-midazolam), enantiomers (ketamine), as well as phenomena such as tolerance (nordiazepam) and sensitization (diazepam). Pharmacodynamic interactions can result in antagonism or synergism and can originate at a receptor level (antagonism, partial agonism, down-regulation, up-regulation), at an intraneuronal level (transduction, uptake), or at an interneuronal level (physiological pathways). Alternatively, psychotropic drug interactions assessed through quantitative pharmaco-EEG can be viewed according to the broad underlying objective of the study: safety-oriented (ketoprofen/theophylline, lorazepam/diphenhydramine, granisetron/haloperidol), strictly pharmacologically-oriented (benzodiazepine receptors), or broadly neuro-physiologically-oriented (diazepam/buspirone). Methodological issues are stressed, particularly drug plasma concentrations, dose-response relationships and time-course of effects (fluoxetine/buspirone), and unsolved questions are addressed (yohimbine/caffeine, hydroxizyne/alcohol).

Influence of individual differences in the Behavioral Inhibition System and stimulus content (fear versus blood-disgust) on affective startle reflex modulation.

Inconsistencies among affective startle reflex modulation studies may be due to differences in the startle potentiation produced by the specific content of the images used, to individual differences in sensitivity to negative stimuli, or to the interaction of both factors. To explore this interaction, 52 undergraduates obtaining extreme scores on a self-report measure of the Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS) participated in an affective startle reflex modulation paradigm. A significant interaction between BIS group (high versus low) and image content emerged from the MANOVA. Comparing startle magnitude between fear and pleasant images, low BIS participants did not seem to show startle potentiation, whereas high BIS participants did. Both groups displayed potentiated startle during blood-disgust images. The present results suggest the importance of considering personality variables and their interaction with image content in the affective startle modulation paradigm.

Effects of tobacco smoking on the kinetics of the pupillary light reflex: a comparison between smokers and non-smokers.

BACKGROUND: The time course of the pupillary light reflex (PLR) is determined by the successive activation of parasympathetic and sympathetic innervations of the iris, latency and amplitude reflecting parasympathetic activity and recovery time showing mainly sympathetic activity. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of tobacco cigarette smoking on the PLR in smokers after an abstinence period of at least 12 h. METHODS: Ten smokers (mean 15.7 cigarettes/day) and 10 non-smokers participated in a randomised, non-intervention controlled, cross-over study that included a parallel control group. Smokers underwent two sessions with a time interval between 3 and 8 days; two recordings were taken at each session, separated by 20 min: session 1, without smoking, and session 2, smoking 3 cigarettes within a 30-min period. Non-smokers underwent one session; two recordings were taken separated by 20 min. At each recording, in both groups, PLR was elicited with four light flashes of increasing luminance. RESULTS: The relationship between PLR parameters and light intensity was linear in each subject. The slope of the regression line for relative amplitude increase versus intensity was significantly flatter in abstinent smokers than in non-smokers (p=0.033); the slope returned significantly after smoking (p=0.043). No other significant effects were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Kinetic parameters of PLR provide a sensitive pharmacological test to detect cholinergic neurotransmission manipulation effects, as they seem to detect changes in moderate smokers after 12 h of abstinence, and their reversal on return to smoking. These results suggest an enhancement in the suppression of the parasympathetic oculomotor reflex arc rather than a facilitation of the sympathetic drive to the iris.

Eberconazole cream: topical and general tolerability, sensitisation potential, and systemic availability.

