RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Tumor Lysis syndrome (TLS) is a well-recognized medical emergency in patients with cancer diagnosis. The diagnostic criteria of TLS have been revised many times since it was recognized, but still have many drawbacks limit diagnosis accuracy. SUMMARY: Autopsy studies in patients with perimortem diagnoses of TLS have shown that they may not have actually had TLS. Therefore, many cancer patients who are at risk for TLS, clinical and laboratory criteria may be fulfilled due to other causes of acute kidney injury. In this review, we aim to cast a spotlight on the shortcomings and pitfalls of the current diagnostic criteria for TLS, and propose a roadmap for developing a more rigorous criteria that improve on the diagnostic accuracy. KEY MESSAGES: Causes of AKI in patients with cancer other than TLS should be considered. Because current diagnostic criteria may miss those differential diagnosis, specific biomarkers that can tell when TLS is the underlying process is an important need, besides appropriate criteria that can jump over the pitfalls in the current criteria and enhance the recognition of TLS among other causes.
RESUMEN
The objective of this study was to describe real-world health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and treatment satisfaction of ibrutinib-treated patients with CLL compared to a reference group. This study was completed in two parts. The first portion (Norming Study) was a US online survey conducted to serve as a reference population. The Norming Study included a total of 139 patients with CLL, excluding those treated with ibrutinib: 64 were treatment naive (Tx naive), 36 were 1st line (1L), and 38 were in or had completed ≥2 lines (2L+) patients with CLL. The second portion (CLL Ibrutinib Study) included 1L and 2L+ ibrutinib patients with CLL treated for ≥6 months in which 118 patients (1L n = 88 and 2L+ n = 30) completed the study. Respondents completed demographic and clinical information and the following HRQoL surveys: (Short Form-12v2® Health Survey [SF-12v2], Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General [FACT-G], FACT-Leukemia [FACT-Leu] Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy [FACIT]-Fatigue, and Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire [CTSQ]). Higher scores indicate better HRQoL/treatment satisfaction. Differences in effect sizes between the two samples at the group level were calculated using Hedges' g. Medium to large positive effects were seen in the CLL Ibrutinib group on several measures compared to the Reference Study groups. The FACT-G total score was 89.2±11.1 for CLL Ibrutinib Study patients compared to 75.8±22.6 CLL Norming Tx naïve patients, 61.3±21.8 in 1L, and 61.7±20.7 in 2L+. Similar trends were seen with FACT-Leu total score and FACIT-Fatigue. CLL Ibrutinib Study patients scored higher on all CTSQ domain scores compared to the CLL Norming patients treated with other CLL therapies. We found that Ibrutinib-treatment had better HRQoL and treatment satisfaction compared to patients receiving other therapies, irrespective of line of therapy.
