Impact of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves on dynamic hyperinflation: Results from the PIERCE study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Dynamic hyperinflation (DH) is a major marker of exertional dyspnoea in severe emphysema. We hypothesized that bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) using endobronchial valves (EBVs) decreases DH. METHODS: In this prospective bi-centre study from both Toulouse and Limoges Hospitals, we assessed DH during an incremental cycle ergometry before and 3 months after EBVs treatment. The primary objective was to observe the change in inspiratory capacity (IC) at isotime. Target lobe volume reduction (TLVR) and changes in residual volume (RV), forced expiratory volume in one-second (FEV1 ), mMRC, 6 minutes walking distance (6MWD), BODE and other dynamic measures like tele-expiratory volume (EELV) were also analysed. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were included, of whom thirty-eight presented DH. IC and EELV at isotime significantly improved (+214 mL, p = 0.004; -713 mL, p Ë‚ 0.001, respectively). Mean changes were +177 mL for FEV1 (+19%, p < 0.001), -600 mL for RV (p < 0.0001), +33 m for 6MWD (p < 0.0001), respectively. Patients who responded on RV (>430 mL decrease) and FEV1 (>12% gain) had better improvements compared to non-responders (+368 mL vs. +2 mL; +398 mL vs. -40 mL IC isotime, respectively). On the opposite, in patients who responded on DH (>200 mL IC isotime increase), changes in TLV (-1216 mL vs. -576 mL), FEV1 (+261 mL vs. +101 mL), FVC (+496 mL vs. +128 mL) and RV (-805 mL vs. -418 mL) were greater compared to non-responders. CONCLUSIONS: DH decreases after EBVs treatment, and this improvement is correlated with static changes.

Bilateral endobronchial valves treatment for severe emphysema.

Bilateral endobronchial valves treatment can lead to additional significant benefits in patients who respond to the first procedure and have a clear target lobe on both lungs but increases the rate of complications https://bit.ly/3J0mZ8h.

Impact of inspiratory threshold loading on brain activity and cognitive performances in healthy humans.

In healthy humans, inspiratory threshold loading deteriorates cognitive performances. This can result from motor-cognitive interference (activation of motor respiratory-related cortical networks vs. executive resources allocation), sensory-cognitive interference (dyspnea vs. shift in attentional focus), or both. We hypothesized that inspiratory loading would concomitantly induce dyspnea, activate motor respiratory-related cortical networks, and deteriorate cognitive performance. We reasoned that a concomitant activation of cortical networks and cognitive deterioration would be compatible with motor-cognitive interference, particularly in case of a predominant alteration of executive cognitive performances. Symmetrically, we reasoned that a predominant alteration of attention-depending performances would suggest sensory-cognitive interference. Twenty-five volunteers (12 men; 19.5-51.5 yr) performed the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT-A and B; calculation capacity, working memory, attention), the Trail Making Test (TMT-A, visuospatial exploration capacity; TMT-B, visuospatial exploration capacity, and attention), and the Corsi block-tapping test (visuospatial memory, short-term, and working memory) during unloaded breathing and inspiratory threshold loading in random order. Loading consistently induced dyspnea and respiratory-related brain activation. It was associated with deteriorations in PASAT-A [52 [45.5;55.5]; (median [interquartile range]) to 48 [41;54.5], P = 0.01], PASAT-B (55 [47.5;58] to 51 [44.5;57.5], P = 0.01), and TMT-B (44 s [36;54.5] to 53 s [42;64], P = 0.01), but did not affect TMT-A and Corsi. The concomitance of cortical activation and cognitive performance deterioration is compatible with competition for cortical resources (motor-cognitive interference), whereas the profile of cognitive impairment (PASAT and TMT-B but not TMT-A and Corsi) is compatible with a contribution of attentional distraction (sensory-cognitive interference). Both mechanisms are therefore likely at play.NEW & NOTEWORTHY To our knowledge, this is the first study exploring the interferences between inspiratory loading and cognition in healthy subjects with the concomitant use of neuropsychological tests and electroencephalographic recordings. Inspiratory loading was associated with dyspnea, respiratory-related changes in brain activation, and a pattern of deterioration of neuropsychological tests suggestive of attentional disruption. Inspiratory loading is therefore likely to impact cognitive performances through both motor-cognitive interference (engagement of cortical networks) and sensory-cognitive interference (dyspnea-related shift in attentional focus).