Eberconazole is a topical imidazole derivative, which has shown high potency against dermatophytes and yeasts (several species of Candida, Malassezia) in vitro and in experimental models. Clinical trials have found that the compound has a high degree of efficacy against dermatophytes and good tolerability. Evaluation of its a) topical and general tolerability, b) eventual development of sensitisation, c) local availability, and d) degree of systemic absorption. Two clinical trials with 28 healthy young volunteers of both sexes were performed. In Study I, placebo or eberconazole cream (2%) were applied at increasing doses: day 1 (0.5 g), days 2-3 (1 g), days 4-5 (2 g), days 6-7 (4 g), days 8-9 (8 g), and days 10-11 (12 g). On day 1, each application area was washed with ethanol-soaked gauzes at different times to assess availability of the active compound. In Study II, eberconazole cream (1%) was applied on day 1 and again at least one week later. After the first application, blood and urine samples were obtained at different times to assess systemic absorption. The only change observed was slight redness in a few volunteers after both active and placebo applications. This remitted spontaneously without intervention and we were able to continue with the administration of repeated increasing-doses. A few participants described side effects; these were all of mild intensity, and occurred in areas where placebo or eberconazole were applied, mainly within the first hour postapplication. The most frequent effect after the first application was coldness, and after repeated increasing-doses there was itching. No signs or symptoms of skin reactivity were observed following reexposure to the product. No clinically relevant changes were observed in vital signs (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, body temperature), ECG, or analytical parameters (clinical haematology and biochemistry). The quantity of compound collected through washing gauzes decreased progressively over time. Plasma and urine concentrations of eberconazole were below the quantification limit of the analytical method (5 ng/ml) at all times. Eberconazole cream is a topical antimycotic drug that has good local and general tolerability. It has acceptable topical availability, no detectable systemic drug levels, and does not appear to cause skin sensitivity.

Access of HTB, main metabolite of triflusal, to cerebrospinal fluid in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: Triflusal has been shown to exert neuroprotective effects by downregulating molecules considered responsible for the development of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model to characterize plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pharmacokinetics of the main active metabolite of triflusal-HTB (2-hydroxy-4-trifluoro-methylbenzoic acid)-in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Data from two studies were combined. Study A: subjects received single oral doses of triflusal 900 mg. Triflusal and HTB plasma concentrations were extensively measured. Study B: triflusal 600 mg once daily was administered orally for 14 days. HTB plasma and CSF concentrations were determined in healthy volunteers. Population pharmacokinetic modeling was performed using NONMEM. RESULTS: A one-compartmental model with rapid first-order absorption for triflusal and first-order formation of HTB best described plasma concentrations. Triflusal elimination rate constant was 50 times faster than that estimated for the metabolite. CSF concentrations of HTB ranged between 0.011 microg/ml and 0.341 microg/ml. A CSF-plasma partition coefficient of 0.002 and a k(e0) value of 0.059 h(-1) were estimated by means of population modeling. CONCLUSION: In the present study in healthy volunteers, HTB penetrated into the CSF in a range of concentrations experimentally proven to have protective effects in AD. These concentrations suggest that triflusal could be used in the treatment of central nervous system diseases in doses similar to those used in cardiovascular diseases. Access to the CSF compartment was characterized by a slow equilibrium rate constant and a low CSF-plasma partition coefficient.

Pharmacokinetics of a new Autogel formulation of the somatostatin analogue lanreotide after a single subcutaneous dose in healthy volunteers.

The pharmacokinetics/tolerability of lanreotide Autogel have been evaluated. Healthy volunteers (n = 24) first received immediate-release lanreotide as a single subcutaneous (s.c.) injection. After two days, 40 or 60 mg lanreotide Autogel was injected subcutaneously. Blood was sampled at various intervals for 56 days. Systemic/local adverse events and changes in biological profile/vital signs were recorded. Lanreotide Autogel produced a prolonged-release pharmacokinetic profile: mean area under the serum concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC) was 53.73 +/- 8.99 and 79.48 +/- 13.06 ng mL(-1) day for 40 and 60 mg, respectively, mean peak serum concentration (C(max)) was 4.38 +/- 2.91 and 5.71 +/- 3.52 ng mL(-1), respectively, median time to reach C (minimum-maximum) was 0.50 (0.083-18.0) and 0.38 (0.083-9.01) days, respectively, mean apparent elimination half-life was 21.63 +/- 9.42 and 22.01 +/- 9.87 days, respectively, and relative bioavailability was 0.93 +/- 0.12 and 0.82 +/- 0.15, respectively. Thus, lanreotide Autogel exhibited linear pharmacokinetics for the doses studied. Pharmacokinetic profiles were similar in both genders, apart from statistically significant differences in C(max) and C(max)/AUC. The Autogel formulation of lanreotide was well tolerated, with systemic adverse events being mild/moderate. Erythema and a painless subcutaneous induration were the most common local adverse events. Lanreotide Autogel provided a prolonged dosing interval and good tolerability for treating acromegaly and carcinoid syndrome.

