Validation of a laser visual feedback and core stability exercise programme to improve lateropulsion reduction and pushing intensity in stroke patients with pusher syndrome: A Delphi study.

BACKGROUND: The patient with pusher syndrome (PS) is characterized by showing postural control alterations due to a lack of perception of his own body in the space. It appears when the patient actively pushes with his unaffected limbs towards the injured side, reacting with resistance to passive straightening towards the midline. Between 10% and 50% of strokes present PS. Nowadays, there is no clearly defined treatment for PS. OBJECTIVE: To design and validate an exercise program using visual feedback and specific core stability exercises (FeViCoS) for the treatment of patients with PS. METHODS: Validation was conducted by expert consensus using the Delphi method. Thirteen neurorehabilitation experts participated in the process. An online questionnaire with 18 Likert-type questions was used to evaluate the designed program. Consensus was considered reached if there was convergence between the quartile 1 and 3 values (RIQ = Q1-Q3) or if the relative interquartile range (RIR) was less than 20%. The degree of agreement between experts was measured by calculating the Fleiss' kappa coefficient. RESULTS: A total of 2 rounds were required to achieve 97.44% consensus with 100% participation. The RIR was less than or equal to 20% for all questions. The Fleiss' kappa index (0.831) showed that the degree of agreement between experts was excellent. CONCLUSION: Neurorehabilitation experts considered FeViCoS valid for the therapeutic approach to patients with PS. Expert consensus suggests a novel strategy in physical therapy clinical practice to improve balance and postural orientation in patients with subacute stroke and PS.

Development and Validation of an Exercise Programme for Recovery Balance Impairments in Poststroke Patients.

BACKGROUND: Deterioration of balance is one of the most common and disabling physical-motor deficits in patients after a stroke that have a negative impact on quality of life and increase the risk of falls. Previous studies have evaluated the effectiveness of the exercises on specific aspects of balance. However, there is no structured exercise program divided by levels for balance impairment in poststroke patients. METHODS: Delphi method was used to design the exercise programme, and then a pilot study was performed. For the pilot study, we included 14 poststroke adults patients (n = 7 in each group), with balance impairment, without previous severe functional dependence, sensorial deficit or dementia. Our 4 weeks intervention (5 times/week) is based on 9 exercise of progressive difficulty, offering a multidimensional approach training (biomechanical constraints, stability limits, anticipatory, postural responses, and sensory orientation). Patients in the intervention arm received 45 minutes of usual rehabilitation plus 15 minutes of the intervention proposed. The usual-care arm received 60 minutes of usual rehabilitation. Balance impairment (Mini BESTest) was assessed at the baseline and at 4 weeks. Differences between groups were analysed using Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: The agreement for the intervention designed was reached after 2 rounds. Participants in pilot study were 69 (SD = 9.7) years, 21.4% females. Post-treatment, median improvements in Mini BESTest were 20 (SD = 8) and 11 (SD = 10) points, P < .01 for intervention and control group respectively. CONCLUSION: A multidimensional approach of balance impairments in poststroke patients through the validated exercise programme proposed, may improve balance deficits.