Evaluation of an automatic ocular filtering method for awake spontaneous EEG signals based on independent component analysis.

Electroencephalographic artifacts associated with eye movements are a potential source of error in the EEG analysis when its interpretation is performed for evaluating the influence of drugs and the diagnosis of neurological disorders. In this study, a new automatic method for artifact filtering based on independent component analysis (ICA) is proposed. Automatic artifact identification is based on frequency domain and scalp topography aspects of the independent components. A comparative study between ICA and the 'gold standard' method based on linear regression analysis is performed. The latter does not take into account the mutual contamination between EEG and electrooculographic activity, reducing not only the ocular movements but also interesting cerebral activity, mainly in anteriorly placed electrodes. This limitation is overcome by ICA and the efficiency of this approach is shown for a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover drug trial in healthy volunteers.

A study comparing the inhibitory effects of single and repeated oral doses of ebastine and fexofenadine against histamine-induced skin reactivity.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this double-blind, randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled clinical trial was to compare the inhibition of the histamine-induced skin reaction induced by ebastine 20 mg with respect to that induced by fexofenadine 120 mg or placebo. METHODS: Eighteen volunteers (10 males, 8 females) received the three treatments once daily for 5 days, with a mean 7-day washout period between treatments. Intradermal tests, using 0.05 ml from a solution containing 100 microg/ml of histamine, were performed at baseline and at 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 10 and 24 h after a single dose and repeated 5-day dose, and in addition after 34, 48, 58 and 72 h after repeated 5-day dose. RESULTS: After 24 h of acute administration, ebastine 20 mg was significantly more effective than fexofenadine 120 mg in reducing the wheal and flare induced by histamine challenge (p<0.001). Although fexofenadine 120 mg had the shortest onset of action (1.5 vs. 3 h in ebastine 20 mg), the duration of its antihistamine effect was the shortest (24 vs. 58 h in ebastine 20 mg) and wheal reduction after 24 h was not significantly different from placebo. The overall effect after single and repeated 5-day dose, expressed as the AUC of reduction of wheal and flare area (%/h), showed the following order of magnitude: ebastine 20 mg>fexofenadine 120 mg>placebo. No significant differences in the incidence of adverse events were found between the three treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The present results clearly show a superior and long-acting effect of ebastine 20 mg compared with fexofenadine 120 mg on the skin response to histamine 24 h after dosing.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

BACKGROUND: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was introduced as a neurophysiological technique in 1985 when Anthony Barker and his team developed a compact machine that permitted non-invasive stimulation of the cerebral cortex (Barker 1985). Since its introduction, TMS has been used to evaluate the motor system, to study the function of several cerebral regions, and for the pathophysiology of several neuropsychiatric illnesses. In addition, it has been suggested that TMS might have therapeutic potential. Some controlled studies have evaluated the effects of repetitive TMS (rTMS) in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Greenberg (Greenberg 1997) observed that a single session of right prefrontal cortex stimulation produced a significant decrease in compulsive urges in OCD patients lasting over eight hours. Other studies have reported transitory improvements in mood but there are no observations for changes in anxiety or obsessions. OBJECTIVES: To develop a systematic review on the clinical efficacy and safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation from randomised controlled trials in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder. SEARCH STRATEGY: An electronic search was performed including the Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Review Group trials register (last searched June, 2002), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Issue 2, 2002), MEDLINE (1966-2002), EMBASE (1974-2002), PsycLIT (1980-2002), and bibliographies from reviewed articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials assessing the therapeutic efficacy and safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All reviewers independently extracted the information and verified it by cross-checking. Disagreements were resolved through discussion. MAIN RESULTS: Three trials were included in the review and only two contained data in a suitable form for quantitative analysis. It was not possible to pool any results for a meta-analysis. No difference was seen between rTMS and sham TMS using the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale or the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale for all time periods analysed. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There are currently insufficient data from randomised controlled trials to draw any conclusions about the efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation for treating depression.

BACKGROUND: Transcranial magnetic stimulation can either excite or inhibit cortical areas of the brain, depending on whether the speed of the repetitive stimulation is applied at high or low frequencies. It has been used for physiological studies and it has also been proposed as a treatment for depression. OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical efficacy and safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation for treating depression. SEARCH STRATEGY: An electronic search was performed including the Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Neurosis and Anxiety Review Group trials register (last searched June, 2001), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Issue 2, 2001), MEDLINE (1966-2001), EMBASE (1974-2001), PsycLIT (1980-2001), and bibliographies from reviewed articles. Unpublished data and grey literature were searched through personal communications with researchers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials assessing the therapeutic efficacy and safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All reviewers independently extracted the information and verified it by cross-checking. Disagreements were resolved through discussion. Continuous data: When similar studies were grouped, the overall standardised mean difference was calculated under a fixed effect model weighted by the inverse variance method with 95% confidence intervals. (In the presence of statistical heterogeneity, a random effects model was to be used.) MAIN RESULTS: Sixteen trials were included in the review and fourteen contained data in a suitable form for quantitative analysis. Most comparisons did not show differences between rTMS and other interventions. No difference was seen between rTMS and sham TMS using the Beck Depression Inventory or the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, except for one time period (after two weeks of treatment) for left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and high frequency; and also for right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and low frequency, both in favour of rTMS and both using the Hamilton scale. Comparison of rTMS (left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and high frequency) with electroconvulsive therapy showed no difference except for psychotic patients after two weeks treatment, using the Hamilton scale, which indicated that electroconvulsive therapy was more effective than rTMS. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The information in this review suggests that there is no strong evidence for benefit from using transcranial magnetic stimulation to treat depression, although the small sample sizes do not exclude the possibility of benefit.

Pharmaco-electroencephalography and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling in basic research: focus on human pharmacology.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling, together with electroencephalography (EEG), have been successfully applied to obtain in vivo pharmacological information of different drugs acting on the central nervous system (CNS) in humans and of the systems with which the drugs interact. Almost all types of variables used to assess the activity of drugs in the human CNS have already been applied in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic research. However, compared with more traditional approaches to quantify the pharmacodynamics of neuropsychotropic drugs, the EEG method has the advantage of being objective, sensitive, continuous and reproducible. The present review focuses mostly on benzodiazepine pharmacology. A selection of some basic aspects that can be covered using pharmaco-EEG and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling from in vivo studies performed in humans in pharmacological research will be introduced: i) determination of the pharmacological characteristics of a compound; ii) comparison of potencies among drugs; iii) comparison of efficacy among drugs; iv) tolerance development; v) metabolite role; vi) enantiomers; vii) drug-drug interactions; viii) circadian rhythms; ix) factors affecting the observed effect; and x) the gain of physiopathological information about the systems with which drugs interact. Looking at the quantity and quality of the results obtained for the benzodiazepines, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling using EEG measures appears to be an ideal tool, and is potentially useful for other drugs acting on the CNS.

Uses of pharmaco-EEG and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling in the clinical scenario.

In order to place pharmaco-EEG within the clinical context, the distinction between biomarkers, surrogate endpoints, clinical endpoints and clinical outcomes is introduced. State-of-the-art applications of pharmaco-EEG, together with pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling in everyday clinical practice in anesthesiology (semilinear canonical correlation), psychiatry (discrimination between responders and nonresponders to pharmacological treatment using the test dose), neurology (antiepileptic field) and neurophysiology (first-order Markov model of sleep stage transitions) are discussed. The combination of both procedures, although successfully used during some drug development programs (opioids or benzodiazepines), is not widely applied in the clinical scenario where the central nervous system (CNS) is concerned. Much work is still need to develop fully the potentials that pharmaco-EEG together with pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling could bring to therapeutics in neuroscience.